Feinstein on Benghazi panel: 'It's a ...

Feinstein on Benghazi panel: 'It's a hunting mission for a lynch mob'

There are 318 comments on the KMIZ story from May 18, 2014, titled Feinstein on Benghazi panel: 'It's a hunting mission for a lynch mob'. In it, KMIZ reports that:

Sen. Dianne Feinstein had some biting words Sunday about the newly formed House select committee to investigate the deadly 2012 terror attack against a U.S. diplomatic post in Benghazi, Libya.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at KMIZ.

serfs up

Ormond Beach, FL

#23 May 19, 2014
conservative crapola wrote:
<quoted text>
They can't. The adult diaper crowd needs their fux...like tea-m extremist trey trey needs his cocaine.
But the adult diaper crowd tried to warn and get the nation put into some responsible economic ways in the late 1980's. Oh yeah. To most of the responsible of that crowd today, you are the fux extremist. Oh yeah. You progressives kept the social security and medicare systems and the massive annual medical increases on track. Now you blame the ones getting old and are old for the problems we face. Its their fault they paid for forty and fifty years and got old. You even stole their wealth to keep the system going. Imagine when the resources run dry enough that the ghettos and the rural areas of the same are affected big time. Thank gaia for the totalitarian state. You will know how bad it is when the ones you screwed over make their choice who to follow for their own survival. And that includes yourselves.
kuda

Cincinnati, OH

#24 May 19, 2014
Responsibility wrote:
Would the repub lynch mob be rattling their sabres, beating their chests, grave dancing, and grandstanding if:
1. Hillary was not such a formidable candidate if she runs?
2. The repubs had better more credible potential candidates?
Perhaps fux can ask those questions? Loll
Their awareness that Hillary will be our next President, and a great one at that, has tea partiers so scared that they're shaking in their clodhoppers and attacking at every opportunity.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-X7wd3lUksWk/UTU-fn6...

“have seen the years,”

Since: Mar 10

and the slow parade of fears"

#25 May 19, 2014
Cordwainer Trout wrote:
<quoted text>
You jerkoffs are still trying to lynch Bush. Anyone the Marxist Democrat Party hierarchy chooses to run becomes a "formidable candidate." You guys could run one of the boys raped by your Hollywood supporters and the pre-teen would be formidable.
You jitbags don't want to hold any repugnantcan responsible for anything they do wrong, yet they are a party of people who do nothing but cheat, steal ,lie, spin and lose elections.
Go figure.
1 post removed
Responsibility

Petaluma, CA

#27 May 19, 2014
kuda wrote:
<quoted text>Their awareness that Hillary will be our next President, and a great one at that, has tea partiers so scared that they're shaking in their clodhoppers and attacking at every opportunity.http://4.bp.blogsp ot.com/-X7wd3lUksWk/UTU-fn68js I/AAAAAAAAAMs/7jLAJm-BcEc/s160 0/pitchforks-460x250.jpg
I prefer to think of shaking bedroom slippers over clodhoppers!
Really

Las Vegas, NV

#28 May 19, 2014
ohbamas legacy is incompetent lying morons ruining this country. This stupid biatch needs to STFU and get off that dumass bandwagon that the head ngr in charge is the World savior.
You people are just stupid enough to fall for the banana in the tail pipe over and over. Dam, you still don't know that lying POS black muslim hates America and Whites.
blacks and muslims are taught the same thing worldwide to destroy America and hate Whites. Ohbama is black and muslim, gee go figure, DUMMIES.
Anytime it doesn't go a blacks way then they cry RACE! It is sickening. Can't dazzle people with brillance then baffle them with BS. You idiots must be baffled by now, but NO, give them more and not one of you IDIOTS has caught on yet, UNBELIEVEABLE!

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#29 May 19, 2014
Really wrote:
ohbamas legacy is incompetent lying morons ruining this country. This stupid biatch needs to STFU and get off that dumass bandwagon that the head ngr in charge is the World savior.
You people are just stupid enough to fall for the banana in the tail pipe over and over. Dam, you still don't know that lying POS black muslim hates America and Whites.
blacks and muslims are taught the same thing worldwide to destroy America and hate Whites. Ohbama is black and muslim, gee go figure, DUMMIES.
Anytime it doesn't go a blacks way then they cry RACE! It is sickening. Can't dazzle people with brillance then baffle them with BS. You idiots must be baffled by now, but NO, give them more and not one of you IDIOTS has caught on yet, UNBELIEVEABLE!
so sad that there is still ignorant scum like you on this planet. don't worry, we are doing all we can to wipe you out.

real humans are winning. slugs like you are dying out like the dinosaurs.

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#30 May 19, 2014
Barb is a good liberal, back to the great Twin Peaks debate, and there’s little chance of her changing her tune unless faced with incontrovertible evidence. With more FOIA’s, she may have to grudgingly admit when “the phone rang at 3AM” Hilary was napping.
Responsibility

Petaluma, CA

#31 May 19, 2014
Really wrote:
, UNBELIEVEABLE!
Boy, how old are you?

