Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 322248 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266822 Nov 29, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
You post is specifically addressing ectopic pregnancies. Here's the prolife approach to ectopic pregnancies.
Yeah yeah [email protected]@ They abort but dont CALL it an abortion. They CLAIM its an 'unintended consequence'....

Except of course thats BULLSHIT. Its a KNOWN consequence that is FULLY intended to save the life of the mother. Its not like they remove the embryo and try to keep it alive, they ABORT it. Period.

Call it a cumquat, its the same thing.
The woman in Ireland who died of sepsis - after miscarrying & undergoing subsequent surgery - was 17 weeks pregnant. She did not have an ectopic pregnancy.
She never said it was an ectopic pregnancy as you know, but nice try at deflection.

She died when an abortion was refused, and she was forced to have a five day miscarriage and who knows what else going on, rather than even TRY to save her life by removing something they KNEW would die, JUST like in an ectopic pregnancy.

Pity they didn't apply the same "logic" as they would to an ectopic.
I've shared this webpage with you before regarding "life of mother" situations: http://www.prolifephysiciansareafuckingjoke.o... b
And nobody cared then either.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266823 Nov 29, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
When the miscarriage is in process, the preborn baby is dying naturally. After he/she dies, mom may naturally remove his body. Surgery can remove him, if not.
OR they can abort and not prolong the inevitable, and PERHAPS prevent more problems and possibly maternal death.
Your plan says since the preborn baby is already dying, just go ahead and rip him apart, crush his skull, squish his beating heart.
Uh no. My plan says if the mother WANTS the abortion, then save the mothers life and to hell with the embryo or fetus.

If its GOING TO DIE, if that's a known and forgone conclusion? They yes,'rip him apart, crush his skull, squich his beating heart' if it saves the mother and she ASKS for the abortion - ABSOFUCKINGLUTELY!

Baby humans in utero deserve dignity.
The WOMAN in this case in particular, deserves the dignity to have her medical wishes carried out, and to NOT be left to die horribly in a hospital while the idiots sat on their hands and did NOTHING.

You treat them worse than your dogs.
I dont 'treat them' at all you moron. But again, good try! Abysmal failure, but kudos on the hyperbolic bullshit!

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266824 Nov 29, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>

If grandma is dying from terminal cancer,("she's already dying") you would support brutally killing her to "stop the cancer"?
I don't consider executing grandma a "treatment" for her cancer.
But, then again, I'm not a proabort who only thinks of myself...or, has culture of death mindset (i.e., no respect for human life).
Oh isn't he cute? The poor little basment dweller is trying to be dramatic!

I would absolutely support assisted suicide if my grandmother was of sound mind and dying, and determined she WANTED so spare herself suffering in her final months.

I support the assisted suicide laws that have been around for quite some time now in three states (with more coming just like with SSM laws...) Oregon, Washington and Montana.

"brutally killing"? NO. "exectuion"?? Sheer stupidity.

Death with dignity in the way the person WANTS to die? 100% yes.

Oh and you dont get a say in THAT either No Relevance! Poor lil fella.....
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#266825 Nov 29, 2012
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>Who said an abortion is a cure for miscarriage? A D&C is a D&C, it's the same D&C that scrapes the uterus in either an elective abortion, or any natural abortion. No one has remotely even come close to saying that should a women need a D&C for a miscarriage does the doctor say, "o.k are you ready for your abortion procedure?". The steps taken to empty the contents are no different in either case.
In one scenerio, preborn baby is alive & intentionally & directly killed. In the other situation, the preborn baby died naturally, & D&C removes his body.
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#266826 Nov 29, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh isn't he cute? The poor little basment dweller is trying to be dramatic!
I would absolutely support assisted suicide if my grandmother was of sound mind and dying, and determined she WANTED so spare herself suffering in her final months.
I support the assisted suicide laws that have been around for quite some time now in three states (with more coming just like with SSM laws...) Oregon, Washington and Montana.
"brutally killing"? NO. "exectuion"?? Sheer stupidity.
Death with dignity in the way the person WANTS to die? 100% yes.
Oh and you dont get a say in THAT either No Relevance! Poor lil fella.....
How kind of you to give deference to your grandma's wishes. Yet, you don't give any consideration to the dignity of the preborn baby. At all. Ever.

