Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201878 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

“The Topix Legend of "GS8"!”

Since: Sep 10

Wilson, NC

#157620 Sep 2, 2012
Hello Doc WAAT. I see you are still lying about your trash on topix. Do I need to post all my studies that shows your information is outdated again?

Oscar_Wilde wrote:
<quoted text>Please explain how anal sex such as Chick-fil-A and churches.

“The Topix Legend of "GS8"!”

Since: Sep 10

Wilson, NC

#157621 Sep 2, 2012
DOC WAAT those that know you are aware you are a lesbian yet you come on here and attack attack attack.
Oscar_Wilde wrote:
<quoted text>It is true, and we can take .
1 post removed

“The Topix Legend of "GS8"!”

Since: Sep 10

Wilson, NC

#157623 Sep 2, 2012
You are such a liar Doc WAAT.
Oscar_Wilde wrote:
<quoted text>So, Bubba, why are you .
Goose bump

La Puente, CA

#157624 Sep 2, 2012
Station breaks are just that, a goose bump.

What did you do with yours?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#157625 Sep 2, 2012
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah, the continues obsession with anal sex. It never ends for you, doe it?
So, do you also believe that unprotected vaginal sex doesn't come with risks? No chance of contracting AIDS, yeast infections, Syphilis, HPV, Herpes, and a multitude of unwanted pregnancies, just for a start?
Let's hear another fairy tale.
Back to your anal obsession ...
Don't put words in my mouth. The issue is the inherent harm of anal sex, distinctly different from possible risky behavior.

AND you somehow 'missed' that I said 'moral' sex. There is no risk of disease in monogamy, the only truly safe sex.

Clearly a black and white difference between moral, natural, evolutionary sex and anal sex. Seems like you are the one trying to spin a stupid fairy tale.

Smirk.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#157626 Sep 2, 2012
Reality wrote:
<quoted text>If anal sex bothers you STOP doing it
See above.

Learn about context and critical thinking, then come back to the forum.

Smirk. E
Mona Lott

West New York, NJ

#157627 Sep 2, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
<quoted text>
This is a little off topic, Mona, but why are you too stupid to realize writing "the lady doth protest too much" marks you as an idiot?
Are you too stupid to realize it makes you look like the Queen of Denial? Or is it that you don't understand the reference?

The phrase's meaning implies the increasing likelihood of suppressed feelings for the contrary of that which is being argued. I.e., the more passionate and fervent the argument, the greater likelihood the cause is a suppression of belief for the contrary argument, and the subsequent confirmation that it is the (actual) truer statement.
Mona Lott

West New York, NJ

#157628 Sep 2, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't put words in my mouth. The issue is the inherent harm of anal sex, distinctly different from possible risky behavior.
AND you somehow 'missed' that I said 'moral' sex. There is no risk of disease in monogamy, the only truly safe sex.
Clearly a black and white difference between moral, natural, evolutionary sex and anal sex. Seems like you are the one trying to spin a stupid fairy tale.
Smirk.
I love it! The disingenuous fundies claiming the moral high ground for sex. Missionary position only, please!
You win Queen of the Priggish Puritans.
Mona Lott

West New York, NJ

#157629 Sep 2, 2012
Oscar_Wilde wrote:
<quoted text>It is true, and we can take that to all areas of measurement. I mean, if you are into homosexuality and the result is suicide, how can you claim success. If you are into homosexuality and the result is AIDS, then how can you admit anything but failure.
This is our fault, you see, we gave gays an inch and now they want the whole cow.
You "gave" us an inch? hahahahahahaha
ahahahahahahha
ahahahahahahah

You didn't "give" us ANYTHING. And FYI... we already have the "whole cow."
trudy

Corona, CA

#157630 Sep 2, 2012
Mona Lott wrote:
<quoted text> You "gave" us an inch? hahahahahahaha
ahahahahahahha
ahahahahahahah
You didn't "give" us ANYTHING. And FYI... we already have the "whole cow."
Its what you nasty kind of people do with that "whole cow" that is the problem! You all should be run out of town!
1 post removed
Were back

La Puente, CA

#157632 Sep 2, 2012
Still playing hard on this topic are ya?
Mona Lott

West New York, NJ

#157633 Sep 2, 2012
trudy wrote:
<quoted text>
Its what you nasty kind of people do with that "whole cow" that is the problem!
And just what is that, Miss Trudy?

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#157634 Sep 2, 2012
Loving v Virginia is US Supreme Court precedent for marriage as one man and one woman. Imagine if the Lovings were a same sex couple who had gone to some mythical jurisdiction where same sex marriage was legal. Do you think the Supreme Court would have decided the same?
1 post removed

Prof Marvel

“The Great and Wonderful Marvel”

Since: Aug 09

Atlanta, GA

#157636 Sep 2, 2012
Mona Lott wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you too stupid to realize it makes you look like the Queen of Denial? Or is it that you don't understand the reference?
The phrase's meaning implies the increasing likelihood of suppressed feelings for the contrary of that which is being argued. I.e., the more passionate and fervent the argument, the greater likelihood the cause is a suppression of belief for the contrary argument, and the subsequent confirmation that it is the (actual) truer statement.
Since it's only been used by nitwits like you about a million times around here already, we all now what the phrase means.

