You couldn't fight your way out of a paper bag. Your *unparalleled* insistence to *continually* accentuating *every**other* word you post *shows* the *inflated* sense of self *inherent* in your *insisted* personalization of your *defensiveness.*<quoted text>
You are quite misrepresentative for misquoting me, aren't you? Thank you for admitting that you are engaging in "sophistry," and quite "audaciously" -- since my comment is DIRECTLY ABOVE for anyone to see.
Wow, look what you omitted: "They, too, are calling the nation unthinking for support of laws that should never have been enacted."
Not only are you speaking of *your opinion* when you call this "sophistry," you (interestingly) have no way of knowing whether my sentence claims *THEY* feel the laws should never have been enacted, since I'm talking about *OBAMA AND CO.*
Do you always misquote others like such an asshole? Do you always *assume*?
Did you expect me to ask what the hell *you* meant rather than tear you a new asshole to complement the one you showed the forum? I know what I meant; I had no trouble responding here. Next time, learn to keep your big mouth shut when you don't know what you're talking about, thanks. If you want to look like you have a *scrap* of morality rather than CLEARLY LYING about what others said, that is. My comment is right there and we both know *you had no way of knowing* my intention; you presumed because you're DISHONEST.
Think before you type next time.
Thanks for reading.
Just deal with the ridiculousness and anti-American nature of your assumptions about American Law. You insist the only way to deal with application of laws is your way, or the highway... including the preposterous proposal of a Politburo being set up keeping courts in line and defending your particular emotionalism.
This extremely deficient perception of how America works makes your repeated defense of tyranny nothing more than spam by a child.