Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 216930 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#50891 Oct 7, 2012
Questions for Evolutionists:

"Living things look like they were designed, so how do evolutionists know that they were not designed? Richard Dawkins wrote,“biology is the study of complicated things that have the appearance of having been designed with a purpose.”4 Francis Crick, the co-discoverer of the double helix structure of DNA, wrote,“Biologists must constantly keep in mind that what they see was not designed, but rather evolved.”5 The problem for evolutionists is that living things show too much design. Who objects when an archaeologist says that pottery points to human design? Yet if someone attributes the design in living things to a designer, that is not acceptable. Why should science be restricted to naturalistic causes rather than logical causes? See: Is the design explanation legitimate?

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#50892 Oct 7, 2012
Questions for Evolutionists:

"How did multi-cellular life originate? How did cells adapted to individual survival ‘learn’ to cooperate and specialize (including undergoing programmed cell death) to create complex plants and animals? See: Evolution of multicellularity: what is required?

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#50893 Oct 7, 2012
Questions for Evolutionists:

"How did sex originate? Asexual reproduction gives up to twice as much reproductive success (‘fitness’) for the same resources as sexual reproduction, so how could the latter ever gain enough advantage to be selected? And how could mere physics and chemistry invent the complementary apparatuses needed at the same time (non-intelligent processes cannot plan for future coordination of male and female organs). See: Argument: Evolution of sex.

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#50894 Oct 7, 2012
Questions for Evolutionists:

"Why are the (expected) countless millions of transitional fossils missing? Darwin noted the problem and it still remains. The evolutionary family trees in textbooks are based on imagination, not fossil evidence. Famous Harvard paleontologist (and evolutionist), Stephen Jay Gould, wrote,“The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology”.6 Other evolutionist fossil experts also acknowledge the problem. See: That quote!—about the missing transitional fossils.

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#50895 Oct 7, 2012
Questions for Evolutionists:

"How do ‘living fossils’ remain unchanged over supposed hundreds of millions of years, if evolution has changed worms into humans in the same time frame? Professor Gould wrote,“the maintenance of stability within species must be considered as a major evolutionary problem.”7 See: Living fossils: a powerful argument for creation.

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#50896 Oct 7, 2012
Now spamming the site could be grounds for banning, I would suggest that you refrain from such practices.

All of your questions have been answered. Why don't you ask them politely? We know that you have admitted that you don't want to see the answers.

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#50897 Oct 7, 2012
President Starky wrote:
Questions for Evolutionists:
"How could mutations—accidental copying mistakes (DNA ‘letters’ exchanged, deleted or added, genes duplicated, chromosome inversions, etc.)—create the huge volumes of information in the DNA of living things? How could such errors create 3 billion letters of DNA information to change a microbe into a microbiologist? There is information for how to make proteins but also for controlling their use—much like a cookbook contains the ingredients as well as the instructions for how and when to use them. One without the other is useless. See: Meta-information: An impossible conundrum for evolution. Mutations are known for their destructive effects, including over 1,000 human diseases such as hemophilia. Rarely are they even helpful. But how can scrambling existing DNA information create a new biochemical pathway or nano-machines with many components, to make ‘goo-to-you’ evolution possible? E.g., How did a 32-component rotary motor like ATP synthase (which produces the energy currency, ATP, for all life), or robots like kinesin (a ‘postman’ delivering parcels inside cells) originate? See: The evolution train’s a-comin’(Sorry, a-goin’—in the wrong direction).
That is easy. By applying selection to natural variation. You have heard of the thought experiment of having a huge number of monkeys typing on a type writer that eventually they would create all of the works of Shakespeare? Now if you use pure random numbers it would still take an inordinately long time, perhaps longer than the life of the universe to happen. But when natural selection is added to the mix it becomes almost child's play. Someone wrote a computer simulation of this and fairly quickly had generated over 90% of the works of the Bard.

