'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Se...

'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate

There are 261693 comments on the thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com story from Oct 1, 2010, titled 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate. In it, thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com reports that:

"Fox News Sunday" is heading to Louisville, Ky. Jack Conway, Kentucky's attorney general and the Democratic candidate for Senate , and Rand Paul, the Republican nominee and son of Representative Ron Paul, Republican of Texas, have agreed to a live debate on "Fox News Sunday" on Oct.3 at 9 a.m. (Eastern time).

Join the discussion below, or Read more at thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com.

Since: Feb 07

Location hidden

#140051 Dec 17, 2013
ObamaCARE
1 post removed
The Huntress

Lexington, KY

#140053 Dec 17, 2013
Injudgement wrote:
<quoted text>You are such an idiot. In almost every election there is always percentage numbers above 100%. FauxNews didn't tell you about that one did they you dumbass POS.
If any candidate gets above the numbers in a voting district that are not their own party it shows up as being above 100% you ignorant POS.
.
In 1996, Dole’s vote share was 106% of the registered Republican share.
Clinton’s share was equal (100%) to the registered Democratic share.
In 2000, Bush’s vote share was 128% of the registered Republican share.
Gore’s share was 109% of the registered Democratic share.
In 2004, Bush’s vote share was 138% of the registered Republican share.
Kerry’s share was 114% of the registered Democratic share.
In 2004, the Kerry vote/registration ratio was 84%; for Bush, it was 102%. Democrats outnumbered Republicans by 369,000, yet Bush won by 381,000 votes. Bush received 61,000 more votes than registered Republicans; Kerry had 689,000 fewer votes than registered Democrats. Was the vote suppressed in TS (Democratic) counties and padded in Optiscan (Republican) counties?
"Registered" as does not change because of a win.
There cannot be an excess of 100 +% You ignorant DOLT!
A Republican may carry as much as 48% of Democrats in a district, that does not equal 148%. You need to lay off the cheese whiz huffing!
Responsibility

Petaluma, CA

#140054 Dec 17, 2013
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text> Get back to us with some facts when you can.
My favorite latest fuxie nonsense was Megan-whatever-her-name discussing black santas and white jesuses. Hilarious and very typical of the kind of garbage spewed by fux.

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#140055 Dec 17, 2013
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>Yes, production is higher, but not due to Obama, but to the free market and technology. If Obama would not hinder it as he has been by banning drilling on government land and the pipeline we could kiss the middle east good by and produce jobs for Americans. Gas went up in price due to Obama. It was a dollar fifty less when he took office. He is kissing the oil companies ass for sure.
BUT you Repubs promised that the only thing standing in the way of cheap gas prices at the pump was production. The US is NOW producing more oil than at anytime in history.
Let me help you understand why gas cost so much. Exxon made more profit last year than any company in the entire history of the WORLD. What's the Rich CEO of Exxon going to do to help Americans in these hard times? Exxon is building one of the largest ports in the world at Port Arthur, TX to EXPORT American oil and natural gas.
Once again the RICH screw America!! Drill-Baby-Drill hahahaha!!!!!!!!!! Suckers.

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#140056 Dec 17, 2013
The Huntress wrote:
<quoted text>
"Registered" as does not change because of a win.
There cannot be an excess of 100 +% You ignorant DOLT!
A Republican may carry as much as 48% of Democrats in a district, that does not equal 148%. You need to lay off the cheese whiz huffing!
That's so sad. Let me break it down more to your level of intelligence.
Example: District # 1 has 100 voters. It has registered 50 Repubs and 50 Dems. The winner gets 60 votes. That means they carried 100% of their share plus 20% from the other side. The winner got 120% of the votes. In all elections there has always been these statistics. It is only with Obama that FauxNews and other propaganda groups twisted the truth and used the numbers to say there was an issue to those that were too stupid to know the difference.
.
.
In 1996, Dole’s vote share was 106% of the registered Republican share.
Clinton’s share was equal (100%) to the registered Democratic share.

In 2000, Bush’s vote share was 128% of the registered Republican share.
Gore’s share was 109% of the registered Democratic share.

