Supreme Court justices say military-base protester's case isn't about free speech
Join the discussion below, or Read more at Washington Post.
#1 Dec 5, 2013
VANDALISM is NOT Freedom of Speech. Hence Apel's ban from the base. The Commander has the legal right to deny and bar this moron [Apel] from protesting on his [Commander] base. This is not a case of FoS. Plain and simple.
Add your comments below
|A look at the judges who will rule on Trump's t...||2 hr||The Troll Stopper||170|
|Federal appeals court upholds Google trademark||May 17||CodeTalker||1|
|Clint Eastwood backs gay marriage in Supreme Co... (Mar '13)||May 16||Norwegian Supremacy||73|
|9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to weigh Dona...||May 16||Well Well||7|
|Appeals court set to hear arguments on Trump's ...||May 8||Retribution||10|
|Court: Employers can pay women less based on pa...||Apr 28||anonymous||3|
|Court denies mustang appeal sought by Nevada co...||Apr 27||okimar||3|
Find what you want!
Search Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC