The GOP already has a 2016 front-runn...

The GOP already has a 2016 front-runner... for Vice President

There are 196 comments on the WAAX-AM Gadsden story from Feb 27, 2014, titled The GOP already has a 2016 front-runner... for Vice President. In it, WAAX-AM Gadsden reports that:

Ask any two Republicans who their choice is for president in 2016 and you'll get three answers; but when it comes to the GOP choice for vice president, there's an emerging sense of agreement, especially in the establishment wing of the party: Senator Kelly Ayotte.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at WAAX-AM Gadsden.

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#176 Mar 9, 2014
Secretary Clinton vs Congressman Rand Paul=landslide Clinton 2016
Jose

San Francisco, CA

#177 Mar 10, 2014
swedenforever wrote:
Secretary Clinton vs Congressman Rand Paul=landslide Clinton 2016
Exactly amigo!! LOL!!!
spud

Weatherly, PA

#178 Mar 10, 2014
Jose wrote:
VIVA Hillary 2016!!! ;)
Skidmark? You gotta be kidding. Viva no skidmark. Skidmark is a bubblehead.
Jose

San Francisco, CA

#179 Mar 10, 2014
spud wrote:
<quoted text>Skidmark? You gotta be kidding. Viva no skidmark. Skidmark is a bubblehead.
Hillary will soon "skid" right into the White House!! LOL!!!
spud

Weatherly, PA

#180 Mar 10, 2014
Jose wrote:
<quoted text> Hillary will soon "skid" right into the White House!! LOL!!!
Hey amigo. You don't sleep much, do you. No Skidmark. I'm begging. If Skidmark wins, I'm going back to Europe. Viva Hunkies.
Sterkfontein Swartkrans

Pennington, NJ

#181 Mar 10, 2014
palin is the reason McCain is not in the white house. Normal people do not want unintelligent extremists in positions of power. The fact that she was nominated is evidence of how dumbed down americans really are!
spud

Weatherly, PA

#182 Mar 10, 2014
Sterkfontein Swartkrans wrote:
palin is the reason McCain is not in the white house. Normal people do not want unintelligent extremists in positions of power. The fact that she was nominated is evidence of how dumbed down americans really are!
I'd say McCain is the extremist in that equation. Unlimited wars, unlimited free trade, deficit spending, open borders and amnesty. McCain isn't right about anything.

“bar0ckalypse n0w”

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#183 Mar 10, 2014
spud wrote:
<quoted text>I'd say McCain is the extremist in that equation. Unlimited wars, unlimited free trade, deficit spending, open borders and amnesty. McCain isn't right about anything.
McCain had a resume, unlike barock.

He attended the US Naval Academy and served with distinction.

He's been an extremely hard-working and effective Senator, unlike barock or hilarity.

He doesn't espouse unlimited wars, unlike barock the Great Appeaser, who surrenders on every front and emboldens our enemies.

Unlimited free trade is good. America can compete with any nation if liberals let us.

McCain is against wasteful spending. Every year he goes through the entire budget and puts out a list of ridiculous pork barrel corruption.

McCain is addressing issues, unlike the unserious surrendercrats who just speak in platitudes without giving real thought or analysis to the effects of their tampering.

The people liberals hurt most are the poor, minorities, and women all over the world that they feign caring about.
spud

Weatherly, PA

#184 Mar 10, 2014
mjjcpa wrote:
<quoted text>
McCain had a resume, unlike barock.
He attended the US Naval Academy and served with distinction.
He's been an extremely hard-working and effective Senator, unlike barock or hilarity.
He doesn't espouse unlimited wars, unlike barock the Great Appeaser, who surrenders on every front and emboldens our enemies.
Unlimited free trade is good. America can compete with any nation if liberals let us.
McCain is against wasteful spending. Every year he goes through the entire budget and puts out a list of ridiculous pork barrel corruption.
McCain is addressing issues, unlike the unserious surrendercrats who just speak in platitudes without giving real thought or analysis to the effects of their tampering.
The people liberals hurt most are the poor, minorities, and women all over the world that they feign caring about.
The comparison was between Palin and McCain. I'd take her over McCain or the other two losers you mention.
fatbacks x

Portland, OR

#185 Mar 10, 2014
Probably already working on more nafta s--t and what to repeal to screw the amer. sheep again. They are all sleazy republicans when it comes to enriching themselves,hillary included. Want to do something for us, then rebuild a bridge and quit pissing money away to keep the world at war including the usa which is two countries of jack o--s pissed at each other.