I would bet you are over sixty with your kind of sick attitude.

UNBELIEVABLE.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#32 May 19, 2014
Aprilvue wrote:
Barb is a good liberal, back to the great Twin Peaks debate, and there’s little chance of her changing her tune unless faced with incontrovertible evidence. With more FOIA’s, she may have to grudgingly admit when “the phone rang at 3AM” Hilary was napping.
in fact, her first call was to the CIA to make sure their assets in Benghazi gave aid, and they were the ones that got there within the hour and saved over thirty people..

ao funny when your own statements point out you haven't the slightest clue as tot eh facts in this issue. do you enjoy making a total ass of yourself with your ignorance?

no way you can recover fro this one, fool. she took the call and her actions saved the day...i hope you asshole gravedancers try to use that against her if she runs...i am sure you are not smart enough to learn from this smackdown and will make a fool of yourself parroting this soundbyte you don't actually understand again and again...

too funny!
2 posts removed

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#35 May 19, 2014
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>in fact, her first call was to the CIA to make sure their assets in Benghazi gave aid, and they were the ones that got there within the hour and saved over thirty people..
ao funny when your own statements point out you haven't the slightest clue as tot eh facts in this issue. do you enjoy making a total ass of yourself with your ignorance?
no way you can recover fro this one, fool. she took the call and her actions saved the day...i hope you asshole gravedancers try to use that against her if she runs...i am sure you are not smart enough to learn from this smackdown and will make a fool of yourself parroting this soundbyte you don't actually understand again and again...
too funny!
Source for Hillary making calls to have the CIA for assets to give aid and proof her actions saved 30 people?????

From WAPO, that of conservative media.“Hillary Clinton largely absent from Benghazi report
BY AARON BLAKE

A new Senate intelligence committee report is out, detailing the attacks that killed four Americans in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11, 2012, and the actions before and after the attack.
Below, we focus on four key points that will be important to the political debate about Benghazi going forward.
1. Hillary Clinton's name comes up only once
The lone mention comes in the section where the Republicans on the committee weigh in. They say Clinton ultimately bears responsibility for the failures and that her failure to act "clearly made a difference" in the lives of the four Americans killed.
"Ultimately, however, the final responsibility for security at diplomatic facilities lies with the former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton," the Republicans write. "Because the Temporary Mission Facility in Benghazi did not meet the security standards set by the State Department, it would have required a waiver to be occupied. Although certain waivers of the standards could have been approved at a lower level, other departures, such as the co-location requirement, could only be approved by the Secretary of State. At the end of the day, she was responsible for ensuring the safety of all Americans serving in our diplomatic facilities. Her failure to do so clearly made a difference in the lives of the four murdered Americans and their families."
2. The report says the attack was, in fact, "preventable"
It highlights numerous instances in which the Clinton-run State Department could have done more and/or was warned about potential danger. In particular, the report points out that Ambassador Christopher J. Stevens, who, later, was among the four Americans killed, in June 2012 asked for a special security team and in July asked for extra security personnel. Neither were provided.
"The State Department should have increased its security posture more significantly in Benghazi based on the deteriorating security situation on the ground" and previous attacks in Benghazi, the report says.“
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-poli...

Ya’d think ONE of the majority number of democrats would have mentioned Hillary’s major role...especially Madame Feinstein.....

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#36 May 19, 2014
Should read,“..From WAPO, that BASTION of conservative media..."

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#37 May 19, 2014
Aprilvue wrote:
<quoted text>
Source for Hillary making calls to have the CIA for assets to give aid and proof her actions saved 30 people?????
From WAPO, that of conservative media.“Hillary Clinton largely absent from Benghazi report
BY AARON BLAKE
A new Senate intelligence committee report is out, detailing the attacks that killed four Americans in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11, 2012, and the actions before and after the attack.
Below, we focus on four key points that will be important to the political debate about Benghazi going forward.
1. Hillary Clinton's name comes up only once
The lone mention comes in the section where the Republicans on the committee weigh in. They say Clinton ultimately bears responsibility for the failures and that her failure to act "clearly made a difference" in the lives of the four Americans killed.
"Ultimately, however, the final responsibility for security at diplomatic facilities lies with the former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton," the Republicans write. "Because the Temporary Mission Facility in Benghazi did not meet the security standards set by the State Department, it would have required a waiver to be occupied. Although certain waivers of the standards could have been approved at a lower level, other departures, such as the co-location requirement, could only be approved by the Secretary of State. At the end of the day, she was responsible for ensuring the safety of all Americans serving in our diplomatic facilities. Her failure to do so clearly made a difference in the lives of the four murdered Americans and their families."
2. The report says the attack was, in fact, "preventable"
It highlights numerous instances in which the Clinton-run State Department could have done more and/or was warned about potential danger. In particular, the report points out that Ambassador Christopher J. Stevens, who, later, was among the four Americans killed, in June 2012 asked for a special security team and in July asked for extra security personnel. Neither were provided.
"The State Department should have increased its security posture more significantly in Benghazi based on the deteriorating security situation on the ground" and previous attacks in Benghazi, the report says.“
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-poli...
Ya’d think ONE of the majority number of democrats would have mentioned Hillary’s major role...especially Madame Feinstein.....
it was in the many hearings on the issue. you should have paid attention instead of just parroting things you clearly do not unsderstand.

