Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Jan 22, 2008 Read more: Newsday 309,318
Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision. Read more
worships reality

AOL

#312182 Sep 25, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>I've never seen the Christian God.
you may very well have without even knowing it. what you mean is you "believe" you've never seen the christian god, shovel.
grumpy

Pomona, NY

#312183 Sep 25, 2013
sassy jm wrote:
<quoted text> Of course. For instance, if you were going to hit me, I have a right to stop you by putting up my fist. I wouldn't stab you though or shoot yohr head off.
Okay let's have it grumpy. Go and tell me that a baby is threatening his/her mom while inutero and that she therefore has a right to kill that child.
My 10 month old threw her glass bottle at me one day. Should i have the rigt to kill her in self defense?
My friend was telling me just about a half of an hohr ago that her husband is a pain in the ass and that the stress is killing her. She feels like shes going to have a stroke. What do you suggest grumpy? A bullet between his eyes or should she choke him.
Out of self defense, of COURSE ;)
But if a fetus is a human being, doesn't a woman have the right to protect herself from the damage the fetus will cause?
The woman has no other defense against the fetus.
You could have dodged the bottle. Your friend could have left her husband. But the woman has no other defense against the fetus.
Of course, if the fetus is not a person.....
Ink

Wynnewood, PA

#312184 Sep 25, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
And yet it happens here daily. The bible is an ancient text translated into many languages, interpreted by many different people and heavy on metaphor and symbolism. Humans scripted the bible so we clearly know what offended the people of the times. God? Not so much. God was merely a manifestation of their somewhat primitive minds. God, like Zeus, was anything the people wanted him to be...loving, hateful, mass murdering, forgiving...anything.
And you are more than welcome to that belief.
Ink

Wynnewood, PA

#312185 Sep 25, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, but I believe C's question was can TWO non-Catholics marry in a Catholic church. She can correct me if I'm wrong.
You're wrong as usual.
worships reality

AOL

#312186 Sep 25, 2013
Husker Du wrote:
<quoted text>You are frustrated, menopausal and a nervous wreck, Pretty sure your blood pressure is through the roof by the way you post, all those nasty dirty words you use. Maybe you need to revisit the Church and rediscover Christ.
her name calling, yelling(caps) and seething anger is apparent in just about all her posts.
what's even more amusing is watching her continuous denials...

i swear i'm calm
i swear i'm not angry
i swear i'm not wrong
i swear i don't lie
i swear i'm not on here 24/7
i swear i have a life
i swear i don't eat butter and bacon sandwiches

is there anyone else here who spends more time defending themselves against posters who in reality don't know her from adam?
Ink

Wynnewood, PA

#312187 Sep 25, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
C asked about TWO non-Catholics.
It is so tiring to have to look stuff up for you all the time,

C said
I'm not a former Catholic, nor did I ever claim to be. I had no idea a Catholic could marry someone not of their faith in the Catholic church. Can another Catholic, other than Knit, confirm this?
Ink

Wynnewood, PA

#312188 Sep 25, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
I see you still haven't seen a doctor about that lying virus you've caught.
I am not lying. That's my opinion. I truthfully believe it to be the case.

Take the hate for anyone in the news who has worked at an abortion clinic and became disgusted with the inhumanity of abortion and has spoken out about it. Only venom for them.
Ink

Wynnewood, PA

#312189 Sep 25, 2013
Bitner wrote:
Okay, here is C's post from Monday.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...
"Who said that it did? Are you telling me that a Catholic priest would be willing to marry Baptists, Protestants, Muslims or Atheists in a Catholic Church? Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe they do."
She did not specifically ask about two non-Catholics, but it seems that was what she was asking, from her words. If she was not, she can correct me.
"I'm not a former Catholic, nor did I ever claim to be. I had no idea a Catholic could marry someone not of their faith in the Catholic church. Can another Catholic, other than Knit, confirm this?"
1 post removed

“Don't forget to”

Since: Sep 09

smile

#312191 Sep 25, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah. I stand corrected :)
Looks like we were reading the same book but on different pages.
:-)
1 post removed
Forum

Carlsbad, NM

#312193 Sep 25, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, but I believe C's question was can TWO non-Catholics marry in a Catholic church. She can correct me if I'm wrong.
Non Catholics are baptized, make first communion,
and are confirmed before they can receive the Sacrament
of Marriage. There adult classes.
1 post removed
Ink

Wynnewood, PA

#312195 Sep 25, 2013
Forum wrote:
<quoted text>
Non Catholics are baptized, make first communion,
and are confirmed before they can receive the Sacrament
of Marriage. There adult classes.
Are you sure?

A Baptized Christian

Both partners do not have to be a Catholic in order to be sacramentally married in the Catholic Church, but both must be baptized Christians (and at least one must be a Catholic). Non-Christians cannot receive the sacraments. For a Catholic to marry a non-Catholic Christian, express permission is required from his or her bishop. A Catholic can marry an unbaptized person, but such marriages are natural marriages only; they are not sacramental marriages. The Church, therefore, discourages them and requires a Catholic who wishes to marry an unbaptized person to receive a special dispensation from his or her bishop. Still, if the dispensation is granted, a non-sacramental marriage is valid and can take place inside of a Catholic church.
1 post removed

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#312197 Sep 25, 2013
Like it or not, a woman has the right to determine if a pregnancy will continue or not. If she perceives that pregnancy to be a threat, then it is.

