Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt...

Full story: Newsday 52,287
When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, global warming was a slow-moving environmental problem that was easy to ignore. Read more

Since: Mar 09

Wichita, KS

#44484 Mar 18, 2014
Mothra wrote:
<quoted text>
1350+ Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skeptic Arguments Against ACC/AGW Alarm
http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer...
Happy reading!
From the rebuttals; " it is not claimed that all the papers are physical science papers, only that they are all peer-reviewed."

Of course there are papers that take issue with many facets of global warming science. That is how science works. The ones from reputable scientific journals have been weighed and studied. Those that have found merit have been incorporated into the science. It is up to you to present those that support your rather loose position.

But I do not expect much other than more blather.

Since: Mar 09

Wichita, KS

#44485 Mar 18, 2014
Mothra wrote:
<quoted text>
1350+ Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skeptic Arguments Against ACC/AGW Alarm
http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer...
Happy reading!
BTW, where is the solid science that supports your tenuous tedium.

Since: Mar 09

Wichita, KS

#44486 Mar 18, 2014
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
what happened to freedom of choice, freedom of speech, freedom of thought?
are you liberals as opposed to this kind of thing?
speak up hypocrites!!
lol
http://www.bizpacreview.com/2014/03/18/colleg...
if man made climate change is so certain....why are you whackos behaving so hysterical? is it becasue science doesn't back up your beliefs quite so much?
The freedoms stop where they trample on others rights. We are a social order, not a bunch of anarchistic individuals. When those ideas infringe upon the social order, they must be contained. It is not an inherent freedom to shout fire in a packed movie theater. You can think whatever you please.

Here is the quote, "The importance of clearly communicating science to the public should not be underestimated. Accurately understanding our natural environment and sharing that information can be a matter of life or death. When it comes to global warming, much of the public remains in denial about a set of facts that the majority of scientists clearly agree on. With such high stakes, an organised campaign funding misinformation ought to be considered criminally negligent."
1 post removed
Coal is King

Paducah, KY

#44488 Mar 18, 2014
Looks like at least one Global Warming Hoax money sink is about to get stopped:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2014/03...

Since: Mar 09

Wichita, KS

#44489 Mar 18, 2014
For what it is worth the denier message is falling rather flat. It seems that our local deniers are a pitiful minority.

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observati...
1 post removed
Mothra

Phoenix, AZ

#44491 Mar 18, 2014
OzRitz wrote:
<quoted text>
I would have thought that was obvious, the clock is ticking and still nothing of substance has been implemented on a global basis.[incoherent ramblings omitted]
What! A crisis?

Goodness... give Al Gore a call! He needs to know this.

If he's not home, call his other mansion. If not there, try is limo. Still no? Try his plane.

Still no luck?

Dunno... smoke signals?

LOL.
Mothra

Phoenix, AZ

#44492 Mar 18, 2014
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
if man made climate change is so certain....why are you whackos behaving so hysterical? is it becasue science doesn't back up your beliefs quite so much?
Maybe they didn't get the memo.... a little "hide" hear, a "trick" there... mix in some homogenization.... and TADA!

It's proven!!!
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#44493 Mar 18, 2014
Coal is King wrote:
Looks like at least one Global Warming Hoax money sink is about to get stopped:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2014/03...
No Joke, NO..

From your link: Increasing amounts of CO2 and other gases caused by the burning of the oil, gas and coal that power our world are enhancing the natural "greenhouse effect," causing the planet to warm to levels that climate scientists say can't be linked to natural forces.

Carbon dioxide levels were around 280 "parts per million" (ppm) before the Industrial Revolution, when humans first began releasing large amounts into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels. They're now near 400 ppm.
..

All of this comes against the backdrop of last week's CO2 rise above 400 ppm at Mauna Loa for the second straight year.(CO2 levels peak in the spring when plants come alive, then decrease when the plants die in the autumn.)

Keeling says that within the next two to three years, the measurement will stay above 400 ppm permanently. "It's just a matter of time before it stays over 400 forever," he said. Consistent levels above 400 ppm haven't been seen in human history and perhaps as long as millions of years.

"We are living in extraordinary times," Keeling said.
Mothra

Phoenix, AZ

#44494 Mar 18, 2014
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
From the rebuttals; " it is not claimed that all the papers are physical science papers, only that they are all peer-reviewed."
Of course there are papers that take issue with many facets of global warming science. That is how science works. The ones from reputable scientific journals have been weighed and studied. Those that have found merit have been incorporated into the science. It is up to you to present those that support your rather loose position.
But I do not expect much other than more blather.
Do please give the whole context:

Under Rebuttals:

Criticism: Paper [Insert Name] is not a physical science paper.
Rebuttal: This is strawman argument as it is not claimed that all the papers are physical science papers, only that they are all peer-reviewed. Just like the WGII and WGIII sections of the IPCC reports, peer-reviewed papers from social scientists and policy analysts are included in the list. These papers appear in the appropriate socio-economic sections (e.g. Socio-Economic) separate from the physical science sections on the list. Regardless, there are over 1000 physical science papers on the list.

