Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 311363 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#263063 Oct 10, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text> Yes I do have that right Lynne.
<quoted text> And we're also free to ridicule you in the process as well. Like it or not.
<quoted text>
ROFLMAO Lynne, YOU may be that stupid, but I certainly am not. Yes, I'm publically stating that I disagree with her choice. I would NOT have supported the choice she made at all. I DO however respect her right to have MADE it.
YOU are the fukwit that is too stupid to understand that we CAN support the right of someone TO make a choice, but not have to support the choice they MADE.
<quoted text> Really Lynne? You're speaking for a dead woman now? A woman you dont know SHIT about?
For all you know, she wasn't so much pro-life, but terrified of her version of G-d. I DO know she was okay with women making their OWN choices when it came to reproductive freedom, we had a number of discussions about it when she was here, and in email and FB talks as well. I dont believe she was pro-choice per`se, but she, much like many other PL'ers woudn't ever even THINK about forcing THEIR RELIGIOUS views on others as legislation.
<quoted text> No Lynne, what's disgusting is the likes of YOU lying here on a regular basis for OVER SEVEN YEARS, and acting like your shit dont stink. THAT is disgusting.
Whatever you say about the woman and what you claim you know of her views or what she would have not minded etc, is all only your hearsay.
Means nothing.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#263064 Oct 10, 2012
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text> If it were for a tonsilectomy it would be entirely different but it would still be a D&C. Since it's not used for anything but uterine issues it's a D&C for uterine issues. Any abortion is a uterine issue.
<quoted text>You've displayed you don't have the intelligence to grasp that.
LOL

"Since it's not used for anything but uterine issues it's a D&C for uterine issues. Any abortion is a uterine issue."

You're inching closer to understanding why I've said you've been posting stupidity all this time about this and why I say you don't have reading comprehnsion skills, but you still don't have the intelligence to grasp exactly why. You still haven't grasped why a D&C is not "an abortion procedure".

It's a dilation and curettage procedure..."for" [uterine issues].

I'm still indulging your ignorance for one reason only: a hope that if you read enough of my posts on it with the correct information, it'll click in your brain one day, and you'll get it. I don't hold out much hope, but a little.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#263065 Oct 10, 2012
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text> Then don't give me "suggestions" as to what I can and cannot do. Then rest of your post is just your willful ignorance.
The rest of my post was common sense based on the information you provided, as well as the knowledge I already have.

"Then don't give me "suggestions" as to what I can and cannot do."

Excuse me? That sounds bossy of you. After telling me not to boss you when I only made a suggestion, you're telling me what to do?

In other words, do as you say, not as you do? lol, could you be more hypocritical?

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#263066 Oct 10, 2012
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>LOL it's so funny that she thinks she can tell (suggest) to others not to post about things they know nothing about but here she is posting about your relationship to a relative of yours for which she knows nothing about.
For your information, Foo already posted she wasn't a relative, she wasn't even really a "friend". She had only met her once and then had an online relationship with her. That much I do know, and know because she posted it, BH.

You really can't read for comprehension, because you still think the woman was a relative of Foo's.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#263067 Oct 10, 2012
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>LOL it's so funny that she thinks she can tell (suggest) to others not to post about things they know nothing about but here she is posting about your relationship to a relative of yours for which she knows nothing about.
Here you go. She even claimed she "barely knew" the woman. You're welcome.

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
"I am not grieving for her per`se Knutbar. I barely knew her."
FFF

Tulsa, OK

#263068 Oct 10, 2012
John-K wrote:
<quoted text>
As I well know...?
Hah!
Ye are not one of the feared "foursome" miladay...of that I'm sure!
;P
Better check your dance card, dear.
I'm the fifth.

