U.S. Supreme Court should overturn Arizona's anti-illegal-immigration law

The Supreme Court should reject Arizona's anti-illegal immigration law and send a cautionary message to states about overbearing immigration legislation.

[Wrong]

Seattle Post with No Intelligence? lmao

[Annie]

US should over turn welfare to illegal aliens

[Afghan - Iraq Vet]

No, Only when the Administration and the Congress revampes the Immigration laws. America needs only talented Immigrants not Peasants.

[bob smith]

Wrong wrote:

Sea-at-tle Post with No In,tell>igence? lmao

is dat clear to read;)

[tomin cali]

arizona law as well as H.R. 2885 need to be law of the lands. as well as give a swift kick in the face of any country that wants to get involved with our law making.

[What]

Annie wrote:

US should over turn welfare to illegal aliens

Octo Mom recdives $2,000.00 a month in food stamps. Take a look at the "large" families in our country who have no business being here.....They're costing us billions! CA it's reported has 1/3 of all welfare recipients.

[tomin cali]

maybe this reporter should step down,with an illegal alien in new york this reporter is doing a job citizens will not do,or does that only count when it effects other jobs citizens do?

i bet all these folks would change their tune the minute they get laid off and find an illegal aliens or two in their place.

[Jack from Bedias]

The 9th Circuit decission should be overturned and the judges impeached.

[Sarah]

Exactly Jack!

[Publius51]

Jack from Bedias wrote:

The 9th Circuit decission should be overturned and the judges impeached.

We should end judicial appointments and elect them that way when they run afoul of the law and the will of the people, they can be canned.

[Jack from Bedias]

Sarah wrote:

Exactly Jack!

Sorry about the game loss. I was for Kansas....Last week the SCOTUS made a comment about cases being premature for action. They were talking about obamacare but one of my arguments about the socalled racial profiling issue has always been the same. One cannot bring an action against a "maybe" or what might happen. There has to be an actual case of abuse of power. The 9th over-stepped and needs another good smacking for it.

[Jack from Bedias]

Publius51 wrote:

<quoted text>
We should end judicial appointments and elect them that way when they run afoul of the law and the will of the people, they can be canned.

I agree in theory, but the idea is for the judges not to be political. That's a joke I know. Snewt has a decent idea about our SCOTUS situation. The idea was that 3 separate branches of government have basically equal power in their realm. In a perfect world the checks and balance approach would deal with political-based decissions, where Congress would pick up the ball and do what they had to do to keep their actions Constitutional and the President would follow suit. I guess that's just a right-wing madman's dream.