Norway climate study sparks debate over global warming urgency

Jan 29, 2013 Full story: The Daily Caller 103

In this Monday, Dec. 17, 2012 photo, bird counters record the number of pelicans sitting on an oyster reef during an annual 24-hour Christmastime ritual to count birds along the Texas Gulf Coast in Mad Island, Texas.

Full Story
SoE

Rozet, WY

#81 Feb 8, 2013
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>And so are you ollie. Try again.
and so am I what?
........
First engage your machine language interpreter
then your foreign language interpreter...
To be as accurate as i assume you demand some of the text had
to be in(r'sskij alfavit) Cyrillic
Apparently that portion goes into ML automatically,perhaps for transfer to other than english machines....I'm not on the machine i normally use...and i'm not a software guy...
Hope that helps... byollie
PHD

Overton, TX

#82 Feb 9, 2013
SoE wrote:
<quoted text>
and so am I what?
........
First engage your machine language interpreter
then your foreign language interpreter...
To be as accurate as i assume you demand some of the text had
to be in(r'sskij alfavit) Cyrillic
Apparently that portion goes into ML automatically,perhaps for transfer to other than english machines....I'm not on the machine i normally use...and i'm not a software guy...
Hope that helps... byollie
No ollie try again.
SoE

Rozet, WY

#83 Feb 9, 2013
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>No ollie try again.
Unfortunately i can aid you only to the point you have the capacity
to utilize the tools...
I have come to realise,as have many others, that any efforts on anyone's part,to enhance your understanding and scientific insight, would marginalize sanity...sorry.
SoE

Rozet, WY

#84 Feb 9, 2013
Perhaps, if the last post is not sufficient, Litesong could aid you with some "food" for thought
you would find more acustomed to your palate...
PHD

Overton, TX

#85 Feb 10, 2013
SoE wrote:
Perhaps, if the last post is not sufficient, Litesong could aid you with some "food" for thought
you would find more acustomed to your palate...
Well if you take notice with the order of my replies and the form of answers you would have noted that I take the trash out first then respond to the rest.“pinheadlitesout” would be your level of science. Try again.
SoE

Rozet, WY

#86 Feb 10, 2013
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>Well if you take notice with the order of my replies and the form of answers you would have noted that I take the trash out first then respond to the rest.“pinheadlitesout” would be your level of science. Try again.

Unfortunately i can aid you only to the point you have the capacity
to utilize the tools...
I have come to realise,as have many others, that any efforts on anyone's part,to enhance your understanding and scientific insight, would marginalize sanity...sorry.
PHD

Overton, TX

#87 Feb 10, 2013
SoE wrote:
<quoted text>
Unfortunately i can aid you only to the point you have the capacity
to utilize the tools...
I have come to realise,as have many others, that any efforts on anyone's part,to enhance your understanding and scientific insight, would marginalize sanity...sorry.
Well if you take notice with the order of my replies and the form of answers you would have noted that I take the trash out first then respond to the rest.“pinheadlitesout” would be your level of science. Try again.
SoE

Rozet, WY

#88 Feb 10, 2013
How does the earths albedo affect the CO2 atom /What is the method of energy transfer/what is the exact frequency/what is the energy lost in conversion/(what is the fall-off rate from (F) shift) what is the total energy that can be inparted to the atom/ extrapolate from the answer the average energy curve/24hrs...
That would be helpful...
PHD

Overton, TX

#89 Feb 10, 2013
SoE wrote:
How does the earths albedo affect the CO2 atom /What is the method of energy transfer/what is the exact frequency/what is the energy lost in conversion/(what is the fall-off rate from (F) shift) what is the total energy that can be inparted to the atom/ extrapolate from the answer the average energy curve/24hrs...
That would be helpful...
As you report to all that you are a scientist and we are the idiots. Do tell all, the answers by your peer reviewed published work.
SoE

Rozet, WY

#90 Feb 10, 2013
I have taken notice of your replys and find the answers seem to project the same order...
PHD

Overton, TX

#91 Feb 10, 2013
SoE wrote:
I have taken notice of your replys and find the answers seem to project the same order...
As you report to all that you are a scientist and we are the idiots. Do tell all, the answers by your peer reviewed published work. Try again.
SoE

Rozet, WY

#92 Feb 10, 2013
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>As you report to all that you are a scientist and we are the idiots. Do tell all, the answers by your peer reviewed published work.
Hahaha
Oh oh...That would fall into the category of assumption...
Where have i stated that everyone on this thread is a idiot?
Where have i stated that i am a scientist?
No evasion or deviation left...
Actually i believe most on this thread follow the posts from a science standpoint adequately....at least well enough to detect
when deviation,from science, starts to take place...
The contrarian,discounting attitude,is a interesting animal
given the amount of published material existing at this point regarding the subject of global warming
well, back to work...
I will let you provide your peer reviewed work...
although be advised some don't ascribe to "cut and past"
PHD

Overton, TX

#93 Feb 10, 2013
SoE wrote:
<quoted text>
Hahaha
Oh oh...That would fall into the category of assumption...
Where have i stated that everyone on this thread is a idiot?
Where have i stated that i am a scientist?
No evasion or deviation left...
Actually i believe most on this thread follow the posts from a science standpoint adequately....at least well enough to detect
when deviation,from science, starts to take place...
The contrarian,discounting attitude,is a interesting animal
given the amount of published material existing at this point regarding the subject of global warming
well, back to work...
I will let you provide your peer reviewed work...
although be advised some don't ascribe to "cut and past"
No, most if not all follow scientific science fiction cut and paste. You crossed the line using the word idiot. You implied by that term you are a cut above all. There are many intelligent people that post here and yet you ascribe to words like idiot, animal and so on. Peer reviewed work seems put you into a tail spin. Try again.
SoE

Rozet, WY

#94 Feb 10, 2013
I will assume not all cut&paste is fiction
I will stand by the passage from Shakespeare
I will assume also most here are from the kingdom
animalia and not plant established by Aristotle several days ago.

I have been duly admonished and will set in the corner pending farther action from your thread by those people you speak for....

No tail spin
SoE

Rozet, WY

#95 Feb 10, 2013

I will henceforth view your posts with no concern...
And no longer trouble you with replies
PHD

Overton, TX

#96 Feb 11, 2013
SoE wrote:
I will henceforth view your posts with no concern...
And no longer trouble you with replies
Your choice, but you never answered the question Mr. Scientist. You will reply directly or indirectly as above. Now we are equal if you have not noticed I never had a concern.
SoE

Rozet, WY

#97 Feb 11, 2013
Wow, I'm allowed back?
Ok, i will endeavor to make this post as terminating as possible...
..........
never answered the question
..........
Given the complexity of agw ether directly or indirectly see #86
..........
Now we are equal
.........
Perhaps even in your eyes however i assume considering we are different people equal probably would not apply
.........
if you have not noticed I never had a concern.
.........
Troll abstracted
..........
PHD

Overton, TX

#98 Feb 11, 2013
SoE wrote:
Wow, I'm allowed back?
Ok, i will endeavor to make this post as terminating as possible...
..........
never answered the question
..........
Given the complexity of agw ether directly or indirectly see #86
..........
Now we are equal
.........
Perhaps even in your eyes however i assume considering we are different people equal probably would not apply
.........
if you have not noticed I never had a concern.
.........
Troll abstracted
..........
No surprise the rodent effect has finally settled in with you. Yes as your norm you assume and that in itself makes an ASSumption of your--self
Do I remind you that you are the scientist and the rest stupid as you claimed? Have a Great Day ollie.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#99 Feb 16, 2013
Norway climate study sparks debate over global warming urgency!
PHD

Overton, TX

#100 Feb 17, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
Norway climate study sparks debate over global warming urgency!
Where have you been they all do. Are you hitting the bottle again?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Conservative Political News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
WaPo: Cuba should not be rewarded for denying f... 4 hr WE JUST DONT CARE 5
Stevie Wonder Breaks Promise To Trayvon Martin 7 hr Kentucky-Mitch 7
Religious persecution continues in Cuba Mon John Grimbaldsun 5
Reports from Cuba: What isn't working? Mon John 2
Gov. Scott Signs Bill To Grant In-State Tuition... Oct 18 swedenforever 64
Oklahoma Police: Meth Mom Molested Her Kids Whi... (Jan '14) Oct 18 swedenforever 49
'Baa Baa Black Sheep' Deemed Racist, Sexist By ... Oct 18 The ADELAIDEAN 7

Conservative Political News People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE