Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 221214 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#107879 Jan 7, 2014
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text> Peer review is riddled with all kinds of problem. Most papers are submitted to true believers. Its not like evos are going to submit papers to IDers for peer review or vice versa. It seems you are holding out a double standard in that you discredit IDers for doing the exact same thing evos do. If your case is so strong then i would think you would relish the opportunity to engage IDers on a public forum. Point out the errors of their ways.
They often do. That's why the rare times ID papers get submitted they're retracted or rejected.

However that doesn't stop the DI from doing their OWN research and publishing in their OWN journals. Like ISCID.

Haven't published anything in 8 years.

Might have something to do with the fact of all the "science" they aren't even doing.

“When you treat people as they ”

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#107880 Jan 7, 2014
well I be wrote:
<quoted text>
So, you have no clue, and have faith in some people that in turn, cannot answer your own questions. Now that is "babble".
Do you? Or do you put your faith in bronze age guesswork?

Honey its not my question, it was chass question and I answered it with FACT, do you have a problem with FACT?
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#107881 Jan 7, 2014
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text> Ah the voice of experience.
<quoted text> Assuming you are correct one can lose all the battles and still win the war. Vietnam proved that. Truth always wins in the end.
Translation: "Satan will get you when you're DEAD!"

Truth is you fundies have been lying for thousands of years.(shrug)
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#107882 Jan 7, 2014
Unsurprisingly Lightbeam's linky to Dennis Jones (who?) is the usual copy-paste of IDcreationist apologetics:

"SCIENTIFIC THEORY: Intelligent Design Theory in Biology is the scientific theory that artificial intervention is a universally necessary condition of the first initiation of life, development of the first cell, and increasing information in the genome of a population leading to greater complexity evidenced by the generation of original biochemical structures."

So what they're saying is that intelligence created life before there was intelligent life.

Now I'm just guessing, but I theorize this paradox is only solved via the application of an invisible Jew wizard.

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#107883 Jan 7, 2014
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
They often do. That's why the rare times ID papers get submitted they're retracted or rejected.
However that doesn't stop the DI from doing their OWN research and publishing in their OWN journals. Like ISCID.
Haven't published anything in 8 years.
Might have something to do with the fact of all the "science" they aren't even doing.
http://www.discovery.org/a/2640

“Do not bend, fold, staple or”

Since: Jan 11

mutilate. Point down range.

#107884 Jan 7, 2014
lightbeamrider wrote:
They publish science in peer-reviewed science journals, but they don't publish their ID religious speculation in these same journals. They don't even submit the ID speculation to these journals. It would be rejected.

The ID and creationist journals don't offer legitimate peer review, because they reject anything that goes against dogma and the agenda.

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#107885 Jan 7, 2014
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>They publish science in peer-reviewed science journals, but they don't publish their ID religious speculation in these same journals. They don't even submit the ID speculation to these journals. It would be rejected.
The ID and creationist journals don't offer legitimate peer review, because they reject anything that goes against dogma and the agenda.
A little fuzzy on your last sentence. What dogma and agenda are you referring to? A lot of your Iders are not Christian. There is an atheist who defends intelligent design. A lot of evos are christian. They just leave God out of the mix when doing their work. Either way, from an outsiders POV there appears to be a cold war going on which is unusual since most of us put aside our differences to do our jobs and work together. Some even become friends in spite of our differences. The animosity between the two camps is disturbing. Hopefully it is mostly cosmetic.

http://www.examiner.com/article/atheist-defen...

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#107886 Jan 7, 2014
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text> A little fuzzy on your last sentence. What dogma and agenda are you referring to? A lot of your Iders are not Christian. There is an atheist who defends intelligent design. A lot of evos are christian. They just leave God out of the mix when doing their work. Either way, from an outsiders POV there appears to be a cold war going on which is unusual since most of us put aside our differences to do our jobs and work together. Some even become friends in spite of our differences. The animosity between the two camps is disturbing. Hopefully it is mostly cosmetic.
http://www.examiner.com/article/atheist-defen...
yes, there are stupid atheists...for the most part they tend to be intelligent.

how can an atheist even consider a designer of the universe? seems he's not an atheist...
Gillette

Fairfield, IA

#107887 Jan 7, 2014
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text> A little fuzzy on your last sentence. What dogma and agenda are you referring to? A lot of your Iders are not Christian.
False. 99% are Protestant evangelicals. There may be one Catholic and a Moonie (Jonathan Wells) for variety.

