Ashley Judd meets with Dems in D.C.

Ashley Judd meets with Dems in D.C.

There are 104 comments on the Politico story from Mar 1, 2013, titled Ashley Judd meets with Dems in D.C.. In it, Politico reports that:

Actress Ashley Judd, who's currently here in Washington, looks like she's getting more serious about a Senate run, POLITICO's Scott Wong reports : Ashley Judd met this week with the current and past chairmen of the Democratic Senate Campaign Committee, a sign the actress is getting more serious about a possible 2014 run against Senate Minority ... (more)

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Politico.

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#81 Mar 3, 2013
Madaman wrote:
<quoted text>
Sounds like a Plan to me.
How about Cuba?
Cuba's kinda close. I was thinking maybe somewhere in the black hole of the Milky Way.

“Sustainability Now!”

Since: May 08

Vadnais Heights

#82 Mar 3, 2013
Pamela wrote:
She's washed up as an actress cause she's old and fat and tore up looking now.... The mother was the prettiest one. She must have had a lot of men asking to marry her when she was a single mother. She is so pretty.
Why don't you inform Dame Judi Dench of your appraisal?

Yes, Ashley's mother was SO PRETTY. Apparently, your assessment of females for leading roles in film OR government is devastatingly superficial -- a perfect match for your commentary here.

No wonder you were a Palinista.
gossamer

Roseville, MI

#83 Mar 3, 2013
It looks like shes looking for a new job.

Judd is currently the magazine advertising "face" of American Beauty, an Estée Lauder cosmetic brand sold exclusively at Kohl's department stores, and H. Stern jewelers.

In early 2012, however, her image suddenly disappeared from American' Beauty's web site.[14] In June 2007, Goody's Family Clothing announced they were going to be releasing three fashion clothing lines with Judd in the fall to be called – "AJ", "Love Ashley" and "Ashley Judd."

Goody's declared bankruptcy a year later due to slow sales and its last store closed in February 2009.

In 2011, Judd co-starred with Patrick Dempsey in the film Flypaper. It grossed only $1,100 total in its theatrical release and received a 17% Rotten Tomatoes rating (15 of 18 critics panned it).[15]

In 2012, Judd starred as Rebecca Winstone on the ABC series Missing. The series aired from March 15 to May 17, 2012.[16] Due to low ratings it was not renewed for a second season.[17]

In February 2006, Judd entered a program at Shades of Hope Treatment Center in Buffalo Gap, Texas and stayed for 47 days.[21] She was there because of personal issues, including depression, insomnia and codependency.[22]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashley_Judd

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#84 Mar 3, 2013
Pamela wrote:
<quoted text>Get the Fk lost. I've told you this for years. I told you for years all you ever think about is "how can I abuse, how can I harm?" All you post is abuse. You're low non-human dead brained abusive garbage. GET LOST.
Awww widdle Pammy....don't post stupid as hell shit and you won't get called on it...

for you, that would mean not posting at all.
Pamela

Citrus Heights, CA

#86 Mar 4, 2013
Madaman wrote:
<quoted text>
Why don't you inform Dame Judi Dench of your appraisal?
Yes, Ashley's mother was SO PRETTY. Apparently, your assessment of females for leading roles in film OR government is devastatingly superficial -- a perfect match for your commentary here.
No wonder you were a Palinista.
Hollywood always gets rid of aging actress except for the few who can really act. Look at the red carpet for the Oscars this year. It was all 20 year old new actresses I never even heard of before. And it's always the few same older ones who get nominated - Meryl Streep, Jesica Lang, and the two older British actresses. Ashley Judd just did some B type of movies. Now she had cosmetic surgery and so her face got really puffy and then she put on a lot of weight when she got in her 40s. So now she wants to be a politician. It's exactly what I said - her family is very aggressive in pursuing careers. You want to make up a bunch of mean attack stuff at me. Has nothing to do with anything real.

“Sustainability Now!”