the findings also said that there was no credible intel that some attack was imminent. so basically it was them saying we could have prevented it, but no one really knew how or that we needed to..

you should actually understand the entire document you are cherry picking from...
see the light

El Paso, TX

#38 May 19, 2014
Responsibility wrote:
<quoted text>
Who the hell mentioned. Bushbaby?
Now if you are talking more American deaths than fout, please coninue ...
How about all the Vets that Democrats deny treatment and they die? You guys lie to cover everything up? Murderers!
Dubya Tee Eff

Webster, MA

#39 May 19, 2014
Responsibility wrote:
Would the repub lynch mob be rattling their sabres, beating their chests, grave dancing, and grandstanding if:
1. Hillary was not such a formidable candidate if she runs?
2. The repubs had better more credible potential candidates?
Perhaps fux can ask those questions? Loll
Or maybe its because Obama lied before and election in about the cause of the attack? Naw, couldnt be that... Carry on with your biased ideology.

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#40 May 19, 2014
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>it was in the many hearings on the issue. you should have paid attention instead of just parroting things you clearly do not unsderstand.
the findings also said that there was no credible intel that some attack was imminent. so basically it was them saying we could have prevented it, but no one really knew how or that we needed to..
you should actually understand the entire document you are cherry picking from...
I gave you the entire article from a reliably liberal newspaper.

NOWHERE, unless from one of your oft quoted delusional leftist BLOGS, is there a reference to Hillary Clinton’s actions.

If I’m wrong...PROVE IT...

I doubt that you can, you would if you could. So I’m back to ignoring your baseless rants.

Disingenuous, intellectually dishonest. At least the left is consistent.
Responsibility

Petaluma, CA

#41 May 19, 2014
Aprilvue wrote:
<quoted text>
....
Diplomatic Security Service agents/Regional Security Officers informed their headquarters in Washington about the attack just as it was beginning at about 9:40 local time (3:40PM Eastern Time). By 4:30 Eastern, Pentagon officials informed Defense Secretary Leon Panetta about the attack. The Pentagon ordered an unmanned aerial vehicle that was in the air conducting surveillance on militant camps to fly over Benghazi. The drone arrived at 11:10 pm local time (5:10 pm Eastern Time) and began providing a video feed to Washington. At 5:41 pm Eastern Time, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton telephoned CIA Director David Petraeus to coordinate. The CIA, which made up most of the US government's presence in Benghazi, had a ten-member security team at its annex and the State Department believed that this team would assist the consulate in the event of an attack

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#42 May 19, 2014
Ah, wikipedia. I saw that too, but here’s what needs sourcing....

“..in fact, her first call was to the CIA to make sure their assets in Benghazi gave aid, and they were the ones that got there within the hour and saved over thirty people..”

Even if wikipedia was accurate, and it’s in doubt as it conflicts with the Senate committee report, it still doesn’t speak to the claim made by the sock earlier.

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#43 May 19, 2014
Oh, BTW, the wikipedia article dealing with Hillary’s actions sourced a 11/2/2012 WSJ article about the events of Benghazi, not anything more recent.
As we all know, much has changed about what really happened since the Obama administration blamed and was responsible for the incarceration an American citizen for causing the deaths of four Americans...but at least somebody got disciplined...so what difference does it make?

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#44 May 19, 2014
conservative crapola wrote:
<quoted text>
They can't. The adult diaper crowd needs their fux...like tea-m extremist trey trey needs his cocaine.
conservative crapola plays Chopsticks on his Tallywhacker once again. Cute stuff.

Do a curtsy when you're finished:->

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#45 May 19, 2014
Responsibility wrote:
<quoted text>
And your answer is?
I'll give you some help:
“Help fight liberals by donating today!” the NRCC’s website screamed.
If you were paid to make sense, you'd be broke and starving....

....if you weren't moochng off of Welfare Cheese....

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min Guest 1,483,095
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 min Just Think 234,471
News Trump Isn't Bluffing, He'll Deport 11 Million P... (May '16) 2 min positronium 18,217
News The Latest: White House freezes new regulations 2 min 16 TEEN SHOTS 36
News Inside Gays for Trump's Deploraball Dance Party 3 min Cordwainer Trout 5
News OPG report on planned nuclear waste bunker blas... 3 min send it 2 Manitoba 1
News Popovich blasts Donald Trump and aides: They're... 3 min Mikey 54
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 5 min Buffalo Bill 409,575
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 9 min brad 256,676
Donald J Trump, our next president (Mar '16) 3 hr TRUMP 45 2,042
More from around the web