Read the Wedge Document from the Discovery Institute and you will see why I say that there would be no ID movement if there were no Christianity. They are on a crusade to get Bible Christianity back in the schools, basically, by whatever deceptive strategies they can employ.
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text> A lot of evos are christian. They just leave God out of the mix when doing their work.
Yes, that means they are SCIENTISTS DOING SCIENCE, whatever their personal religious or philosophical beliefs. Get the point?

Contrast that to your ID and Creationists who start with a religious premise and twist everything around to try and fit that. These folks are NOT doing science.
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text>Either way, from an outsiders POV there appears to be a cold war going on which is unusual since most of us put aside our differences to do our jobs and work together.
The reason there is a "cold war" is that the Christians involved have, for decades, try to deceptively invade the science classes of our public schools with their religion and have been beaten back repeatedly by our Supreme and District courts,a s well as by scientists and science organizations all around the nation.
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text> The animosity between the two camps is disturbing. Hopefully it is mostly cosmetic.
No, it runs very deeply, and justifiably so.

If you are an established scientist in biology like Stephen Jay Gould was, for example, how could you ever "work together" with evangelical Christians who ignorantly criticize science by quote-mining your published papers and public comments and try and dishonestly make it seem as if you actually DISPUTE evolution, when instead you are one of the leading lights of evolutions science?

Why would real scientists "work together" with religious apologists who are trying to tear down 150 years of established science in order to further and publicly promote their backward Bible beliefs?

“Up with which, I will not put”

Since: Jul 08

Sao Paulo

#107888 Jan 8, 2014
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> OK, do you agree that English originated in England? if yes, it belongs to them by origin. Ok?
Wow Charles, are you STILL on insisting this point? You sound like a stubborn little kid.
If England actually believed they OWNED English, they would be charging other countries royalties for using it. Imagine having to pay a language tax.

“Up with which, I will not put”

Since: Jul 08

Sao Paulo

#107889 Jan 8, 2014
Gillette wrote:
<quoted text>
...Scroll to the very bottom, where you read:
"6. No apparent, perceived or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the Scriptural record."
In other words, "our strict interpretation of the Bible trumps science, no matter what the scientific evidence says."
Like I said: NOT science, but religious apologetics.
Very good points Gillette, and LOL at #6, which is absolutely ridiculous. Almost like their 'Get-out-of-jail-free' clause.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#107890 Jan 8, 2014
lightbeamrider wrote:
No, that's a pile of apologetics for anti-evolutionism, NOT "ID science" (the term of which is an oxymoron anyway).

That's why you will notice that the ACTUAL peer-reviewed stuff doesn't falsify evolution nor demonstrate (or even mention) ID, and the stuff that does (claim to) bypasses peer-review by being published by their own religious rags.

In the meantime though their "theory", as I already pointed out, is left unexplained.

Note how you can't either, instead preferring spam.
6 posts removed

““You must not lose faith ”

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#107897 Jan 8, 2014
pfft i left of at page 5037

The guy asking insolent questions got called an idiot...that gts me of the hook.

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/evolution/T9Q...

May the new year bring you all you wish for.

Shoot chinese philosophers if need be.

““You must not lose faith ”

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#107898 Jan 8, 2014
JM_Brazil wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow Charles, are you STILL on insisting this point? You sound like a stubborn little kid.
If England actually believed they OWNED English, they would be charging other countries royalties for using it. Imagine having to pay a language tax.
I think the only solution is to reloop him.

I can;t even recall apropos of what this arguement was.
Everybody has some input so i guess it's a cry for attention.

““You must not lose faith ”

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#107899 Jan 8, 2014
Charles Idemi wrote:
So by that premise, English belongs to England.
Your point being?

“Do not bend, fold, staple or”

Since: Jan 11

mutilate. Point down range.

#107900 Jan 8, 2014
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text> A little fuzzy on your last sentence. What dogma and agenda are you referring to? A lot of your Iders are not Christian. There is an atheist who defends intelligent design. A lot of evos are christian. They just leave God out of the mix when doing their work. Either way, from an outsiders POV there appears to be a cold war going on which is unusual since most of us put aside our differences to do our jobs and work together. Some even become friends in spite of our differences. The animosity between the two camps is disturbing. Hopefully it is mostly cosmetic.
http://www.examiner.com/article/atheist-defen...
The dogma would be the existence of an intelligent designer for ID and for creationists, it would be a young earth, the global flood, Adam and Eve and so forth.