Since: May 08

Vadnais Heights

#87 Mar 4, 2013
Pamela wrote:
<quoted text>Hollywood always gets rid of aging actress except for the few who can really act. Look at the red carpet for the Oscars this year. It was all 20 year old new actresses I never even heard of before. And it's always the few same older ones who get nominated - Meryl Streep, Jesica Lang, and the two older British actresses. Ashley Judd just did some B type of movies. Now she had cosmetic surgery and so her face got really puffy and then she put on a lot of weight when she got in her 40s. So now she wants to be a politician. It's exactly what I said - her family is very aggressive in pursuing careers. You want to make up a bunch of mean attack stuff at me. Has nothing to do with anything real.
Your reply is just as superficial as your original post. All you appear to care about is Ashley Judd's physical appearance -- NOTHING about her education, nor anything she may wish to contribute to public life. Notice that when a man indicates interest in public office, most of us do not spend ANY time discussing his appearance, any weight gain/loss, nor his last irrelevant job. We discuss his statements, his past positions on issues, and what he promises to bring to the office. YOU show NO INTEREST in any of these areas regarding Ashley Judd -- just keep discussing her weight and film career -- TOTALLY IRRELEVANT to the US Senate. You continue your focus on superficial and irrelevant issues, paying NO ATTENTION to the political office at hand. Rather than being "mean," I am simply calling you out on your extremely superficial "analysis" of Ashley Judd. THAT is real.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#88 Mar 4, 2013
Madaman wrote:
<quoted text>
Your reply is just as superficial as your original post. All you appear to care about is Ashley Judd's physical appearance -- NOTHING about her education, nor anything she may wish to contribute to public life. Notice that when a man indicates interest in public office, most of us do not spend ANY time discussing his appearance, any weight gain/loss, nor his last irrelevant job. We discuss his statements, his past positions on issues, and what he promises to bring to the office. YOU show NO INTEREST in any of these areas regarding Ashley Judd -- just keep discussing her weight and film career -- TOTALLY IRRELEVANT to the US Senate. You continue your focus on superficial and irrelevant issues, paying NO ATTENTION to the political office at hand. Rather than being "mean," I am simply calling you out on your extremely superficial "analysis" of Ashley Judd. THAT is real.
None of pammy's posts have any depth. it would seem that she has no depth to draw from...
the rest of us

Saint Paul, MN

#89 Mar 5, 2013
Madaman wrote:
<quoted text>
Your reply is just as superficial as your original post.....BLAH,FART,BLAH.......
The extremely deluded and arrogant one is popping off again with his trademark quotes and caps as if anybody gives a crap. As always it is YOU who is "totally irrelevant" as indicated by your well documented failed life. There is good reason why you're a school bus driver and not a policy maker, numbnuts......LOLOLOLOLOL!
gossamer

Roseville, MI

#90 Mar 5, 2013
From the same party that gave us peanut head and Oblamebush. Why not Assley Fudd. Not.

Poor 47 per centers.
gossamer

Roseville, MI

#91 Mar 5, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>Ummm..no, he never quit, he was promoted to the highest office in the land...
what a tool...
He quit the senate to do that.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#92 Mar 5, 2013
gossamer wrote:
From the same party that gave us peanut head and Oblamebush. Why not Assley Fudd. Not.
Poor 47 per centers.
Aren't most of the 47%ers fronm the GOP? you know, the bible belt and STP belt and trailer trash belt people?

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#94 Mar 5, 2013
gossamer wrote:
<quoted text>
He quit the senate to do that.
No, he was promoted above the Senate. Quitting is when you can't hack the job and step down as a loser...
Billy Ringo

United States

#96 Mar 5, 2013
Ashley Judd meets with Dems - and Mitch is shytting bricks.......

LMAO !!!!!!!!!
gossamer

Roseville, MI

#97 Mar 5, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>Aren't most of the 47%ers fronm the GOP? you know, the bible belt and STP belt and trailer trash belt people?
No they are from the ghettos of Detroit.
gossamer

Roseville, MI

#98 Mar 5, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>No, he was promoted above the Senate. Quitting is when you can't hack the job and step down as a loser...
The whole time he was in the senate he never voted. He spent the time campaigning.
Pamela

Citrus Heights, CA

#99 Mar 5, 2013
Madaman wrote:
<quoted text>
Your reply is just as superficial as your original post. All you appear to care about is Ashley Judd's physical appearance -- NOTHING about her education, nor anything she may wish to contribute to public life. Notice that when a man indicates interest in public office, most of us do not spend ANY time discussing his appearance, any weight gain/loss, nor his last irrelevant job. We discuss his statements, his past positions on issues, and what he promises to bring to the office. YOU show NO INTEREST in any of these areas regarding Ashley Judd -- just keep discussing her weight and film career -- TOTALLY IRRELEVANT to the US Senate. You continue your focus on superficial and irrelevant issues, paying NO ATTENTION to the political office at hand. Rather than being "mean," I am simply calling you out on your extremely superficial "analysis" of Ashley Judd. THAT is real.
She is an actress, not a politican. She's trying to get into politics ONLY because her career as an actress is ending. Do you want someone representing you ONLY because their other career ended? Don't talk to me about people being superficial. Don't even start that ignorant crapola with me. This country lives and breathes on objectifying people, THAT'S ALL AMERICANS DO. I have had men coming onto me in mass since I was about 13 years old and it went on nonstop until I was 55 years old. And, every one of those men did not know one thing about me - all of it was always only based on how I look, and the reason men do that is to try to feed their egos. The idea is if they can have a good looking woman on their arm, that means they are something. It's all about them, them, them, has nothing to do with the woman they all stalk and follow and hit on even when they are married. And, most of them are fat, ugly, dumb and bad dressers. Most of them are married, all in dead marriages and their big solution to being broke and in a dead marriage is to go and stalk a good looking woman when they are ugly. I've had to deal with that crapola for over 40 years. I'm not the one who invented men ONLY liking women based on how they look. I could be an ax murderer for all they know. They don't care. There is NO such thing as love. It's men stalking women if they are thin, pretty, athletic trying to feed their dead egos on the back of strangers. It's sick crap. I didn't start it. I'm a victim of it, and Hollywood lives and breathes objectifying people. Get a clue dumb ass.
Billy Ringo

