Area gun sales, fears rising

There are 20 comments on the Nov 14, 2012, North Port Sun story titled Area gun sales, fears rising. In it, North Port Sun reports that:

Gun stores in Charlotte County have experienced increased sales since Election Day as local gun owners brace for an anticipated restriction of gun laws following the re-election of President Barack Obama.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at North Port Sun.

Yeah

Mililani, HI

#4726 Feb 10, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Proving you wrong?????
Tell us again how the burden of proof rest on the defense???
lol! Why should I tell you AGAIN, son?

You didn't read or discuss it the first time.

You simply ignored it, then continued to post your tripe.

You're the one with the problem, not me. And thanks for proving it.
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#4727 Feb 10, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Well many times we can't wait until they come to our shores to fight. Sometimes you have to fight them in other countries. If we wait for them to come to us, we end up with results like 911.
Wait.... so now you're ok with violating the Constitution?

BTW, you do know that 911 wasn't done by a country or countries, right? Or did you miss that part?
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#4728 Feb 10, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
You can't stop illegal narcotics no more than you can stop murder, rape, or theft. All you can do is try to control it somehow.
You mean... like gun control?

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Puerto Vallarta, Mexico

#4729 Feb 10, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>I still don't see your AF part son. After all, that's the part in question.
Simply quoting the Constitution isn't making your point. It's simply showing you don't understand it.
Military was clearly mentioned and the AF is part of the military.......

Why do you black thugs try so hard to prove you are morons???

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Puerto Vallarta, Mexico

#4730 Feb 10, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>Nor does it show the AF as a branch of services.
Are you so stupid that you dont know the AF is a branch of the military???

Just like you are so stupid you dont know the burden of proof falls on the prosecution even after the law was posted for you???

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
Please post a link that shows that???
Would you like the link again that proves you wrong???
Burden of proof is on the prosecution
http://nationalparalegal.edu/conlawcrimproc_p...

Yea wrote.
lol! Nope. Don't need to son.

That's the defense's job. Even a dumb person would know that!

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Puerto Vallarta, Mexico

#4731 Feb 10, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! Why should I tell you AGAIN, son?
You didn't read or discuss it the first time.
You simply ignored it, then continued to post your tripe.
You're the one with the problem, not me. And thanks for proving it.
Wrong again village liar..........LOL

I posted a link that showed you were a moron and the burden of proof does fall on the prosecution and you said this..........LOL

On post # 46912 here http://www.topix.com/forum/us/politics/TKPEED...
The moron yea claimed that the burden of proof falls on the defense even after I had posed a link from a legal law lib ray showing what everyone else knows that the burden of proof falls on the prosecution……

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
Please post a link that shows that???
Would you like the link again that proves you wrong???
Burden of proof is on the prosecution
http://nationalparalegal.edu/conlawcrimproc_p...

Yea wrote.
lol! Nope. Don't need to son.

That's the defense's job. Even a dumb person would know that!

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Puerto Vallarta, Mexico

#4732 Feb 10, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>You mean... like gun control?
Did that stop you ghetto thugs from selling dope????

NOPE..........ROTFLMAO
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#4733 Feb 10, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Military was clearly mentioned and the AF is part of the military.......
Why do you black thugs try so hard to prove you are morons???
lol! So stupid and yet... so stupid.

You really are an idiot son.
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#4734 Feb 10, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong again village liar..........LOL
I posted a link that showed you were a moron and the burden of proof does fall on the prosecution and you said this..........LOL
On post # 46912 here http://www.topix.com/forum/us/politics/TKPEED...
The moron yea claimed that the burden of proof falls on the defense even after I had posed a link from a legal law lib ray showing what everyone else knows that the burden of proof falls on the prosecution……
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Please post a link that shows that???
Would you like the link again that proves you wrong???
Burden of proof is on the prosecution
http://nationalparalegal.edu/conlawcrimproc_p...
Yea wrote.
lol! Nope. Don't need to son.
That's the defense's job. Even a dumb person would know that!
lol! You posted a link that showed you're a moron son.

