Ann Coulter Calls Melissa Harris-Perry MSNBC's 'Token' African-American

Jan 7, 2014 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Mediaite.com

Sean Hannity is not letting MSNBC's Melissa Harris-Perry off the hook any time soon.

Comments
161 - 180 of 183 Comments Last updated Jan 14, 2014

Since: Oct 12

Ashburn, GA

#201 Jan 11, 2014
conservative crapola wrote:
<quoted text>Cutting taxes on business doesn't create jobs. We've learned that from flub's 8-year mistake. teahadist wants to turn the whole country into a right-to-be-cheated,er, right-to-work state, and further destroy the middle class.
why are the right to work states doing better than the union states?? Talk about cheaters look at the fed gov
thats right

Farmington, MO

#202 Jan 11, 2014
There you go again wrote:
<quoted text>why are the right to work states doing better than the union states?? Talk about cheaters look at the fed gov
Doing better?
JBH

Delta, Canada

#203 Jan 11, 2014
How come some people don't mention the many of so large ratio of victims slaughtered in Iraq, and tortured by Bush?

When talk about the lives killed in Eastern Europe (as if from Bolshevik communism) with no saying of lives killed by Nazis.

Germans were no Liberators to Baltics and rest of Europe because Nazi-Germany would have taken all Euro-states if there was no Bolshevik communism by forming Soviet Union.

Bolshevik communism was necessary to make Europe to be free nowadays.
It could be a foresight that Soviet Union took place to counter the foreseeable surging of Hitler -Nazis to demolish Europe.

Hitler-Germany had killed more lives than anything else, for it costed so many millions of Russian and Baltic lives as a result of Hitler waging war.

It wasn't Nazi-Germany giving freedom to people by assailing against Bolshevik communism, as all Germany did, was suppressing freedom of people, to propel war to make one single country of its own, to generate having no freedom for Europe .

Without Soviet Union, Europe is only one country being Nazi-Germany, so that people have no original countries of their own anymore, like Latvia, Sweden, Italy, etc.

Then these days, European people are not free people, that Hitler would have taken them under his oppressing rules to slaughter a lot more, that they would have no freedom at all as of this time.

Only through Bolshevik communism, Soviet Union was able to liberate Europe to remain as free countries in Europe.

In other words, Bolshevik communism-Soviet Union gave freedom to Europe, but not Germany.

Bolshevik communism had saved and liberated Europe to be free because of the formation of Soviet Union..

It was only Soviet Union that made freedom to the Europe.

“bar0ckalypse N0W”

Since: Mar 10

Huntington, NY

#204 Jan 11, 2014
orval wrote:
<quoted text>
GOP Supercommittee Member Admits Bush Tax Cuts Didn’t Create Jobs, Can’t Explain Why
HUNT: Why under those pre-Bush tax cut tax rates did the economy do so well in the ‘90s? And why under the Bush tax rates, less for the wealthy, to do so poorly in this decade?
It's not that tax cuts creates jobs, it's that taxes kill them.

Cutting taxes merely removes the roadblocks to prosperity and progress put in place by power-hungry liberals looking to control their mindless constituents.

“bar0ckalypse N0W”

Since: Mar 10

Huntington, NY

#205 Jan 11, 2014

“bar0ckalypse N0W”

Since: Mar 10

Huntington, NY

#206 Jan 11, 2014
Bob Bidone

Da Nang, Vietnam

#207 Jan 11, 2014
mjjcpa wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2014/01/07/ opinion/bergen-al-qaeda-terror ity-gains/index.html
CNN & BCC are belong to Bolleewood Gandhihihihihi butler;)
BigKnob

United States

#208 Jan 11, 2014
Monshari wrote:
<quoted text>
White men might have set the tone but it is some black men's self-hatred and lack of interest in preserving their own race or community is why black men have gone white women obsessed, disgracing and embarrassing the black community. This has caused a big break along gender lines where black people are concerned. Where do you see black women moving in masses to partner with white men? I just see some black women and white men as being more open about dating each other. Now are the white women who are openly flaunting their sexual relationships and half black kids with black men , also apart of white pet management?
are you going to set the tone for anti twerking,& gg..........
white woman

Farmington, MO

#209 Jan 12, 2014
BigKnob wrote:
<quoted text>are you going to set the tone for anti twerking,& gg..........
It's not the black men that have gone "white woman obsessed", it's us white women that have gone black man obsessed. Black men who date white women, more often than not, will date black women also. White women that date black men, tend to only date black men and no white men at all.

So stop blaming black men for you not being able to hold onto your white women!

Since: Oct 12

Ashburn, GA

#210 Jan 13, 2014
white woman wrote:
<quoted text>It's not the black men that have gone "white woman obsessed", it's us white women that have gone black man obsessed. Black men who date white women, more often than not, will date black women also. White women that date black men, tend to only date black men and no white men at all.

