BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 20 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Jacques of Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#183384 Jan 4, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
I hope Jacqueau will accept this more current report from a non-George Soros approved source.
At least 100 of the 603 freed Guantanamo Bay prisoners have returned to terrorism, U.S. intelligence report reveals
603 inmates have been released from Guantanamo Bay prison in Cuba
100 are confirmed (and another 74 suspected) to have returned to terrorism
The U.S. military facility has recently been condemned for its controversial force-feeding processes
By Sophie Jane Evans PUBLISHED:, 11 September 2013
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-24172 ...
<quoted text>
I knew you would not accept it from a non-George Soros approve Daily Mail but if it was on the George Soros approved Guardian you wood!
Soros is obviously one of your obsessions. I know he fooled around with Asian securities at one point and had the Japanese stock market crash. I know he publishes stuff, though I don't know what and I' ve, to my knowledge, never read any of his stuff. What you posted was mere speculation and rumours, and you know it. Prove the 100 confirmed and 74 suspected.
Jacques of Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#183385 Jan 4, 2014
Pdamerica org wrote:
Al-Qaida Raises Flag, Claims Control Over Iraqi City of Fallujah
January 03, 2014 / http://tinyurl.com/mkauwfj
Black-clad al-Qaida militants in Iraq appeared to seize control of the embattled western city of Fallujah on Friday, raising their flag over government buildings and declaring an independent Islamic state.
Witnesses said the Sunni militants, members of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, or ISIS, cut power lines in the city late in the day and ordered residents not to use backup generators.
But the chief of Fallujah police, Mohamed al-Isawi, disputed the ISIS claims of control, telling The New York Times that he was repositioning his forces north of the city for a decisive battle. He said his force had been strengthened by an alliance of tribal leaders, and that part of a main street had been recaptured by late in the day.
http://www.voanews.com/content/alqaida-raises...
Which begs the question addressed to Rogue : Was there an AlQaeda presence in Iraq when Saddam was in charge? While we are at it, was Ezbolah present, were there any Iranians? As to killings, were there as many terrorist attempts and deaths? There were, we all know that, Saddam was a vile S.O.B., but were there as many killings? What happened to the Christians who lived under Saddam? Rogue will surely rush to answer these questions.
Jacques of Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#183386 Jan 4, 2014
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>1.Democrats held the majority in both Houses of Congress when Obama took office and until after the 2010 election. 2.Obama exploited the Gitmo prisoners for political reasons. This is much worse than torture. 3.Bush was referring to the mission assigned to the men he was visiting. The mission accomplished sign was furnished by the unit not by The White House. 4. Obama has been using The Patriot Act to attack people that don't agree with his political agenda,not to protect our country. 6.True unemployment is worst today than it has been the past fifty years. 7. The Obama economy is no where near normal -- it is dismal. 9. It is sad to know that commercial interests can know what I am buying for lunch,but it is despicable that Obama can use the NSA , IRS, and other agencies to attack people that don't share his radical left wing agenda or who simply don't agree with his ObamKare bill. 10. Obama's policies haven't helped. Obama has never had the best interests of our country on his mind.
I cited facts. You cited your opinion and wishful thinking. Sorry.
Jacques of Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#183387 Jan 4, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
And you probably think Owl Gore won the election of 2000 too!
Gore DID win the election. And Obama won BOTH elections without the help of Jeb Bush and the Supreme Court.

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

#183388 Jan 4, 2014
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear, we want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program".

