Judge says Wash. can't make pharmacie...

Judge says Wash. can't make pharmacies sell Plan B

There are 27 comments on the NWCN.com story from Feb 22, 2012, titled Judge says Wash. can't make pharmacies sell Plan B. In it, NWCN.com reports that:

Washington state cannot force pharmacies to sell Plan B or other emergency contraceptives, a federal judge ruled Wednesday, saying the state's true goal was to suppress religious objections by druggists - not to promote timely access to the medicines for people who need them.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at NWCN.com.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Contributions

Minneapolis, MN

#25 Feb 27, 2012
SirPrize wrote:
<quoted text>
The analagoy is a false one old man. You are attempting to equate contraceptives to CPR. Tha't just silly.
Both are part of the job descriptions of the people in my example you moron.

That's like saying a cashier at a local grocery refusing to checkout anyone buying pork based on religious grounds.

Or a toll booth operator refusing passage for anyone driving a hummer due to their religion.

You'd support contraceptives too if you weren't so retarded and don't realize that no contraception means more abortions which in your rightwing mind means loss of lives.

Do you rightwing cavemen even think past your own moronic talking points?

“Yeah, but...”

Since: Sep 11

MILKY WAY

#26 Feb 27, 2012
Contributions wrote:
<quoted text>
Both are part of the job descriptions of the people in my example you moron.
That's like saying a cashier at a local grocery refusing to checkout anyone buying pork based on religious grounds.
Or a toll booth operator refusing passage for anyone driving a hummer due to their religion.
You'd support contraceptives too if you weren't so retarded and don't realize that no contraception means more abortions which in your rightwing mind means loss of lives.
Do you rightwing cavemen even think past your own moronic talking points?
You certainly seem angry, or perhaps you're just naturally nasty.

When you calm down, please answer the question I asked:
Are you, as a parent, required to provide contraceptives to your children?
Contributions

Minneapolis, MN

#27 Feb 27, 2012
SirPrize wrote:
<quoted text>
You certainly seem angry, or perhaps you're just naturally nasty.
When you calm down, please answer the question I asked:
Are you, as a parent, required to provide contraceptives to your children?
Typical rightwing bullshit deflection.

You don't answer a question with another question moron.

How about you answer the original question first and stop deflecting.

Should a person working at a job fulfill the obligations of that job or can he just arbitrarily decide parts of it were against his beliefs and ignore them?
Chicago Guy

Evanston, IL

#28 Feb 27, 2012
SirPrize wrote:
<quoted text>
You certainly seem angry, or perhaps you're just naturally nasty.
When you calm down, please answer the question I asked:
Are you, as a parent, required to provide contraceptives to your children?
I imagine he's simply frustrated with the idiocy of your response.

What relevance does your question have? It's not an "analogy", as it reveals nothing, compares nothing, and makes no sense.

“Yeah, but...”

Since: Sep 11

MILKY WAY

#29 Feb 27, 2012
Contributions wrote:
<quoted text>
Typical rightwing bullshit deflection.
You don't answer a question with another question moron.
How about you answer the original question first and stop deflecting.
Should a person working at a job fulfill the obligations of that job or can he just arbitrarily decide parts of it were against his beliefs and ignore them?
I deflect only what is thrown in my direction.
As you say, you've only thrown bullshit so far.

Your question suggests that you have determined the obligations of a person's job. Where did you get this information? I am not a pharmacist, so I'm interested in knowing where I can find a complete description of a pharmacist to verify your position that all pharamcists are required to provide contraceptives.

I am a parent, though. I haven't seen any job descriptions for this position either, but I do the best that I can. I'm wondering if that set of job descriptions you hold also includes a requirement that parents must provide contraceptives to their children. Why not share this knowledge you have? Wouldn't it be more productive in convincing others than name-calling?
Contributions

Minneapolis, MN

#30 Feb 27, 2012
SirPrize wrote:
<quoted text>
I deflect only what is thrown in my direction.
The single instance of truth within all of your lies, and admission of what I've been saying you were doing in the first place.

Fyi, you are supposed to answer or counter things thrown your way, not deflect.

Deflections by definition are dishonest and a tacit admission you are wrong and want to avoid facing the facts.

But then again, being dishonest and avoiding the facts are typical rightwing strategy so I am not surprised.
Contributions

Minneapolis, MN

#31 Feb 27, 2012
SirPrize wrote:
<quoted text>
Your question suggests that you have determined the obligations of a person's job. Where did you get this information?
Are you completely incapable of reading comprehension or are you just acting stupid to avoid answering the question?

Each job has its own job description.

A schoolteacher teaches.
A surgeon performs surgery.
A mortician performs autopsies.

Does that mean those people can lawfully refuse to do their job based on arbitrary beliefs?

No, because they'd be fired.

When you work, you have an obligation to your employer to fulfill the requirements of the job.

If your beliefs conflict with your job then you should either find another more fitting job or just live with it. That's how a free society functions moron.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Washington, West Coast states in legal fight ag... 9 hr davy 2
News Father of fallen Muslim-American soldier decrie... Apr 21 CodeTalker 5
News Bill O'Reilly Says Voters, Not Judges, Should D... (Feb '12) Apr 20 Ray 3
News Tom Perez calls Trump 'worst president in histo... Apr 12 slick willie expl... 47
News Court denies mustang appeal sought by Nevada co... Apr 11 mtarochi 1
News Lawyers in Travel Ban Case Seek Emails, Subpoenas Apr 6 Fcvk tRump 4
News Another Second Amendment Appeal Shot-Down by th... Apr 5 Defeat Elizabeth ... 12
More from around the web