Good point. The democrats have been informed and know the evidence very well. That they have not acted speaks volumes about who they are. When a response is demanded, they claim they don't want the election fraud information to make people think their vote doesn't matter, just because it doesn't. They know they have lost election after election, yet they keep up the pretense. That is why I won't vote for any democrat either.<quoted text>And yet the Democrats could never show proof that there was cheating in the 2000 election despite their shrill cries about it. They screamed about voter fraud. Now that there have been proposals to stop it, again they're screaming and using the same tired buzzwords like "disenfranchisement" .
I would correct your statement. The democrats can show proof, but they have chosen not to.
As to specifically the 2000 election, while there was massive evidence, the USSC threw out the election and appointed bush. So what if there was election fraud, the USSC threw out the election. So even if you prove in court all of the fraud, it wouldn't matter because the USSC would not consider it.
Another correction, they were screaming about election fraud, not voter fraud. They also screamed about the USSC taking upon itself the right to void our elections and appoint their guy. Show me that one in the constitution.