Bill Clinton
Jacques of Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#183389 Jan 4, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Hillary Clinton's Sex Scandals
Western Journalism
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =ZvxUuAl85hoXX
Disgusting. Western Journalism yet ! Shame on you. News of the World , Wnd.com and Globe trash kind of yellow journalism, lies, untruths, fabrications, innuendos, mud, all of it and more. More than ever with you, Rogue, the medium IS the message.
Jacques of Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#183390 Jan 4, 2014
loose cannon wrote:
Jacques,
This today from the archives:
"I know I speak for everyone in this chamber, Republicans an Democrats, when I say to Saddam Hussein,'You cannot defy the world', and when I say to him,'You have used weapons of mass destruction before; We are determined to deny you the capacity to use them again' ".
Bill Clinton, 1998 State of the Union Address.
Where does Clinton say Saddam HAS them? Where does it say Clinton approved the invasion of Iraq?
Jacques of Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#183391 Jan 4, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
I wonder if Barrack H. Obama, aka Harry Bounel, is worried now?
Taitz-v-Colvin-filed-second-am ended-complaint
https://docs.google.com/gview...
https://docs.google.com/gview...
I won't even read your trashy accounts. But I'll tell you what, 210-0 must show just how worried he must be.
Jacques of Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#183392 Jan 4, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Isn't it odd that you bash someone who became addicted to prescription medications but totally ignore someone like Obama who not only was a cocaine user but a cocaine dealer!
Would you now please elaborate, and cite reliable sources? Specially the "dealer" thing.

Do you hate him and Hillary so much that you SEARCH the internet day and night for this kind of trash , jubilant when you locate it, and certainly no intention to verify the accuracy of said reports?
JBH

Delta, Canada

#183393 Jan 4, 2014
It is only a relative measurement to depict that US is declining.

In other words, it is a comparison appraisal that when the rest of world are having population explosion, gaining more technologies and better education, with climbing emerging economies around the world, US is not that strong and effective in operating its polices anymore.

Some emerging economies (e.g., El Salvador) have better economic growths than that of China where its economy has been growing rapidly in the last 20 straight years, yet there are signs showing China's growth slowing from now on.

Emerging economies are mostly the ones of developing countries, as those like El Salvador, Brazil, India, Russia, China whereas advanced economies are those of G-7.

There are very few advanced economies on the planet while besides those G-7, only few in Europe and elsewhere are of advanced economies.

China has expanded its military to challenge US that China could be the largest military on earth, but not US .

Russia has built to having most number of strategic missiles to meet US and face NATO.

North Korea already has nuclear bombs and built up the training base of its military that it is ready for anything.

US has shown ineffectiveness in quelling insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan as they are only small countries that US could not even tackle.

In this aspects, the rest of the world gain strength in many areas that US no longer would be taken for granted to force a policy or on any issues.

From the perspectives showing globally, US is declining as it is not as what it used to be to engage operatives that other countries would go along or yield to it.

When there is ineffectivity in all these, US is viewed as going downhill (and declining) because other countries become stronger and make more success in many matters.

Declining speaking is only a relative measurement related to world situations and phenomenon worldwide, nowadays, as compared to previous era.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#183394 Jan 4, 2014
Jacques of Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Which begs the question addressed to Rogue : Was there an AlQaeda presence in Iraq when Saddam was in charge? While we are at it, was Ezbolah present, were there any Iranians? As to killings, were there as many terrorist attempts and deaths? There were, we all know that, Saddam was a vile S.O.B., but were there as many killings? What happened to the Christians who lived under Saddam? Rogue will surely rush to answer these questions.
Soooo, al Qaeda is worse than Saddamn Hussein? How many Jews were in Iraq under Saddamn? 150,000! How many are left? Less than ten!!! What happened to them? They were moved to Israel and the U.S.!
Yes, under the Shia, Jews and Christians do better than if they were under the Sunnis but Saddamn was a Sunni in name only. But the Christians and Jews "lived" under Saddamn and nothing more.
In my book, Saddamn and al Qaeda are EQUALLY evil.
Just like Cracker and Honkie are just as evil as the N-word. But you Libtards have a hard time seeing the difference as you think black people have the right to be racists!!!!
Citizen org

West Sayville, NY

#183395 Jan 4, 2014
Jacques of Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Which begs the question addressed to Rogue : Was there an AlQaeda presence in Iraq when Saddam was in charge? While we are at it, was Ezbolah present, were there any Iranians? As to killings, were there as many terrorist attempts and deaths? There were, we all know that, Saddam was a vile S.O.B., but were there as many killings? What happened to the Christians who lived under Saddam? Rogue will surely rush to answer these questions.
Zero al Qaeda in Iraq when Bush invaded in 2003.