BTW: I'm prolife, so I don't support assisted suicide. That's a culture-of-death thing.
The Weatherman

Burlington, KS

#266827 Nov 29, 2012
Pro-aborts can argue "save the mother" until they are blue in the face, but the fact is the VAST majority of abortions are performed on healthy mothers and healthy fetuses. Using the minority to justify the majority is simply mindless...
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#266828 Nov 29, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
OR they can abort and not prolong the inevitable, and PERHAPS prevent more problems and possibly maternal death.
<quoted text>
Uh no. My plan says if the mother WANTS the abortion, then save the mothers life and to hell with the embryo or fetus.
If its GOING TO DIE, if that's a known and forgone conclusion? They yes,'rip him apart, crush his skull, squich his beating heart' if it saves the mother and she ASKS for the abortion - ABSOFUCKINGLUTELY!
<quoted text>
The WOMAN in this case in particular, deserves the dignity to have her medical wishes carried out, and to NOT be left to die horribly in a hospital while the idiots sat on their hands and did NOTHING.
<quoted text>
I dont 'treat them' at all you moron. But again, good try! Abysmal failure, but kudos on the hyperbolic bullshit!
You don't know the intricate details surrounding her death. That's what the investigation is for.

Your World Health Organization link addressed infection/sepsis AFTER abortion procedures. Who's to say she wouldn't have contracted E.Coli bacterial infection => sepsis during/after abortion procedure?

You've come to your conclusions before investigation is complete. I also have my suspicions as to the circumstances surrounding her death.

We'll both know who is correct when investigation is complete & made public.

Your default plan typically includes death (preborn babies, sick grandma, etc.)

Death & destruction has willingly become a part of who you are.
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#266829 Nov 29, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
OR they can abort and not prolong the inevitable, and PERHAPS prevent more problems and possibly maternal death.
<quoted text>
Uh no. My plan says if the mother WANTS the abortion, then save the mothers life and to hell with the embryo or fetus.
If its GOING TO DIE, if that's a known and forgone conclusion? They yes,'rip him apart, crush his skull, squich his beating heart' if it saves the mother and she ASKS for the abortion - ABSOFUCKINGLUTELY!
<quoted text>
The WOMAN in this case in particular, deserves the dignity to have her medical wishes carried out, and to NOT be left to die horribly in a hospital while the idiots sat on their hands and did NOTHING.
<quoted text>
I dont 'treat them' at all you moron. But again, good try! Abysmal failure, but kudos on the hyperbolic bullshit!
Foo: "to hell with the embryo or fetus."

Foo: "If its GOING TO DIE, if that's a known and forgone conclusion? They yes,'rip him apart, crush his skull, squich his beating heart'"

__________

'Nuf said.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#266830 Nov 30, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
NR: Abortion procedures aren't treatments for miscarriage.
AyakaNeo: Well yes they are.
__________
The preborn baby dies in a miscarriage. A D&C is sometimes needed after a miscarriage.
Abortion as a cure for a miscarriage is like grandma's terminal cancer being cured by blowing her head off w/ a 12-gauge shot gun.
Why would a miscarriage need a "cure?" Don't you mean, "treatment?"

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#266831 Nov 30, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
When the miscarriage is in process, the preborn baby is dying naturally. After he/she dies, mom may naturally remove his body. Surgery can remove him, if not.
Your plan says since the preborn baby is already dying, just go ahead and rip him apart, crush his skull, squish his beating heart. Baby humans in utero deserve dignity. You treat them worse than your dogs.
If grandma is dying from terminal cancer,("she's already dying") you would support brutally killing her to "stop the cancer"?
I don't consider executing grandma a "treatment" for her cancer.
But, then again, I'm not a proabort who only thinks of myself...or, has culture of death mindset (i.e., no respect for human life).
You know, if you're going to try to have a medical discussion, you should call a fetus a fetus. "Preborn baby" is not a term a legitimate physician uses, dear.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#266832 Nov 30, 2012
The Weatherman wrote:
Pro-aborts can argue "save the mother" until they are blue in the face, but the fact is the VAST majority of abortions are performed on healthy mothers and healthy fetuses. Using the minority to justify the majority is simply mindless...
A woman doesn't need to justify having an abortion. Her reasons are none of your business.
2 posts removed

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#266835 Nov 30, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
But Bitner, of COURSE she's not the "same person", time has passed and she's a MUCH bigger bitch now, pissed off as heck that EVERYONE see's through her, but determined to act as if she has some credibility here (tho of course she has none)- so she's a MUCH "different person" than she was as Lynne D and Perverse.
Therefore, she can lie about it, while acting as if she's telling the truth and she can delude herself that somewhere, someone believes her .......
And yet, she's never ONCE answered that particular question. I wonder why?:)
Ocean56

