Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 336650 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Gtown71

United States

#292503 Apr 16, 2013
sassylicious wrote:
<quoted text>The truth is the truth whether one wants to hear and accept it or not. Abortion kills a living,developing human. That human is the offspring of that woman. These are facts. You people support and/or participate in this evil act and you(like the poster pointed out) need prayers.
Do you really think that going before your God/creator on judgment day(the day you die) is going to be good when you attempt to bullsh@t your way out of explaining why you supporting killing what/whom God willed to exist and created in his/her mothers womb? Do you think that God is okay with you trying to play him or be him(like Lucifer did when he was cast out of heaven)?
This forum is discussing abortion. God says that you are either WITH him or AGAINST him.
Do you think that a person locked up in prison shouldn't be if they committed a crime against humanity? Is it ungodliness to point out his crime? Or do you ONLY use that card when discussing those who defend the preborn? You're fooling nobody hut yourself.
Well said!!!!!!
Gtown71

United States

#292504 Apr 16, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sorry, it sounds like fairy tales and myths.
I agree with you!!!
What is normal "for our minds " about a Godman comming from Heaven, living a life we never could, to make a way, for us to live a life after we die forevermore???
Yet what else do YOU have? A tiny dot, the size of a period at the end of the sentence began to spin so fast, it exploded into all we now see and know. Notice the period? Kinda small :)
Talk about fairy tales?!?!?
Choose this day which fairy tale you wish to accept, becouse one may appear to be a fairy tale, but it is very much real.
Gtown71

United States

#292505 Apr 16, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Why do you support restrictions on elective abortions?
Others pregnancies are not your business remember? Nobody cares what YOU think.
Don't want a late term abortion..don't have one? If a woma wants to kill her fetus as it is coming out of the womb...oh well..not your business..its her medical decision right? In fact if she wants to kill the baby out of the womb...well....don't judge her.
Aren't I a good person now?
Yet again, well said!!!
1 post removed
Ocean56

AOL

#292507 Apr 16, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
Are you on auto-reply? Repeating the same crap over and over swithout even readjng what your replying to?
I said; A WOMAN WHO CONCEIVES IS THE BIOLOGICAL MOTHER.
Yeah, sASSy, and I said: only if she WANTS to be. Meaning only if she WANTS to be a mother, which many women don't.

Don't like my saying that? Too bleeping bad. Motherhood is OPTIONAL, not required, even if a pregnancy does happen. If a woman doesn't want motherhood, she isn't required or obligated to accept it.
razzmatazz

Falls City, NE

#292508 Apr 16, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually Knutter, I'm more of a woman than you'll EVER be. I took one of the children YOUR kind couldn't be bothered with.
And you're insinuating that women that choose not to have chilren aren't "real women"?? Lady, you're WAY more fuckedinthehead than I thought you were.
Aw, Foo's upset, too bad. I am right on the target, you chose not to follow God, you hate God because you think its okay to slaughter God's Image. When you admit you are a drug addict, there is a high possibility of neglect was going on when you were supposedly raising your adopted daughter, if you ever had one.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#292509 Apr 16, 2013
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>No she didn't say anything about full term and preeclampsia or abortion being the treatment if the woman is full term. She quoted from the website..."The only safest way to cure pre-eclampsia is to abort or deliver the child. She also said....."This conversation, regarding pre-eclampsia and abortion or early delivery". Early delivery is not full term.
Once again, you post not knowing wth you're talking about. Seems to be a habit of pro-choicers here.

Katie's post that I was referring to, regarding my use of the words "full term";

"My youngest was born under these circumstances. After I was admitted to the hospital on Christmas Eve following an OB appt. My oldest went full term, but the pre-ecclampsia began rearing its ugly head toward the end of that pregnancy. My second full term pregnancy was designated high risk right toward the end of the first trimester due to protein in my urine. Why that op acts as if I don't know what I'm talking about is beyond me. Apparently STO is right. She was there, a fly on the wall, during all my OB appts."