“bar0ckalypse n0w”

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#186 Mar 11, 2014
spud wrote:
<quoted text>The comparison was between Palin and McCain. I'd take her over McCain or the other two losers you mention.
Palin needed more foreign policy experience, like barock.
spud

Weatherly, PA

#187 Mar 11, 2014
mjjcpa wrote:
<quoted text>
Palin needed more foreign policy experience, like barock.
Yeah, McCain was a genius for totally backing going to war with Iraq and Afganistan. That did a lot of good. We'd still be there if he were president. We'd be in Syria too. Of course he had no idea about stimulus or the bank bailouts when he was a candidate. He claimed it wasn't his expertise. He never achieved anything on his own. He owes his naval academy experience and naval career to nepotism and his political career to the woman he dumped his disabled wife for. He never did anything on his own, except maybe the Keating five thing. He's a user without a conscience, that's all.

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#188 Mar 11, 2014
spud wrote:
<quoted text>Hey amigo. You don't sleep much, do you. No Skidmark. I'm begging. If Skidmark wins, I'm going back to Europe. Viva Hunkies.
take your psychiatrist with you

“bar0ckalypse n0w”

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#189 Mar 11, 2014
spud wrote:
<quoted text>Yeah, McCain was a genius for totally backing going to war with Iraq and Afganistan. That did a lot of good. We'd still be there if he were president. We'd be in Syria too. Of course he had no idea about stimulus or the bank bailouts when he was a candidate. He claimed it wasn't his expertise. He never achieved anything on his own. He owes his naval academy experience and naval career to nepotism and his political career to the woman he dumped his disabled wife for. He never did anything on his own, except maybe the Keating five thing. He's a user without a conscience, that's all.
barock supported the war in Afghanistan too. We liberated millions in Iraq. If we did it your way saddam would be making nukes there today.

If we went to Syria, assad would be gone, and pootin would not have gone into the Ukraine.

Have you seen barock's masterful job in Libya? He just handed all of khaddafi's weapons to al qaeda.

both sides in Egypt HATE barock.

barock turned recession to global depression and arab spring to winter by golfing from behind.
Justin

United States

#190 Mar 11, 2014
WeTheSheeple wrote:
The VP nominee has never helped the ticket; it can only hurt the ticket like Palin did.
The East Coast Democrats would never vote for a female Republican candidate, because they are sexist.

Harumph !
spud

Weatherly, PA

#191 Mar 11, 2014
mjjcpa wrote:
<quoted text>
barock supported the war in Afghanistan too. We liberated millions in Iraq. If we did it your way saddam would be making nukes there today.
If we went to Syria, assad would be gone, and pootin would not have gone into the Ukraine.
Have you seen barock's masterful job in Libya? He just handed all of khaddafi's weapons to al qaeda.
both sides in Egypt HATE barock.
barock turned recession to global depression and arab spring to winter by golfing from behind.
We liberated millions in Iraq? To what? Do you think Iraq or Afganistan is better today? Do you think we're better for going there? You saying Sadam would have nukes today is like saying we had to stop the North in Vietnam or communism would eventually spread worldwide. Your position is as alarmist and wrong as the one in 69. If we went to Syria it would be the same never ending result. I agree that Obama is a socialist idiot, bordering on a totalitarian. He's bad. But that doesn't excuse McCain or the other neocon buffoons in the Republican leadership. Don't believe the media brother. They're in it for themselves, not reality.
spud

Weatherly, PA

#192 Mar 11, 2014
Justin wrote:
<quoted text>
The East Coast Democrats would never vote for a female Republican candidate, because they are sexist.
Harumph !
I think you're onto something there. I've seen a lot of them foam at the mouth just at the mention of Palins name. I think they hate the fact that the Republicans were the first ones to put a female on the presidential ticket. Democrats are a real bitter bunch, stubborn too. They're just lucky they have the media 80% controlled.
spud

Weatherly, PA

#193 Mar 11, 2014
OOPS, I forgot about old Geraldine Ferraro. Anyway, I think Democrats are bitter that Palin got on the ticket before the Clinton buffoon.
Responsibility

Petaluma, CA

#194 Mar 11, 2014
mjjcpa wrote:
<quoted text>
Palin needed more foreign policy experience,.
Reading a newspaper along with her index cards might have helped!
spud

Weatherly, PA

#195 Mar 11, 2014
Responsibility wrote:
<quoted text>
Reading a newspaper along with her index cards might have helped!
Who you down with dog? The Democrat,'it takes a skidmark'. When is she going to come out of hiding? It's like playing where's Waldo with this simple minded female. She hides whenever anything happens because she has no opinions. Skidmark, the weasel.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min Libtardimus Maximus 1,567,636
News How should an angry liberal celebrate the Fourt... 2 min Retribution 596
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 3 min Calvin_Coolish 280,249
News Trump's transgender troops ban divides veterans... 4 min Melvin 29
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 4 min Jacques in Ottawa 242,129
News House to consider ban on transgender surgery fo... 5 min Marcavage s Trick 275
News Dear Trump Voters: The 1950's Aren't Coming Back 7 min Valerie 628
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 9 min bad bob 18,039
News Can Trump pardon anyone? Himself? Can he fire M... 36 min fingers mcgurke 189
More from around the web