Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 222264 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

imagine2011

Southaven, MS

#95802 Jul 31, 2013
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>Ever seen the Vatican? Or a megachurch?
"No monetary reward"?
Youse funny.
The Vatican is not an acceptable argument (too much to discuss here) and many false TV like preachers are not honest...

but the majority are honestly doing this work for faith reasons alone and in these churches most of their donations go to benevolence and missions.
imagine2011

Southaven, MS

#95803 Jul 31, 2013
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>Ever seen the Vatican? Or a megachurch?
"No monetary reward"?
Youse funny.
...one more thing...the Pope has accepted evolution and martians (if that tells you anything about why I don't prescribe to their teachings)
imagine2011

Southaven, MS

#95804 Jul 31, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
The same question was asked twice under slightly different wording but in both questions the meat was why is the suns corona so hot. It is typically christian to go round and round asking the same question over and over in the hope of one day getting the answer that suites their belief.
The answer to either version is available on line and with the inkling for a little self education, something it seems you are not fond of.
Not sure what you mean by BYO (is it British Youth Orchestra? Or Bring Your Own?) but I am certain that science has progressed considerably in the last 50 years. And yes they understand the entire mechanism of the sun, completely. Just because you and your godbot buddies don’t is your problem. And why are you moving the goalposts? There was no mention of the centre of the sun (core) in your previous post, the question was about the corona.
FYI, The Sun is made of 74% hydrogen, 24% helium and 1% oxygen The remaining 1% of the Sun is made of iron, nickel, oxygen, silicon, sulphur, magnesium, carbon, neon, calcium and chromium.
Wrong, there are several hundred similar such solar systems that can now be measured if not observed. our solar system is not unique,
However you are welcome to continue with your bronze age ideas of “d’oh I don’t know so god musta did it by magic” but please don’t attempt to justify your belief by offering outdated science backed up by lies. Remember we are not all as deliberately ignorant as you.
Billions of years old=BYO
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong, there are several hundred similar such solar systems that can now be measured if not observed. our solar system is not unique,
Our solar system is unique in that the sun, moon and earth are set up to be the perfect home for life. Show me another set up like ours, I'd be interested to see that.

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#95805 Jul 31, 2013
imagine2011 wrote:
<quoted text>
You make me laugh with your 'mind your 9th commandment' entries in just about all of your posts, lol!
What reason would creationists have to lie?
There is no monetary reward for believing in creationism.
On the other hand, Evo-scientists have a very lucrative, financial gain and motive for keeping their story spread.
(psssst...they get to keep their jobs)
That is a very good question.

Why would a creationist have to lie?

It can be shown how almost every creationist ever lies time after time. Supposedly they have evidence of creation but they never post any. My conclusion is that with lying they have nothing. They seem to think that lying for Jesus is okay.

It really isn't.

Now what incentive do scientists have for lying? Keeping their jobs? Please dream on. If a scientist is caught in a serious lie about his work he will be canned. Not only that he will not be hired as a research scientist again for a very long period of time.

He could work for some private industry. A lot of them do need scientists and he could continue his research on his own time with his own money and if he ever contributes something of substance that way he might be forgiven.

You cannot show a lying scientist who was not greatly harmed by his lies. We can show you several lying creationists who make quite a bit of money off of their lies and it never ever lands them in trouble, oops.... unless they don't pay their taxes.

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#95806 Jul 31, 2013
imagine2011 wrote:
<quoted text>
Billions of years old=BYO
<quoted text>
Our solar system is unique in that the sun, moon and earth are set up to be the perfect home for life. Show me another set up like ours, I'd be interested to see that.
There have been quite a few planets discovered in the "Goldilocks Zone" of their own star. I am not so sure if the Moon played a critical role in the evolution of life. Did the tides from the Moon help or hinder evolution? At any rate here is an article of only one example of where another star may have a planet with life around it:

http://www.futurity.org/science-technology/ea...

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#95807 Jul 31, 2013
imagine2011 wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem is with your "plucked out of the air' aging process, that if you have several scientist separately carefully observe and test, they ALL come up with DIFFERENT DATES.
Explain this.
(hint: they're making this s*** up as they go)
Oh, that's easy to explain.

Your claim is pure made up bullshit.

Scientists are very specific when they date an item on how they found the item. How they harvested it. How they dated it, etc.. If a date is not repeatable it is worthless.

