Who's Liable For Vendor's CAN-SPAM Vi...

Who's Liable For Vendor's CAN-SPAM Violation?

There are 1 comment on the JD Supra story from Nov 1, 2012, titled Who's Liable For Vendor's CAN-SPAM Violation?. In it, JD Supra reports that:

Perhaps your organization uses a marketing company or other servicer that sends out email on your behalf.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at JD Supra.

Since: Feb 08

Kagoshima, Japan

#1 Nov 2, 2012
Spam Mail Is One Version of Terrorist Communication

http://park.geocities.jp/jpcdebate/0103/p034....

Among numerous spam-mail communications, terrorists pick out their specific communications.

In this process, the filtering service in the Internet is very implemental for such rogue people.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News U.S. Supreme Court partly rejects Trump in late... Thu Winning Yet 5
News Gorsuch can't escape travel ban at San Francisc... Jul 19 Lawrence Wolf 24
News Court: Detained immigrant children entitled to ... Jul 6 Truth 4
News 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to weigh Dona... Jul 5 C Kersey 10
News Trump travel ban: U.S. Court clears way for int... Jun '17 Jeff Brightone 1
News Trump travel ban dealt another blow, faces high... Jun '17 stupid 1
News Another US appeals court keeps US President Don... Jun '17 Wildchild 10
More from around the web