• Sections
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

# BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 240358 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

#180956 Dec 2, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
5.6T is 76% of 10.025T? 66% is also incorrect. Only a DIM!!!!!
Sorry Dufus, the increase was 76.7%, not 76%. I know math is not a birfoon strength.

If you need a math lesson I'll show you how to calculate it.

BTW, Dufus, did you score in the top 7% of college graduates in quantitative thinking? Didn't think so.

Judged:

1

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#180957 Dec 2, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Then you've committed plagiarism! LMAO!
LMAO (LRS tm reg'd). So ignorant. Why do I bother replying? You don't even know what plagiarism means.

Definition of plagiarism to LRS : The weatherman says tomorrow's gonna be sunny. I then say to my friend it's gonna be sunny tomorrow. I've committed plagiarism.

To the corner, put the dunce hat on, and sit there, LOSER.

Judged:

1

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#180958 Dec 2, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey, hey, dumbazz.....those precentages are skewed to say the least. Of course, if you start with a lower base then the percentages are going to be higher! Fool. Lies and misinformation. Do you ever tire of spreading BS? What a piece of work you are. Pathetic.
And so you decided to go from the higher number ! What a fool. You don't even understand grade 4 math. And you worked on airplanes? Wow. Probably emptied the toilet tanks with a straw.

Judged:

1

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

#180959 Dec 2, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Nitpicking ignoramus ! It's 76.7% and 66.7%. What a loser, never heard of rounding out numbers or percentages?
Instead of saying, "hey, you're right about GWB's bigger debt, thanks for setting me straight", you remark on tenths of percents? What a birther birfoon buffoon loser. Plus ça change, plus c'est pareil.
LRS wasn't nitpicking. He was out in left field calculating something else totally irrelevant. Indeed, if the increase had been, say, 300%, according to LRS it would only be 25%. LRS is so innumerate that he doesn't realize his math calculates a smaller percentage the larger the increase. He's mathematically an imbecile.

Judged:

1

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!
Truth Detector
#180960 Dec 2, 2013
From a woman of faith who loves America:‘Black people have been deceived’[VIDEO]

What exactly do you think she means by Native Born Citizen?
Justice LRS
#180961 Dec 2, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry Dufus, the increase was 76.7%, not 76%. I know math is not a birfoon strength.
If you need a math lesson I'll show you how to calculate it.
BTW, Dufus, did you score in the top 7% of college graduates in quantitative thinking? Didn't think so.
And these percentages are still skewed. Do you really think simple math is that hard? Bush spent 4.4 in 8 years, Obobblehead has run up 6+ in 5 years. These numbers tell the story, Mr. BS! DUH!!! Hell, you probably don't see your error! LMAO!!!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

#180962 Dec 2, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
And the cellar-dwelling six year old thinks he has a full deck? LMAO! NOW THAT IS FUNNY!
The sad illiterate twerp thinks that's a rebuttal.

Please explain to the class how in 14 months, if the Republicans have a majority in the Senate, lack of the "nuclear option" for Democrats would affect Obama's appointments. Puh-lease! That was the point, MORON.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Rouge isn't working with a full deck. The so-called "nuclear option" only affects appointments, and in 14 months, even if the Repubs control the Senate, the President will still be Obama. Even without the the "option" if Repubs were to have a majority they could block appointments. So the "nuclear option" will not matter as Dems will not be interested in blocking Obama's appointments and wouldn't need the option if they were in the minority.
Duh!
Meanwhile, Rouge's prophesies about who is going to win the "next" election is always wrong. Hehehehe.
Rouge should predict that the Dems will keep control of the Senate; then maybe the Republicans might win.
Justice LRS
#180963 Dec 2, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
LRS wasn't nitpicking. He was out in left field calculating something else totally irrelevant. Indeed, if the increase had been, say, 300%, according to LRS it would only be 25%. LRS is so innumerate that he doesn't realize his math calculates a smaller percentage the larger the increase. He's mathematically an imbecile.
You clowns are looking real foolish. Really, even for you two! LMAO! Simple math blows them out of the water, and they call themselves geniuses!!!!! LMAO! Not a chance in hell. LMAO!
Justice LRS
#180964 Dec 2, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
The sad illiterate twerp thinks that's a rebuttal.
Please explain to the class how in 14 months, if the Republicans have a majority in the Senate, lack of the "nuclear option" for Democrats would affect Obama's appointments. Puh-lease! That was the point, MORON.
<quoted text>
Damn, already I have to correct you again! That was "your" point, not mine. Moron.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

#180965 Dec 2, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
And these percentages are still skewed. Do you really think simple math is that hard? Bush spent 4.4 in 8 years, Obobblehead has run up 6+ in 5 years. These numbers tell the story, Mr. BS! DUH!!! Hell, you probably don't see your error! LMAO!!!
What a sad little twerp. Here's his arse backwards comment:
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
5.6T is 76% of 10.025T? 66% is also incorrect. Only a DIM!!!!!
No, Moron, 5.6T isn't 76% of 10.025T. The real question is why did you think an increase of 4.351T relative to 5.674T involves "76% of 10.025T".

