Weighing in on gay marriage ban? Obam...

Weighing in on gay marriage ban? Obama may ask the Supreme Court to overturn California's ban

There are 58 comments on the The Washington Post story from Feb 20, 2013, titled Weighing in on gay marriage ban? Obama may ask the Supreme Court to overturn California's ban. In it, The Washington Post reports that:

The Obama administration is quietly considering urging the Supreme Court to overturn California's ban on gay marriage, a step that would mark a political victory for advocates of same-sex unions and a deepening commitment by President Barack Obama to rights for gay couples.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Washington Post.

First Prev
of 3
Next Last
JrEsq

El Segundo, CA

#4 Feb 20, 2013
sickofit wrote:
<quoted text>
God is not real and because of 1st amendment we dont have to follow your cult..So F OFF NAZI..
The First Amendment does not give you the right to insist that because a person is a believer he is violating your First Amendment rights.
sickofit

Owatonna, MN

#5 Feb 20, 2013
JrEsq wrote:
<quoted text>
The First Amendment does not give you the right to insist that because a person is a believer he is violating your First Amendment rights.
You dont get 1st amendment at all do you???? You have rights to your beliefs and so do others...when you nazi pigs make laws forcing others to follow your beliefs your breaking the constitution///...GOT IT NOW HITLER???
1 post removed

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#7 Feb 20, 2013
^ "religion"
JrEsq

El Segundo, CA

#8 Feb 20, 2013
sickofit wrote:
<quoted text>
You dont get 1st amendment at all do you???? You have rights to your beliefs and so do others...when you nazi pigs make laws forcing others to follow your beliefs your breaking the constitution///...GOT IT NOW HITLER???
"You have rights to your beliefs and so do others."
OK, idiot, then start practicing what you are preaching. Meaning, stop telling other people that God does not exist.
Jeff

Huntsville, TN

#9 Feb 20, 2013
sickofit wrote:
<quoted text>
God is not real and because of 1st amendment we dont have to follow your cult..So F OFF NAZI..
Mother nature is real so F off queer.
sickofit

Owatonna, MN

#10 Feb 20, 2013
JrEsq wrote:
<quoted text>
"You have rights to your beliefs and so do others."
OK, idiot, then start practicing what you are preaching. Meaning, stop telling other people that God does not exist.
Well a fact is a fact. That said I wont ask for any alws banning you from your beliefs. Will you stop makeing laws taking others rights away then?
Jeff

Huntsville, TN

#11 Feb 20, 2013
Dude wrote:
<quoted text>the bible also bans bacon and masturbation... Two of my favorite things
Shaving and haircuts are banned, while standing for your elders is a must, and killing unruly children is demanded, while slavery is permitted.. Good stuff
Queers are not part of Mother Natures plan.
Jeff

Huntsville, TN

#12 Feb 20, 2013
sickofit wrote:
<quoted text>
You dont get 1st amendment at all do you???? You have rights to your beliefs and so do others...when you nazi pigs make laws forcing others to follow your beliefs your breaking the constitution///...GOT IT NOW HITLER???
Gays molest little boys and should be banned.
Some Never Came Home

Beacon, NY

#13 Feb 20, 2013
JrEsq wrote:
<quoted text>
"You have rights to your beliefs and so do others."
OK, idiot, then start practicing what you are preaching. Meaning, stop telling other people that God does not exist.
But he doesn't! What are you stupid or something besides being a slimy homophobic human bigoted POS? Move along now little doggie,the adults are talking here loser! Lets consult with Zeus shall we?Shaddup!
sickofit

Owatonna, MN

#14 Feb 20, 2013
Jeff wrote:
<quoted text>Mother nature is real so F off queer.
Oh good gawd your ignorant....Go away hitler boy....
1 post removed
sickofit

Owatonna, MN

#16 Feb 20, 2013
Jeff wrote:
<quoted text>Queers are not part of Mother Natures plan.
Mother nature and god and easter bunny are not real moron,,,,supper time bye hitler.
JrEsq

El Segundo, CA

#17 Feb 20, 2013
sickofit wrote:
<quoted text>
Well a fact is a fact. That said I wont ask for any alws banning you from your beliefs. Will you stop makeing laws taking others rights away then?
"Well a fact is a fact."
When are you going to start being factual?

“Now do whats right!”

