Forcing us to be a dishonest nation

Forcing us to be a dishonest nation

There are 47 comments on the Eureka Times Standard story from Dec 12, 2010, titled Forcing us to be a dishonest nation. In it, Eureka Times Standard reports that:

How many civil liberties must the government override and trample for our own good before we finally put our foot down? We are spied on by the Patriot Act, imprisoned for filming law enforcement, groped by the TSA, and now an Internet Blacklist Bill is quietly making its way through Congress.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Eureka Times Standard.

First Prev
of 3
Next Last
Dillinger

Eureka, CA

#44 Dec 15, 2010
Annie Muk wrote:
<quoted text>
So we say nothing more than any of the others, you care less what we have to say, and because of all that we should seek psych treatment?
Well, if our opinon is no better (but certainly no worse) than the others, why shouldn't we continue to express our "equal waste of time and space" by expressing our opinions along with everyone else, for which you "care less" about yet took the time to read our posts and even make a lengthy reply? I also find some posters less than interesting but then I don't bother to read their contributions and wouldn't take my precious time to tell them about it. For that reason perhaps I have less need to seek "psych treatment" than someone like yourself. Do you not agree that there is some logic in that?
The reason I reply to you both is I have worked in a state institution a ways back and Having been around a lot of patients I could see every day the lost lives, the denial and I just wanted to point it out to you so that maybe you could find a real life again.
Also that if there was even a small chance you would go away it was worth the attempt.

The logic is someone sometimes has to step up and say what needs to be said. Understand I don't feel sorry for you just a little compassion, not very much as I realize that now you are addicted just as a doper. There is no insult as such just a real fact.

But as long as you care to continue in denial and are not dangerous to the public go for it.

But another fact remains you say nothing of value as you have no proof only opinions, speculation, others like yourselves and lot of time to waste.
ted dungy

Chino, CA

#45 Dec 15, 2010
Annie Muk wrote:
<quoted text>
Uuuuh, have I just been insulted?
not by me, i was referrin to those twp and middle of the toad and those guys, certainly not you, my precious...
ted dungy

Chino, CA

#46 Dec 15, 2010
TWP wrote:
<quoted text>
You know...
I really don't know what is more creepy...
Old Dave Shor t pretending to be a woman when he posts as "Annie Muk" and goes on and on about how smart and good looking old Bro-Toad is...
or...
When old Dave Shor t pretends to be a MAN, and dares people to come up to that filthy little trailer where he lives in Salyer for a fight...!
Either way, whether he is pretending to be a man or a woman, he/she isn't very convincing...!!!
Poor old Dave Shor t... such a sorry excuse for a man...
or a woman...!!!
he she or it certainly seems to have fixated you focus...lolz
hey dillinger

Chino, CA

#47 Dec 15, 2010
blah blah blah. there, cut and paste that, it will save you a bunch of typing, and you still get to make your point...lolz

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#48 Dec 15, 2010
TWP wrote:
<quoted text>

I really don't know what is more creepy...
Old Dave Shor t pretending to be a woman .

..or...

When old Dave Shor t pretends to be a MAN,...


Be sure to let us know when you've made your decision, then I'll tell which I find less inconsequential; Anon from California calling himself Tp from Texas ... or Tp from Texas calling himself Anon from California.

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#49 Dec 15, 2010
ted dungy wrote:
<quoted text>not by me, i was referrin to those twp and middle of the toad and those guys, certainly not you, my precious...
Why, thank ya' darlin'!
ted dungy wrote:
<quoted text>he she or it certainly seems to have fixated you focus...lolz
You must cetainly be mistaken. Didn't he state very clearly that I "don't matter" and that I "have nothing worthwhile to say"? And I'm quite certain he said (on at least a dozen ocassions)that he will NEVER read or respond to anything I post.

No Ted, I'm afraid that you have unfairly misjudged him for sure.
Censored by name

Ripon, CA

#51 Dec 18, 2010
Everybody must worship the Papal Antichrist.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Patriot Act Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Appeals court reverses ruling that found NSA pr... Aug 28 Sterkfontein Swar... 3
News Senate clears White House-backed trade bill Aug 16 wearvinms 5
News Ron Paul: The only Patriot Act reform is total ... Aug 12 Eyes of AWOL 9
News Secret Service Involvement in Gang Stalking (Feb '13) Jun '15 5 is still alive 55
News Transgender Visibility, Incriminating Spit, and... Jun '15 Tazo 1
News Edward Snowden hails 'historic victory' on surv... Jun '15 Fundie Fatwasz Aroma 4
News Senate Approves Freedom Act; Sends To Obama Jun '15 Kahoki 9
More from around the web