Festus, MO

#100 Mar 5, 2013
gossamer wrote:
<quoted text>
The whole time he was in the senate he never voted. He spent the time campaigning.
You must be a typical low-information Rethuglican who spends too much time watching Bullshyt Mountain News.

That's a prety stupid statement you made - not to mention it's an out-an-out lie - even for a dumb Con.

No wonder you boys lose elections.

lamer

Hopkins, MN

#101 Mar 5, 2013
Pamela wrote:
<quoted text>She is an actress, not a politican. She's trying to get into politics ONLY because her career as an actress is ending. Do you want someone representing you ONLY because their other career ended? Don't talk to me about people being superficial. Don't even start that ignorant crapola with me. This country lives and breathes on objectifying people, THAT'S ALL AMERICANS DO. I have had men coming onto me in mass since I was about 13 years old and it went on nonstop until I was 55 years old. And, every one of those men did not know one thing about me - all of it was always only based on how I look, and the reason men do that is to try to feed their egos. The idea is if they can have a good looking woman on their arm, that means they are something. It's all about them, them, them, has nothing to do with the woman they all stalk and follow and hit on even when they are married. And, most of them are fat, ugly, dumb and bad dressers. Most of them are married, all in dead marriages and their big solution to being broke and in a dead marriage is to go and stalk a good looking woman when they are ugly. I've had to deal with that crapola for over 40 years. I'm not the one who invented men ONLY liking women based on how they look. I could be an ax murderer for all they know. They don't care. There is NO such thing as love. It's men stalking women if they are thin, pretty, athletic trying to feed their dead egos on the back of strangers. It's sick crap. I didn't start it. I'm a victim of it, and Hollywood lives and breathes objectifying people. Get a clue dumb ass.
Still cant post anything about her policies? Just that she is "done" as a actress and now wants to be in politics cause she has no "career" to goto?

Hell i could point at dozens of politicians whom have no "career" to goto. At this point its pretty obvious that it doesnt matter whom is running, your just going to vote with the R and bash the D. Nothing more.

Your a very shallow person
lolol

Albuquerque, NM

#102 Mar 5, 2013
BUT who would you want to see on the news ?

maxine 'aunt esther' waters
feinstien
pelousi

????

I'm not a lib, but I would vote for Judd just not to see the fuglies that occupy DC now on TV or on a webpage every day.
Pamela

Citrus Heights, CA

#103 Mar 6, 2013
lamer wrote:
<quoted text>
Still cant post anything about her policies? Just that she is "done" as a actress and now wants to be in politics cause she has no "career" to goto?
Hell i could point at dozens of politicians whom have no "career" to goto. At this point its pretty obvious that it doesnt matter whom is running, your just going to vote with the R and bash the D. Nothing more.
Your a very shallow person
I am obviously NOT the one who is shallow, that would be the thousands and thousands of MEN who only hit on women based on how they look. That is the definition of shallow moron from hell. Ashley Judd will be another big liberal. The liberal class died a long time ago. Obama is in with the corporations, and all the people on MSNBC have left is to lie that blacks love gays and Mexicans love blacks and their coalition will be everyone on welfare against the whites. I have never voted Dem and never will. I could give a rat's ass if a rich Hollywood liberal wants to run for office.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Democrat Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 6 min Incognito4Ever 1,743,423
News Senate panel divided over Pompeo for secretary ... 8 min Annie Oakly 7
News GOP-led Congress takes regulatory fight to car ... 21 min BHM5267 3
News CNN: Trump Is Considering Axing Deputy AG Rosen... 27 min Critical Eye 273
News Senate Votes to End Auto-Loan Anti-Discriminati... 40 min inbred Genius 5
News Online sex ads likely to use new sites 43 min semper fries 5
News California Dems Dreamin'? Long-shot bid to spli... 1 hr inbred Genius 1