So stop blaming black men for you not being able to hold onto your white women!
you can't stop some women from being trash there born that way!!! If a white woman sleeps with a black man she will sleep with other animals!!
white woman

United States

#211 Jan 13, 2014
There you go again wrote:
<quoted text>you can't stop some women from being trash there born that way!!! If a white woman sleeps with a black man she will sleep with other animals!!
Nope, I no longer date white men, no animals for me.

And it's they're. The only thing that is obviously trash, is your education.
JBH

Delta, Canada

#212 Jan 13, 2014
The McCain-Graham claim that Iraq’s ‘main political blocs were supportive’ of keeping U.S. troops in Iraq
BY GLENN KESSLER
January 13 at 6:00 am

%^&*()_+====

The above report is from Topix source.

By drawing on facts from this report, it displays that US is furthering the digging of the deepening into Iraq by Obama.
Obama, hence, is contradicting himself, since Obama shows he does not stand for what he opposed for , on whether it was wrong to invade Iraq, and/or it was too costly that US had to withdraw from Iraq.

Bush by lying about WMD, did the wrongs by calling of regime change to invade Iraq.
To be a War president in Bush's thoughts, creates the myth of naive incapacity based on this thinking which converts the showing of Bush's inaptness and inability.
This is rather the oddness of demonstrating the evil terror imposed, in a changing, different and new world by operating the gun-boat policy which could spread into uprising more invasions and wars when occupation and controlling of Iraq was successful, but still in these new times, to be reflecting as if directing Hitlerism.
Hitlerism is merely invasions to occupy by controlling and running.

The changing, different and new world confers that invasion of any county to occupy by its motives demonstrates the wrongful, deceiving standard of returning to past unjustified acts as if Hitlerism is the spirit of non-mediocre criteria, whereby generating the rated-down, negative image.

This gambit on regime change is the radicalism in modern times in the first place, that US tainted UN as there was not such agenda at any given time for regime change while UN agenda was all about WMD finding pursuit.
This actually confirms the incompetence of UN that led to current ensembles in Iraq, as such so forth that UN could have proceeded to prevent the occurrence.

On the other aspect, US had miscalculated the volatile, turbulent surging efforts of numerous insurgents before invasion, by which even US forced such occupation, it would have known US military engagement would never make it possible to support a new formed government to any length of time.
To this time, insurgent segments have spread, expanded and escalated which are under-estimated in their claiming of tearing syndrome.
The time of insurgent uprising has proven to be enduring and lasting through the long length of time.
These unrest and violences would be the longest on the planet, that they may never end until the current regime would be displaced.
US did not pull out in time when insurgents exploded by not installing any government, but preferred to occupy, as there showed no WMD finding.
Only upon costly factors of lives, US operated the stand wrongfully by not enforcing the position as if Vietnam, that the matters of the country were upon Iraqi's choices, without US meddling.

Either Obama's CONTINUOUS endeavor of supporting the current installed Iraq government will remain for more than 50 more years, or it is just symbolizing as the US Hitlerism aggression acts, that extremism is the domain of US dysfunctional policy, that defines US is travelling the backward direction.

Obama is the neo-Hitler shadow by implementing the unfinished Bush mission.
guest

United States

#213 Jan 13, 2014
JBH wrote:
The McCain-Graham claim that Iraq’s ‘main political blocs were supportive’ of keeping U.S. troops in Iraq
BY GLENN KESSLER
January 13 at 6:00 am

%^&*()_+====

The above report is from Topix source.

By drawing on facts from this report, it displays that US is furthering the digging of the deepening into Iraq by Obama.
Obama, hence, is contradicting himself, since Obama shows he does not stand for what he opposed for , on whether it was wrong to invade Iraq, and/or it was too costly that US had to withdraw from Iraq.

Bush by lying about WMD, did the wrongs by calling of regime change to invade Iraq.
To be a War president in Bush's thoughts, creates the myth of naive incapacity based on this thinking which converts the showing of Bush's inaptness and inability.
This is rather the oddness of demonstrating the evil terror imposed, in a changing, different and new world by operating the gun-boat policy which could spread into uprising more invasions and wars when occupation and controlling of Iraq was successful, but still in these new times, to be reflecting as if directing Hitlerism.
Hitlerism is merely invasions to occupy by controlling and running.

The changing, different and new world confers that invasion of any county to occupy by its motives demonstrates the wrongful, deceiving standard of returning to past unjustified acts as if Hitlerism is the spirit of non-mediocre criteria, whereby generating the rated-down, negative image.

