BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 240363 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#193777 Jun 17, 2014

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#193778 Jun 17, 2014
What are you Libtards worried about? The TRUTH??? If they are wrong, the lawsuit should bring this out.
But the fact remains, everyone who is paying into ObamaCare is paying for "female reproductive health" which includes the Day-After pill which is a form of ABORTION.
Why are Libtards worried about the truth? Because they can not handle the truth!!!

Supreme Court Votes For The Right To Lie
By Sally Kohn 23 hours ago The Daily Beast

In court cases, sometimes the ruling is just even though the facts are anything but. And so it is in the case of Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus.

In a rare unanimous ruling, the Supreme Court held that the Susan B. Anthony List, an anti-abortion organization, has legal standing to sue regarding Ohio’s False Statement Law. The law makes it a criminal offense to knowingly or recklessly make false statements about a candidate—what ordinary people might call lying. The maximum penalty for making such lies in the context of an Ohio electoral campaign is a fine of $5,000 and six months in prison.

Ask any five-year-old and, if they’re being honest, they’ll tell you lying is wrong. That doesn’t mean it should be illegal. And it certainly doesn’t mean that criminalizing false speech is constitutional. For this reason, the ACLU and other staunch defenders of the First Amendment filed amici briefs arguing that the Supreme Court should indeed allow the Susan B. Anthony List’s lawsuit to proceed.

To be clear, the Court did not rule as to whether the Ohio False Statement Law is constitutional—it simply ruled that the Susan B. Anthony List has legal justification in suing. And without a doubt, part of the reason that the Susan B. Anthony List has standing is because they lie.
http://news.yahoo.com/supreme-court-votes-lie...
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#193779 Jun 17, 2014
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, "the way I support that survey" did you say? I don't, I merely commented on it. There is nothing to support as it confirms what 90%+ of the population supported last year. We have a conservative gov't here, it launched the survey, ha ha, and look what it got. Number 1 was LIBERAL prime minister P.E. Trudeau (how ironic) and then Universal Health Care. Of the first 10, not one conservative, but 3 liberals and 1 socialist. Wow. You'll understand why the conservatives were "late" releasing it.
Obamacare's ratings are improving day by day. No longer will families go bankrupt getting proper medical care and, maybe avoid costly remedies by at last being able to afford PREVENTIVE care. Do you even know what that is?
Look :
At 49 Percent Support, Obamacare Hits a High
By Gary Langer ABC News
Mar 31, 2014 3:07pm
Public support for the Affordable Care Act narrowly notched a new high in the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll, while criticism of Barack Obama’s handling of the law’s rollout – although still substantial – has eased from its peak last fall.
Views hardly are enthusiastic: With the year’s sign-up deadline upon us, Americans split on Obamacare, 49 percent in support, 48 percent opposed. But that compares with a 40-57 percent negative rating after the initial failure of the federal enrollment website last November.
See PDF with full results, charts and tables here.
While still shy of a majority, 49 percent support is numerically the highest on record – albeit by a single point – in more than 20 ABC/Post polls since August 2009. The previous high was 48 percent in November 2009. The low was 39 percent in April 2012; the average, 45 percent.
Taking it another way, while not statistically significant, this survey’s +1 positive score for the law is a first. Other than an even 47-47 percent in July 2012, it’s been numerically negative in every other measurement, ranging from -1 to last November’s -17, averaging -5 points.
==========
Yup, from 40% approval rate to 49% in 6 months. Come back in 6 months and see and in 2 years, let any party try to take it away.
ABC? HaHaHa! No link? I can't imagine!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#193780 Jun 17, 2014
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>You can put light where it is needed, even around corners.
Organ!! Unlike you I do have one!
Unlike Dale, I don't play with mine in public.

And, Dale, child, you cannot manipulate light to violate the Laws of Thermodynamics. Playing with solar panels and optics cannot create energy.

The point, Dufus, is not that there is a lot you can do with light, but rather, there are some things you cannot do - PERIOD. You cannot violate the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics.