In 2004, Bush’s vote share was 138% of the registered Republican share.
Kerry’s share was 114% of the registered Democratic share
1 post removed

“Gloria Ad Caput Venire”

Since: Jan 08

Trump 2017 and beyond

#140058 Dec 17, 2013
Injudgement wrote:
<quoted text>That's so sad. Let me break it down more to your level of intelligence.
Example: District # 1 has 100 voters. It has registered 50 Repubs and 50 Dems. The winner gets 60 votes. That means they carried 100% of their share plus 20% from the other side. The winner got 120% of the votes. In all elections there has always been these statistics. It is only with Obama that FauxNews and other propaganda groups twisted the truth and used the numbers to say there was an issue to those that were too stupid to know the difference.
.
.
In 1996, Dole’s vote share was 106% of the registered Republican share.
Clinton’s share was equal (100%) to the registered Democratic share.
In 2000, Bush’s vote share was 128% of the registered Republican share.
Gore’s share was 109% of the registered Democratic share.
In 2004, Bush’s vote share was 138% of the registered Republican share.
Kerry’s share was 114% of the registered Democratic share
Cheese huffing is bad for some. There is no %s above 100. You need to know this. LOL.
Some day you will thank me.
3 posts removed
conservative crapola

“Hicksville Hootenanny”

Since: Sep 13

Kornfield Kounty

#140062 Dec 17, 2013
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>Yes, production is higher, but not due to Obama, but to the free market and technology. If Obama would not hinder it as he has been by banning drilling on government land and the pipeline we could kiss the middle east good by and produce jobs for Americans. Gas went up in price due to Obama. It was a dollar fifty less when he took office. He is kissing the oil companies ass for sure.
Gas was cheap when he took office, because your mumblin', bumblin', fumblin' hero, flubs, trashed the economy. Not very bright are ya, rube?

lafraud cry-a-thon: 1 year 41 days.
1 post removed
Phil Shifley

Coffeyville, KS

#140064 Dec 17, 2013
Fox News Is A Joke wrote:
<quoted text>President Obama increased production unlike Bush who wanted to import more and more like his pos Daddy.
Lmfao
Lmfao
Lmfao
Obama didn't do sh*t to increase production. PRIVATE LAND PRIVATE BUSINESS NO GOVERNMENT HELP......That is where and how it was increased. Government and Obama were not involved AT ALL!!! Obama was too busy destroying coal companies and trying to end the very livelihood of several American's.
Phil Shifley

Coffeyville, KS

#140065 Dec 17, 2013
Fox News Is A Joke wrote:
<quoted text>Go watch Faux now tard.
Well at least they would be where most American's get their news.....unlike you tards that think MSNBC and CNN are telling anything that isn't pre-WH approved.

It's not like most American's don't know that you libs like to trash what you think is your biggest threat and what and whom are most likely to prove your lib lies!

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#140066 Dec 17, 2013
RayOne wrote:
ObamaCARE
Obama has yet to enroll in health insurance under Affordable Care Act, could it be because it's bad, or could it be that he would have to divulge private information he has been paying millions to hide. Shades of his fraud on his Illinois Bar Application.
1 post removed

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#140068 Dec 17, 2013
conservative crapola wrote:
<quoted text>
Gas was cheap when he took office, because your mumblin', bumblin', fumblin' hero, flubs, trashed the economy. Not very bright are ya, rube?
lafraud cry-a-thon: 1 year 41 days.
GM's CEO rejects repaying Feds for bailout losses...

WASHINGTON -- The General Motors bailout may have cost the government $10 billion, but GM CEO Dan Akerson rejects any suggestion that the company should compensate for the losses. This of course doesn't count the 43 billion Obama gave to the GM's Union that taxpayers will never see..........except those of course that are Union Members.
fhyr

Toledo, OH

#140069 Dec 17, 2013
Annoying

Since: Apr 11

Danville, KY

#140070 Dec 17, 2013
Jay wrote:
<quoted text>
**********
OMG! I'm so glad you told me that! Now I can be scared to death of AL?!!! She's a terrorist? Belongs to that Tea Party group, sticks and stones? Wow! you mean their words are going to harm me?!
I think I will go and hide under the Constitution. Maybe that will protect me, ya think?
Maybe you should go there, too!!!
**********
Poll: Cruz Among World’s Most Influential
December 16, 2013
http://www.westernjournalism.com/poll-cruz-am...
Wow... when Fox News was handing out the kool-aid... you came to them with a big rig and said... "filler up".

I bet you also think Jesus & Santa are white Europeans too. ROLF!!!!

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#140071 Dec 17, 2013
LIES-Fox News-LIES wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow... when Fox News was handing out the kool-aid... you came to them with a big rig and said... "filler up".
I bet you also think Jesus & Santa are white Europeans too. ROLF!!!!
Obama: Worst approval ratings since Nixon...

Liberals abandon...
1 post removed

Since: Apr 11

Danville, KY

#140073 Dec 17, 2013
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>GM's CEO rejects repaying Feds for bailout losses...
WASHINGTON -- The General Motors bailout may have cost the government $10 billion, but GM CEO Dan Akerson rejects any suggestion that the company should compensate for the losses. This of course doesn't count the 43 billion Obama gave to the GM's Union that taxpayers will never see..........except those of course that are Union Members.
Get over it... you're only crying about it because Fox News told you to. However, since you're so concerned about wanton waste of tax money... how about you also worry about all the pork Republicans give out.