Now if a scientist gets a different date from another scientist and he finds where the other scientist made an error, and other scientists do the same work and agree with him, then we have a valid date.

Dates are never "Plucked out of the air".

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#95808 Jul 31, 2013
imagine2011 wrote:
<quoted text>
...one more thing...the Pope has accepted evolution and martians (if that tells you anything about why I don't prescribe to their teachings)
I see your record of inaccuracies continues.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#95809 Jul 31, 2013
imagine2011 wrote:
<quoted text>
Billions of years old=BYO
<quoted text>
Our solar system is unique in that the sun, moon and earth are set up to be the perfect home for life. Show me another set up like ours, I'd be interested to see that.
The planets orbiting Gliese 581 is one possibility.

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#95810 Jul 31, 2013
imagine2011 wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem is with your "plucked out of the air' aging process, that if you have several scientist separately carefully observe and test, they ALL come up with DIFFERENT DATES.
Explain this.
(hint: they're making this s*** up as they go)
Cite your source.

Oh, and "different dates" within about a 3% error don't count.

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#95811 Jul 31, 2013
imagine2011 wrote:
<quoted text>
The Vatican is not an acceptable argument (too much to discuss here) and many false TV like preachers are not honest...
but the majority are honestly doing this work for faith reasons alone and in these churches most of their donations go to benevolence and missions.
Pfft. One Christian is much the same as another. Unless you're a connoisseur.

A difference that makes no difference is no difference.

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#95812 Jul 31, 2013
imagine2011 wrote:
<quoted text>
The Vatican is not an acceptable argument (too much to discuss here) and many false TV like preachers are not honest...
but the majority are honestly doing this work for faith reasons alone and in these churches most of their donations go to benevolence and missions.
Nevertheless.

Organized religion is a quest for temporal power.

It's never been anything else.
Dak-Original

Slough, UK

#95813 Jul 31, 2013
imagine2011 wrote:
<quoted text>
These fish could never have evolved gradually to become immune to the poisonous plants which they live among or they would have ALL died off before they acquired this "SLOWLY EVOLVING IMMUNITY".
Isn't that what evo's teach that evolution is so slow moving, we can never witness it?
Majority of its earlier populations must have died before both organism realised interdependence! That is how evolution works. Do you know that white Europeans have 10% of population which has protection to HIV only because 35% of earlier population perished in bubonic plague about 900 years ago.

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#95814 Jul 31, 2013
imagine2011 wrote:
<quoted text>
...one more thing...the Pope has accepted evolution and martians (if that tells you anything about why I don't prescribe to their teachings)
You've already lost near half of your young people.

How the heck do you expect to create the next generation of halfwits?

"The poll by the Public Religion Research Institute found that 44 percent – nearly half – of young evangelicals between the ages of 18 to 29 favor allowing gays and lesbians to marry."

Here's the link: http://www.nola.com/religion/index.ssf/2011/0...

You're hemorraging believers and homophobes.

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#95815 Jul 31, 2013
imagine2011 wrote:
<quoted text>
This is exactly how many feel about you guys giving us an estimate of time for example: 40,000 years, 4.6 Billion years, 50 Million years.
Sounds like it is numbers pulled out the air, to many people.
That is only true until you look into the reasons that scientists propose those numbers. For example, that 4.6 billion for Earth is a long process of refinement. Why don't you read up on the history of Earth's age estimate and learn a bit about the processes scientists go through to arrive at a figure?

Remember, they started only with the preconception that 6000 years was what the Bible said, and the earliest geologists marched out into the world really believing that and horribly surprised that the world did not seem to fit their preconceptions. The notion of a 6000 year old world was dead by 200 years ago, well before the theory of evolution existed, by the way.

Try this for a starter...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#95816 Jul 31, 2013
imagine2011 wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem is with your "plucked out of the air' aging process, that if you have several scientist separately carefully observe and test, they ALL come up with DIFFERENT DATES.
Explain this.
(hint: they're making this s*** up as they go)
Learning the truth about the age of Earth was and is a process , just like learning anything. If you want to know how the process in discovering the age of Earth went then this is the best way here.
Science is a process, one that progresses with new discovery and we haven't discovered everything about this planet yet , but have a vast amount of knowledge that has accumulated over the years by the progression of science.

