Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt...

[mememine69]

-If you don’t think fear mongering the voter’s children with CO2 death threats will cost Obama the White House, think again.
-Science only agrees it might happen, not will happen as there isn’t one single IPCC warning without “maybes”.
-We are at the brink and the edge of unstoppable warming and science still won’t say it “WILL” happen, only could and might and probably and….-Help my planet is on fire maybe?
*Occupywallstreet does not even mention CO2 in its list of demands because of the bank-funded carbon trading stock markets run by corporations.
*Obama has not mentioned the crisis in the last two State of the Unions addresses.
*Julian Assange is of course a climate change denier.
*Canada killed Y2Kyoto with a freely elected climate change denying prime minister and nobody cared, especially the millions of scientists warning us of unstoppable warming (death).
-Meanwhile, the entire world of SCIENCE, journalism and progressivism had allowed bank-funded and corporate-run “CARBON TRADING STOCK MARKETS” to trump 3rd world fresh water relief, starvation rescue and 3rd world education for just over 26 years of insane attempts at climate CONTROL.

[Here Is One]

mememine69 wrote:

-If you don’t think fear mongering the voter’s children with CO2 death threats will cost Obama the White House, think again.
-Science only agrees it might happen, not will happen as there isn’t one single IPCC warning without “maybes”.
-We are at the brink and the edge of unstoppable warming and science still won’t say it “WILL” happen, only could and might and probably and….-Help my planet is on fire maybe?
*Occupywallstreet does not even mention CO2 in its list of demands because of the bank-funded carbon trading stock markets run by corporations.
*Obama has not mentioned the crisis in the last two State of the Unions addresses.
*Julian Assange is of course a climate change denier.
*Canada killed Y2Kyoto with a freely elected climate change denying prime minister and nobody cared, especially the millions of scientists warning us of unstoppable warming (death).
-Meanwhile, the entire world of SCIENCE, journalism and progressivism had allowed bank-funded and corporate-run “CARBON TRADING STOCK MARKETS” to trump 3rd world fresh water relief, starvation rescue and 3rd world education for just over 26 years of insane attempts at climate CONTROL.

Liberals dont like their poster boy for healthcare Canada anymore..........

Canada is extracting oil..........Big no no for liberals......
Canada lowered it max tax rate on the rich and business to less than half of the US rate to 15%........Big no no for liberals......

[SpaceBlues]

mememine69 wrote:

-If you don’t think fear mongering the voter’s children with CO2 death threats will cost Obama the White House, think again.
-Science only agrees it might happen, not will happen as there isn’t one single IPCC warning without “maybes”.
-We are at the brink and the edge of unstoppable warming and science still won’t say it “WILL” happen, only could and might and probably and….-Help my planet is on fire maybe?
*Occupywallstreet does not even mention CO2 in its list of demands because of the bank-funded carbon trading stock markets run by corporations.
*Obama has not mentioned the crisis in the last two State of the Unions addresses.
*Julian Assange is of course a climate change denier.
*Canada killed Y2Kyoto with a freely elected climate change denying prime minister and nobody cared, especially the millions of scientists warning us of unstoppable warming (death).
-Meanwhile, the entire world of SCIENCE, journalism and progressivism had allowed bank-funded and corporate-run “CARBON TRADING STOCK MARKETS” to trump 3rd world fresh water relief, starvation rescue and 3rd world education for just over 26 years of insane attempts at climate CONTROL.

Are you eligible to vote in our elections?

[SpaceBlues]

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
Liberals dont like their poster boy for healthcare Canada anymore..........
Canada is extracting oil..........Big no no for liberals......
Canada lowered it max tax rate on the rich and business to less than half of the US rate to 15%........Big no no for liberals......

Are you liberal?

[Here Is One]

SpaceBlues wrote:

<quoted text>Are you liberal?

On many things I am.......

1. I dont think US troops should be dying in a foreign country unless the country is going to reimburse the for every penny spent and every drop of blood we shed.....

2. I personally think abortion is horrible and there would be a huge fight if a relative wanted one under most circumstances but I dont think the government has a right to tell a woman what she can do untill it comes to partial birth abortions and that is just murder.