Flat out stupid.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry Dufus, the increase was 76.7%, not 76%. I know math is not a birfoon strength.
If you need a math lesson I'll show you how to calculate it.
BTW, Dufus, did you score in the top 7% of college graduates in quantitative thinking? Didn't think so.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

#180966 Dec 2, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Damn, already I have to correct you again! That was "your" point, not mine. Moron.
Which dull boy has failed to rebut. Duh!

(Hence "The sad illiterate twerp thinks that's a rebuttal.")
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
The sad illiterate twerp thinks that's a rebuttal.
Please explain to the class how in 14 months, if the Republicans have a majority in the Senate, lack of the "nuclear option" for Democrats would affect Obama's appointments. Puh-lease! That was the point, MORON.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

#180967 Dec 2, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
You clowns are looking real foolish. Really, even for you two! LMAO! Simple math blows them out of the water, and they call themselves geniuses!!!!! LMAO! Not a chance in hell. LMAO!
Simple math blows the Bayou twerp out of the water. Now can he please explain to the class why 10.026 T should be the divisor?

Innumerate twerp: "5.6T is 76% of 10.025T? 66% is also incorrect. Only a DIM!!!!!"

DUH! He fails Middle School math. Pathetic.

Would you like a lesson on how to calculate the percentage increase? It's really easy.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
LRS wasn't nitpicking. He was out in left field calculating something else totally irrelevant. Indeed, if the increase had been, say, 300%, according to LRS it would only be 25%. LRS is so innumerate that he doesn't realize his math calculates a smaller percentage the larger the increase. He's mathematically an imbecile.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#180968 Dec 2, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
What a sad little twerp. Here's his arse backwards comment:
<quoted text>
No, Moron, 5.6T isn't 76% of 10.025T. The real question is why did you think an increase of 4.351T relative to 5.674T involves "76% of 10.025T".
Flat out stupid.
<quoted text>
It's not use, wojar. I'm no mathematician, but I get it. It's so fundamental . But he does not. Why's that?
Justice LRS
#180969 Dec 2, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
What a sad little twerp. Here's his arse backwards comment:
<quoted text>
No, Moron, 5.6T isn't 76% of 10.025T. The real question is why did you think an increase of 4.351T relative to 5.674T involves "76% of 10.025T".
Flat out stupid.
<quoted text>
I know exactly what the 76% is, dumbazz. Why do you think I brought up the base values? R U Dense?
Justice LRS
#180970 Dec 2, 2013
4.4 in 8 or 6+ in 5? LMAO! You don't have a leg to stand on. Other than some skewed numbers. LMAO! Typical DIM!!!
Justice LRS
#180971 Dec 2, 2013
Twaddle that for awhile, grasshut slumlord! LMAO! I'll check back and see if you two have figured it out. Cya twit boys!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

#180972 Dec 2, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
I know exactly what the 76% is, dumbazz. Why do you think I brought up the base values? R U Dense?
Look at the little twerp in denial. Why did he think the 76% had anything to do with 76% of 10.025 T. Why oh why? Because he's an innumerate twerp.

Twerp: "5.6T is 76% of 10.025T? 66% is also incorrect. Only a DIM!!!!!"

Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

Do the math moron.(10.025-5.674)/5.674 X 100 = DUH!

It's 76.7%, jackass. You know it now that the egg is all over your face.

This denial is as dumb as LRS's "Harvard Study" fiasco. Hilarious.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
What a sad little twerp. Here's his arse backwards comment:
<quoted text>
No, Moron, 5.6T isn't 76% of 10.025T. The real question is why did you think an increase of 4.351T relative to 5.674T involves "76% of 10.025T".
Flat out stupid.
<quoted text>
Truth Detector
#180973 Dec 2, 2013
Bombshell! What America should have known already,
No security ever built into Obamacare site: Hacker
http://www.cnbc.com/id/101068119

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

#180974 Dec 2, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
4.4 in 8 or 6+ in 5? LMAO! You don't have a leg to stand on. Other than some skewed numbers. LMAO! Typical DIM!!!
Innumerate twerp: "5.6T is 76% of 10.025T? 66% is also incorrect. Only a DIM!!!!!"

Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#180975 Dec 2, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
5.6T is 76% of 10.025T? 66% is also incorrect. Only a DIM!!!!!
WOW!

Just WOW.

#### Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

### US Politics Discussions

Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min Incognito4Ever 1,522,053
This is why the first 100 days is a 'ridiculous... 2 min 07 Mustang 16
Under Trump, ICE arrests soar for migrants with... 2 min Chicagoan by Birth 214
Attorney General doesn't realize Hawaii is a state 3 min spud 323
'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 4 min Jonah1 25,269
Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 9 min Susanm 313,966
Top StoryTrump tells young immigrants in US ill... 15 min Chilli J 63
'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 20 min Limbertwig 265,236
Americans have rendered their verdict on the fi... 3 hr Retribution 96
Will Islam Inherit the Earth? 4 hr Rabbeen Al Jihad 181

#### US Politics News

More US Politics News from Topix »

More from around the web