Sorry Dale, have a nice delusion.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Dale, you cannot manipulate light to violate the Laws of Thermodynamics. Playing with solar panels and optics cannot create energy.
No amount of idiotic blithering, hand waving, and name calling can change that fact of the universe.
The only thing Dale is manipulating is the same organ he's been playing with since the age of two.
<quoted text>
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#193781 Jun 17, 2014
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you understand how light is manipulated in CD and ORD? Are you familiar with the principles behind absorbance by chromophores? Do you even have a clue what a forbidden transition is or ever heard of selection rules?
And Dufus Dale thinks he can "manipulate" light to violate the Laws of Thermodynamics while his sidekick, Romper laughs and giggles incessantly.
Paathetic.
Light? WTH? Keep up, dummy!
1 post removed

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#193783 Jun 17, 2014
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>

==========
Yup, from 40% approval rate to 49% in 6 months [for ObamaCare]. Come back in 6 months and see and in 2 years, let any party try to take it away.
Well, November 5th is less than six months so we will really know what they think in less than FIVE months, won't we!!!!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#193784 Jun 17, 2014
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
If I may, can't pass this up, oh why, why, do birthers make it so easy ?
Yes you do have one, and it's right in your crotch, beside THAT organ - guess which is the smallest of the two LMAO (LRS-Dale tm reg'd).
Perfectly written!

WTF did he say?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#193785 Jun 17, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
What are you Libtards worried about? The TRUTH??? If they are wrong, the lawsuit should bring this out.
But the fact remains, everyone who is paying into ObamaCare is paying for "female reproductive health" which includes the Day-After pill which is a form of ABORTION.
Why are Libtards worried about the truth? Because they can not handle the truth!!!
Supreme Court Votes For The Right To Lie
By Sally Kohn 23 hours ago The Daily Beast
In court cases, sometimes the ruling is just even though the facts are anything but. And so it is in the case of Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus.
In a rare unanimous ruling, the Supreme Court held that the Susan B. Anthony List, an anti-abortion organization, has legal standing to sue regarding Ohio’s False Statement Law. The law makes it a criminal offense to knowingly or recklessly make false statements about a candidate—what ordinary people might call lying. The maximum penalty for making such lies in the context of an Ohio electoral campaign is a fine of $5,000 and six months in prison.
Ask any five-year-old and, if they’re being honest, they’ll tell you lying is wrong. That doesn’t mean it should be illegal. And it certainly doesn’t mean that criminalizing false speech is constitutional. For this reason, the ACLU and other staunch defenders of the First Amendment filed amici briefs arguing that the Supreme Court should indeed allow the Susan B. Anthony List’s lawsuit to proceed.
To be clear, the Court did not rule as to whether the Ohio False Statement Law is constitutional—it simply ruled that the Susan B. Anthony List has legal justification in suing. And without a doubt, part of the reason that the Susan B. Anthony List has standing is because they lie.
http://news.yahoo.com/supreme-court-votes-lie...
Rougie, are you aware that Susan B. Anthony List is a RIGHT WING anti-abortion group?

----------

To even file this lawsuit in the first place, the Susan B. Anthony List had to admit it lied. The lying wasn’t an accident or even a momentary lapse in good judgment. It was conscious and deliberate. The ultimate constitutionality of the Ohio False Statement Law is still up in the air but what’s clear is that a right-wing organization put lying at the center of its campaign strategy—disappointing facts but increasingly unanimously common across the right.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/06...

