Paul Ryan promises hate group that he...

Paul Ryan promises hate group that he'll fight equality

There are 5442 comments on the www.wisconsingazette.com story from Oct 9, 2012, titled Paul Ryan promises hate group that he'll fight equality. In it, www.wisconsingazette.com reports that:

In a recent interview with Focus on the Family president Jim Daly, Paul Ryan reassured the anti-gay hate group that a Romney-Ryan administration will fiercely oppose gay rights.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.wisconsingazette.com.

Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

#5187 Dec 8, 2012
Laquesha Jefferson PhD wrote:
<quoted text>
You'd need to double up on your viagra first. and sneek up on me from behind but use a condom 'cause if you knock me up I'd abort your vile spawn.
I have a feeling that your oder would protect you. Besides, I prefer slim and attractive women, not stinky old cows.
Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

#5188 Dec 8, 2012
Wondering wrote:
I have a feeling that your oder would protect you. Besides, I prefer slim and attractive women, not stinky old cows.
See, Justice Dumbass, even I can have a brainfart, but you bring it to a new level.
Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

#5189 Dec 8, 2012
cpeter1313 wrote:
No, it's not a state interest, since the state does not legislate or encode anything you mentioned. If it is not enforceable for straights it cannot be used against gays.
<quoted text>
Actually, you've inspired a question. Who said anything about gays?
Another. Why do you think it's all about gays?

As for not legislating or encoding anything mentioned, you would have to live under a rock to believe that.
Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

#5190 Dec 8, 2012
cpeter1313 wrote:
I'm HIV NEGATIVE, moron. <quoted text>
That's not what you said, moron.
"I'm HIV" is what you said.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#5191 Dec 8, 2012
obama blows wrote:
<quoted text>
Obamahammed, the Kenyan usurper and failure.
Obama is Hawaiin, ergo not illegal.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#5192 Dec 8, 2012
Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
That's not what you said, moron.
"I'm HIV" is what you said.
Hey moron, can't you read? He said "I'm HIV-"

lides

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#5193 Dec 8, 2012
Wondering wrote:
To get back to the comment, a child being raised by both married biological parents is a state interest.
Wondering, no it's not. Want proof? Can biological parents divorce, with one gaining sole custody of the children (both administered by the state)? Can non-biological parents adopt children? Can unmarried people have and raise children, even if only one of the biological parents will be involved in the latter?

If ANY of the aforementioned are true, then your argument is in tatters.
Wondering wrote:
Kids being raised by both parents are less likely to use drugs, be on state assistance, drop out of school or commit crimes.
Feel free to actually cite a study that finds this to be true. EVEN IF you can, which is doubtful, it does not render the fact that there is not a legitmate state interest in children being raised by their biological parents. Only an incredibly stupid person would make such an argument.
Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

#5194 Dec 8, 2012
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
Wondering, no it's not. Want proof? Can biological parents divorce, with one gaining sole custody of the children (both administered by the state)? Can non-biological parents adopt children? Can unmarried people have and raise children, even if only one of the biological parents will be involved in the latter?
If ANY of the aforementioned are true, then your argument is in tatters.
Your brain is in tatters. Yes, give me proof. I don't think you are capable of doing so.

lides

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#5195 Dec 8, 2012
Wondering wrote:
Your brain is in tatters. Yes, give me proof. I don't think you are capable of doing so.
I just did. The state not only allows, but presides over both adoption and divorce with sole custody; both situations affirm that there is no legitimate state interest in a child being raised by two biological parents. Anyone who wasn't an imbecile could see that.

Wondering, most people don't go to such great lengths to put their shortcomings on public display. One wonders why you do?
Mona Lott

West New York, NJ

#5196 Dec 8, 2012
Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
Incorrect spelling of asinine.
Oh? And who decides what is correct? Would it be the professionals?... you know, the guys whom you REJECT because they're all gay like the APA?
Mona Lott

West New York, NJ

#5197 Dec 8, 2012
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
I just did. The state not only allows, but presides over both adoption and divorce with sole custody; both situations affirm that there is no legitimate state interest in a child being raised by two biological parents. Anyone who wasn't an imbecile could see that.
Wondering, most people don't go to such great lengths to put their shortcomings on public display. One wonders why you do?
It's the only way his opinions can be "validated." He certainly can't back them up with VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE, because he rejects verifiable evidence.

lides

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#5198 Dec 8, 2012
Mona Lott wrote:
It's the only way his opinions can be "validated." He certainly can't back them up with VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE, because he rejects verifiable evidence.
Wondering is an idiot first class.