We now have the ability to expand our knowledge about the universe, but are barely more than fledglings when it comes to that. But as far as the Earth you can learn what the scientists before leaned and how here if you really want to know.
I have my doubts you want to do anything but argue though.

imagine2011

Southaven, MS

#95817 Jul 31, 2013
Chimney1 wrote:
<quoted text>
That is only true until you look into the reasons that scientists propose those numbers. For example, that 4.6 billion for Earth is a long process of refinement. Why don't you read up on the history of Earth's age estimate and learn a bit about the processes scientists go through to arrive at a figure?
Remember, they started only with the preconception that 6000 years was what the Bible said, and the earliest geologists marched out into the world really believing that and horribly surprised that the world did not seem to fit their preconceptions. The notion of a 6000 year old world was dead by 200 years ago, well before the theory of evolution existed, by the way.
Try this for a starter...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
The Bible does not say that the world is only 6000 years old, it tells of the years that humans have lived on earth, when they were born and died, who was in power, etc....We add the years that way.

Remember, everything was created first and then man last.

God actually gives us no clues to truly understand the age of the universe. He does tell us we would not understand what He understands and that His time is not the same as our time.

Just as scripture states:

1. Scientist still do not understand everything about the universe and probably never will.

2. Time in space and in other galaxies and other solar systems is different than our time on earth.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#95818 Jul 31, 2013
imagine2011 wrote:
<quoted text>
The Bible does not say that the world is only 6000 years old, it tells of the years that humans have lived on earth, when they were born and died, who was in power, etc....We add the years that way.
Remember, everything was created first and then man last.
God actually gives us no clues to truly understand the age of the universe. He does tell us we would not understand what He understands and that His time is not the same as our time.
Just as scripture states:
1. Scientist still do not understand everything about the universe and probably never will.
2. Time in space and in other galaxies and other solar systems is different than our time on earth.
Chapter and verse?

“Leave That Thing Alone!”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#95819 Jul 31, 2013
imagine2011 wrote:
<quoted text>
The Bible does not say that the world is only 6000 years old, it tells of the years that humans have lived on earth, when they were born and died, who was in power, etc....We add the years that way.
Remember, everything was created first and then man last.
God actually gives us no clues to truly understand the age of the universe. He does tell us we would not understand what He understands and that His time is not the same as our time.
Just as scripture states:
1. Scientist still do not understand everything about the universe and probably never will.
2. Time in space and in other galaxies and other solar systems is different than our time on earth.
LOL! It's amazing that folks like you can post something like that and NOT want to slap the stupid out of yourself!

“Up with which, I will not put”

Since: Jul 08

Sao Paulo

#95820 Jul 31, 2013
imagine2011 wrote:
<quoted text>
...Our solar system is unique in that the sun, moon and earth are set up to be the perfect home for life. Show me another set up like ours, I'd be interested to see that.
Earth was not "set up" to support life Imagine, life adapted to what Earth had to offer, and has evolved to who we are today.

Imagine this; If you have an infinite quantity of monkeys banging on an infinite amount of pianos for an infinite amount of time, eventually one will reproduce a perfect rendition of a Mozart masterpiece.

Now consider an infinite universe with an infinite amount of solar systems with an infinite amount of planets and tell me you honestly believe we are the only life-bearing planet in existence.
Lol – I know, of course you wouldn't think such an absurd thought. Afterall, no one is that close-minded.

Right?

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#95821 Jul 31, 2013
imagine2011 wrote:
<quoted text>

Just as scripture states:
1. Scientist still do not understand everything about the universe and probably never will.
Only because the more we find out about nature, the more questions are raised. Of course we will never learn EVERYTHING about the Universe, but we will continue to learn MORE than we did yesterday.
imagine2011 wrote:
<quoted text>
2. Time in space and in other galaxies and other solar systems is different than our time on earth.
The Bible never referred to "other galaxies" or "other solar systems", other than what you're trying to read into certain Bible verses.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 2 min Elerby 26,782
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 min USAsince1680 1,582,478
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 7 min JCPete 287,743
News Ohio to feel the Bern again 7 min blind tomato 6
News Antifa: A Look at the Antifascist Movement Conf... 8 min 13th Angel 45
News Dems risk culture war fight in Charlottesville ... 10 min 13th Angel 76
News House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi calls for re... 26 min Holy Guacamole 21
News Dear Trump Voters: The 1950's Aren't Coming Back 2 hr The Rooster 1,490
More from around the web