(The one whose name the Fearsome Foursome fears to utter...)
:)

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#263069 Oct 10, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL
"Since it's not used for anything but uterine issues it's a D&C for uterine issues. Any abortion is a uterine issue."
You're inching closer to understanding why I've said you've been posting stupidity all this time about this and why I say you don't have reading comprehnsion skills, but you still don't have the intelligence to grasp exactly why. You still haven't grasped why a D&C is not "an abortion procedure".
It's a dilation and curettage procedure..."for" [uterine issues].
I'm still indulging your ignorance for one reason only: a hope that if you read enough of my posts on it with the correct information, it'll click in your brain one day, and you'll get it. I don't hold out much hope, but a little.
You don't and never have worked in the medical field you're just a layperson who thinks she knows it all.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#263070 Oct 10, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
The rest of my post was common sense based on the information you provided, as well as the knowledge I already have.
"Then don't give me "suggestions" as to what I can and cannot do."
Excuse me? That sounds bossy of you. After telling me not to boss you when I only made a suggestion, you're telling me what to do?
In other words, do as you say, not as you do? lol, could you be more hypocritical?
Whoopeeeedooo. So we're both hypocrites. I can admit it.
3 posts removed

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#263074 Oct 10, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Here you go. She even claimed she "barely knew" the woman. You're welcome.
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
"I am not grieving for her per`se Knutbar. I barely knew her."
It's irrelevant. You're still posting about something you know nothing about while "suggesting" I don't post about something I know nothing about. SMHLMAOAY
1 post removed
Googleicious

Cicero, NY

#263076 Oct 10, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Foo: "First off, who said anything about going to the funeral? Not me. I didn't mention a funeral at all."
You mentioned that Ariel and her mother were heading your way for the services.
"LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Except I've made up nothing Knutbar. Ariel ( the 20 yr old that you thought was 14 Yrs old)will be here this weekend in fact, we're going to the memorial service together and she and her mom are staying for a few days. I'll tell her you said 'hi'. "
The terms "services" and "funeral" (or funeral services) mean the same thing.
Yet a "memorial service" and a "funeral service" are NOT the same thing. YOU said funeral SHE said memorial service.

I've been to many memorial services that were not funerals. This is not unusual when people live in other states or countries and loved ones for whatever reason can't travel to where the funeral is being held.

I would guess since foofoo also said her body was being send home, wherever "home" is, is where the funeral would be.

But far be it from me to try to stop you from trying to create an issue where none exists given YOU jumped the gun with your 'funeral' comments and are clearly trying to "backpedal" from your own words by making it about something she DID NOT say.
Googleicious

Cicero, NY

#263077 Oct 10, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Whatever you say about the woman and what you claim you know of her views or what she would have not minded etc, is all only your hearsay.
Means nothing.
If it may says so, its YOUR view that it "means nothing" is what means nothing to many of us dear. You do not speak for anyone but yourself. You DO comprehend that, dont you?
Googleicious

Cicero, NY

#263078 Oct 10, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
How am I a hypocrite, hypocrite?
LOL

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#263079 Oct 10, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
I know more than you do, Toots. That much is painfully obvious to anyone with intelligence and an IQ that's not in the doubkle digits.and sense.
CD claimed to be a lawyer and many of us knew more than he did about the law.
Just because you document/transcribe codes, doesn't prove you understand wth they're about. You've made it clear you don't.
I don't care about CD, don't know who CD is. You claim you're not the same person who posted as Lynne D, and we all know you are. YOU prove by your posting style, your name calling and all this same crap Lynne D posted about respect, reading comprehension, fool, you defended her as if you knew anything about her, you double talk. You are just as much a liar, fool, hypocrite, and idiot as you say others are.
As for coding, it's a 5 digit CPT code (current procedural terminology)59820 = code for the surgical treatment of missed abortion. 59840 = code for surgical treatment of induced abortion. Gosh what could the surgical treatment be? Dilation and curettage? well the ICD 9 code for a D&C, aka surgical treatment is 69.01.
Katie

Graham, WA

#263080 Oct 10, 2012
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
....says the forum's Admitted Liar, hypocritically.
Hi Bit :)

Was wondering if you saw this, Doc's interpretation of the definition of VIABILITY per RvW? He is convinced he's correct. It's fair to let him continue believing his own ignorance, right? For the sake of peace and quiet?
Doc Degall wrote:
<quoted text>
A physician will be making the determination regarding whether or not a newborn is physiologically capable of benefitting from ALS. If he determines it CAN benefit then he will deem it VIABLE.
If he determines it CANNOT benefit then he will deem it NON VIABLE.
Simple as that.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#263081 Oct 10, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it's not irrelevant. You don't even know what the rest of us know and you still post on it with your usual ignorance.
I'm posting on what I do know about, from what Foo posted. Big difference, DW.
It is irrelevant. Regardless of the relationship status, you're still posting about a situation that you know nothing about with your usual ignorance.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#263082 Oct 10, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
How am I a hypocrite, hypocrite?
By the way, you do sound like Moncie. She was as ignorant and childish as you are.
By the way you sound like LynneD she was ignorant too. Deflect much?