This gambit on regime change is the radicalism in modern times in the first place, that US tainted UN as there was not such agenda at any given time for regime change while UN agenda was all about WMD finding pursuit.
This actually confirms the incompetence of UN that led to current ensembles in Iraq, as such so forth that UN could have proceeded to prevent the occurrence.

On the other aspect, US had miscalculated the volatile, turbulent surging efforts of numerous insurgents before invasion, by which even US forced such occupation, it would have known US military engagement would never make it possible to support a new formed government to any length of time.
To this time, insurgent segments have spread, expanded and escalated which are under-estimated in their claiming of tearing syndrome.
The time of insurgent uprising has proven to be enduring and lasting through the long length of time.
These unrest and violences would be the longest on the planet, that they may never end until the current regime would be displaced.
US did not pull out in time when insurgents exploded by not installing any government, but preferred to occupy, as there showed no WMD finding.
Only upon costly factors of lives, US operated the stand wrongfully by not enforcing the position as if Vietnam, that the matters of the country were upon Iraqi's choices, without US meddling.

Either Obama's CONTINUOUS endeavor of supporting the current installed Iraq government will remain for more than 50 more years, or it is just symbolizing as the US Hitlerism aggression acts, that extremism is the domain of US dysfunctional policy, that defines US is travelling the backward direction.

Obama is the neo-Hitler shadow by implementing the unfinished Bush mission.
I need to take this to have it translated. Could you recommend a good trailer park? Preferably one with just single wides from the seventies.

Since: Oct 12

Valdosta, GA

#214 Jan 13, 2014
white woman wrote:
<quoted text>Nope, I no longer date white men, no animals for me.

And it's they're. The only thing that is obviously trash, is your education.
I knew you were an animal lover!!!
Y now

Auburn, MA

#215 Jan 13, 2014
white woman wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope, I no longer date white men, no animals for me.
And it's they're. The only thing that is obviously trash, is your education.
Ahh yes. racism shows its ugly face yet again on Topix.
JBH

Delta, Canada

#216 Jan 13, 2014
China Flaunts Secret Fleet of 40 Nuclear Submarines

29 October 2013
After 40 years of secrecy, China openly acknowledged its formidable fleet of 40 nuclear submarines, in a series of demonstration missions off the coast of Qingdao.

STORY BY:
JOEL BUXTON
FOLLOW:@joelbuxton
TAGS

Political analysts suspect that this decision is the most recent in a series of actions by the burgeoning world power meant to display their offensive capabilities.

China has been openly bolstering its military for some time, and earlier this year, two missile destroyers were spotted running naval maneuvers in international waters near Japan and Russia.

Considering that record-high smog levels were reported in China recently, some may criticize the decision to allocate so much money into weapons of war at the expense of citizen health. However, if we compare their priorities to the world’s existing super-power the United States, China seems to be on the right track.

=========

It proves US military could not even handle the upheaval of vast insurgent elements in Iraq.

But now China has too many submarines that would have US having worries.

North Korea is a nuclear power, as It already has nuclear weapons, in addition to having a well-trained, tough and fierce military.

Russia will have more tactical missiles aiming since US wants to install missile shield in Europe.

What has US military ever won?

The major efforts to defeat Hitler were from Soviet Union.
If US did not drop atomic bombs to Japan, Japan would still be defeated or withdrawing because Mao of China stopped the internal fighting..

But today's new world is never about nuclear exchange to demolish the human kingdom.
Any nuclear warfare nowadays, will damage, destroy and harm US people by global density (high concentration) of nuclear radiation.

The bottom line is that US gun-boat policy to face world nations, proves nothing of anything which is called winnable.

“bar0ckalypse N0W”

