Excerpts from ruling on Calif's gay marriage ban
There was no such reason that Proposition 8 could have been enacted. Because under California statutory law, same-sex couples had all the rights of opposite-sex couples, regardless of their marital status, all parties agree that Proposition 8 had one effect only.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Wichita Eagle.
“WAY TO GO”
Since: Mar 11
#1 Feb 7, 2012
Nicely put together......and it makes it easy for folks to understand the ruling without having to read the entire ruling!!!
Since: Mar 09
#2 Feb 8, 2012
This is the real prize in the Cracker Jack box:
" ... through the proponents of ballot measures, the people of California must be allowed to defend in federal courts, including on appeal, the validity of their use of the initiative power. Here, however, their defense fails on the merits. The people may not employ the initiative power to single out a disfavored group for unequal treatment and strip them, without a legitimate justification, of a right as important as the right to marry. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.... "
Add your comments below
|Trump travel ban: U.S. Court clears way for int...||Jun 20||Jeff Brightone||1|
|Trump travel ban dealt another blow, faces high...||Jun 14||stupid||1|
|Another US appeals court keeps US President Don...||Jun 13||Wildchild||10|
|A look at the judges who will rule on Trump's t...||Jun 13||Mohamma smellslik...||196|
|30-day deportation reprieve for Hawaii coffee f...||Jun 9||RustyS||2|
|9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to weigh Dona...||Jun 4||Cordwainer Trout||9|
|Federal appeals court upholds Google trademark||May '17||CodeTalker||1|
Find what you want!
Search Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC