The ongoing attack on global warming skeptics

There are 20 comments on the Oct 23, 2013, Washington Times story titled The ongoing attack on global warming skeptics. In it, Washington Times reports that:

CHICAGO , October 23, 2013 - "Denial" is a venomous term applied to those skeptical about the role of humans in global climate change, meant to equate climate change skeptics with Holocaust deniers.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Washington Times.

First Prev
of 4
Next Last
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#1 Oct 24, 2013
Are there any skeptics left? Let's count the deniers. They will stay.. till they die..
Cordwainer Trout

Campbellsville, KY

#2 Oct 24, 2013
Why did President Obama and his staff fake the woman's fainting spell at the Rose Garden news conference? It's easily proven that it was faked. When you start to understand why these Leftists will fake such mediocre things as this to further a Socialist tyranny policy, you will begin to understand why the Leftist administrations since Carter have been faking the climate data.

They are cynical liars, cheats and thieves... that's why.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#3 Oct 24, 2013
Cordwainer Trout wrote:
Why did President Obama and his staff fake the woman's fainting spell at the Rose Garden news conference? It's easily proven that it was faked. When you start to understand why these Leftists will fake such mediocre things as this to further a Socialist tyranny policy, you will begin to understand why the Leftist administrations since Carter have been faking the climate data.
They are cynical liars, cheats and thieves... that's why.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =eupEkeYOhj4XX
Climate sceptics more likely to be conspiracy theorists, study claims

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/planet...
Cordwainer Trout

Campbellsville, KY

#4 Oct 24, 2013
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
Climate sceptics more likely to be conspiracy theorists, study claims
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/planet...
That Communist rag will naturally prefer any propaganda even obliquely supporting the Party line to the truth.

The only thing relevant to this discussion is did Obama and his staff fake the woman fainting at the Rose Garden news conference. As soon as you realize he did, conspiracy red herrings don't count.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#5 Oct 24, 2013
Cordwainer Trout wrote:
<quoted text>
That Communist rag will naturally prefer any propaganda even obliquely supporting the Party line to the truth.
The only thing relevant to this discussion is did Obama and his staff fake the woman fainting at the Rose Garden news conference. As soon as you realize he did, conspiracy red herrings don't count.
Among American Conservatives, but not Liberals, trust in science has been declining since the 1970's. Climate science has become particularly polarized, with Conservatives being more likely than Liberals to reject the notion that greenhouse gas emissions are warming the globe. Conversely, opposition to genetically-modified (GM) foods and vaccinations is often ascribed to the political Left although reliable data are lacking. There are also growing indications that rejection of science is suffused by conspiracist ideation, that is the general tendency to endorse conspiracy theories including the specific beliefs that inconvenient scientific findings constitute a “hoax.”
http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F1...

You don't have to be a conspiracy theorist to be a science denier, but it helps.
Cordwainer Trout

Campbellsville, KY

#6 Oct 24, 2013
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F1...
You don't have to be a conspiracy theorist to be a science denier, but it helps.
GAW scaremongers have no recourse to REAL science, which shows a ZERO degree warming trend per century.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/10/23/getting...

Intentionally biases science arranged for decades to control masses of people with fear based assertions of the most extreme nature was thoroughly discussed by the Communist leaders of the anti-war movement as they saw their impact on youthful activists diminishing with the decline of the Vietnam war. That's documented. Check out the waning publications of Ramparts and Seven Days magazines for complete exposure of their intent to replace the anti-war fervor with environmental challenges. Soon after, you had the Carter Global 2000 Report, all a precursor to what you have today and all of it without foundation, except the Communist Democrat intention to use food and energy as weapons.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#7 Oct 24, 2013
Cordwainer Trout wrote:
<quoted text>
GAW scaremongers have no recourse to REAL science, which shows a ZERO degree warming trend per century.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/10/23/getting...
Intentionally biases science arranged for decades to control masses of people with fear based assertions of the most extreme nature was thoroughly discussed by the Communist leaders of the anti-war movement as they saw their impact on youthful activists diminishing with the decline of the Vietnam war. That's documented. Check out the waning publications of Ramparts and Seven Days magazines for complete exposure of their intent to replace the anti-war fervor with environmental challenges. Soon after, you had the Carter Global 2000 Report, all a precursor to what you have today and all of it without foundation, except the Communist Democrat intention to use food and energy as weapons.
lol.

Your barking mad frothing at the mouth and rabid conspiracy theories prove the point.
Cordwainer Trout

Campbellsville, KY

#8 Oct 24, 2013
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
lol.
Your barking mad frothing at the mouth and rabid conspiracy theories prove the point.
No conspiracy theory. I've read the Ramparts and Seven Days discussions amongst the Communists. They're as erudite as they are sinister. The policies they described back then have been implemented. Global 2000 Report had US cities under water by 2000. Carter was and is a Communist and is as anti-America as the suits come.

It's fully understood how psychologically difficult it is for you guys to realize you've been had, been made tools and used. I went through it myself. Former editors of Ramparts went through it. It's shocking. The natural reaction is to be assaultive and arrogant and stubborn. My first recommendation is to give up the marijuana and other drugs you've been encouraged to use by the same Communists. They cause deluded thinking.
Cordwainer Trout

Campbellsville, KY

#9 Oct 24, 2013
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
lol.
Your barking mad frothing at the mouth and rabid conspiracy theories prove the point.
BTW, I personally bought a whole case of the first volume of the Global 2000 Report and gave copies to friends, thinking it relevant and completely taken in by the scholarship behind it. It did turn out to be bad science, too.