3. I think the war on drugs is a failure and the money would be better spent on education

4. If two people of the same sex are together in a relationship they should have the same rights as any other couple under a different name than marriage as the government has no business in someones bedroom.

Other than that I am very conservative.....

[Northie]

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
On many things I am.......
1. I dont think US troops should be dying in a foreign country unless the country is going to reimburse the for every penny spent and every drop of blood we shed.....
2. I personally think abortion is horrible and there would be a huge fight if a relative wanted one under most circumstances but I dont think the government has a right to tell a woman what she can do untill it comes to partial birth abortions and that is just murder.
3. I think the war on drugs is a failure and the money would be better spent on education
4. If two people of the same sex are together in a relationship they should have the same rights as any other couple under a different name than marriage as the government has no business in someones bedroom.
Other than that I am very conservative.....

You could have spared yourself writing that long post. The last four words say it all.

[Here Is One]

Northie wrote:

<quoted text>
You could have spared yourself writing that long post. The last four words say it all.

You and I agree on solar???.......LOL

[Northie]

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
You and I agree on solar???.......LOL

I'm sure we also agree that the sky is blue and that pigs seldom fly. So?

[Here Is One]

Northie wrote:

<quoted text>I'm sure we also agree that the sky is blue and that pigs seldom fly. So?

Oh I see

You only look for reason to hate someone not to see what you can agree on..........LOL

[PHD]

The only hate spread here is by the dirtling. The dirtling has nothing to offer but useless babble tainted with hate covered with spam cut and paste. The sub zero education the dirtling has attained in its lifetime prohibits the dirtling from answering a 2nd grade question.

[mememine69]

History will show that you remaining-fear-mongering-clima te-cowards of climate blame belief are the real fear mongering neocons of CO2Environ MENTAL ism.

You all just hated your own pathetic lives and enjoyed dragging the rest of us down with you in your hate for humanity and so called "love" for the planet.
And now the world refuses to follow you in your quest to love the planet with fear.

*Occupywallstreet does not even mention CO2 in its list of demands because of the bank-funded carbon trading stock markets run by corporations.
*Obama has not mentioned the crisis in the last two State of the Unions addresses.

[Charles R Darwin]

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2012/...

This link is a Forbes article that reports this year shows record ice formation in the Antarctic Sea. For those of you who don't click on links, here's a snippet:

NPR failed to mention anywhere in its article that Antarctic sea ice has been growing since satellites first began measuring the ice 33 years ago and the sea ice has been above the 33-year average throughout 2012.

Pretty straight forward, huh? The article also bashes the MSM for failing to report this FACT, opting instead for fear mongering in an effort to push their agenda.

[Northie]

Charles R Darwin wrote:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/ja mestaylor/2012/09/19/antarctic -sea-ice-sets-another-record/
This link is a Forbes article that reports this year shows record ice formation in the Antarctic Sea. For those of you who don't click on links, here's a snippet:
NPR failed to mention anywhere in its article that Antarctic sea ice has been growing since satellites first began measuring the ice 33 years ago and the sea ice has been above the 33-year average throughout 2012.
Pretty straight forward, huh? The article also bashes the MSM for failing to report this FACT, opting instead for fear mongering in an effort to push their agenda.

A propaganda piece from an oil industry lawyer and PR dweeb at the industry's most notorious front group? Puleeze.

If you care at all about the actual scientific evidence, look to scientific papers. Which, as it happens, show that Antarctic land ice is melting even as the continent's fringe of sea ice is growing slightly in extent, probably due to changing ocean circulation:

http://www.skepticalscience.com/antarctica-ga...

[Northie]

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh I see
You only look for reason to hate someone not to see what you can agree on..........LOL

Who's hating? You said you are extremely conservative and I agreed with you.

So your objections to climate science are politically motivated. That's almost always the case, except among the small army of oil and coal industry PR flacks and lobbyists whose motives are purely financial.

