<sigh><quoted text> If truly, you guys have the so called evidence, there would be no need for the debate, " evolution versus creation.
You seem to think that you simply stating something then refusing to back it up constitutes debate.
Reading back through this thread it is apparent that evidence for evolution has been presented - but you can't come up with an argument against it - this isn't debate.
You have not produced evidence against evolution - this isn't debate.
Now the same thing happens in the community where it actually matters (the scientific one)
Which is why there is no controversy in science on evolution.
But why not up your game?
Present what you think is the best evidence AGAINST evolution
Now that would be a debate
One argument for evolution I would present is ERVs and the correlation with the heirarchies we deduce from other lines of evidence.
Now dispute that -
that would be a debate
So far you seem to just make assertions that you can't/won't back up