Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 199226 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

“Seventh son”

Since: Dec 10

Will Prevail

#107777 Dec 26, 2013
Kong_ wrote:
<quoted text>
But modern cosmology (science) DOES refute the literal Genesis.
Whether or not there is a God involved.
What you don't think gawd said let the water in the sky come to one place and let dry land appear?
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#107778 Dec 27, 2013
replaytime wrote:
The saddest part about it all is it is not a search of the truth. It is about one side against the other side and both sides lie and make shyt up tying to convince people to come to their side. Neither side knows or will ever know the truth about it. The battle between evolutionists and creationists have became as bad if not worse than the battle between democrats and republicans. If your on their side they will tell you what you want to hear and if your not on their side they will lie to you to try to get you on their side. SMDH
You're really not getting it, bub. The battle between the 'evolutionists' and creationists is political. Evolution already won the scientific debate, long before you were born. Today, there IS no scientific debate over whether or not evolution occurred.

By the way, I've never lied to you to try and get you on "my side". I don't even want you on my side anyway.(shrug)
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#107779 Dec 27, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Both sides have lied. It is that simple. If you deny that then you are a liar.
Except when evolutionary scientists have lied it's evolutionary scientists that have exposed them and corrected their claims.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#107780 Dec 27, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> The same with all world languages. Henceforth, start using that.
BORNEO OWNS ENGLISH!!! Move on!
anonymous

Absecon, NJ

#107781 Dec 27, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
BORNEO OWNS ENGLISH!!! Move on!
Wasn't that copyright to English traded to Atlantis a few year back for the copyright to UNIX?

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#107782 Dec 28, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Both sides have lied. It is that simple. If you deny that then you are a liar.
I cannot speak for every post written for both sides.

I simply want you to back your claims of parity with some real examples, because I doubt you can do it.

We don't need lies and in this evolution debate and I have never knowingly told one in defence of evolution.

So I expect some substance from you, not just blind accusations.

And I expect that you know this is the case but making the claim you have is your own last ditch attempt not to confront the overwhelming weight of evidence that you know is on the side of evolution.

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#107783 Dec 28, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure does sound familiar and he believes God did it and said it way before science had an inkling thought of the BBT <<< I think but could be wrong.
We have good evidence of the BBT. And of evolution, for that matter. None of these things disprove God, only the specific local creation tradition of some primitive goatherds.

And still waiting for a straight answer from you about the lies you claimed have been told on the forum in order to support evolution or the BBT. Admit it, you have nothing substantial.

“Ask Randy From Ballwin”

Since: Mar 13

He Is A Sock Know It All

#107784 Dec 28, 2013
Chimney1 wrote:
<quoted text>
We have good evidence of the BBT. And of evolution, for that matter. None of these things disprove God, only the specific local creation tradition of some primitive goatherds.
And still waiting for a straight answer from you about the lies you claimed have been told on the forum in order to support evolution or the BBT. Admit it, you have nothing substantial.
I said both sides lie. And both sides do. I id not claim that for this forum. I claim in general. Both sides have lied and made shyt up. We all know it.
1 post removed

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#107786 Dec 28, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
I said both sides lie. And both sides do. I id not claim that for this forum. I claim in general. Both sides have lied and made shyt up. We all know it.
I very very rarely see evolutionists lie. Sometimes a mistake can be made. That is not a lie. And many creationists may be honest and only make the mistake of using lying sources.

But there are clearly creationists that lie. Kent Hovvind is my favorite example. He lied not only about evolution, he lied about how much he owed in taxes. The former has no penalty. He learned the hard way that the latter does have a very severe penalty.
anonymous

Absecon, NJ

#107787 Dec 28, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
I very very rarely see evolutionists lie. Sometimes a mistake can be made. That is not a lie. And many creationists may be honest and only make the mistake of using lying sources.
But there are clearly creationists that lie. Kent Hovvind is my favorite example. He lied not only about evolution, he lied about how much he owed in taxes. The former has no penalty. He learned the hard way that the latter does have a very severe penalty.
I see evolutionists lie all the time and it is historically represented by many Eugenics movements. Nowadays, it's usually a politically motivated endorsement of homosexuality but often times it's some rationalization for endorsing corporate greed. I posted a link just a couple of days ago where some economics magazine was taking a current science article and turning it into a condemnation of primitive inbreds, more than a bit ironic considering the breeding habits of aristocratic dynasties.

Mistake or lie? Sorry. "Mistake" is a word game for someone who hasn't been held accountable as yet..