http://tinyurl.com/pzh4mfd

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#193786 Jun 17, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
And IRS-gate gets deeper. Not only was CBS the only other major news outlet, besides Fox News, to cover this Friday-night-document-dump, they covered the issue for less than thirty seconds.
Now they have announced not only are Louis Learner's email missing, so are the emails of SIX other persons of interest. IRS must have retain the services of Inspector Clueseau!
<quoted text>
On Monday, only CBS This Morning reported Friday's stunning revelation that the IRS somehow lost two years worth of emails from Lois Lerner, the official at the center of the agency scandal in which conservative groups were unfairly targeted. At the top of the morning show, co-host Norah O'Donnell wondered: "How did the IRS lose emails in the scandal targeting conservatives after the government spent millions to back up data?" [Listen to the audio]
Introducing the later report, fellow co-host Charlie Rose noted: "The Washington Times says congressional Republicans are blasting the IRS for losing some of Lois Lerner's emails.... the controversy that started last year is erupting again." Correspondent Nancy Cordes reported: "Republican lawmakers, as you can imagine, are furious. They say the IRS has been promising to get them these emails for a year, and now suddenly says that Lois Lerner's computer crashed way back in 2011."
http://www.mrc.org/biasalerts/only-cbs-covers ...
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Qu'est-ce que tout ça veut dire? Faudra-t-l remplacer Obama ŕ la tęte du Service interne du Revenu?
Ask me. I'll translate though I'm sure your advanced French will be sufficient. You have, after all, been babbling in French all along. Never mind Google translator - no good.
You do know that if you have a federal contract you mush keep ALL business emails for FIVE years, don't you? And what do you suppose will happen to you if you don't?
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#193787 Jun 17, 2014
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Unlike Dale, I don't play with mine in public.
And, Dale, child, you cannot manipulate light to violate the Laws of Thermodynamics. Playing with solar panels and optics cannot create energy.
The point, Dufus, is not that there is a lot you can do with light, but rather, there are some things you cannot do - PERIOD. You cannot violate the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics.
Sorry Dale, have a nice delusion.
<quoted text>
"Unlike Dale, I don't play with mine in public".

We know, you're a closet tosser.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#193788 Jun 17, 2014
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Light? WTH? Keep up, dummy!
Yes Romper, light. Got Alzheimer's?

Your buddy brought it up. Need I remind you? And you replied in response to my comments about CD-ORD, UV-VIS, and AA about "looking through an instrument". Hahahahaha! Evidently Romper has no clue how light and electromagnetic radiation are involved in these techniques. But that doesn't stop him from yammering away, putting his foot in his mouth.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you understand how light is manipulated in CD and ORD? Are you familiar with the principles behind absorbance by chromophores? Do you even have a clue what a forbidden transition is or ever heard of selection rules?
And Dufus Dale thinks he can "manipulate" light to violate the Laws of Thermodynamics while his sidekick, Romper laughs and giggles incessantly.
Paathetic.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#193789 Jun 17, 2014
Why are you Libtards worried about the TEA Partiers? They are no longer a factor so stop worrying, be happy.

Tea Partier’s KKK Connection
By Ben Jacobs 12 hours ago The Daily Beast

Tea Partier’s KKK Connection

After break-ins, gaffes and scandals, the Mississippi Senate race now includes a flashback to the state’s troubled racial politics.

Tea Partier Chris McDaniel has taken $800 in donations from Carl Ford, a former lawyer for Sam Bowers, the imperial wizard of the White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan who died in prison after being convicted of the murder of civil rights activist Vernon Dahmer. Ford also is active in the League of the South, a neo-Confederate organization that has been labeled a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center and was active in the Klan in Laurel, Mississippi, in the early 1960s.

In an interview with The Daily Beast, Ford, who still practices in Laurel, McDaniel’s hometown, said he was supporting the Tea Party challenger facing six-term Republican incumbent Thad Cochran in a June 24 runoff because of McDaniel’s opposition to what Ford called “immigration reform, so-called.” In contrast, Ford said Cochran was siding with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and supporting “knocking the wall down on the borders and advocating bringing more illegals in.” The septuagenarian lawyer also condemned Michael Bloomberg’s donations to Mississippi Conservative PAC, a super PAC backing Cochran, because of the former New York mayor’s support for gun control.“Don’t think we want a nanny state,” Ford added.“I’m too old and too fat to drink too much sody pop and still don’t want nobody telling me how much to drink.”
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#193790 Jun 17, 2014
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>Rougie, are you aware that Susan B. Anthony List is a RIGHT WING anti-abortion group?