Since: Jan 09

Doolittle, Mo.

#18 Feb 20, 2013
Jeff wrote:
<quoted text>Gays molest little boys and should be banned.
And of religious leaders who...?????

“equality for ALL means ALL”

Since: Jan 07

Fort Lauderdale FL

#19 Feb 20, 2013
I hope Obama does this. I think it can only help.

“equality for ALL means ALL”

Since: Jan 07

Fort Lauderdale FL

#20 Feb 20, 2013
JrEsq wrote:
<quoted text>
"You have rights to your beliefs and so do others."
OK, idiot, then start practicing what you are preaching. Meaaning, stop telling other people that God does not exist.
That's just his opinion.

Notice while I do believe in God, sickofit never says things like that directe towards me because we respect each others' right to believe whatever we want, and I am not using my religion to try to restrict his rights.

Since: Feb 08

Hypoluxo Fl

#21 Feb 20, 2013
sickofit wrote:
<quoted text>
Mother nature and god and easter bunny are not real moron,,,,supper time bye hitler.
Then why did the toothe fairy leave ten bucks under my pillow?
1 post removed
Dude

Marshall, VA

#23 Feb 20, 2013
Jeff wrote:
<quoted text>Queers are not part of Mother Natures plan.
Right, homosexuals are the most discriminated group in history, so how could it possibly be a choice? By nature, we're designed to pass on our DNA. Jesus loved all men, taught us to love one another, and to treat each other as we would want to be treated. It's none of our business what two consenting adults do. Worry about yourself.
1 post removed
Far Away

Anchorage, AK

#25 Feb 20, 2013
It is the sworn duty of every presidential administration to defend every law of the land, even if they don't agree with it, so long as there is any legal argument supporting it. Not only does Øbama refuse to defend the DOMA without seeking to change the law through legislation,Øbama actively litigates from his office to overturn the individual states' laws, even though they are not in conflict with existing federal law. Impeachable? Probably not. Reprehensible? Hell yes.
Dude

Marshall, VA

#26 Feb 20, 2013
Happy Anniversary 1913 wrote:
<quoted text>
M. H. DE HEEKELINGEN, in Israel: Son Passe, Son Avenir
"The former Rabbi Drach, converted to Catholicism, says that the Talmud contains "a large number of musing, utterly ridiculous extravagancies, most revolting indecencies, and, above all, the most horrible blasphemies against everything which the Christian religion holds most sacred and most dear."
"In the matter of the translation of the Talmud by non-Jews, we have always preferred that of Luzsensky, whose accuracy has been established by the Courts. In 1923, the Public Prosecutor of Hungary caused his Hungarian Talmud to be seized on account of "attack on public morals" and "pornography." In delivering its verdict, the Court declared 'INTER ALIA:'
"The horrors contained in the translation of Alfred Luzsensky are to be found, without exception, in the Talmud. His translation is correct, in that it renders these passages, which are actually to be found in the original text of the Talmud, after their true meaning."
QUINTAS SPETIMUS FLORENS TERTULLIAN (160 - 230 A. D.) Latin Church Father "The Jews formed the breeding ground of all anti-Christian actions."
True or false?
You two 'halve' a lot in common.
I've read this three times now and I'm not sure what you're asking, or what your agenda is. You appear to want to have an anti semitic/Semitic debate, it's not happening with me.

“equality for ALL means ALL”

Since: Jan 07

Fort Lauderdale FL

#27 Feb 20, 2013
Far Away wrote:
It is the sworn duty of every presidential administration to defend every law of the land, even if they don't agree with it, so long as there is any legal argument supporting it. Not only does Øbama refuse to defend the DOMA without seeking to change the law through legislation,Øbama actively litigates from his office to overturn the individual states' laws, even though they are not in conflict with existing federal law. Impeachable? Probably not. Reprehensible? Hell yes.
Neither impeachable nor reprehensible, but morally imperative.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 4 min showmethemoney 171,715
News The View that Putin's Advisor Has on Obama's Uk... (Nov '14) 39 min Pro Ukraine 2,877
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 1 hr Quirky 336,550
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr Dr Guru 194,484
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) 1 hr karl44 10,733
Time to go? 2 hr Patriot 2,394
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 hr nanoanomaly 1,263,163
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 4 hr AMERICAN SUNSHINE 190,022
More from around the web