Since: Mar 10

Huntington, NY

#217 Jan 14, 2014
JBH wrote:
The McCain-Graham claim that Iraq’s ‘main political blocs were supportive’ of keeping U.S. troops in Iraq
BY GLENN KESSLER
January 13 at 6:00 am
%^&*()_+====
The above report is from Topix source.
By drawing on facts from this report, it displays that US is furthering the digging of the deepening into Iraq by Obama.
Obama, hence, is contradicting himself, since Obama shows he does not stand for what he opposed for , on whether it was wrong to invade Iraq, and/or it was too costly that US had to withdraw from Iraq.
Bush by lying about WMD, did the wrongs by calling of regime change to invade Iraq.
To be a War president in Bush's thoughts, creates the myth of naive incapacity based on this thinking which converts the showing of Bush's inaptness and inability.
This is rather the oddness of demonstrating the evil terror imposed, in a changing, different and new world by operating the gun-boat policy which could spread into uprising more invasions and wars when occupation and controlling of Iraq was successful, but still in these new times, to be reflecting as if directing Hitlerism.
Hitlerism is merely invasions to occupy by controlling and running.
The changing, different and new world confers that invasion of any county to occupy by its motives demonstrates the wrongful, deceiving standard of returning to past unjustified acts as if Hitlerism is the spirit of non-mediocre criteria, whereby generating the rated-down, negative image.
This gambit on regime change is the radicalism in modern times in the first place, that US tainted UN as there was not such agenda at any given time for regime change while UN agenda was all about WMD finding pursuit.
This actually confirms the incompetence of UN that led to current ensembles in Iraq, as such so forth that UN could have proceeded to prevent the occurrence.
On the other aspect, US had miscalculated the volatile, turbulent surging efforts of numerous insurgents before invasion, by which even US forced such occupation, it would have known US military engagement would never make it possible to support a new formed government to any length of time.
To this time, insurgent segments have spread, expanded and escalated which are under-estimated in their claiming of tearing syndrome.
The time of insurgent uprising has proven to be enduring and lasting through the long length of time.
These unrest and violences would be the longest on the planet, that they may never end until the current regime would be displaced.
US did not pull out in time when insurgents exploded by not installing any government, but preferred to occupy, as there showed no WMD finding.
Only upon costly factors of lives, US operated the stand wrongfully by not enforcing the position as if Vietnam, that the matters of the country were upon Iraqi's choices, without US meddling.
Either Obama's CONTINUOUS endeavor of supporting the current installed Iraq government will remain for more than 50 more years, or it is just symbolizing as the US Hitlerism aggression acts, that extremism is the domain of US dysfunctional policy, that defines US is travelling the backward direction.
Obama is the neo-Hitler shadow by implementing the unfinished Bush mission.
Appeasing surrendercrats enable totalitarian dictators and slavery with their yellow cowardice in the face of the enemy.

OBAMA:'Give peace a chance'...
'Win' for Iran...
ROUHANI:'World Powers Surrendered to Iranian Nation's Will'...
Foreign minister lays wreath at grave of Beirut Marine barracks bomber...

http://www.latimes.com/world/worldnow/la-fg-w...

BENGHAZI DOCS: WH first briefed on 'terrorist attack,' not video or protest...

Feinstein rejects NYTIMES conclusions...

http://thehill.com/blogs/global-affairs/middl...

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#218 Jan 14, 2014
JBH wrote:
<quoted text>
========
Do you make logic for yourself, if you say Carter and Obama are good?
What was referred to, previously (Those are the two worsts as Presidents behind Buchanan)--worsts meant worst persons to be presidents, compared to (Those are the two worse Presidents behind Buchanan)--this meant two presidents who were worse than others, not necessarily the worst.
There is no disagreement that Carter was not the worst (and as president) that he was no worst as person and as president.
Obama has not finished his term yet, to conclude about him.
The point is about persons whether they are bad, worse, or worst persons, and presidents whether were worse presidents than other presidents or as worst presidents.
There needs no more discussion unless you would make it more specific.
You are free to pursue such a discussion, but not with me.
TheDogCatcher

Farmington, MO

#219 Jan 14, 2014
mjjcpa wrote:
<quoted text>Appeasing surrendercrats enable totalitarian dictators and slavery with their yellow cowardice in the face of the enemy.

OBAMA:'Give peace a chance'...
'Win' for Iran...
ROUHANI:'World Powers Surrendered to Iranian Nation's Will'...
Foreign minister lays wreath at grave of Beirut Marine barracks bomber...

http://www.latimes.com/world/worldnow/la-fg-w...

BENGHAZI DOCS: WH first briefed on 'terrorist attack,' not video or protest...

Feinstein rejects NYTIMES conclusions...

http://thehill.com/blogs/global-affairs/middl...
If they don't throw you a bone, just dig up a stick, and act like it's a bone, don't worry, the other dogs will believe you!
Do you spend your whole day gnawing on sticks, or do you get out to sniff a lot of ass too?

“bar0ckalypse N0W”

Since: Mar 10

Huntington, NY

#220 Jan 14, 2014
TheDogCatcher wrote:
<quoted text>
Why is barock the worst President?
Affirmative action

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 11 min Dick Topick 49,508
Gay marriage (Mar '13) 11 min lides 54,890
Ukraine Says Russia Has Invaded 16 min Pro Ukraine 19
Rubio: "We must move slowly on immigration." 17 min Tea Party Supporter 6
Teen's Shooting Highlights Racial Tension 17 min ima-Ilis Myka Ash... 1,400
Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 23 min TurkanaBoy 115,239
Republicans become party of 'Deport 'em All' 24 min Tea Party Supporter 14
Race in America: Why are blacks being seen as r... (Jul '13) 28 min xxxrayted 9,835
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 29 min sonicfilter 1,100,260
The President has failed us (Jun '12) 1 hr Independent patriot 256,266
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

US Politics People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••