The Iraqi Shiites were second class citizens with Sunni Saddam in charge and today they run the whole country and loyal to Iran.

Iraqi teenagers and school kids were allowed to frequent bars, clubs, and go to the movies on weekends with a curfew at 11pm under Saddam.

Saddam even had Women School Teachers, Women Scientist, Women Doctors, Women Lawyers, and Women in his government because he was a Secular Muslim and hated by al Qaida fundamentalist.

Turns out you Jacques was right and Rogue was wrong about Iraq that cost the American taxpayers over THREE TRILLION DOLLARS.

Bush lost Iraq and Afghanistan with the best military on earth.

==========

'The Country You Destroyed': A Letter to George W. Bush
by Ralph Nader / January 3, 2014 / http://tinyurl.com/kkcq9ef
George W. Bush
George W. Bush Presidential Center
PO Box 560887
Dallas, Texas, 57356
Dear Mr. Bush:
A few days ago I received a personalized letter from your Presidential Center which included a solicitation card for donations that actually provided words for my reply. They included “I’m honored to help tell the story of the Bush Presidency” and “I’m thrilled that the Bush Institute is advancing timeless principles and practical solutions to the challenges facing our world.”(Below were categories of “tax-deductible contributions” starting with $25 and going upward.)
Did you mean the “timeless principles” that drove you and Mr. Cheney to invade the country of Iraq which, contrary to your fabrications, deceptions and cover-ups, never threatened the United States? Nor could Iraq [under its dictator and his dilapidated military] threaten its far more powerful neighbors, even if the Iraqi regime wanted to do so.
Today, Iraq remains a country (roughly the size and population of Texas) you destroyed, a country where over a million Iraqis, including many children and infants (remember Fallujah?) lost their lives, millions more were sickened or injured, and millions more were forced to become refugees, including most of the Iraqi Christians. Iraq is a country rife with sectarian strife that your prolonged invasion provoked into what is now open warfare. Iraq is a country where al-Qaeda is spreading with explosions taking 20, 30, 40, 50 or 60 lives per day. Just this week, it was reported that the U.S. has sent Hellfire air-to-ground missiles to Iraq’s air force to be used against encampments of “the country’s branch of al-Qaeda.” There was no al-Qaeda in Iraq before your invasion. Al-Qaeda and Saddam Hussein were mortal enemies.
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/01/03

----------

Military can't win in Iraq: General Petraeus Says
March 10, 2007 / http://tinyurl.com/2n3l43
AS THE new US commander in Iraq warned there was no military solution to the conflict and the US needed to talk to insurgents, the US Democratic Party leadership has finally bitten the bullet and proposed a deadline for the withdrawal of US combat forces by October next year.

"There is no military solution to a problem like that in Iraq," General David Petraeus said. "Military action is necessary to help improve security … but it is not sufficient."
Addressing massed ranks of reporters in Baghdad's fortified green zone, General Petraeus said Iraqi leaders would eventually have to sit down and talk with some of the violent factions tearing the country apart.
http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/military-can...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#183396 Jan 4, 2014
Jacques of Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
I won't even read your trashy accounts. But I'll tell you what, 210-0 must show just how worried he must be.
If you are not worried, why did you bother and respond? Dr. Orly Taitz is attacked daily which means you Libtards are very worried. Same goes for Rush Limbaugh.