It's depressing to know I personally took part in misleading all those people into believing that nonsense. Hopefully, they've woken up with the sea level constant since the report was issued.
LessHypeMoreFact

Toronto, Canada

#10 Oct 24, 2013
It remains that the science is solid, and their are no significant scientific finding that conflict with AGW theory. Those who claim 'skepticism' have no BASIS for their position (unlike those who have examined the evidence and concluded that the science is correct) and thus are NOT 'sceptics' in the way science defines the term. In science, when the facts are counter to your initial 'hypothesis' you change your hypothesis. You don't stand firm on your 'convictions' against all the facts presented.
curmudgeon

Mountain Home, AR

#11 Oct 24, 2013
Here We are again the same looney tunes glowbull warming supporters starting a new thread. Glowbull warming is a Myth scam religion.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#12 Oct 24, 2013
curmudgeon wrote:
Here We are again the same looney tunes glowbull warming supporters starting a new thread. Glowbull warming is a Myth scam religion.
You are such a delight.

When will you stop being a science denier?
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#13 Oct 24, 2013
Cordwainer Trout wrote:
<quoted text>
BTW, I personally bought a whole case of the first volume of the Global 2000 Report and gave copies to friends, thinking it relevant and completely taken in by the scholarship behind it. It did turn out to be bad science, too.
It's depressing to know I personally took part in misleading all those people into believing that nonsense. Hopefully, they've woken up with the sea level constant since the report was issued.
What? You will have to eat your words.. start now!
LessHypeMoreFact

Toronto, Canada

#14 Oct 24, 2013
curmudgeon wrote:
Here We are again the same looney tunes glowbull warming supporters starting a new thread.
The thread is another one started by global warming DENIERS, one of a large many. That is the 'big lie' tactic. By contrast, science has ONE voice and rarely spams the media.
curmudgeon wrote:
Glowbull warming is a Myth scam religion.
Come back when you have some facts to support your denial. If ever..
Cut n Paste

Minneapolis, MN

#15 Oct 24, 2013
LessHypeMoreFact wrote:
<quoted text>
The thread is another one started by global warming DENIERS, one of a large many. That is the 'big lie' tactic. By contrast, science has ONE voice and rarely spams the media.
<quoted text>
Come back when you have some facts to support your denial. If ever..
"There may also be a contribution from forcing inadequacies and, in some models, an overestimate of the response to increasing greenhouse gas and other anthropogenic forcing."

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#16 Oct 24, 2013
Cut n Paste wrote:
<quoted text>
"There may also be a contribution from forcing inadequacies and, in some models, an overestimate of the response to increasing greenhouse gas and other anthropogenic forcing."
Lol.

Cut'n paste is right: that quote has been cut'n posted round every denier blog on the internet.
There is medium confidence that internal decadal variability causes to a substantial degree the difference between observations and the simulations; the latter are not expected to reproduce the timing of internal variability. There may also be a contribution from forcing inadequacies and, in some models, an overestimate of the response to increasing greenhouse gas and other anthropogenic forcing (dominated by the effects of aerosols).
Unfortunately ignorant fuckwits like you don't have the brains to understand it, or the humility to ask someone who does.

It says it's probably just short term variability, and if it anything, it's most likely pollution masking global warming.

Absolutely no reason to doubt the risks of AGW.
litesong

Monroe, WA

#17 Oct 24, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
Are there any skeptics left? Let's count the deniers. They will stay.. till they die..
toxic topix AGW deniers have no place in science or mathematics to go, since toxic topix AGW have no science or mathematics degrees & have little science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra or pre-calc for their poorly earned hi skule DEE-plooomaas.
Jim

Euless, TX

#18 Oct 24, 2013
LessBrainMoreFart wrote:
It remains that the science is solid, and their are no significant scientific finding that conflict with AGW theory. Those who claim 'skepticism' have no BASIS for their position (unlike those who have examined the evidence and concluded that the science is correct) and thus are NOT 'sceptics' in the way science defines the term. In science, when the facts are counter to your initial 'hypothesis' you change your hypothesis. You don't stand firm on your 'convictions' against all the facts presented.
Uh, yeah the science is solid. Solidly bought and paid for by governments and globalists that want unequivocal control over each and every aspect of your daily life. The only science in the hoax deniers argument is "hypothesis". When in comes to experimentation and reproducibility, well suffice it to say there is room for improvement. The Xbox is no foundation to build your so called climate science on.
curmudgeon

Mountain Home, AR

#19 Oct 24, 2013
The fundamental cause of trouble in the world
is that the stupid are sure while the intelligent are full of doubt.**
Bertrand Russell
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#20 Oct 24, 2013
curmudgeon wrote:
The fundamental cause of trouble in the world
is that the stupid are sure while the intelligent are full of doubt.**
Bertrand Russell
Have you hijacked a liberal quote? Yes, you have.

See above #11 for who you are.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 3 min freebird 324,543
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min Nuculur option 1,220,419
News The Latest on GOP's 2016 hopefuls: Cruz on gay ... 4 min Lawrence Wolf 61
News Republicans back bill letting illegal immigrant... 5 min tomin cali 1
News 5 Reasons The American Dream Is Eluding Black P... 5 min xxxrayted 428
News Majority Oppose 'Religious Freedom' Laws That C... 6 min Wall 179
News 'Deep-Seated Cultural Codes, Religious Beliefs ... 6 min SirPrize 46
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 12 min Wow 160,961
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 16 min brad 179,252
News Clinton charities will refile tax returns, audi... 3 hr Le Jimbo 180
More from around the web