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#50898 Oct 7, 2012
President Starky wrote:
Questions for Evolutionists:
"How do ‘living fossils’ remain unchanged over supposed hundreds of millions of years, if evolution has changed worms into humans in the same time frame? Professor Gould wrote,“the maintenance of stability within species must be considered as a major evolutionary problem.”7 See: Living fossils: a powerful argument for creation.
Again easy. If a creature is well adapted for a particular niche and there are no major changes in that niche there is no reason for a specie to evolve. A specie can evolve, it does not have to evolve.

“WISDOM IS A GIFT”

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#50899 Oct 7, 2012
Subduction Zone wrote:
Now spamming the site could be grounds for banning, I would suggest that you refrain from such practices.
All of your questions have been answered. Why don't you ask them politely? We know that you have admitted that you don't want to see the answers.
I happen to find these questions very interesting as well as on topic.
I may not understand all the science involved but the questions are very provocative and intelligent.

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#50900 Oct 7, 2012
President Starky wrote:
Questions for Evolutionists:
"How did the DNA code originate? The code is a sophisticated language system with letters and words where the meaning of the words is unrelated to the chemical properties of the letters—just as the information on this page is not a product of the chemical properties of the ink (or pixels on a screen). What other coding system has existed without intelligent design? How did the DNA coding system arise without it being created? See: The genetic information code points to an intelligent source.
It is not a sophisticated language. Where did you get that idea? It is more of a recipe than anything else. Short story DNA evolved from RNA.
1 post removed

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#50902 Oct 7, 2012
Subduction Zone wrote:
Now spamming the site could be grounds for banning, I would suggest that you refrain from such practices.
All of your questions have been answered. Why don't you ask them politely? We know that you have admitted that you don't want to see the answers.
Report it to Topix then.
I placed quotation marks before each question.
Why does it bother you so much?
All I'm doing is my homework on the topic.
Suddenly you feel threatened by this information and want to suppress my freedom of speech.
Typical liberal!

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#50903 Oct 7, 2012
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Again easy. If a creature is well adapted for a particular niche and there are no major changes in that niche there is no reason for a specie to evolve. A specie can evolve, it does not have to evolve.
"Niche" is your scientific answer?
Fail!

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#50904 Oct 7, 2012
FALCONER wrote:
<quoted text>
I happen to find these questions very interesting as well as on topic.
I may not understand all the science involved but the questions are very provocative and intelligent.
They don't want dialogue.
They want to dominate and suppress opposing opinions.

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#50905 Oct 7, 2012
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
That is easy. By applying selection to natural variation. You have heard of the thought experiment of having a huge number of monkeys typing on a type writer that eventually they would create all of the works of Shakespeare? Now if you use pure random numbers it would still take an inordinately long time, perhaps longer than the life of the universe to happen. But when natural selection is added to the mix it becomes almost child's play. Someone wrote a computer simulation of this and fairly quickly had generated over 90% of the works of the Bard.
Random numbers?
Fail!

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Since: Jun 11

Evolution is true.....

#50906 Oct 7, 2012
President Starky wrote:
Questions for Evolutionists:
"How did new biochemical pathways, which involve multiple enzymes working together in sequence, originate? Every pathway and nano-machine requires multiple protein/enzyme components to work. How did lucky accidents create even one of the components, let alone 10 or 20 or 30 at the same time, often in a necessary programmed sequence. Evolutionary biochemist Franklin Harold wrote,“we must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian accounts of the evolution of any biochemical or cellular system, only a variety of wishful speculations.”3 See: Design in living organisms (motors: ATP synthase)(includes animation).
You need to take up all your crap with evolutionary scientists. Trouble is they generally don't want to waste time on your creationist bulls--t. There is nothing that creationists have come up with in the last 25 years that real scientists haven't been able to discredit.

Creationist are just dead wrong in everything they have brought up.

Christianity is a man-made religion, just like ALL of the others.