[Earthling-1]

Charles R Darwin wrote:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/ja mestaylor/2012/09/19/antarctic -sea-ice-sets-another-record/
This link is a Forbes article that reports this year shows record ice formation in the Antarctic Sea. For those of you who don't click on links, here's a snippet:
NPR failed to mention anywhere in its article that Antarctic sea ice has been growing since satellites first began measuring the ice 33 years ago and the sea ice has been above the 33-year average throughout 2012.
Pretty straight forward, huh? The article also bashes the MSM for failing to report this FACT, opting instead for fear mongering in an effort to push their agenda.

Well spotted.
Alarmist posters will ignore it until or unless their sponsors find a way to rebut the facts with some spin.

[Earthling-1]

I spoke too soon, Nauseous had already posted a rebuttal from his sponsor, skepticalseance.

[litesong]

Charles R Darwin wrote:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/ja mestaylor/2012/09/19/antarctic -sea-ice-sets-another-record/
This link is a Forbes article that reports this year shows record ice formation in the Antarctic Sea.
//////////
'steenking piddling diddling middling mudling mudslinger dirtling' wrote:
Well spotted.
Alarmist posters will ignore it until or unless their sponsors find a way to rebut the facts with some spin.
//////////
litesong wrote:
'steenking piddling diddling middling mudling mudslinger dirtling' knows this issue has been reviewed by topix AGW deniers often(30-50 times) & often(30-50 times) shown to be an AGW science 2002 prediction, affirmed in 2005 & proved in recent years past:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/06/...

AGW deniers show their denial by repeating what is repeatedly disproven. AGW deniers just trying to sidetrack the extreme Arctic sea ice losses.

[Here Is One]

Northie wrote:

<quoted text>
Who's hating? You said you are extremely conservative and I agreed with you.
So your objections to climate science are politically motivated. That's almost always the case, except among the small army of oil and coal industry PR flacks and lobbyists whose motives are purely financial.

I said on some things I am extremely conservative and those are mainly fiscally.....

I dont believe anything I read and only half of what I see......

I know that solar is a good option in may places and can ROI in around 5 years
But as soon as the government gets involved we have solar arrays that will not ROI in 15 years and that is the wrong thing to spend tax payers money on....

Wind is also a good choice in very few select areas but far left loons have all but killed that...

Hydro is very economic power but far left loons want to take down every dam.

I was involved with a project in Winchester Bay Or where we were going to install tidal generators in about a 100 sq mile area that would have powered 2/3 of oregon.

But far left loons killed that project also....

[Patriot AKA Bozo]

Charles R Darwin wrote:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/ja mestaylor/2012/09/19/antarctic -sea-ice-sets-another-record/
This link is a Forbes article that reports this year shows record ice formation in the Antarctic Sea. For those of you who don't click on links, here's a snippet:
NPR failed to mention anywhere in its article that Antarctic sea ice has been growing since satellites first began measuring the ice 33 years ago and the sea ice has been above the 33-year average throughout 2012.
Pretty straight forward, huh? The article also bashes the MSM for failing to report this FACT, opting instead for fear mongering in an effort to push their agenda.

Just more denier spin to try to discredit the science.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/pics/SKS2.png

[Teddy R]

Northie wrote:

<quoted text>
A propaganda piece from an oil industry lawyer and PR dweeb at the industry's most notorious front group? Puleeze.
If you care at all about the actual scientific evidence, look to scientific papers. Which, as it happens, show that Antarctic land ice is melting even as the continent's fringe of sea ice is growing slightly in extent, probably due to changing ocean circulation:
http://www.skepticalscience.com/antarctica-ga...

Scientific lierature?

Happy to oblige: http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/3/8/1603/pdf

"Study co-author Dr. Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and U.S. Science Team Leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer flying on NASA’s Aqua satellite, reports that real-world data from NASA’s Terra satellite contradict multiple assumptions fed into alarmist computer models."

“The satellite observations suggest there is much more energy lost to space during and after warming than the climate models show,” Spencer said in a July 26 University of Alabama press release.“There is a huge discrepancy between the data and the forecasts that is especially big over the oceans.”

"In addition to finding that far less heat is being trapped than alarmist computer models have predicted, the NASA satellite data show the atmosphere begins shedding heat into space long before United Nations computer models predicted."

"The new findings are extremely important and should dramatically alter the global warming debate."

We look forward to your learned commentary on the paper.