BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 237222 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Therealnews com

Edison, NJ

#178006 Nov 5, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Obummer Boy is politically religious in that he appears to be religious to foster his political ambitions.
What effrontery you have by talking about our president Obama like that.

Shame On You!

P.S. You do know that Obama reads everything on the Internet?

P.S.S. Why do you think George W. Bush never used email for 8 years in the White House?

ROTFL
Therealnews com

Edison, NJ

#178007 Nov 5, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
But Obama droning civilians to death is okay with you?!?
Yes, Yes, and more Yes!

NOT!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#178008 Nov 5, 2013
Hummm, the average age of people registering for ObamaCare is age ...... 55 and has preexisting medical conditions. ObamaCare was doomed to fail and the Democrats designed it that way so they could blame the evil health insurance companies and go to Single Payer.
But so far The People are not blaming the insurance companies but ...... Obama!!!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#178009 Nov 5, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Obummer Boy is politically religious in that he appears to be religious to foster his political ambitions.
Stubborn, aren't you? We've been over this aspect a million times. Do you know of any president, except Jimmy Carter, who did not use religion to further their ambitions? Told you many times that intelligent presidents, and there were a few of them, were/are not religious. They just use/used religion. But you keep coming back to Obama and Obama alone. Why?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#178010 Nov 5, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
How many times has Jacqueau stated that our Constitution does not cover the rights of an "individual" to bear arms when our Supreme Court has already ruled otherwise in District of Columbia v. Heller.
But he will sometime in the near future claim we don't have that right. And that is why I call you people Libtards as you can not accept facts that counter your beliefs.
You imagine AND then fabricate lies. I've said many a time that thre 2nd amendment was made for the 18th century, not today and that "militias" were a myth. I've however said a million times that the Supreme Court has spoken on the 2nd amendment and that it is the final word and get on with it. We cannot all agree with what judges and courts decide, now can we? I don't agree with the Zimmerman verdict either, but it's done, get on with it and go on to something else. Obama was twice elected president. You don't like it? That's okay, you don't have to. But live with it! Same for the 2nd amendment. Done and Bye bye.
Therealnews com

Edison, NJ

#178011 Nov 5, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Hummm, the average age of people registering for ObamaCare is age ...... 55 and has preexisting medical conditions. ObamaCare was doomed to fail and the Democrats designed it that way so they could blame the evil health insurance companies and go to Single Payer.
But so far The People are not blaming the insurance companies but ...... Obama!!!
I wish that were true.

Single Payer would be cost effective and any American would be covered by any doctor they choose.

THAT IS CALLED FREEDOM IN MY BOOK!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#178012 Nov 5, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Hummm, the average age of people registering for ObamaCare is age ...... 55 and has preexisting medical conditions. ObamaCare was doomed to fail and the Democrats designed it that way so they could blame the evil health insurance companies and go to Single Payer.
But so far The People are not blaming the insurance companies but ...... Obama!!!
So you think that pre-conditions, specially for people over 55 who are bound to have said pre-conditions, is fair and square and the way to keep going? Do you think there is one single "have" nation that has such a clause that sets apart the citizens who REALLY need health care? I was looking at the set-up yesterday and reading Consumer Reports magazine on U.S. health care coverage. My god! Are you people nuts? A mere application for health coverage would stymie Einstein. Has someone lost it? Is that what happens when compromises are piled over compromises in order for two egotistical political parties to come to an agreement? All this to keep rich insurance companies in the near-scandalous profit column? All this to ensure that per capita cost of so-called universal health coverage in the U.S. is the most expensive in the whole wide world, at the same time excluding, up to now, 55 million citizens and poor and expensive coverage for a hundred million others?

The example of 33 others OECD countries looks you square in the eye, with lower costs, gov't-administered, and no referral to said gov'ts for analyses, prescriptions or surgeries. One plan, no premiums, no red tape. Look, study, imitate and, oh yes, longer life expectancy. You're 30th of 34 for now. Cuba just passed you.

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

#178013 Nov 5, 2013
Jacques,
The Bill of Rights are timeless and immutable. You can't have one without he others.
loose

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#178014 Nov 5, 2013
Correction : 27th of 34, with Mexico, Czech Republic, Slovania etc fast catching up. 33rd in the world. And universal health care is not a factor?