They've already proven that they haven't the mental capacity to understand basic logic, or for that matter to count to three.

Ultimately, I should just ignore the troll, but it's just so fun to point out the idiocy of their various arguments.
Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

#5199 Dec 8, 2012
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
I just did. The state not only allows, but presides over both adoption and divorce with sole custody; both situations affirm that there is no legitimate state interest in a child being raised by two biological parents. Anyone who wasn't an imbecile could see that.
Wondering, most people don't go to such great lengths to put their shortcomings on public display. One wonders why you do?
No you didn't. In fact, you are just exemplifying the fact that you are a fool. What do divorce, adoption and a mother and father have in common? They are all in the best interest of the child.

If adoption were not permitted what would happen to kids without parents?

If divorce were not available what would the home life be for a child with two parents that hated each other?

I don't expect an old closet case unwanted reject like you to understand anything about children or the laws that preotect them.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#5200 Dec 8, 2012
See that "-" sign after the HIV, idiot? That indicates NEGATIVE.
Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
That's not what you said, moron.
"I'm HIV" is what you said.
Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

#5201 Dec 8, 2012
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
Wondering is an idiot first class.
They've already proven that they haven't the mental capacity to understand basic logic, or for that matter to count to three.
Ultimately, I should just ignore the troll, but it's just so fun to point out the idiocy of their various arguments.
Justice Dumbass, you are the troll, but I'm loving it. You are so pathetic you make me laugh out loud. As for the three thing, I did finally force you to admit you were wrong.
Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

#5202 Dec 8, 2012
lides wrote:
Ultimately, I should just ignore the troll,
You can't. You've tried, you've failed. Failure = Justice Dumbass.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#5203 Dec 8, 2012
Spend some time in family court and divorce court, and then tell me everything is for the child's interest.

Then tell me how adoption is what's best for the child:
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/55422492-78...
Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
No you didn't. In fact, you are just exemplifying the fact that you are a fool. What do divorce, adoption and a mother and father have in common? They are all in the best interest of the child.
If adoption were not permitted what would happen to kids without parents?
If divorce were not available what would the home life be for a child with two parents that hated each other?
I don't expect an old closet case unwanted reject like you to understand anything about children or the laws that preotect them.

lides

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#5204 Dec 8, 2012
cpeter1313 wrote:
Spend some time in family court and divorce court, and then tell me everything is for the child's interest.
Then tell me how adoption is what's best for the child:
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/55422492-78...
You are wasting your time. Wondering is completely impervious to reality.

“Luke laughs at hypocrites!”

Since: Sep 10

Palm Springs, California

#5205 Dec 8, 2012
Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
That's not what you said, moron.
"I'm HIV" is what you said.
In other words, you could say "I am not gay" and since "gay" was in his statement, YOU are then, using YOUR, ahem,**logic**, cough cough.

“Luke laughs at hypocrites!”

Since: Sep 10

Palm Springs, California

#5206 Dec 8, 2012
Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
Justice Dumbass, you are the troll, but I'm loving it. You are so pathetic you make me laugh out loud. As for the three thing, I did finally force you to admit you were wrong.
that's an amusing picture, you sitting there at your messy desk, Cheetos all over and coke cans piled up in huge mounds, you sitting there screaming with laughter at some stupid postings on Topix. I can see your poor wife, or whatever, cowering in the corner, biting her nails in fear of what is next.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min RoxLo 1,599,527
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 2 min cpeter1313 317,364
News DACA recipients question future 2 min southern at heart 128
News 'Dress-wearing' students must submit photos bef... 5 min Ted Haggard s Mas... 7
News Trump pardons former Sheriff Joe Arpaio 6 min Chicagoan by Birth 1,242
News Strange bedfellows: Jimmy Carter defends Trump 9 min Sublime1 174
News Monument madness a leftist cover to crumble Ame... 10 min See The Light 1,142
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 24 min Littlebigman 289,006
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 54 min old_moose 30,572
More from around the web