“Dinosaurs survived the flood!”

Since: Jan 11

Jesus probably rode dinosaurs!

#107788 Dec 28, 2013
anonymous wrote:
<quoted text>
I see evolutionists lie all the time and it is historically represented by many Eugenics movements. Nowadays, it's usually a politically motivated endorsement of homosexuality but often times it's some rationalization for endorsing corporate greed. I posted a link just a couple of days ago where some economics magazine was taking a current science article and turning it into a condemnation of primitive inbreds, more than a bit ironic considering the breeding habits of aristocratic dynasties.
Mistake or lie? Sorry. "Mistake" is a word game for someone who hasn't been held accountable as yet..
So do you consider evolutionists those scientists and thinkers that accept the theory and/or work in the field? Or do you consider that group more broadly to include all those that use or misuse the information taken from the field? It sounds like the latter. Being that inclusive, as the driver of a car, I can be considered an automotive manufacturer.

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#107789 Dec 28, 2013
anonymous wrote:
<quoted text>
The truth is that you're a very sad creature.
Likewise.

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#107790 Dec 28, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
BORNEO OWNS ENGLISH!!! Move on!
And by that, the people of Borneo would have been known as the English, but not, who is now the liar?

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#107791 Dec 28, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
I said both sides lie. And both sides do. I id not claim that for this forum. I claim in general. Both sides have lied and made shyt up. We all know it.
You said both sides lie, and we both know you said it in order to imply parity in the case for each side, and you did not exclude this forum.

Now give us examples of evolutionists lying to support their case as creationists have lied to support theirs. Its funny to watch you wriggle as you splutter and babble trying to back out of your claim.

Here are some concrete examples of creationists / IDers being caught in actual lies, some of which were used by creatards right here.

Lie: Coe and Prevot's work in fluctuations in a single magnetic reversal event supports the idea of daily reversals during a "flood" period.

Lie: The RATE deliberate attempts to fool radiometric daters show radiometric dating is unreliable.

Lie: There are no intermediates in the fossil record.

Lie: The nested hierarchy is a made up system that can be applied to any collection of objects.

Lie: We can calculate the odds against abiogenesis (when we do not even know the proposed process)

Lie: The flagellum and the clotting cascade are irreducibly complex.

Lie: All multicellular creatures appeared at the same time in the Cambrian Explosion.

Lie: hypervariable parts of the mtDNA can be used to calibrate the rate of change of the slower mutating parts of the mtDNA

Lie: spiral galaxies cannot maintain their shape for billions of years

Lie: life violates the second law of thermodynamics

Lie: junk DNA is a core and necessary part of the theory of evolution

---------
Every damned day when I log in here I see more utter bollocks being promulgated by creationists / ID ers, which for the most part (i.e. the first 100 times they say it), gets refuted with facts and logic from the actual science. After that, yeah, we get impatient with lying little turds.

But you cannot come up with anything remotely comparable to that list up there just off the top of my head, just feeble attempts to soften your claim without retracting it.

“Ask Randy From Ballwin”

Since: Mar 13

He Is A Sock Know It All

#107792 Dec 29, 2013
Chimney1 wrote:
<quoted text>
You said both sides lie, and we both know you said it in order to imply parity in the case for each side, and you did not exclude this forum.
Now give us examples of evolutionists lying to support their case as creationists have lied to support theirs. Its funny to watch you wriggle as you splutter and babble trying to back out of your claim.
Here are some concrete examples of creationists / IDers being caught in actual lies, some of which were used by creatards right here.
Lie: Coe and Prevot's work in fluctuations in a single magnetic reversal event supports the idea of daily reversals during a "flood" period.
Lie: The RATE deliberate attempts to fool radiometric daters show radiometric dating is unreliable.
Lie: There are no intermediates in the fossil record.
Lie: The nested hierarchy is a made up system that can be applied to any collection of objects.
Lie: We can calculate the odds against abiogenesis (when we do not even know the proposed process)
Lie: The flagellum and the clotting cascade are irreducibly complex.
Lie: All multicellular creatures appeared at the same time in the Cambrian Explosion.
Lie: hypervariable parts of the mtDNA can be used to calibrate the rate of change of the slower mutating parts of the mtDNA
Lie: spiral galaxies cannot maintain their shape for billions of years
Lie: life violates the second law of thermodynamics
Lie: junk DNA is a core and necessary part of the theory of evolution
---------
Every damned day when I log in here I see more utter bollocks being promulgated by creationists / ID ers, which for the most part (i.e. the first 100 times they say it), gets refuted with facts and logic from the actual science. After that, yeah, we get impatient with lying little turds.
But you cannot come up with anything remotely comparable to that list up there just off the top of my head, just feeble attempts to soften your claim without retracting it.
Again are you telling me that no scientists, no one that has researched for evidence of evolution has never lied about their research? Falsified their research? Falsified their findings?