That's right, you're conditioned by Fox News to believe that Democratic pork is bad and that Republican pork is good.

What a tool you are.
ROTFL

Lansing, MI

#140074 Dec 17, 2013
Injudgement wrote:
<quoted text>You are such an idiot. In almost every election there is always percentage numbers above 100%. FauxNews didn't tell you about that one did they you dumbass POS.
If any candidate gets above the numbers in a voting district that are not their own party it shows up as being above 100% you ignorant POS.
.
In 1996, Dole’s vote share was 106% of the registered Republican share.
Clinton’s share was equal (100%) to the registered Democratic share.
In 2000, Bush’s vote share was 128% of the registered Republican share.
Gore’s share was 109% of the registered Democratic share.
In 2004, Bush’s vote share was 138% of the registered Republican share.
Kerry’s share was 114% of the registered Democratic share.
In 2004, the Kerry vote/registration ratio was 84%; for Bush, it was 102%. Democrats outnumbered Republicans by 369,000, yet Bush won by 381,000 votes. Bush received 61,000 more votes than registered Republicans; Kerry had 689,000 fewer votes than registered Democrats. Was the vote suppressed in TS (Democratic) counties and padded in Optiscan (Republican) counties?
LOLOL, now its Doles fault! LOLOLOL, one great big baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa to you for today,
ROTFL

Lansing, MI

#140075 Dec 17, 2013
Injudgement wrote:
<quoted text>BUT you Repubs promised that the only thing standing in the way of cheap gas prices at the pump was production. The US is NOW producing more oil than at anytime in history.
Let me help you understand why gas cost so much. Exxon made more profit last year than any company in the entire history of the WORLD. What's the Rich CEO of Exxon going to do to help Americans in these hard times? Exxon is building one of the largest ports in the world at Port Arthur, TX to EXPORT American oil and natural gas.
Once again the RICH screw America!! Drill-Baby-Drill hahahaha!!!!!!!!!! Suckers.
you continue to amaze me with just how ignorant a human being, I mean, sheepletard can be, hussein oblamer has his EPA Nazis stopping oil production on govt. lands, private industry looked elsewhere so hussein oblamer can continue to fund terrorists in the middle east with U.S. dollars,

so, sodotard, if flooding the U.S. economy with printed $, then why would flooding the U.S. petroleum industry with U.S. oil not work, libtard logic, find, destroy, blame, baaaaaaa, find, destroy, blame, baaaaaaaa, find, oops, nothing left to find and destroy, but we can still blame,

baaaaaaaaaaaaaa

man are you dumb,

Since: Apr 11

Danville, KY

#140076 Dec 17, 2013
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>Obama: Worst approval ratings since Nixon...
Liberals abandon...
No kidding!

The entire US Government is at all time lows in approval ratings but we know how Fox News forgets to tell you that the entire Republican party has an even lower approval rating than Obama.

However, keep on focusing on Obama because we know you're a loyal Fox News echo chamber who could care less about reality... so long as you can find reasons to echo the hate disseminated by Fox News.

GOP gets 28 percent Gallup approval rating — worst ever recorded
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/n...
ROTFL

Lansing, MI

#140077 Dec 17, 2013
G.W. Bush, highest approval ratings of any U.S. president in history,
hussein oblamer, working towards the lowest,

G.W. Bushs average approval rating is still higher than hussen oblamers, and you sheepletards keep claiming he is da man!

ROTFL, ROTFL, LOLOLOL,
ROTFL

Lansing, MI

#140078 Dec 17, 2013
LIES-Fox News-LIES wrote:
<quoted text>
No kidding!
The entire US Government is at all time lows in approval ratings but we know how Fox News forgets to tell you that the entire Republican party has an even lower approval rating than Obama.
However, keep on focusing on Obama because we know you're a loyal Fox News echo chamber who could care less about reality... so long as you can find reasons to echo the hate disseminated by Fox News.
GOP gets 28 percent Gallup approval rating — worst ever recorded
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/n...
GOP gets 28%! Thats great, now add in the demotards for the entire congress and you get 9%, thanks for clearing that up,

LOLOLOLOL,

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Comey: FBI probing links between Russia, Trump ... 2 min swampmudd 256
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min Injudgement 1,508,118
News North Korea blasts Trump for being too much lik... 7 min kuda 34
News GOP at war with itself (Mar '16) 8 min Phil Shifley 3,383
News Thousands support and protest Trump rally in Na... 11 min Raymond for Pence... 91
News Young Americans: Most see Trump as illegitimate... 17 min jonjedi 612
News Trump to GOP: Pass health care bill or seal you... 26 min kuda 56
News Trump Transition Team Communications Incidental... 1 hr No Surprize 21
News Trump's repeated claim that he won a 'landslide... 3 hr True Judment 7,358
More from around the web