Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Full story: Newsday 309,009
Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision. Full Story
sickofit

Blooming Prairie, MN

#276941 Jan 15, 2013
BraveCon wrote:
<quoted text>
If God was to show Himself to you and He then asked that you become Pro-Life, would you do it, or would you tell Him to mind his own business?
If a god showed me his godly power and then told me to do anythingf I would....BUT SINCE NO GOD IS REAL IT DOENST MATTER DOES IT....NO ONE HAS EVER SEEN GOD OUTSIDE OF THE GOAT HERDERS WHO WROTE THE BUYBULL./...../
feces for jesus

East Meadow, NY

#276942 Jan 15, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
The reason you choose evolution, is becouse there is no God involved, and that is your main problem. You know if there is a God, then your in trouble.(There is, and you are.) Both take faith. Noone has ever seen anything evolve.
Actually, johnnycakes, evolution does not rule out the possibility of a creator, but you're too busy puking your ignorance on topix to be bothered to learn something.

Can you EVER prove anything you claim?

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#276943 Jan 15, 2013
Why would a loving husband want his wife to go through something she is opposed to? And who are you to tell anyone how they "should" feel?

Yes, people can CHOOSE to have kids...what a revelation. But it can't be a choice without an alternative, which would be a choice NOt to have kids.

Gays arent sterile idiot. Many have had kids, through various scenarios.

You enjoyed watching your sister die, and then have the temerity to judge anyone else?
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
When a man and woman love each other enough, that they get married and plan on spending the rest of their life together, and the woman gets with child, before they planned, they should still want the child, if the woman don't and the husband does, then there is a Major problem. Should the woman be forced to have the child? Absolutely Not!
Yet I doubt the marriage will survive.
You and others are here becouse two people chose the hardships and joys of having you.
If all lived like c -baby, then all would be gay, and the world would be over very soon.
if all lived like ocean -then their would be No more kids, or everyone would be like me -42 years old with a 5 years old.
My father was 52, when I was born, and my mom was 40.
I enjoyed having a large family, but didn't enjoy watching them all die, except my sister.
My little girl has only an aunt on my side, and her granparents on her moms side will be dead before she's old enough to have kids.
Gods way is best, and that's why many want to remain childless. It defies God, and that's what sinfull humans do.
Thank God -He made a way, for us to become adopted by Him.-
feces for jesus

East Meadow, NY

#276944 Jan 15, 2013
BraveCon wrote:
<quoted text>
If God was to show Himself to you and He then asked that you become Pro-Life, would you do it, or would you tell Him to mind his own business?
Next time God shows "Himself" to you, please take a photo.

The National Enquirer will be waiting for you.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#276945 Jan 15, 2013
Trot his ass out here, and we'll find out. Of course, you'd first have to ask him if he was anti-choice. That might not go so well for you.
BraveCon wrote:
<quoted text>
If God was to show Himself to you and He then asked that you become Pro-Life, would you do it, or would you tell Him to mind his own business?

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#276946 Jan 15, 2013
BraveCon wrote:
This question is for you married Pro-Choice women.
If your husband was to have an affair and get another woman pregnant and you then found out that she has decided to have his child, would you consider her choice wrong/immoral, or would you respect her decision since every woman has the right to make her own choices in life and nobody has the right to try to make her change her mind?
Every woman has the legal, and moral, right to make her own choice regarding her own uterus and pregnancy. Period.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#276947 Jan 15, 2013
In what universe would one woman have a voice in another woman's pregnancy? I suspect that the wife would be more outraged by the infidelity than the other woman's reproductive choices.

The thing to remember is that the spouses swore fidelity; there is no basis for anger at the third party.
BraveCon wrote:
This question is for you married Pro-Choice women.
If your husband was to have an affair and get another woman pregnant and you then found out that she has decided to have his child, would you consider her choice wrong/immoral, or would you respect her decision since every woman has the right to make her own choices in life and nobody has the right to try to make her change her mind?

“Never give up”

Since: Dec 12

North Olmsted, OH

#276948 Jan 15, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Every woman has the legal, and moral, right to make her own choice regarding her own uterus and pregnancy. Period.
So it wouldn't upset you if this was to happen -- you're prefectly okay with it?