AOL

#266836 Nov 30, 2012
Conservative Democrat wrote:
I see, you're expecting me to accept the word of the Catholic church as the authority on this matter, when you are not willing to accept Jewish law as the authority on why if a pregnancy threatens a mother's life an abortion is mandatory, because the life of the unborn IS NEVER more paramount than that of the mother.
Duly noted.
Hi CD! When you consider that "Husker" is KNUTTER, under another new name (I lost count of how many she's had over the last few years), her stupidity is easily explained.:-)

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#266837 Nov 30, 2012
HuskerDu wrote:
<quoted text> Abortion is pure evil. Abortion destroys. Nothing good comes from it.
Sometimes it saves lives.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#266838 Nov 30, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
When the miscarriage is in process, the preborn baby is dying naturally. After he/she dies, mom may naturally remove his body. Surgery can remove him, if not.
Your plan says since the preborn baby is already dying, just go ahead and rip him apart, crush his skull, squish his beating heart. Baby humans in utero deserve dignity. You treat them worse than your dogs.
If grandma is dying from terminal cancer,("she's already dying") you would support brutally killing her to "stop the cancer"?
I don't consider executing grandma a "treatment" for her cancer.
But, then again, I'm not a proabort who only thinks of myself...or, has culture of death mindset (i.e., no respect for human life).
At 17 weeks and her cervix dilated they could have induced delivery and avoided all that. She was not treated with dignity NR, she was treated like a woman requesting an elective abortion and not as a patient in need of obstetric, emergency care. Grandma doesn't have to die "brutally" if she wishes to die with dignity.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#266839 Nov 30, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
NR: Abortion procedures aren't treatments for miscarriage.
AyakaNeo: Well yes they are.
__________
The preborn baby dies in a miscarriage. A D&C is sometimes needed after a miscarriage.
Abortion as a cure for a miscarriage is like grandma's terminal cancer being cured by blowing her head off w/ a 12-gauge shot gun.
Sometimes needed doesn't make it not the same procedure. It's the exact same procedure, the exact same steps are taken in either case to scrape the wall of the uterus. As far as your grandma analogy goes, grandma could take a handful of pills and just go to sleep and her head remains intact.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266840 Nov 30, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
In one scenerio, preborn baby is alive & intentionally & directly killed. In the other situation, the preborn baby died naturally, & D&C removes his body.
And in yet a third scenerio, both the mother and the fetus is endangered, the fetus WILL die, and the hospital does nothing while BOTH die.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266841 Nov 30, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
How kind of you to give deference to your grandma's wishes. Yet, you don't give any consideration to the dignity of the preborn baby. At all. Ever.
Sure I do. When its the MOTHERS decision. Beyond that, its not by business to give it any consideration, its not YOURS either.
BTW: I'm prolife, so I don't support assisted suicide. That's a culture-of-death thing.
No, its a death with dignity thing.

Nobody that matters cares if YOU stupport it or not. The last thing these people considering it is if some idiot on a messageboard cares.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266842 Nov 30, 2012
The Weatherman wrote:
Pro-aborts can argue "save the mother" until they are blue in the face, but the fact is the VAST majority of abortions are performed on healthy mothers and healthy fetuses. Using the minority to justify the majority is simply mindless...
Actually, the FACT is that IGNORING the majority and pretending it doesn't happen is what's madness.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266843 Nov 30, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Foo: "to hell with the embryo or fetus."
Foo: "If its GOING TO DIE, if that's a known and forgone conclusion? They yes,'rip him apart, crush his skull, squich his beating heart'"
__________
'Nuf said.
In CONTEXT, yep, Nuff said.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News What would Jesus say about same-sex marriage? (Jul '15) 3 min Frindly 14,885
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 4 min June VanDerMark 46,972
News Democrats silent on whether Trump should resign... 4 min RustyS 33
News Jose Canseco on being molested by women: - It w... 5 min Lawrence Wolf 22
News Forged documents falsely accuse Chuck Schumer o... 7 min inbred Genius 21
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 8 min Unmeltable Snowflake 1,658,527
News White House will override Obama's climate plan 8 min Into The Night 1,634
News Trump should resign amid sexual assault claims:... 47 min Lawrence Wolf 57
More from around the web