“Dinosaurs survived the flood!”

Since: Jan 11

Jesus probably rode dinosaurs!

#107793 Dec 29, 2013
Chimney1 wrote:
<quoted text>
You said both sides lie, and we both know you said it in order to imply parity in the case for each side, and you did not exclude this forum.
Now give us examples of evolutionists lying to support their case as creationists have lied to support theirs. Its funny to watch you wriggle as you splutter and babble trying to back out of your claim.
Here are some concrete examples of creationists / IDers being caught in actual lies, some of which were used by creatards right here.
Lie: Coe and Prevot's work in fluctuations in a single magnetic reversal event supports the idea of daily reversals during a "flood" period.
Lie: The RATE deliberate attempts to fool radiometric daters show radiometric dating is unreliable.
Lie: There are no intermediates in the fossil record.
Lie: The nested hierarchy is a made up system that can be applied to any collection of objects.
Lie: We can calculate the odds against abiogenesis (when we do not even know the proposed process)
Lie: The flagellum and the clotting cascade are irreducibly complex.
Lie: All multicellular creatures appeared at the same time in the Cambrian Explosion.
Lie: hypervariable parts of the mtDNA can be used to calibrate the rate of change of the slower mutating parts of the mtDNA
Lie: spiral galaxies cannot maintain their shape for billions of years
Lie: life violates the second law of thermodynamics
Lie: junk DNA is a core and necessary part of the theory of evolution
---------
Every damned day when I log in here I see more utter bollocks being promulgated by creationists / ID ers, which for the most part (i.e. the first 100 times they say it), gets refuted with facts and logic from the actual science. After that, yeah, we get impatient with lying little turds.
But you cannot come up with anything remotely comparable to that list up there just off the top of my head, just feeble attempts to soften your claim without retracting it.
Well put.
anonymous

Absecon, NJ

#107794 Dec 30, 2013
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>So do you consider evolutionists those scientists and thinkers that accept the theory and/or work in the field? Or do you consider that group more broadly to include all those that use or misuse the information taken from the field? It sounds like the latter. Being that inclusive, as the driver of a car, I can be considered an automotive manufacturer.
Obviously, the latter. But the term "Evolutionist" suggests a philosophy or ideology that is based on Evolution science.

From WordWeb: evolutionist: a person who believes in organic evolution.

I'm not sure what term that scientists use to describe themselves, but I'm sure it has SOME Greek or Latin in it to make is sound special! Either way, I'm interested in the facts. The conclusions are not absolute.
anonymous

Absecon, NJ

#107795 Dec 30, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Likewise.
Ouch! What button should I press today to wind you up on one of your rants?
anonymous

Absecon, NJ

#107796 Dec 30, 2013
Chimney1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Now give us examples of evolutionists lying to support their case as creationists have lied to support theirs. Its funny to watch you wriggle as you splutter and babble trying to back out of your claim.
Well, I don't often see lies support "their" case as they don't have one agenda, but you certainly have historical examples of frauds like Piltdown Man. Scientists are human. They're looking for fame and money and other political agendas just like anyone else. According to scientific method, we have a system in place to prevent such agendas from taking hold, but personally, I think we live in dark times.

Since: Dec 13

Iasi, Romania

#107797 Dec 30, 2013
Make money staying home. Up to 100$ a day. This is not a joke.
Subscribe here:
http://www.probux.com/...
....and start making your money!!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min Teaman 1,394,854
News Britain pressured for quick EU split as Brexit ... 5 min Synque 21
News EDITORIAL: Immigration system is cruel 5 min tomin cali 1
News African-Americans should start voting for Repub... 5 min Trumping On 192
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 5 min Freespirit8 387,926
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 12 min tina anne 60,036
News Hillary Clinton wavers on Second Amendment righ... 15 min WasteWater 1,016
News Trump Isn't Bluffing, He'll Deport 11 Million P... 37 min An NFL Fan 3,289
News Donald Trump: Brexit is sign of independence de... 56 min abc 177
More from around the web