“Never give up”

Since: Dec 12

North Olmsted, OH

#276949 Jan 15, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
In what universe would one woman have a voice in another woman's pregnancy? I suspect that the wife would be more outraged by the infidelity than the other woman's reproductive choices.
The thing to remember is that the spouses swore fidelity; there is no basis for anger at the third party.
<quoted text>
So a wife should not try to contact the woman her husband got pregnant and ask if she has considered getting an abortion and/or why she has decided to have his child?

“Never give up”

Since: Dec 12

North Olmsted, OH

#276950 Jan 15, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
Trot his ass out here, and we'll find out. Of course, you'd first have to ask him if he was anti-choice. That might not go so well for you.
<quoted text>
Well, one thing's for sure...you wouldn't be an atheist anymore.

“Never give up”

Since: Dec 12

North Olmsted, OH

#276951 Jan 15, 2013
Well, I just wanted to join in the conversation for a little bit. I got to go to the Home Depot now to try to finish up a home improvement project.

Y'all keep on truckin'
1 post removed
Gtown71

United States

#276953 Jan 15, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
Evolution has evidence behind it; your god does not. Nobody has seen your god.
<quoted text>
Many have seen the power of God, including me.
No one has ever seen a fish become a bird, or a rock become anything, but a rock.
You would rather believe "have faith in " millions or billions of years, how slimmy rocks turned into humans -whom after evolved into having to have sex, in order to keep the race going. Wow

So do all animals.

I've already shown the 6 basics of evolution, and the last one, is the only one that has ever been seen, and that is no different then breeding a zebra and a donkey, and getting a zonkey.

Yer you cannot breed a donkey and a fish. It just cannot happen, unless you believe in evolution. You have nothing.

You want to believe we evolved from animals, becouse you like living like one.
Gtown71

United States

#276954 Jan 15, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
You're the one using the bible to shore up your arguments. Which it doesn't. You know why? In biblical times, life was considered to begin atthe first breath, not in utero. Your god never said anything different. So you blaspheme by ADDING to the scriptures what is not there--which is clearly condemned.
which makes you a hypocrite.
<quoted text>
Why are you concerned about what the bible says?
If no God, then who care who is a hypocrite?
You say Jesus was not even real in another post, yet it is 2013 AD - after the death of Jesus.

If you truly want to know what the bible says, then read it.

John the Baptist was filled with the Holy Spirit "BEFORE HE WAS BORN ".

He leaped in His mothers womb, when mary came to visit, becouse even BEFORE HE WAS BORN, He realize he was in a holy presence, becouse Jesus was in marys womb.

Jesus was Jesus long BEFORE HE WAS BORN.

You can hang onto your evolutionary lie all you wish, but God is real, and has waaay more proff, the evolution.

God says you must come to Him "by faith "
Eph. 2 : 8-9
Tondaleyo lives

Muscotah, KS

#276955 Jan 15, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Knutter, seriously, take your jesus, go to your hell and swim and fornicate with the spawns of satan or whatever.
@@ No Knutter, your jebus is NOT my g-d. Deal with it.
We know you do not follow God, you are too evil, you can't wait to get to Gahenna.
Gtown71

United States

#276956 Jan 15, 2013
feces for jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, johnnycakes, evolution does not rule out the possibility of a creator, but you're too busy puking your ignorance on topix to be bothered to learn something.
Can you EVER prove anything you claim?
Yes, we all evolve from being babies into adults, but none of us came from slimmy rocks.

I believe the earth is about 7 thousand years old, and the mountains and valleys are from the flood we had about 4 thousand years old. Plus the flood is talked about in just about every culture known to man. Stories may vary, just like three people can sit and watch the same tv show, but explain what happened in three difderent ways.

People don't want a God, becouse they love sin.
They love sex, but don't love stds or being pregnant, so they push for meds and laws to help them get rid of the problems.
heck, even computers get viruses from porn. Lol

Sin has consequences.
When we die in our sins we have everlasting consequences.

Jesus died for us, and wants His rightfull place, that's all.
How hard is that?
very hard to pridefull, sinfull people.
Katie

Puyallup, WA

#276957 Jan 15, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
No moron, I did not claim "it legally defines" a fetus as a human being.

That's how you MISREAD what was said.

I said that in THAT law, they "defined" the fetus as an "unborn child", and also a "human being".

