Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201860 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#163705 Oct 17, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
No, I proved I was telling the truth.
I said you brought religion into the debate, then provided a link to a post were you did. Are you claiming you didn't make that post?
So you prove that I brought religion into the debate about same sex marriage by providing no proof that I had done so?

I guess that works out in your fantasy world Rose..

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#163706 Oct 17, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL! You are such an idiot.
You are such a dope!

Since: Apr 11

Panorama City, CA

#163707 Oct 17, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
He may havemistakenly tried to use that as a logical argument, but he (and you) have missed the point that abberations occur in everything. There are mistakes made every day, but that does not make them "natural". And I have yet to hear the argument against society lack of rights to set standards and to decide what we find acceptable. And your claim that most people who have ass sex are normal, what proof do you offer ? Back your claim up.
Most people who have anal sex are straight. You are aware of the fact women have anuses? Right? Don't know/care if they are "normal" or not.
Society doesn't have any "rights". People do. The Constitution says all US citizens should have equal rights. Why are you against the Constitution?

Since: Apr 11

Panorama City, CA

#163708 Oct 17, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
So you prove that I brought religion into the debate about same sex marriage by providing no proof that I had done so?
Straw man. I didn't say that. Deal with what I actually said, dummy.
akpilot wrote:
I guess that works out in your fantasy world Rose..
I said you brought religion into the debate, and proved it!
I didn't say the debate about same sex marriage, you did.
Again, are you claiming you didn't make the post I posted the link to?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#163709 Oct 17, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL! You are such an idiot.
I'm sorry that you aren't very bright.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#163710 Oct 17, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Straw man. I didn't say that. Deal with what I actually said, dummy.
<quoted text>
I said you brought religion into the debate, and proved it!
I didn't say the debate about same sex marriage, you did.
Again, are you claiming you didn't make the post I posted the link to?
Now we are back to this "strawman" nonsense. That happens a lot when you have your a$$ handed to you..

You really can't be this stupid Rose. You do realize there were two different conversations going on don't you?

BTW, I brought the Declaration of Independence into a debate about the Constitution, not religion.

So either way you are still an idiot.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#163711 Oct 17, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Boy, you people will just keep throwing sh%% at the wall until something sticks won't you?
There is no inalienable right to vote. Voting is a function of our government, thus it is subjected to laws and regulations.
Lesson 1: How to dumb down America
- Tell them everything is a "right"
The founders did not believe there was a "right" to vote, they restricted it far more than we do today.
Bullshit loser.

It was the ability for citizens to voice their choice for a government that formed our country you unpatriotic spoiled ass.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#163712 Oct 17, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sorry that you aren't very bright.
Nice response.

It's akin to claiming sushi isn't any good just because you don't like it.

Get lost punk.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#163713 Oct 17, 2012
Fry Zimmerman wrote:
<quoted text>
Bullshit loser.
It was the ability for citizens to voice their choice for a government that formed our country you unpatriotic spoiled ass.
Really? Does that go for 17 year old's?

BTW, do you even have a clue how limited voting was when our country was founded? Why the hell to you think we have 3 Amendments expanding voting privilege?

Since: Apr 11

Panorama City, CA

#163714 Oct 17, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Now we are back to this "strawman" nonsense. That happens a lot when you have your a$$ handed to you..
You really can't be this stupid Rose. You do realize there were two different conversations going on don't you?
Yep. That's why I said you brought religion to the debate, I didn't say you brought religion to the debate about gay marriage. Duh.
Or perhaps you can show where I said you brought religion to the debate about gay marriage?
Didn't think so.
akpilot wrote:
BTW, I brought the Declaration of Independence into a debate about the Constitution, not religion.
So either way you are still an idiot.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/gay/TH6FC2NTH...
Are you claiming you didn't make that post?

LOL. You are such a joke.

Since: Apr 11

Panorama City, CA

#163715 Oct 17, 2012
Fry Zimmerman wrote:
<quoted text>
Nice response.
It's akin to claiming sushi isn't any good just because you don't like it.
Get lost punk.
Akpilot has no real arguments. He just nit picks and plays word games. He tries to sound scholarly, but he just comes off as the pretentious ahole he is.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#163716 Oct 17, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Really? Does that go for 17 year old's?
BTW, do you even have a clue how limited voting was when our country was founded? Why the hell to you think we have 3 Amendments expanding voting privilege?
Why not ask why infants can't vote given you're grasping fopr straws loser.