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

#178015 Nov 5, 2013
Jacques,
Civilization is a very thin veneer.
loose

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#178016 Nov 5, 2013
loose cannon wrote:
Jacques,
Civilization is a very thin veneer.
loose
Very profound. Meaning?
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#178017 Nov 5, 2013
Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>
Sounds about right... The reps putting all their eggs in the Ted basket.
When a guys natural facial expression is a bewildered Joe McArthy and it doesn't seem to raise any red flags....
I wouldn't exactly call Hillary bitch slapping another corporate GOP candidate payback.... or lovely.
Killary? The one responsible for four Americans being killed? That Killary? The one that said, "what difference does it make"? That Killary? She's right up your alley. There is a study going on to determine, or attempt to determine, the last time she spoke the truth. So far, they're lost with no clue! The woman lies more than a lady of the night. Scruff will move from one liar to the next. Now, that is brilliant, skippy.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#178018 Nov 5, 2013
Fluffybritches, that's five posts on one page and you managed to say absolutely nothing! Then again, you never post anything of substance, just BS drivel. Tell us, why do you support a liar? None of you gum-flapping fools seem to be able to answer this, how come? LMAO!

Repeat after me: OBOBBLEHEAD IS A PROVEN LIAR.

Justify it! You can't!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#178019 Nov 5, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Stubborn, aren't you? We've been over this aspect a million times. Do you know of any president, except Jimmy Carter, who did not use religion to further their ambitions? Told you many times that intelligent presidents, and there were a few of them, were/are not religious. They just use/used religion. But you keep coming back to Obama and Obama alone. Why?
Because he's Muslim.
Learn to Read

United States

#178020 Nov 5, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>Stubborn, aren't you? We've been over this aspect a million times. Do you know of any president, except Jimmy Carter, who did not use religion to further their ambitions? Told you many times that intelligent presidents, and there were a few of them, were/are not religious. They just use/used religion. But you keep coming back to Obama and Obama alone. Why?
Ford?
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#178021 Nov 5, 2013
Gum-Flappers, you support liars......why?

Since: Feb 11

Nearer than you would like

#178022 Nov 5, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
That "Mission Accomplished" really bugs you Libtards, doesn't it?!?
No. I find it really funny that it is a perfect example of that administration's duplicity. You see, those words were the backdrop for these.
"My fellow Americans: Major combat operations in Iraq have ended." ~ 05/01/2003, George W. Bush, President
Incidentally, the next three years saw the casualty rate climb, along with combat operations.
Could you see Obummer Boy landing on board a carrier? If he did, he would be in the back of a COD!
Why would the President land on one of our carriers to lie to the world? That is what his predecessor did.
I wonder if any of the Libtards knows what a COD is without looking it up!
I do, I do...pick me, come on...I know, I know. I'll put my service up against yours any day. I am still a nephew and had boots in the sand in both recent fronts. You?
By the way, do you remember this?
11/01/2002, George W. Bush, President
"... for the sake of protecting our friends and allies, the United States will lead a mighty coalition of freedom-loving nations and disarm Saddam Hussein. See, I can't imagine what was going through the mind of this enemy when they hit us. They probably thought the national religion was materialism, that we were so selfish and so self-absorbed that after 9/11/2001 this mighty nation would take a couple of steps back and file a lawsuit."
Two years later...
09/17/2003
Question from reporter: Mr. President, Dr. Rice and Secretary Rumsfeld both said yesterday that they have seen no evidence that Iraq had anything to do with September 11th.
President George W. Bush: "We've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with the September 11th."
Doh!
Learn to Read

United States

#178023 Nov 5, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
Fluffybritches, that's five posts on one page and you managed to say absolutely nothing! Then again, you never post anything of substance, just BS drivel. Tell us, why do you support a liar?!
Show me where I have. You can't!

(Romper blathering about sbstance? A Morrisette would have a field day)
Learn to Read

United States

#178024 Nov 5, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>Because he's Muslim.
Because he's semi-black

Since: Feb 11

Nearer than you would like

#178025 Nov 5, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Because he's Muslim.
So, that whole, "He's a member of that crazy and racist Reverend Wright's Christian Church!" is moot?

Let us know when you want to flip flop again.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Investigations into Russia to continue after Fl... 1 min Norcross hacked 145
News Graham: Trump must punish Russia for election i... 1 min Hostis Publicus 9
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min Copout 1,496,697
News Is the media "the enemy"? Pentagon chief weighs in 2 min Cordwainer Trout 5
News Democrats react to Michael Flynn's resignation 4 min Jgfdsvb 419
News Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn r... 4 min huntcoyotes 321
News Senate on track to confirm Scott Pruitt as EPA ... 5 min Hostis Publicus 23
Donald J Trump, our next president (Mar '16) 6 min huntcoyotes 2,534
News Trump's repeated claim that he won a 'landslide... 17 min Obama who 5,828
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 24 min dP cassie 412,532
News Dem rep: Steve Bannon 'is a stone cold racist' 26 min Lawrence Wolf 36
More from around the web