Get back to your reading... and this time make sure you look at all the words.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#44495 Mar 18, 2014
Mothra wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe they didn't get the memo.... a little "hide" hear, a "trick" there... mix in some homogenization.... and TADA!
It's proven!!!
Proven what, denier?

Whining suits you!
Mothra

Phoenix, AZ

#44496 Mar 18, 2014
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
BTW, where is the solid science that supports your tenuous tedium.
Ahhh... nothing like the cart before the horse, huh?

It's the warmists that have presented the "theory". As such, they gotta answer to all comers.

Not my rules... just the way it is (or used to be).
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#44497 Mar 18, 2014
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>exactly who's rights are being trampled on, son?
funny.....you people can never disprove any facts given to you....no matter how much misinformation you all produce.
You, pops, can't handle the truth.. starting with the greenhouse gas effect!

Back to elementary school..
Mothra

Phoenix, AZ

#44498 Mar 18, 2014
Coal is King wrote:
Looks like at least one Global Warming Hoax money sink is about to get stopped:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2014/03...
Oh my goodness! A crisis within a crisis!

But funding should be no big deal... just snip out a few resort conferences, take commercial airlines, drop some SUV convoys... you know little budget tightening.

Tada! You've got scads of money!

And don't forget your curly-cue light bulbs and to inflate your tires!

btw... anyone know why it takes $1 million a year to keep this running? Seen a cost breakdown anywhere?
1 post removed
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#44500 Mar 18, 2014
coal is kinky wrote:
Looks like at least one Global Warming.....
Coal advocates want to cover up evidence of their rape of the atmosphere, seas, & Earth.
Mothra

Phoenix, AZ

#44501 Mar 18, 2014
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
For what it is worth the denier message is falling rather flat. It seems that our local deniers are a pitiful minority.
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observati...
"...according to an assessment of 21 surveys ..."

A survey of surveys? Yeah... there's some hard hitting stuff there. This guy's gotta be a warmists... who else could support cherry picking data in such a unique fashion, and then present it as a "fact"?

>>The majority of Americans continue to believe that the effects of global warming are happening or will begin to happen during their lifetimes. At the same time, many fewer, currently 36%, believe global warming will pose a serious threat to their way of life during their lifetimes.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/167879/not-global-...

First... note the distinction... "are happening" or "will happen during their lifetimes"... nothing like a broad brush to cover a big area.

But... is it a big deal?... nope. Check the graph. Never has a majority seen it as a "serious" threat.

d'Oh!
Franklin

Los Angeles, CA

#44502 Mar 18, 2014
True or false?

Several solar energy experts said they have not calculated the industry’s total waste and were surprised at what the records showed.

Solyndra, the now-defunct solar company that received $535 million in guaranteed federal loans, reported producing about 12.5 million pounds of hazardous waste, much of it carcinogenic cadmium-contaminated water, which was sent to waste facilities from 2007 through mid-2011.

Before the company went bankrupt, leading to increased scrutiny of the solar industry and political fallout for President Barack Obama’s administration, Solyndra SAID it created 100 megawatts-worth of solar panels, enough to power 100,000 homes.

The records also show several other Silicon Valley solar facilities created millions of pounds of toxic waste without selling a single solar panel, while they were developing their technology or fine-tuning their production.
1 post removed
Mothra

Phoenix, AZ

#44504 Mar 18, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Proven what, denier?
Whining suits you!
Still in a snit?

Have some Ovaltine, and have a little nappy-poo..
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#44505 Mar 18, 2014
motheaten wrote:
funding should be no big deal... just snip out....
......evidence of coal advocates' rape of the atmosphere, seas, oceans & Earth. re-pubic-lick-uns would fund such...... with snips.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#44506 Mar 18, 2014
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>apparently you don't understand the greenhouse effect.
even after i explained it to you.
so....shut up, you mental midget.
BAHAHAHA you can't handle the truth, LIAR.

Go back to my previous posts for hard cramming before you post again..
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#44507 Mar 18, 2014
[QUOTE who="ratdownthemiddle ","middleofthedownwr onggully"] who's rights are being trampled on......[/QUOTE]

"ratdownthemiddle", "middleofthedownwronggull y" has no eyes to see:
https://www.google.com/search...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Indiana officials look to stem religious object... 4 min FYI 32
News Indiana religious objections law slammed on soc... 4 min barefoot2626 35
News Cheney: Obama Is 'Worst President in My Lifetime' 4 min woodtick57 370
News Progressive Hispanics Slam Ted Cruz as 'Anti-Im... 5 min tomin cali 6
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 5 min Pearl Jam 309,243
News Latest on Ferguson: Civil rights leaders condem... 6 min xxxrayted 1,662
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 6 min Grey Ghost 1,206,480
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 10 min Ari son of Anarchy 175,762
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 18 min Karma is a_______ 320,474
News Official resigns after insulting Obama, Holder,... 33 min Righteous 151
News Harry Reid to retire, will not be seeking re-el... 40 min Le Jimbo 64
More from around the web