Arizona gov. defends Day of Prayer proclamation
Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer is asking a federal court in Phoenix to dismiss a lawsuit over her "day of prayer" proclamations.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at KTVK Phoenix.
#1 Apr 22, 2011
Loud protests are good.
#2 Dec 20, 2011
Judge Dismisses Lawsuit on Arizona Day of Prayer
There is a disturbing trend developing in First Amendment jurisprudence; especially in the area of church and state separation. Notwithstanding the fact that many state sponsored or endorsed religious actions appear to clearly violate the well established parameters of the First Amendment, courts are now routinely dismissing lawsuits for lack of standing. To be clear, these dismissals do not involve a rejection of the constitutional challenge on the merits of the claim. To the contrary, they are simply evasions of the issue altogether. They are technical dismissals resulting in the untenable position that these First Amendment violations are simply unchallengeable by any person. Rather than hear these challenges on the merits and reach the inescapable conclusion that such actions are indeed unconstitutional, many courts have agreed to side step the issue by construing the doctrine of standing so such unconstitutional acts remain safe from constitutional challenge. Courts should be bold enough to hear and decide these challenges on constitutional grounds. Constitutional protections are meaningless if courts construe the law such that no person can invoke those protections.
In an effort to attempt to have these matters heard on the merits and to validate the notion that constitutional violations can be challenged, our clients have decided to appeal the district courtís dismissal of the Day of Prayer lawsuit. We expect to file an appeal to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeal very soon. Additionally, another lawsuit will be filed in the state court alleging violations of the state constitution.
This lawsuit is about the role of government. Our clients remain committed to the notion that prayer is either a private matter or one that can be openly and loudly promoted by any private individual or private company on any private property for any length of time. Any effort by government to inhibit any private personís right to pray on any non-governmental property would be opposed by all plaintiffs to this lawsuit. However, our clients, those religious and non-religious, remain equally committed to the well established notion that government should neither promote, inhibit nor endorse any religious view. Simply put, government should stay out of religious matters altogether; our constitution forbids it and it is both consistent and indispensible to notions of a free and open society.
Add your comments below
|Growing Trend: 2nd and 6th Circuits Join 7th in...||Thu||Kasick of Pancakes||9|
|Judge refuses to order school to suspend transg...||Jan '18||BHM5267||60|
|Republicans: 'Catholic bigotry' over Democrats ...||Oct '17||mr gleeble||2|
|Sexual orientation Title VII cases work way tow... (Aug '17)||Sep '17||Rubio s Foam Partays||16|
|DOJ asks to keep 'Making a Murderer' inmate loc... (Jun '17)||Jun '17||CodeTalker||1|
|Chicago court stays deportation of pizza worker... (May '17)||May '17||Geezer||1|
|Ex-Gov. Rod Blagojevich files another appeal on... (May '17)||May '17||online reality bu...||1|
Find what you want!
Search Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Forum Now
Copyright © 2018 Topix LLC