BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 243000 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Rush

Åkersberga, Sweden

#117202 Oct 13, 2012
How are the Obama buttsurfers doing tonight? 23 days and a wakeup.... LOL
1 post removed

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#117204 Oct 13, 2012
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
That's news?
You forgot to mention that the person who wrote that believed that persons born in the US (other than children of foreign ambassadors and foreign hostile occupying troops) were born as natural born citizens and were not born "foreigners, aliens".
Duh! Your crap is tired, old, and tedious. Long dispensed with.
Get a grip!
<quoted text>
It's only tired because you can't formulate a logical rebuttal. But that's nothing new for you puppet.
3 posts removed
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117208 Oct 13, 2012
Grand Birther wrote:
That all children, born within the dominion of the United States, of foreign parents holding no diplomatic office, became citizens at the time of their birth, does not appear to have been contested or doubted until more than fifty years after the adoption of the Constitution, when the matter was elaborately argued in the Court of Chancery of New York, and decided upon full consideration by Vice Chancellor Sandford in favor of their citizenship. Lynch v. Clarke,(1844) 1 Sandf. Ch. 583.
You have to move on to 1866! LMAO Give it up you morons.
2 posts removed
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117211 Oct 13, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
It's only tired because you can't formulate a logical rebuttal. But that's nothing new for you puppet.
There is no rebuttal. He just can't admit he's wrong.
Willie

Bolivar, MO

#117212 Oct 13, 2012
He showed it,he was born in Hawaii. he is an American people.
4 posts removed
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117217 Oct 13, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no rebuttal. He just can't admit he's wrong.
Or should I say, WONG!
3 posts removed
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117221 Oct 13, 2012
Grand Birther wrote:
The only adjudication that has been made by this court upon the meaning of the clause, "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof," in the leading provision of the Fourteenth Amendment, is Elk v. Wilkins, 112 U.S. 94, in which it was decided that an Indian born a member of one of the Indian tribes within the United States, which still existed and was recognized as an Indian tribe by the United States, who had voluntarily separated himself from his tribe, and taken up his residence among the white citizens of a State, but who did not appear to have been naturalized, or taxed, or in any way recognized or treated as a citizen, either by the United States or by the State, was not a citizen of the United States, as a person born in the United States, "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof," within the meaning of the clause in question.
Welp, butthurt birfoons, there's no mention of citizenship passing from the father to his children. In fact, that was explicitly stated as NOT THE LAW of the US in this same case.
You're a lot dumber than I thought.
3 posts removed
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117225 Oct 13, 2012
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Butthurt Loser, if you could argue as eloquently as the WINNING side in Wong Kim Ark, and write as well as the Justice did in the opinion, I wouldn't be laughing so hard right now.
Too bad your limited literacy has left you unable to connect the language in the posts I am making right now.
Must suck to be a birfoon and on the wrong side of long stnading decisions.
You mean your copy and paste garbage, right? Just don't leave out this part, "NOT SUBJECT TO ANY FOREIGN POWER". I don't care what you post, you obviously don't understand it, so why post it? I'm on the side of the law as of 1866! There's no getting around, "not subject to any foreign power". Sorry, you lose Barfer.
1 post removed
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#117227 Oct 13, 2012
Nite, nite Johnboy! HILARIOUS
1 post removed

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#117229 Oct 13, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
<quoted text>
No one who is in Opus Dei can vote for Ryan after the debate and a non-Christian.
They voted for Obama/Biden, so obviously you're wrong.
Stick to easy bake oven.

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#117230 Oct 13, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
Terri Tanna wrote:
"PAUL RYAN IS EXCOMMUNICATED LATAE SENTENTIAE BY THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH WHILE LOSING THE ENTIRE CATHOLIC VOTE – BOTH CONSERVATIVE AND LIBERAL"
====
<quoted text>
LINK? There is no "link." How stupid.
I posted extensively earlier today from the exact words of the infallible doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church on the subject of killing children while they are still in the womb of their mothers. Please consult the widely-circulated documents of the Roman Catholic Church that are everywhere.
Do you need a link to know that Joe DiMaggio was a baseball player who was married to Marilyn Monroe?
You don't have the power to excommunicate anyone, so I guess you're SOL on that fantasy.
1 post removed

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#117232 Oct 13, 2012
Terri Tanna wrote:
<quoted text>
Not everything is a "link." How uneducated. Most of the important stuff is in that new media: PRINTED BOOKS!
You claimed Paul Ryan was excommunicated.
If it were true, it would be a very big story and virtually every news agency would have covered it.
There would be a ;ink to back up your ridiculous claim.
Of course, the entire class knows you're a habitual liar.

"Stuff's gettin better"
2012

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#117233 Oct 13, 2012
Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
Now, now Anita,
All you've posted on here is insults, crap and nothing else.
None of you can even hold a conversation with anyone not on your side without resorting to insults.
And did you cry like the little wilted pansy that you are?
American Lady

Danville, KY

#117234 Oct 13, 2012
Background Briefing on Libya
Office of the Spokesperson
Background Conference Call With Senior State Department Officials
Washington, DC
October 9, 2012

http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2012/10/1987...
American Lady

Danville, KY

#117235 Oct 13, 2012
Hillary Strikes Back: Attaches U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice to Obama White House Propaganda Messaging

The Clinton’s are clearly on a divergent path than President Obama. Hillary just Judo’d Obama in this informative article posted in the UK Daily Mail.

In this report Secretary Clinton separates U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice from her State Department, and instead says that Rice was selling the message, and following orders, from the White House, not from the State Department.

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2012/10/1...

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#117236 Oct 13, 2012
Terry Buckeye wrote:
<quoted text>
You might want to actually read the legislation. NO religious group is given blanket exemption, and that includes muslims.
You might want to actually read my post and get back with me when you find the words "blanket exemption"
The bill used the internal revenue code 1402(g)(1)which governs exemptions of social security and medicare taxes.

Don't bother getting back to me until you find the words "Blanket exemption" or admit you're a Mingo Junction liar.

"Stuff's gettin better"
2012

“DC Police Complaint #T14002751”

Since: Nov 08

Swift Water,NY

#117237 Oct 14, 2012
Obama's BC is a common forgery!
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#117238 Oct 14, 2012
Robert Laity wrote:
Obama's BC is a common forgery!
Bobby is a common fool

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#117239 Oct 14, 2012
Terry Buckeye wrote:
<quoted text>
Reagan was suffering from Alzheimers or dementia praecox, and Bush was... well, Bush was Bush. Good fodder for the late night talk shows, but that's about it.
And just when did Reagan start to have Alzheimer'sor dementia praecox?
And what does Joe Biden suffer from? Hoof in Mouth disease?
And if Bush was soooo stupid and Obama soooo smart, why has Obama not been able to undo what Bush did?
3 posts removed
Justice Dale

United States

#117243 Oct 14, 2012
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Got a clue the difference between used and quoted?
<quoted text>
What a puss!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min OBAMANATION 1,641,590
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 3 min About time 41,861
News Winners and losers in Republican tax bill 3 min Retribution 13
News Many Christian conservatives are backing Alabam... 12 min ShareAsNeeded 12
News Diagnosing Trump: Did America elect a madman? 20 min Retribution 222
News Gillibrand: Bill Clinton should've resigned ove... 29 min Runaway Trash dau... 77
News Star Tribune: Franken Wona t Resign, Staffer Says 31 min Just Think 9
More from around the web