What's unclear is why you think you're the first nitwit to use it.
1 post removed

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#157638 Sep 2, 2012
jacques renault wrote:
<quoted text>
"Traditional" anal sex is not an issue for you because you and your partner would have to use a plastic or rubber phallus. That offers a bit of "ease of mind" regarding health issues.
But what about the practice of each of you giving one another rim? The use of your tongues in the anus of one another is not safe. Especially if you tend to ingest scat when you do so.
Have you or your partner considered wiping after using the restroom?
jacques renault wrote:
Please, bittch. Be honest in your posts when you comment.
Why don't you find someone to sext with? My fellow Rose just isn't interested in you.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#157639 Sep 2, 2012
jacques renault wrote:
<quoted text>
It seems whenever you get backed into a corner, you cry foul and claim a troll is baiting you. If you can't hack it, then leave this thread.
What goes on between yourself and your wife is everyone's business. You post your sexual hijinx and oddities on other threads within the Topix community. You really should let others here know what kind of lesbian you really are. Folks here would enjoy the stories you posted about you and the wife taking long soaks in bathtubs filled with urine and daisy-chaining with other lesbians from your local bridge club.
Dude, if you are over 18, go to you porn dot com and then go to the lesbian section...

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#157640 Sep 2, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
To reiterate -- anal sex is a perversion no one should be doing. The fact that "straights do it too!" doesn't change this.
I mean, do you people even think there's such a thing as perversion?
In your homosexual sex guide The Little Black Book you also list "rimming," "pee play," "fisting," as normal sex practices.
But these practices are degrading and dangerous.
The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
Just go have some anal sex, already.
Prof Marvel wrote:
Why do you want to teach children they're normal, safe, and as wholesome as mom's apple pie?
Rose's Law:
Morons with no real argument scream, "But what about the children!?"

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#157641 Sep 2, 2012
RnL2008 wrote:
<quoted text>
I did answer it.....what about the bathhouses? Never been to one, don't care that others have been to them.......and they are irrelevant to the subject of the right to marry for Same-Sex Couples!!!
There should be a "slam dunk" judge it icon.
ELH

Portland, OR

#157642 Sep 2, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
<quoted text>
You read the question -- either answer it or stop wasting everybody's time trying to be clever.


Worried we are going to cut into your schick? Don't be. No one has the time or inclination to out post the volume of nutty off topic spam you've posted on this thread.

"The Last Missing Link"...Brooklyn DUDE and BLACK PhD CHICK battle over missing link creature extinct for two million years. I love the part where "Brooklyn Dude" ogles the "creatures" breasts!

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#157643 Sep 2, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
"The only way to completely avoid anal sex risks is to abstain from anal sex. If you engage in anal sex, it is always important to use a condom to protect against the spread of infections and diseases.
Following are more tips for increasing anal sex safety:
Avoid inserting a penis into the mouth or vagina after it's been inserted in the anus until your partner puts on a new condom. 
Use plenty of lubricant to reduce the risk of tissue tears. With latex condoms, always use a water-based lubricant. 
Relax prior to insertion of the penis to help reduce the risk of tears. Taking a warm bath before anal sex or lying on your stomach may make insertion easier. 
Stop if anal sex is painful.
If you experience bleeding after anal sex or you notice a sores or lumps around the anus or a discharge coming from it, see your doctor as soon as possible. "
NONE OF THESE 'PRECAUTIONS' ARE NECESSARY FOR MORAL, NATURAL, EVOLUTIONARY SEX.
SMIRK.
 
Why do you think using the caps lock key makes up for the fact you can't reason?
I'll assume by "moral, natural evolutionary sex" you mean penis/vagina sex.
Well, stupid, many of those precautions are necessary for that type of sex. Condoms help prevent pregnancy and the spread of STDs. Many women don't lubricate enough naturally for many reasons, and lube should be used. Also, penis/vagina sex can be painful. And if it is, it's a good idea to stop. Or at least adjust positions.
Have you ever had sex?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Trump bars transgender individuals from US arme... 1 min defend america 171
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 1 min PolarisPutz 280,289
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min obama muslim 1,567,756
News What would Jesus say about same-sex marriage? (Jul '15) 2 min barry 7,063
News Trump's transgender troops ban divides veterans... 2 min Melvin 38
News Amazon and Foxconn reflect a growing trend: Del... 4 min Retribution 11
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 9 min WasteWater 18,066
News Dear Trump Voters: The 1950's Aren't Coming Back 10 min WasteWater 633
News Can Trump pardon anyone? Himself? Can he fire M... 3 hr fingers mcgurke 189
More from around the web