High court throws out Arizona's citizenship proof law
The Supreme Court ruled Monday that states cannot on their own require would-be voters to prove they are U.S. citizens before using a federal registration system designed to make signing up easier.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at KEPR CBS 19.
Since: Aug 11
#1 Jun 17, 2013
the high court has attacked the country,no wonder they are placed and not voted in they are unfit.
#2 Jun 17, 2013
Sonja is helping to ruin the Politic's of this country. How long did you think it would take before she voted not to allow our laws to be enforced. She was an anchor baby. Where in the developed world can foreign Nationals Vote for the highest position in this land??? And no I.D.? The supreme Court needs to have a bomb dropped on their heads after this one. Disgusting.
#3 Jun 17, 2013
They might be 'placed' but they are appointed and approved by politicians which means there are favors to pay and deals to be made.
One must also wonder how the court's recents decisions seem to back the adminstration's view with the jokester justices voting opposite their party or idealogy-Blackmail? With the use of the IRS and NSA for political expediency one must wonder.
The jokester justices also contradict other uses of a federal responsibility, the control of social security system and your social security number-how many other governments and businesses use a number only the federal government should have control of. Then the jokester justices say with 'the permission' of the federal government and courts a state can implement and use proof of citizenship as a requirement???
If not blackmailed or letting their law clerks and aides steer them into these positions they are falling for the manipulative agenda driven spin turning a voting requirement clear and simple into voter 'suppression'.
In one year this court has done more to trash the constitution, freedom and commonsense than any in history with Obama Care-individual mandate, DNA samples, an ILLEGAL search and siezure and now this.
Never ever forget the 'supreme' justices are appointed and approved by politicians. This IS a political decision.
#4 Jun 18, 2013
They should be more concerned with restoring the integrity of our elections. Instead of doing something about the rampant fraud in our election system, they defend the motor voter law, which encourages fraudulent voting. They are protecting the corrupt and the fraudulent with this stupid decision.
Add your comments below
|Copyright lawsuits involving hit songs||Fri||John McCharlie||3|
|Appeals court: No right to carry concealed weap...||Jun 12||WeTheSheeple||79|
|Concealed carry in public not guaranteed under ...||Jun 12||payme||11|
|Could appeals court concealed carry ruling impa...||Jun 11||RiflemanIII||1|
|Federal Court rules Arizona cannot legally deny...||Jun 11||Nopal||71|
|Appeals courts agree on concealed weapons ban r...||Jun 11||Bama Yankee||1|
|Illegal immigrants kidnapping children to sneak...||Jun 8||tomin cali||1|
Find what you want!
Search Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC