California's 'gay conversion' law faces two federal lawsuits

[KittenKoder]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
I have proof they wouldn't hullicinate!

Saying you have evidence then not providing it is lying. Stop lying or present the evidence.

[KittenKoder]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
Hullicinations would have the person to at least have some form of hope or expectations, the disciple had no hope whatsoever, so they wouldn't hullicinate.

You are still making assertions and still presenting no evidence.

Thus, you are lying, since you are not presenting evidence yet you claimed you had it.

[KittenKoder]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
It comes from the book called, "the resurrection factor".

So you have no actual evidence, none at all. Next time save us the trouble of going through the song and dance and just admit it's part of your god delusion.

[Lacez]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
The cute yellow cat in the video is very adorable and ought to be supported both morally and politically!
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Orangelion still going on his crazy rants.
He doesn't know how to make sense because he's forgotten what sanity is.

[Lacez]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
This is from wikipedia.
"PSYCHODYNAMIC FACTS
Various theories have been put forward to explain the occurrence of hallucinations. When psychodynamic (Freudian) theories were popular in psychology, hallucinations were seen as a projection of unconscious wishes, thoughts and wants. As biological theories have become orthodox, hallucinations are more often thought of (by psychologists at least) as being caused by functional deficits in the brain. With reference to mental illness, the function (or dysfunction) of the neurotransmitters glutamate and dopamine are thought to be particularly important.[36] The Freudian interpretation may have an aspect of truth, as the biological hypothesis explains the physical interactions in the brain, while the Freudian deals with the origin of the theme of the hallucination. Psychological research has argued that hallucinations may result from biases in what are known as metacognitive abilities."

And how does that proves what you claimed you could prove?

[KittenKoder]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
The book does actually exist, its written by Josh McDowell.

So does Grimm's Fairytales, do you also believe that ogres live under bridges?

[Lacez]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>Pay attention Lacez!

The cute yellow cat in the video is very adorable and ought to be supported both morally and politically!

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

KittenKoder already answered for me, regarding your previous comment.

As for this one, a video game character (an alien by the way, not a cat) has nothing to do with this discussion.
Your constant mentioning of Ratchet simply professes your state of mind; completely looney.

[Rick in Kansas]

Largelanguage wrote:

Playing mother? HUH!
Anyway, evolution is a myth.

Buttercup, you're free to believe as many impossible things before breakfast that your dysfunctional little brain can come up, but if you think I'm hanging out at your tea party, you're sadly mistaken, You clearly have had enough.

[Rick in Kansas]

Largelanguage wrote:

I have proof against evolution!

Cupcake, the fact that you're still here to annoy us is proof that "survival of the fittest" isn't always true. As mentally handicapped as you are (if one considers deliberately stupider than dirt to be an actual handicap) you should have been culled from the human herd before you figured out how to use a computer. Evolution may not be the only answer sweetie, but it makes far more sense than your bronze age retelling of a stone age campfire story. Even with you still here.

[Lacez]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
He still is a cat, and meant to be one, foolish child! How cute do you find him?

Once it becomes relevant to the discussion, we might be able to talk about your obsession with Ratchet.
I find it funny that you have such an obsession with a male "cat" and yet are against equality.

As it stands, you really are insane if you think Ratchet is relevant to anything discussed here.

[KittenKoder]

Lacez wrote:

<quoted text>
Once it becomes relevant to the discussion, we might be able to talk about your obsession with Ratchet.
I find it funny that you have such an obsession with a male "cat" and yet are against equality.
As it stands, you really are insane if you think Ratchet is relevant to anything discussed here.

Who would have thought there'd be self-hating furries, I mean, this even amazes me.

[Lacez]

KittenKoder wrote:

<quoted text>
Who would have thought there'd be self-hating furries, I mean, this even amazes me.

There are gay nazi's out there.
Anything's possible within the warped mind.

[Lacez]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>I am not a furry. Furries are freaks!

Sure, you go ahead and bash yourself, lover-boy.
How many times a week do you have wet dreams of Ratchet doing Clank?

[Lacez]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>None, young turd!

So every day then?
You must do the laundry quite often.

[Lacez]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>I don't ever stupid. How old are you? 18? 19?

You don't ever do the laundry?
Wow, I feel bad for whoever lives with you/near you or works with you/near you.

[FYMO]

WeTheSheeple wrote:

<quoted text>
Parents don't have the right to harm their children as part of that "upbringing". And the overwhelming consensus among mental health professionals is that "gay conversion" therapy causes harm.
You lose AGAIN!

The fact that an "overwhelming consensus" of mental health professionals thinks one way does not mean anything until a court of competent jurisidiction takes judicial notice of that and the opinion is upheld by higher courts. In other words courts can do anything they want. Welcome to the real world.

[Lacez]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>You must be younger than even 20! Heck, you are just a kid!

You're the one having fantasies of Ratchet doing you while Clank watches.

[Lacez]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
So graphic for someone not interested! Do you have gay fantasies for ratchet? So much detail you gave, fascinating!

I'm only making a remark on your obvious obsession.
You have to make a post about Ratchet in every single thread you comment in.
You also constantly tell everyone he's cute and obsess over that as well.

[KittenKoder]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
But who would say a thing to that level? I wonder what other fantasizes you have in your mommas basement!

You post in the gay threads more than us advocates. You are obsessed with homosexuality.

[Lacez]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>But who would say a thing to that level? I wonder what other fantasizes you have in your mommas basement!

Now you're wondering about my fantasies?
I thought you were anti-gay, not interested in gay fantasies?
Wow, what a turn of events!
Who would have thought?