Supreme Court says interpretation and translation are different things when it comes to fee
There are 1 comment on the The Washington Post story from May 21, 2012, titled Supreme Court says interpretation and translation are different things when it comes to fee. In it, The Washington Post reports that:The high court ruled Monday that Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd. did not deserve to get $5,517.20 in compensation for interpreters for fighting off a lawsuit from a Japanese professional baseball player.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Washington Post.
“ROCK ON ROCKERS!!”
Since: Mar 11
Rockin' USA ;)
#1 May 21, 2012
HOW THE FREAK can ya put a dollar amount on anything really..Some folks think their education merits warrant them for a higher paying job..afterall they have a degree...all about supply and demand. EVERYONE knows that every language has different meanings for word used in their vocabulary. The ruling has passed..let it be..now run and play..
Add your comments below
|Man back in immigration custody after claim of ... (Aug '17)||Wed||popemup||10|
|1st appeals court to weigh Trump's decision to ...||May 20||Impeach the Creep||33|
|1st appeals court to weigh Trump's decision to ...||May 15||Bama Yankee||1|
|Another federal judge rules against Trump move ...||Apr 30||Wildchild||103|
|Judge agrees to delay Stormy Daniels' lawsuit a...||Apr 30||Used to be a Demo...||22|
|Court: Women can't be paid less than men based ...||Apr '18||guyol||11|
|Fight over Trump sanctuary order heads to appea...||Apr '18||Critical Eye||10|
Find what you want!
Search Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Forum Now
Copyright © 2018 Topix LLC