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#263083 Oct 10, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
*That much is painfully obvious to anyone with intelligence and sense, and an IQ that's not in the double digits.
You're the only one with a deficit.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#263084 Oct 10, 2012
Googleicious wrote:
<quoted text>
Yet a "memorial service" and a "funeral service" are NOT the same thing. YOU said funeral SHE said memorial service.
I've been to many memorial services that were not funerals. This is not unusual when people live in other states or countries and loved ones for whatever reason can't travel to where the funeral is being held.
I would guess since foofoo also said her body was being send home, wherever "home" is, is where the funeral would be.
But far be it from me to try to stop you from trying to create an issue where none exists given YOU jumped the gun with your 'funeral' comments and are clearly trying to "backpedal" from your own words by making it about something she DID NOT say.
Listen Toots, to many people, they mean the same thing.

A ceremony to honor the dead.

She said tomato, I said tomahto.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#263085 Oct 10, 2012
Googleicious wrote:
<quoted text>
If it may says so, its YOUR view that it "means nothing" is what means nothing to many of us dear. You do not speak for anyone but yourself. You DO comprehend that, dont you?
I said "Means nothing." I was speaking for myself. You don't see any words indicating I was speaking for others, do you? Obviously you're the one who couldn't comprehend that.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#263086 Oct 10, 2012
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't care about CD, don't know who CD is. You claim you're not the same person who posted as Lynne D, and we all know you are. YOU prove by your posting style, your name calling and all this same crap Lynne D posted about respect, reading comprehension, fool, you defended her as if you knew anything about her, you double talk. You are just as much a liar, fool, hypocrite, and idiot as you say others are.
As for coding, it's a 5 digit CPT code (current procedural terminology)59820 = code for the surgical treatment of missed abortion. 59840 = code for surgical treatment of induced abortion. Gosh what could the surgical treatment be? Dilation and curettage? well the ICD 9 code for a D&C, aka surgical treatment is 69.01.
First part of your post; irrelevant and ignorant stupidity, and I don't expect others to do as I say not as I do. That's the PCers who expect that.

As for the 2nd part of your post; the codes you gave for D&C isn't a "598..." number, is it? No, it's a different code altogether.

Codes you presented in a prior post also show a distinct difference between the procedure and purpose for which the proceudre is used. You can't understand what you read.

You posted codes for "abortions"

"ICD 9 - International Classification of Diseases
634 Spontaneous Abortion
635 Induced Abortion
636 Illegally Induced Abortion
637 Unspecified Abortion
638 Failed Attempt Abortion"

Then the procedure of dilation and curettage codes

"ICD 9 Code for D&C

69.02 - Dilation and curettage following delivery or abortion.
CPT - Current Procedural Terminology

Code 59812
Dilation and curettage for the surgical management of an incomplete abortion."

Not the same codes as the specific medical issue the D&C for which the procedure is being used.

[Procedure] and [specific medical issue for which it's used] are NOT the same thing.

Explaining this to you is like explaining quantum physics to a toddler. You're displaying how this is so far above your ability to understand.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min Grey Ghostmoron 1,396,468
News The Republican Party is dead 3 min Responsibility 1,833
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 4 min who cares 13,182
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 5 min Rogue Scholar 05 217,109
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 6 min Denny CranesPlace 228,988
News 31 scientific societies just told Congress to t... 8 min Earthling-1 3
News Trump Isn't Bluffing, He'll Deport 11 Million P... 10 min Responsibility 3,657
News Obama signs Puerto Rico debt relief bill 31 min Le Jimbo 11
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 1 hr katrina 88 388,442
More from around the web