Your friend is a doormat. NOBODY can stress you out without your permission. Doesn't she know where the door is?
sassy jm wrote:
<quoted text> Of course. For instance, if you were going to hit me, I have a right to stop you by putting up my fist. I wouldn't stab you though or shoot yohr head off.
Okay let's have it grumpy. Go and tell me that a baby is threatening his/her mom while inutero and that she therefore has a right to kill that child.
My 10 month old threw her glass bottle at me one day. Should i have the rigt to kill her in self defense?
My friend was telling me just about a half of an hohr ago that her husband is a pain in the ass and that the stress is killing her. She feels like shes going to have a stroke. What do you suggest grumpy? A bullet between his eyes or should she choke him.
Out of self defense, of COURSE ;)

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#312198 Sep 25, 2013
You're delusional. I don't need validation from any other person for anything. I support a woman's choice, period.
sassy jm wrote:
<quoted text>You spending your life on an abortion forum doesn't bother me at all. IMHO, you proaborts are all here to hear truth. Obviously, your conscience is bothering you. You NEED validation for what your supporting as choice.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#312199 Sep 25, 2013
Wash your fu**ing produce, idiot. As for meat, animals eat all kinds of horrible things when free-ranged. But the reality is that, regardless, their digestive systems filter out most objectionable compounds regardless of origin. After that, cooking further breaks down any compounds left, and finally OUR digestive process takes care of the rest.

The fact is that not one case of human disease has been traced to "non-organic" meat. Fish, in fact are safer if farmed instead of free.
sassy jm wrote:
<quoted text>Sooooooo....eating animals that have been forced fed junk while caged that have been injected with hormones, and eating chemicals and pesticides on fruit and veggies or using products that have all kinds of God knows what in them,....is just as good as NOT.
LMAO!
What a puppet fool you are.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#312200 Sep 25, 2013
The fates were implacable, but hera was glenn close-level scary!
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
And Hera fixed his wagon a lot, too.
feces for jesus

Westbury, NY

#312201 Sep 25, 2013
Husker Du wrote:
<quoted text>Jesus is God.
You had a mispelling there..

jesus is gone
The Weimar Republic

Cummington, MA

#312202 Sep 25, 2013
feces for jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
You had a mispelling there..
jesus is gone
Jewish Psychological and Political Warfare (Part II)

by editor Jonas Alexis of Veterans Today dotcom

A compelling article by Jonas Alexis who never seems to disappoint.

Subtitles:

WHILHELM REICH TAUGHT PRIESTS HOW TO BE TITILLATED
LIBERATE THE JEWISH BOYS LIBIDO!
THE ZIONIST BURDEN
ROUHANI VS. NETANYAHU
POPE FRANCIS AND THE JEWS

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/09/24/jewis ...
STO

Vallejo, CA

#312203 Sep 25, 2013
sassy jm wrote:
<quoted text> First of all, your assumption that condom use equates to no pregnancy, is totally ignorant.
God forbids sex outside of marriage. It was meant to be used within a marriage for the procreation of children(first and foremost). Promoting a sinful act is wrong, participating in a sinful act is wrong and suggesting a false sense of avoiding the natural result of that act is sinful. You went from giving into a sinful temptation to dismissing that sin and oping to rid yourself of the natural result of that act.
It's not a temptation sin anymore, it's a completely mind made up 'I'm going to do this regardless of offending our Lord and that's that". It becomes premeditated .
It's equates to giving into "a one time"temptation to cheat on your wife with your neighbor vs the attitude of "oh well I cheated already on my wife, what's one more romp in the back of my car as if it makes any difference".
At the temptation to sin(tegardless of that sin) we ought to go to God to give us graces and strength to avoid it and if we give in to the temptation, we should ask for forgiveness...not premeditate the next occurance.
So I'm right.

According to your belief, fornicators are forbidden from using condoms. Instead, they are ordered to accept any consequences that may have been avoided by using a condom -- pregnancy and/or STDs.

I'm glad I wasn't raised in your f*cked up religion.

I don't get why you'd want to exacerbate the risks that lead to unwanted pregnancy. Because, as you know, it's the unwanted ones that are aborted.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#312204 Sep 25, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
So I'm right.
According to your belief, fornicators are forbidden from using condoms. Instead, they are ordered to accept any consequences that may have been avoided by using a condom -- pregnancy and/or STDs.
I'm glad I wasn't raised in your f*cked up religion.
I don't get why you'd want to exacerbate the risks that lead to unwanted pregnancy. Because, as you know, it's the unwanted ones that are aborted.
She wants unmarried women to sew their legs shut until properly united to a man, by the RCC, and to attempt gestation of each and every resulting pregnancy, regardless of circumstances. She doesn't give a damn what the guys do, married or not.
Katie

Kent, WA

#312205 Sep 25, 2013
worships reality wrote:
<quoted text>
even if it wasn't a possibility that she would choose to abort, her pregnancy would still be subject to miscarriage which is still an abortion and still at the behest and whim of the deity who "allows' it, as you screwballs are always pointing out. so yes, 100% of embryos/fetuses are subject to death at someone's whim.
"you" are going to dumb something down? lol
So you're going to side with Ink and believe that 100% of Gays do not face murder, but that 100% of embryo/fetuses do?

Wow.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Indiana backlash: What you need to know 2 min Cochran 153
News Bristol Palin to marry U.S. Medal of Honor winn... 6 min The Cure 557
News New Jersey US Sen. Robert Menendez indicted on ... 6 min Jiminiy Schlitz 3
News Ferguson Police Are Being Relieved Of Their Dut... (Aug '14) 9 min The Cure 6,212
News Indiana House OKs religious objection bill by w... 9 min serfs up 186
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 14 min Agents of Corruption 155,554
News The Hoosier Nuremberg Laws 15 min Spuds 126
News Hillary approval ratings slip after State email... 1 hr serfs up 40
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 2 hr Agents of Corruption 320,502
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 hr woodtick57 1,208,344
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 5 hr Sunshine 176,186
More from around the web