Both of her children were bo0rn at "full term", and she had preeclampsia at the end of one pregnancy and at the end of 1st trimester for another. BOTH pregnancies went "full term".

You make yourself look totally clueless when you post, not having any clue what you're talking about because you can't follow what we're posting about in the first place.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#292510 Apr 16, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
You know what you're talking abort, Ayaka. It's the op projecting her inability to follow the conversations.
LOL! Holy crap, even the one who posted about her pregnancies going "full term" and having preeclampsia doesn't have any clue what I was posting on when I used those words. Talk about CLUELESS.

Not one of you PC can follow what's being said, or why, or what's being referred to, and all of you jump in as if you do. Making yourselves look like idiots.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#292511 Apr 16, 2013
Katie wrote:
Heh! Ayaka, see my typo? S/b about, not abort.
:-|
<groan>
Your typo is the least of the reasons you should "<groan>" about what you posted.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#292512 Apr 16, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
You know what you're talking abort, Ayaka. It's the op projecting her inability to follow the conversations.
Just to let you know, becauseI know you won't see it yourself; you're the one who just displayed you can't follow the conversations and proved that what you posted is in fact you projecting your inability to do so.

What a bonehead you are.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#292513 Apr 16, 2013
razzmatazz wrote:
<quoted text>LOL, this comes from a lesbian who won't have anything to do with a male or pregnancy. Get real foo , you know nothing about being pregnant, its your choice you chose not to be a real woman. You are wrong, foo .
"its your choice you chose not to be a real woman"

So by your thinking women who are unable to get pregnant are not "real" women.

That's really cold, Knut.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#292514 Apr 16, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree with you!!!
What is normal "for our minds " about a Godman comming from Heaven, living a life we never could, to make a way, for us to live a life after we die forevermore???
Yet what else do YOU have? A tiny dot, the size of a period at the end of the sentence began to spin so fast, it exploded into all we now see and know. Notice the period? Kinda small :)
Talk about fairy tales?!?!?
Choose this day which fairy tale you wish to accept, becouse one may appear to be a fairy tale, but it is very much real.
I'm not saying the Big Bang is fact. It's a theory, but one that is being heavily researched.

What we do know is there is a vast Universe out there full of things you believe a God created, yet most of it (that we've seen and studied) appears empty, cold and dead, so why did God create such vast nothingness?

I would like your actual opinion on that, not scripture please.
razzmatazz

Falls City, NE

#292515 Apr 16, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
"its your choice you chose not to be a real woman"
So by your thinking women who are unable to get pregnant are not "real" women.
That's really cold, Knut.
What is cold and cowardly is supporting the slaughter of over fifty five million pre born children.
1 post removed

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#292517 Apr 16, 2013
You post reflection all the time.
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
You're anti-intelligence... Take a valium. Being an asshat on this forum isn't ...
^^^...going to make you look intelligent.

You're one of the ignorant buffoons who tried to bring in proof about abortion for preeclampsia, when the posts I made were about STO's claim of abortion needed for preeclampsia at 32 weeks (late pregnancy and a viable fetus), and Petey's post made awhile back claiming late term abortion was needed for preeclampsia in late pregnancy.

Doctors don't abort for preeclampsia or eclampsia in late pregnancy. They DELIVER/BIRTH the child, with the goal of keeping the child ALIVE, not killing the child in utero

You jumped in trying to prove me wrong and once again proved you don't know what was being said or why.
Katie

Kent, WA

#292518 Apr 16, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Once again, you post not knowing wth you're talking about. Seems to be a habit of pro-choicers here.
Katie's post that I was referring to, regarding my use of the words "full term";
"My youngest was born under these circumstances. After I was admitted to the hospital on Christmas Eve following an OB appt. My oldest went full term, but the pre-ecclampsia began rearing its ugly head toward the end of that pregnancy. My second full term pregnancy was designated high risk right toward the end of the first trimester due to protein in my urine. Why that op acts as if I don't know what I'm talking about is beyond me. Apparently STO is right. She was there, a fly on the wall, during all my OB appts."
Both of her children were bo0rn at "full term", and she had preeclampsia at the end of one pregnancy and at the end of 1st trimester for another. BOTH pregnancies went "full term".
You make yourself look totally clueless when you post, not having any clue what you're talking about because you can't follow what we're posting about in the first place.
My youngest was not born full term. My oldest was. Learn to comprehend. My youngest was born under the circumstances we were discussing about pre-eclampsia. She was delivered 6wks early. That is NOT full term by any stretch.
Katie