Fact is as Americans cit is out inherent right to vote DUMBFUCK.

You need to wake up and take some vitamin B idiot.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#163717 Oct 17, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Akpilot has no real arguments. He just nit picks and plays word games. He tries to sound scholarly, but he just comes off as the pretentious ahole he is.
Amen to that sister.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#163718 Oct 17, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
We all have a creator Rose, do you think we just pop out of thin air?
It's called nature freak....and not all those who have seen evolution believe "God" made it so over aspects such as natural selection and the small fact science supports their theories whereas nothing supports yours other than some two thousand year ols supersticious book.

FYI
Frisbee

Seattle, WA

#163719 Oct 17, 2012
akpilot wrote:
Why don't you take a little time and educate yourself. I bet you haven't even read the Federalist Papers.
Have you read the Ninth Amendment?

The ENUMERATION in the CONSTITUTION, of certain RIGHTS...

Explain that away.
The Ninth Amendment isn't in the Constitution?
The text doesn't say the EXACT OPPOSITE of your lunatic claims?
The Federalist Papers supersede the TEXT of the CONSTITUTION?
Which delusion do you hang your hat on?

You've spent so much time searching for some justification in UNOFFICIAL documents to justify what you choose to believe, that you've forgotten to look at what the Constitution ACTUALLY SAYS.

Since: Apr 11

Panorama City, CA

#163720 Oct 17, 2012
Fry Zimmerman wrote:
<quoted text>
It's called nature freak....and not all those who have seen evolution believe "God" made it so over aspects such as natural selection and the small fact science supports their theories whereas nothing supports yours other than some two thousand year ols supersticious book.
FYI
Have you ever seen Richard Dawkin's "The God Delusion"? It's brilliant, IMHO.
http://youtu.be/LVr9bJ8Sctk
Frisbee

Seattle, WA

#163721 Oct 17, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
Akpilot has no real arguments. He just nit picks and plays word games. He tries to sound scholarly, but he just comes off as the pretentious ahole he is.
He's Oswald Bates.
&fe ature=relmfu

Pontificating like he's educated, and not realizing he's a laughing stock. At least Oswald is humble. AK is an arrogant prick on top of being a clueless idiot. One or the other is bad enough. Both at the same time is a case study.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#163722 Oct 17, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep. That's why I said you brought religion to the debate, I didn't say you brought religion to the debate about gay marriage. Duh.
Or perhaps you can show where I said you brought religion to the debate about gay marriage?
Didn't think so.
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/gay/TH6FC2NTH...
Are you claiming you didn't make that post?
LOL. You are such a joke.
You're an idiot. You do realize that was the Declaration Of Independence don't you, and it was in a discussion regarding the Constitution.

So now idiots like you are going to claim that the Declaration of Independence is a "religious argument"..

Do you realize how ignorant you sound?

Since: Apr 11

Panorama City, CA

#163723 Oct 17, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
You're an idiot. You do realize that was the Declaration Of Independence don't you, and it was in a discussion regarding the Constitution.
Yeah, a debate about where our rights come from, and you brought religion to the debate.
akpilot wrote:
<
So now idiots like you are going to claim that the Declaration of Independence is a "religious argument"..
Do you realize how ignorant you sound?
Claiming our rights come from a creator is a religious argument.

Since: Apr 11

Panorama City, CA

#163724 Oct 17, 2012
Frisbee wrote:
<quoted text>
He's Oswald Bates.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =O7dPprbzNScXX&feature=rel mfu
LOL.
Frisbee wrote:
Pontificating like he's educated, and not realizing he's a laughing stock. At least Oswald is humble. AK is an arrogant prick on top of being a clueless idiot. One or the other is bad enough. Both at the same time is a case study.
So true.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News If Donald Trump Was President, Here's What Woul... (Oct '15) 9 min Jimmy Dandy 8,503
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 16 min Dr Guru 214,382
News Protesters clash with police outside Trump rall... 20 min Quirky 99
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 22 min Chimney1 197,267
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 26 min Quirky 384,011
News House takes action against Confederate flag, a ... 27 min Bubba Dump 186
News Violence follows California Trump rally, about ... 33 min VorenusI 1,018
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 hr Incognito4Ever 1,382,931
More from around the web