----------

To even file this lawsuit in the first place, the Susan B. Anthony List had to admit it lied. The lying wasn’t an accident or even a momentary lapse in good judgment. It was conscious and deliberate. The ultimate constitutionality of the Ohio False Statement Law is still up in the air but what’s clear is that a right-wing organization put lying at the center of its campaign strategy—disappointing facts but increasingly unanimously common across the right.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/06...

http://tinyurl.com/pzh4mfd
Sooooo many things Rouge isn't aware of.
1 post removed

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#193792 Jun 17, 2014
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
ABC? HaHaHa! No link? I can't imagine!
ABC is no link? Why don't you contradict it with your own numbers?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#193793 Jun 17, 2014
P.S.: Ir says ABC at the top. I then proceeded to post it, word for word. Do you think I made it up?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#193794 Jun 17, 2014
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
I really see nothing wrong with it. Besides, your interpretation of my post is irrelevant.
If you see nothing wrong with making a racist and homophobic remark, then you have a huge problem. Good luck with that.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#193795 Jun 17, 2014
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
ABC is no link? Why don't you contradict it with your own numbers?
Ok.

Views of Obamacare overall have also dropped after a slight boost. While 49 percent approved of the law last month, 44 percent approve of it this month -- the lowest that number has been since November. Forty-eight percent of Americans disapprove of the law.

Wow, jacqtari, that's a 5 point drop in a month!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#193796 Jun 17, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, November 5th is less than six months so we will really know what they think in less than FIVE months, won't we!!!!
And if you are wrong, as you have been almost every time you ventured into predictions, who will be blamed this time? The pollsters, the media?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#193797 Jun 17, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
And IRS-gate gets deeper. Not only was CBS the only other major news outlet, besides Fox News, to cover this Friday-night-document-dump, they covered the issue for less than thirty seconds.
Now they have announced not only are Louis Learner's email missing, so are the emails of SIX other persons of interest. IRS must have retain the services of Inspector Clueseau!
<quoted text>
On Monday, only CBS This Morning reported Friday's stunning revelation that the IRS somehow lost two years worth of emails from Lois Lerner, the official at the center of the agency scandal in which conservative groups were unfairly targeted. At the top of the morning show, co-host Norah O'Donnell wondered: "How did the IRS lose emails in the scandal targeting conservatives after the government spent millions to back up data?" [Listen to the audio]
Introducing the later report, fellow co-host Charlie Rose noted: "The Washington Times says congressional Republicans are blasting the IRS for losing some of Lois Lerner's emails.... the controversy that started last year is erupting again." Correspondent Nancy Cordes reported: "Republican lawmakers, as you can imagine, are furious. They say the IRS has been promising to get them these emails for a year, and now suddenly says that Lois Lerner's computer crashed way back in 2011."
http://www.mrc.org/biasalerts/only-cbs-covers ...
<quoted text>
You do know that if you have a federal contract you mush keep ALL business emails for FIVE years, don't you? And what do you suppose will happen to you if you don't?
And Obama personally regulates and keeps tabs on all of that?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#193798 Jun 17, 2014
Naw, dose Dems ain't worried ....... much!!!

Democrat says he's leading black GOTV effort for Cochran

Hinds County Supervisor Robert Graham said he was "shocked" to learn that an elected county official let supporters of Chris McDaniel into the county courthouse in the wee hours after the June 3 primary election.

"I was briefed yesterday by the district attorney," Graham said Tuesday. "The reports that a county employee let them in is completely wrong. It was an elected official."

Graham would not name the county elected official who allegedly let the McDaniel supporters into the closed courthouse.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min Pete 1,522,844
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 8 min uIDIOTRACEMAKEWOR... 106
News Sen. Elizabeth Warren blasts Donald Trump's fir... 15 min Lawrence Wolf 19
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 17 min AMERICAN SUNSHINE 265,347
News Trump blasts 'super liberal Democrat' in Georgi... 18 min Lawrence Wolf 63
News Donald Trump on first 100 days: It's a differen... 21 min NotSoDivineMsM 39
News Will Islam Inherit the Earth? 29 min Lawrence Wolf 202
News Attorney General doesn't realize Hawaii is a state 1 hr spocko 356
News Americans have rendered their verdict on the fi... 2 hr huntcoyotes 121
More from around the web