You're just not intelligent enough to comprehend... or more likely just not intelligent for much of anything.
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#4735 Feb 10, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Did that stop you ghetto thugs from selling dope????
NOPE..........ROTFLMAO
What?
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#4736 Feb 10, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>I still don't see your AF part son. After all, that's the part in question.
Simply quoting the Constitution isn't making your point. It's simply showing you don't understand it.
No, it shows you don't know how to read. The US Constitution requires our leaders to protect us and yes, with whatever means it takes to do that. An air force is necessary for the protection of our country.

Now if you want to know what's not in our Constitution, try affirmative action, abortion, hate crimes, church and state for starters.
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#4737 Feb 10, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>You mean... like gun control?
The US Constitution does not guarantee a right to harmful narcotics. It does guarantee a right for citizens to have arms.
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#4738 Feb 10, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it shows you don't know how to read. The US Constitution requires our leaders to protect us and yes, with whatever means it takes to do that. An air force is necessary for the protection of our country.
Now if you want to know what's not in our Constitution, try affirmative action, abortion, hate crimes, church and state for starters.
lol! No, now you're interpreting son.

You obviously have problems with the literal meaning so this is what you resort to.

Because the Air Force clearly is not listed, along with the items you did!
sickofit

Faribault, MN

#4739 Feb 10, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
The US Constitution does not guarantee a right to harmful narcotics. It does guarantee a right for citizens to have arms.
Do you think if the government banned fatty foods or sugar it would be ok with you?

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Puerto Vallarta, Mexico

#4740 Feb 10, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! So stupid and yet... so stupid.
You really are an idiot son.
Yes you are..........LOL

You have shown you are so stupid you think the burden of proof in a court of law is on the defense..........LOL

You have shown that you dont know the Air Force is a branch of the military..........LOL

You have shown you are so stupid you think a dead body means a crime happened......

You have show us you are so stupid you think it is illegal to shoot a black punk that is attacking you.......

Yes a typical black thug........

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Puerto Vallarta, Mexico

#4741 Feb 10, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! You posted a link that showed you're a moron son.
You're just not intelligent enough to comprehend... or more likely just not intelligent for much of anything.
Yes we know you think the burden of proof is on the defense..........

Typical black thug..........Dumber than a box of rocks..........LOL

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Puerto Vallarta, Mexico

#4742 Feb 10, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>What?
Yes we know you are too stupid to understand a simple sentence.....

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Puerto Vallarta, Mexico

#4743 Feb 10, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! No, now you're interpreting son.
You obviously have problems with the literal meaning so this is what you resort to.
Because the Air Force clearly is not listed, along with the items you did!
Once again you are proven a moron..........LOL
rider

Gwinn, MI

#4744 Feb 10, 2013
C Street and The Family - The Christian Mafia

“Antisocialistic”

Since: May 12

Lake Charles, LA

#4745 Feb 10, 2013
sickofit wrote:
<quoted text>People steal who dont do drugs or drink alcohol. We have laws for that. Guns can be used to rob someone. But we should not ban guns...So why ban drugs?
I never said everyone that steals does drugs or drinks alcohol. If you feel that I did, please show the post. Why do you feel the need to detract from what I'm saying?

Have you read anything I've posted? I've addressed that question at least twice. In a perfect world where we have ALL of our freedoms and survival of the fittest is in play, drugs should not be banned.
But in the country we live in, I'm forced to pay taxes on my earnings to pay for people to sit on their ass. If drugs are legal, with that comes responsibility. If those that sit on their ass won't take responsibility for their own shelter, food, and healthcare, what makes you think they are responsible enough to use drugs? If hard drugs are legalized, lets say crack or meth for instance, they get to sit on their ass while I and half of the US work, use crack or meth, live as well as the average middle class family, deteriorate their health, and get free healthcare on my and half of America's dime.
If crack and meth are made legal, do you think it should be purchased via food stamps? If your answer is no, then you just agreed to another government regulation.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 6 min Hister 187,435
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 7 min NTRPRNR1 324,874
The Email Address Debacle: Did Hillary Do Somet... 8 min spud 1,041
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 10 min Bluestater 1,220,921
News 5 Reasons The American Dream Is Eluding Black P... 14 min spud 591
News Congressman: Global Warming Is A 'Religion' 18 min Emily Latella 21
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 32 min Aura Mytha 161,145
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 1 hr brad 179,464
News Poll: Hillary Clinton most admired woman 5 hr Tracker 750
More from around the web