***pat pat*** Suuuuuuuure Lynniekins. Sure! LOL!<quoted text>
Foo: "Sorry Failure Freak - the documentation is irrelevant to the discussion - the PROCEDURE is the SAME PROCEDURE. Same equiptment, same purpose - to EVACTUATE THE UTERUS."
Sorry, Fool, the purpose for the procedure and the documentation is what proves a D&C after miscarriage is not considered an "abortion procedure". It's some pro-choice idiots that were saying,(Carbon, Petey Elise and then you), a &C after miscarriage is an abortion and/or an abortion procedure. The only time the word abortion is documnted in the patient's file, is because the pregnancy spontaneouly aborted. She does not have a D&C to induce an abortion, as in surgical abortion. She has a D&C as a treatment to prevent sepsis, which is what we pro-lifers said back in Jan., in Oct. and still today about i.
YOU weresiding with the po-choicers in tht argument, nd now you're trying to claim what we've said all alon, as though that's what you said all along.
You're a lying mess.
Now why dont you get to proving your CLAIM that you know someone that was "born in a PVS". Get back to us when you can admit you were lying,'k Lyin Lynne?