A law is something LEGAL.
Alrighty then.
Katie

Puyallup, WA

#276958 Jan 15, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
I thought you understood they were defining the fetus as a "human being" in that law.
Now that you've put what Ayakaneo said next to what you had said, I see now that you didn't get it either.
Katie: "That is exactly what the law is suggesting. That the ZEF will be treated as a human being, same as its victimized mother, for purposes of sentencing punishment."
Ayakaneo: "It clearly says the punishment for intentionally causing harm to or the death of a child in utero is the same punishment one would get for doing the same to a human being."
The law states, "(C) If the person engaging in the conduct thereby intentionally kills or attempts to kill the unborn child, that person shall instead of being punished under subparagraph (A), be punished as provided under sections 1111, 1112, and 1113 of this title for intentionally killing or attempting to kill a human being."
["If the person engaging in the conduct thereby intentionally kills or attempts to kill the unborn child, that person shall...be punished ...for intentionally killing or attempting to kill a human being."]
They're not just "treating" the fetus "as" a human being as Katie claimed; and they're not saying the punishment for killing a fetus is "the same punishment one would get for doing the same to a human being".
Wrong on both counts. They're saying the fetus IS the human being the person who killed them will be punished for doing so.
They're not defining the ZEF as an unborn child or a human being. They're saying, for sentencing purposes (for punishment of the crime of violence against a pregnant woman), the ZEF will be treated as a human being, just like it's mother is.

You have to read and understand that "subparagraph A" states what the punishment HAD BEEN when a ZEF was killed by a 3rd party. And that NOW sentencing is "...provided under sections 1111, 1112, and 1113 of this title for intentionally killing or attempting to kill a human being."

You've been C&Ping it for days now.
The law states, "(C) If the person engaging in the conduct thereby intentionally kills or attempts to kill the unborn child, that person shall instead of being punished under subparagraph (A), be punished as provided under sections 1111, 1112, and 1113 of this title for intentionally killing or attempting to kill a human being."

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#276959 Jan 15, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Foo: "Oh and BTW, according to the autopsy and coroner report (link already provided) she was 9 months pregnant (your buddy Inkstain said 7 months) and MAY have given birth before they were murdered.
Nobody knows."
LOL bumbling buffoon. Her FAMILY knew how far along she was when she "disappeared" that Dec.. THEY said she was 8 months pregnant.
I dont really care what THEY said thanks, I'll go with the coroner's report and the court testimony, which I've provided and you're chosing to ignore for a Good Morning America fluff piece, because it says what you WANT it to say, as opposed to what the FACTS are.

Typical for you really.
Gtown71

United States

#276960 Jan 15, 2013
I forgot I was writing to 5 year olds. My sister is the only one left. You act like the man is asking his wife for a threesome. It is their child we are talking about. Sex is a small part of a long term marriage. And not all live for lust. The main purpoe of marriage, is to start a family. Yet the world we live in wants coffee shops by day, and sex bars by night. When folks get old, they never look back, when they are all alone, and are thankfull they had no kids.
cpeter1313 wrote:
Why would a loving husband want his wife to go through something she is opposed to? And who are you to tell anyone how they "should" feel?
Yes, people can CHOOSE to have kids...what a revelation. But it can't be a choice without an alternative, which would be a choice NOt to have kids.
Gays arent sterile idiot. Many have had kids, through various scenarios.
You enjoyed watching your sister die, and then have the temerity to judge anyone else?
<quoted text>

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#276961 Jan 15, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Your opinion isn't substantiated fact,
ROFLMAOOOOOOOOO!! Anyone else catch that Lynnie found herself a new word, and she'd using it as often as she can?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Giuliani explains why Obama doesn't love America 2 min xxxrayted 700
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min shinningelectr0n 1,193,430
'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 5 min Ron 172,636
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 5 min Talkin To Idiots 51,595
The President has failed us (Jun '12) 6 min Coffee Party 313,842
Scott Walker reverses immigration stance 7 min Dee Dee Dee 119
Anti-gay Tenn. billboard stirs religion debate 9 min The_Box 4,017
Scott Walker has no college degree. That's norm... 1 hr Le Jimbo 1,986
5As House panel issues subpoenas, questions mou... 1 hr Le Jimbo 29
More from around the web