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#50907 Oct 7, 2012
Questions for Evolutionists:

"How did blind chemistry create mind/ intelligence, meaning, altruism and morality? If everything evolved, and we invented God, as per evolutionary teaching, what purpose or meaning is there to human life? Should students be learning nihilism (life is meaningless) in science classes? See: G.K. Chesterton: Darwinism is ‘An attack upon thought itself’.

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#50908 Oct 7, 2012
Questions for Evolutionists:

Why is evolutionary ‘just-so’ story-telling tolerated? Evolutionists often use flexible story-telling to ‘explain’ observations contrary to evolutionary theory. NAS(USA) member Dr Philip Skell wrote,“Darwinian explanations for such things are often too supple: Natural selection makes humans self-centered and aggressive—except when it makes them altruistic and peaceable. Or natural selection produces virile men who eagerly spread their seed—except when it prefers men who are faithful protectors and providers. When an explanation is so supple that it can explain any behavior, it is difficult to test it experimentally, much less use it as a catalyst for scientific discovery.”8 See:‘Just-so’ stories of sex and family life.

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#50909 Oct 7, 2012
Questions for Evolutionists:

Where are the scientific breakthroughs due to evolution? Dr Marc Kirschner, chair of the Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, stated:“In fact, over the last 100 years, almost all of biology has proceeded independent of evolution, except evolutionary biology itself. Molecular biology, biochemistry, physiology, have not taken evolution into account at all.”9 Dr Skell wrote,“It is our knowledge of how these organisms actually operate, not speculations about how they may have arisen millions of years ago, that is essential to doctors, veterinarians, farmers ….”10 Evolution actually hinders medical discovery.11 Then why do schools and universities teach evolution so dogmatically, stealing time from experimental biology that so benefits humankind? See: Is evolution relevant or helpful to real science?

“Stuffs gettin better ”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#50910 Oct 7, 2012
thewordofme wrote:
<quoted text>
You need to take up all your crap with evolutionary scientists. Trouble is they generally don't want to waste time on your creationist bulls--t. There is nothing that creationists have come up with in the last 25 years that real scientists haven't been able to discredit.
Creationist are just dead wrong in everything they have brought up.
Christianity is a man-made religion, just like ALL of the others.
But i thought all the experts were on here.
Hahahahaha!

This isn;t about Christianity.

Its about Creationism vs evolution.
DUH!

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#50911 Oct 7, 2012
President Starky wrote:
<quoted text>
Report it to Topix then.
I placed quotation marks before each question.
Why does it bother you so much?
All I'm doing is my homework on the topic.
Suddenly you feel threatened by this information and want to suppress my freedom of speech.
Typical liberal!
Spamming is rude and inconsiderate. You are not doing your homework, you are attempting a Gish Gallup. It is a dishonest technique used by cretinists where they spout a whole bunch of untrue claims and are not really interested in the truth of the matter.

And as I said, I don't report people. I am sometimes guilty of breaking the rules here myself. To report people would therefore make me a creationist, oops I mean hypocrite.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Colleges pushed to note sexual misconduct on tr... 3 min clay 14
News If Donald Trump Was President, Here's What Woul... (Oct '15) 3 min king of kings 13,205
News Thousands of people march during rally at Bosto... 4 min Sandra 2,318
News Study: 'Obamacare' repeal-only would make 30M u... 4 min o see the light 71
News Trump close to naming retired Marine general to... 4 min Quirky 31
News Barbara Bush: Sarah Palin should stay in Alaska (Nov '10) 6 min Sugar3838 4,779
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 8 min Im Better than You 404,363
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 17 min Incognito4Ever 1,460,347
News Trump Isn't Bluffing, He'll Deport 11 Million P... (May '16) 59 min Xrcb 14,932
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 1 hr AMERICAN SUNSHINE 253,598
News Trump says cancel new Air Force One: Costs 'out... 1 hr Mothra 149
More from around the web