9 Responses to “Another sign the regime is in panic: some 300,000 articles about my cases and my work were removed or de-linked on Google. Hacking and sabotage of my web site and my computer, slander and defamation of character intensified”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#183397 Jan 4, 2014
Hey Jacqueau, have you ever seen the 1997 film Amistad ? Do you remember the scene in which the lawyer is attacked and he asked the character played by Morgan Freeman why and he said that was because they were afraid of him. And that is why you Libtards attack Dr. Orly Taitz and Rush Limbaugh.
2 posts removed

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#183400 Jan 4, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Isn't it odd that you bash someone who became addicted to prescription medications but totally ignore someone like Obama who not only was a cocaine user but a cocaine dealer!
Jacques of Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Would you now please elaborate, and cite reliable sources? Specially the "dealer" thing.
Do you hate him and Hillary so much that you SEARCH the internet day and night for this kind of trash , jubilant when you locate it, and certainly no intention to verify the accuracy of said reports?
I knew you would fall for the Red Herring "dealer" allegation while ignoring the cocaine allegation. Why? Because you, and everyone else, knows that Obama used illegal drugs like cocaine but in your Libtardian mind Rush addiction to prescription medication is worse!!! And that makes you a bigot!!!
And, as if, you do not look for trash on people like Rush Limbaugh. Do you know what the allegations against Rush were? He had ten too many Oxycontin pills, and nothing more. You see, here in Florida you can only pickup a thirty day supply of certain medications while in most states, under federal law, you can pickup a NINETY day supply. Florida enacted that law to help stop trafficking in prescription pills but Rush was not trafficking and it was obviously nothing more than a minor error. The ONLY reason why Rush was prosecuted was because he was ...... Rush Limbaugh and nothing more.
It is like doing one mile and hour over the speed limit and you get stopped for speeding, and ticketed, while the cops ignore the people who are drive 15+ mph over the speed limit.
About ten years ago the State of Tennessee was ignoring LOCAL trucks who were running seriously overweight while citing out of state trucks for the minor overweight violations. And, the Feds under G.W. Bush, came down hard on Tennessee for it too.
Citizen org

West Sayville, NY

#183401 Jan 4, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Isn't it odd that you bash someone who became addicted to prescription medications but totally ignore someone like Obama who not only was a cocaine user but a cocaine dealer!
If Obama sold cocaine I am sure Hillary, McCain, and Romney would have brought that up.

Same with his birth certificate, his Muslim faith, and his communism.

Rogue the Dreamer.

ROTFL


Everly Brothers All I Have To Do Is Dream

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#183402 Jan 4, 2014
Oh, while trucking I have had my fuel tanks dipped a dozen times to see if I had "red" diesel fuel (non-highway/tax free (also called "Farm diesel)) but where does an over-the-road trucker get his fuel from? Truck stops. Meanwhile I wonder how many farm "trucks" using farm diesel which is meant for off-road farm vehicles ONLY? It would stand th=o reason the people who most likely to violate that law are farmers and construction vehicles but 90+% of the enforcement is done against out of state, long-haul truckers who are the least likely to violate that law.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#183403 Jan 4, 2014
In the early 1970s I cause a civilian stealing aircraft fuel from the Army. He was a contract fuel truck driver who would refuel aircraft at the base field and at the stage fields. We were using 100/130 octane AvGas and he would miss log about five gallons for every aircraft. He would refuel 40-50 aircraft per shift which would mean he was miss-logging 200-250 gallons per day.
After he refueled the aircraft at the stage field he would return to the base field. He would leave before the student bus but would arrive back at the base field AFTER the bus did. So I flew my helicopter and caught him stopping at a farm and filling a large tank there.
If you blend 100/130 AvGas with 87 AutoGas, you get a real good hightest. I informed Army CID and they turned it over to the FBI and that was the last time I saw him on Army property. I assume he got busted!
Again, would the student pilots be steal fuel or would the fuel truck drivers be more likely to do so? So why would Rush Limbaugh TRAFFIC in prescription drugs when he already has enough money? Again, the ONLY reason why Rush was prosecuted was because he was ...... Rush.
Citizen org

West Sayville, NY

#183404 Jan 4, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay, why did Pelosi not impeach either Bush-43 or Dick Cheney? What would the charges be? And no you know why Clinton WAS impeached?
Pelosi is a corporate hack Democrat just like Obama, Clinton, Bush and Cheney.