I would say that he isn't an atheist if he defends ID. Most of the IDers are Christian though. They have even stated in weak moments that the designer is God. Yes a lot of people that accept the science and the theory of evolution are Christian, or Jewish.

How are you an outsider? You come on here. Your posts show your stand. I would not consider you an outsider. At least in the context of this forum.

Most of the animosity starts with the fundamentalists directed at the science side. The science sends it back to some extent, but they don't tend to start it.

“Do not bend, fold, staple or”

Since: Jan 11

mutilate. Point down range.

#107901 Jan 8, 2014
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>yes, there are stupid atheists...for the most part they tend to be intelligent.
how can an atheist even consider a designer of the universe? seems he's not an atheist...
That was the first thing I thought. If you are an atheist, seems you wouldn't believe a designer exists.

“Do not bend, fold, staple or”

Since: Jan 11

mutilate. Point down range.

#107902 Jan 8, 2014
MAAT wrote:
<quoted text>
I think the only solution is to reloop him.
I can;t even recall apropos of what this arguement was.
Everybody has some input so i guess it's a cry for attention.
You know, I don't remember how the argument started either. It goes all the way back before Charles registered is about all I can remember.

““You must not lose faith ”

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#107903 Jan 8, 2014
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>You know, I don't remember how the argument started either. It goes all the way back before Charles registered is about all I can remember.
I was like god, being here since the creation of this line, or nye there.(those pico-seconds are drat) and did not see it happen. I did not evoke it nor ordain it.
So why, what fore this insolence.
Testing my patience with free will.
Is it jewish? No! That is good, well let it grab a square implement with shoddy doves on it and be burned.
That will show him to behove acording to his Stolen Scriptures!

““You must not lose faith ”

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#107904 Jan 8, 2014
woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>Because it was a backwater, minor little nowhere.
when Pompey finally strode through the gates of jerusalem had long since passed its economic and cultural zenith. Cicero even called it the "hole in the corner" of the Roman empire. the only reason they were even allowed to keep their temple was it was a good way to rule the jews via the high priests they picked.
even when the babylonians conquered the area, Cyrus let the jews return to jerusalem because he considered them an irrelevant backwater of little interest or concern to an empire that stretched across Asia... the jews felt so grateful for this, the prophet Isaiah anointed Cyrus as messiah.
history is fun!
De Angelo of Memphis.((like what...they hold the carpet up when you pass!)
Maybe they were just humble enough to not wanna go a conquer everything that they laid their eyes on like we see in the Caucasians and the Mongolians...tearing the land as they thirsted only for MORE power and MORE territory. Yea, maybe they weren't that much of a threat because they were humble enough to appreciate what they had, which the "big guys" to for weakness!

Two birds...

Well yes Woodtick after having been nuovemeted and enslaved they of the upperclass that make history were indeed pretty glad to be restored. Nowadays one should not expect this.
Yesterday i came across a book that showed the jews had been a bane to various conquerors for centuries.
In Galilee the huge Roman empire lost. The rapta aquila!
Do you really think there would have been so much negative publicity (the gospel at all that) if they had been such an irrelevant backwater.
they lived everywhere and counted at that time 20% of the popuation of the empire. And like the germans and german/anglo-saxon Boudica and the Scott they fought as the Celts also once did.
The Celts were also treated horrifficly.
The Romans even has several walls build. one in Africa, Hadrianus wall and the one spanning al Europe. As long as they could regulate sheep not passing they considerd themselves safe. Eco-terrors those sheep.

De Angelo nothing stopped them but the trouble all invaders have as in being cut of from supply lines.
Even the mere suggestion of any noble gesture i consider misplaced.
Why do you think they razed a town to the ground that was not even in a province of theirs!

Ceasar allready started with misinformation.
And the trouble with him was that he had to be revered like a god.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News This is why the first 100 days is a 'ridiculous... 1 min Geezer 45
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 min VetnorsGate 1,522,327
News Donald Trump on first 100 days: It's a differen... 9 min Fcvk tRump 2
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 22 min AMERICAN SUNSHINE 265,267
News Thousands of demonstrators protest Trump in Atl... 32 min ThomasA 2,060
News Under Trump, ICE arrests soar for migrants with... 42 min Chilli J 225
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 48 min ThomasA 313,980
News Attorney General doesn't realize Hawaii is a state 1 hr spud 332
News Americans have rendered their verdict on the fi... 2 hr Retribution 106
More from around the web