The only value in the posts regarding viability is simply to demonstrate just how stupid some of the PC can be.....nothing more. If you don't have the mental capacity to grasp the meaning of concept so basic and so fundamentally at the heart of a SC decision you hold so dear, then you really have no business arguing anything.<quoted text>If you got my point vis a vis viability. and restrictions, you would see that's exactly what I said.
Given that viability legally begins restrictions:
When should viability occur for an anti-choicers? At conception!
I was trying to give value to the endles posts regarding viability. Otherwise, all of you were just spinning your wheels.
So stop trying so hard to put what you see as value on that discussion. The value is already there. I have no desire to see viability begin at conception. Viability plays absolutely no part in my opposition to abortion.