----------
The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder
by Vincent Bugliosi / May 9, 2008 / http://tinyurl.com/yjwxsea
There is direct evidence that President George W. Bush did not honorably lead this nation, but deliberately misled it into a war he wanted. Bush and his administration knowingly lied to Congress and to the American public -- lies that have cost the lives of more than 4,000 young American soldiers and close to $1 trillion.
A Monumental Lie
In his first nationally televised address on the Iraqi crisis on October 7, 2002, six days after receiving the National Intelligence Estimate (NIE), a classified CIA report, President Bush told millions of Americans the exact opposite of what the CIA was telling him -a monumental lie to the nation and the world.

On the evening of October 7, 2002, the very latest CIA intelligence was that Hussein was not an imminent threat to the U.S. This same information was delivered to the Bush administration as early as October 1, 2002, in the NIE, including input from the CIA and 15 other U.S. intelligence agencies. In addition, CIA director George Tenet briefed Bush in the Oval Office on the morning of October 7th.

According to the October 1, 2002 NIE, "Baghdad for now appears to be drawing a line short of conducting terrorist attacks with conventional or CBW [chemical and biological warfare] against the United States, fearing that exposure of Iraqi involvement would provide Washington a stronger case for making war." The report concluded that Hussein was not planning to use any weapons of mass destruction; further, Hussein would only use weapons of mass destruction he was believed to have if he were first attacked, that is, he would only use them in self-defense.
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/05/0...


========
Citizen org

West Sayville, NY

#183405 Jan 4, 2014
Judge Andrew Napolitano says Bush and Cheney should be prosecuted for crimes against the United States Constitution.
The Libertarian commentator debates politics, history and what he considers to be the unconstitutional behavior of both the Bush and Obama administrations, with consumer advocate and four-time presidential candidate Ralph Nader.
June 2, 2010 / http://tinyurl.com/kpno7e7
Well, this is something you don't see every day. Ralph Nader hosted this interview segment with Fox News' Judge Andrew Napolitano and discussed his book, Lies the Government Told You. I'm surprised the judge is going to be allowed on Fox after making the statements he did about Bush and Cheney during the interview.

Nader: What's the sanction for President Bush and Vice President Cheney?

Napolitano: There's been no sanction except what history will say about them.

Nader: What should be the sanctions?

Napolitano: They should have been indicted. They absolutely should have been indicted for torturing, for spying, for arresting without warrants. I'd like to say they should be indicted for lying but believe it or not, unless you're under oath, lying is not a crime. At least not an indictable crime. It's a moral crime.

Nader: So you think George W. Bush and Dick Cheney should even though they've left office, they haven't escaped the criminal laws, they should be indicted and prosecuted?

Napolitano: The evidence in this book and in others, our colleague the great Vincent Bugliosi has amassed an incredible amount of evidence. The purpose of this book was not to amass that evidence but I do discuss it, is overwhelming when you compare it to the level of evidence required for a normal indictment that George W. Bush as President and Dick Cheney as Vice President participated in criminal conspiracies to violate the federal law and the guaranteed civil liberties of hundreds, maybe thousands of human beings

--------

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Obama turns up heat on climate change debate in... 3 min Mothra 204
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 4 min HILLARY 2016 180,331
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 5 min Coffee Party 326,287
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 8 min Mothra 53,039
News 5 Reasons The American Dream Is Eluding Black P... 10 min someone else 1,125
News Riots in Baltimore raise questions about police... 22 min neveratfault 610
News 8 Shocking Statements Opponents Of Marriage Equ... 24 min lides 92
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 25 min leosnana 1,224,059
News Ben Carson confirms presidential campaign 1 hr yup 74
More from around the web