Kent, WA

#292519 Apr 16, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yet again, well said!!!
No, it wasn't well said.
It was deceitful.

But you probably can't tell the difference :|
Katie

Kent, WA

#292520 Apr 16, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL! Holy crap, even the one who posted about her pregnancies going "full term" and having preeclampsia doesn't have any clue what I was posting on when I used those words. Talk about CLUELESS.
Not one of you PC can follow what's being said, or why, or what's being referred to, and all of you jump in as if you do. Making yourselves look like idiots.
Stop projecting your own inabilities to comprehend.

Here you are telling people my youngest went full term when that is not the case. Here you are telling people what my experiences were really about, when you have no clue.

The way to cure pre-eclampsia is to terminate the pregnancy. Abort it. By the means the physician determines is best for the woman and the woman agrees to. Whether that is delivery or D&E is up to the physician and the pregnant woman.

It is not up to you, the clergy, or the gov't.
grumpy

Hackensack, NJ

#292521 Apr 16, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not saying the Big Bang is fact. It's a theory, but one that is being heavily researched.
What we do know is there is a vast Universe out there full of things you believe a God created, yet most of it (that we've seen and studied) appears empty, cold and dead, so why did God create such vast nothingness?
I would like your actual opinion on that, not scripture please.
The universe appears empty because we have not made accelerators stong enough to see everything. Years ago Higgs speculated that there were bodies which he called Bosuns that exist in what you call nothingness. Now with more powerful accelerators we do see things never before seen.
Not only that, Bosuns give a symetry to the universe.
If the universe has symetry, doesn't show design rather than chance?

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#292522 Apr 16, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
My youngest was not born full term. My oldest was. Learn to comprehend. My youngest was born under the circumstances we were discussing about pre-eclampsia. She was delivered 6wks early. That is NOT full term by any stretch.
Oh big deal. Point is, your pregnancies went past viability and were DELIVERED, despite preeclampsia being present in both cases.

Learn to read for comprehension of the POINT. Your post doesn't excuse your stupidity in saying Ayakaneo knew what she was talking about in what I posted using the words "full term", when she didn't. Neither did you.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#292523 Apr 16, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Stop projecting your own inabilities to comprehend.
Here you are telling people my youngest went full term when that is not the case. Here you are telling people what my experiences were really about, when you have no clue.
The way to cure pre-eclampsia is to terminate the pregnancy. Abort it. By the means the physician determines is best for the woman and the woman agrees to. Whether that is delivery or D&E is up to the physician and the pregnant woman.
It is not up to you, the clergy, or the gov't.
You're an ignorant buffoon.

Treatment in late pregnancy (which is 32 weeks as STO mentioned and viability as I was talking about when Petey posted his response to me) is DELIVERY, proven with medical links stating that fact. Period. Argue your bullshit all you want. Your pregnancies both went past VIABILITY, and delivered. That was the point you conveniently choose to ignore to post about something that has nothing to do with that point.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#292524 Apr 16, 2013
* Treatment in late pregnancy (which is 32 weeks as STO mentioned and *past* viability as I was talking about...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 7 min VetnorsGate 1,744,393
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 28 min Bonho 71,315
News Comey speculates Russians may have damaging inf... 31 min Ronald 225
News Trump wants military to secure border with Mexico 1 hr Concerned 379
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr Quirky 243,394
News California: The Crazy State 1 hr DeadLeftistFunDitch 267
News With her father hospitalized, Meghan McCain twe... 1 hr Tumor 3