Boehner: Immigration 'absolutely not'...

Boehner: Immigration 'absolutely not' dead

There are 101 comments on the The Hill story from Nov 21, 2013, titled Boehner: Immigration 'absolutely not' dead. In it, The Hill reports that:

Speaker John Boehner on Thursday declared that immigration reform was "absolutely not" dead for this Congress, renewing his commitment to the issue without laying out plans for a House vote.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Hill.

wild child

Brooklyn, NY

#67 Nov 23, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Then you have nothing to worry about. Quit fussing over a few illegals.
not worried dont want them.I dont think we are talking about a few.do you?

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#68 Nov 23, 2013
see the light wrote:
<quoted text>12 m8illion is a few?
Considering there are over 300 million people in the US, yes.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#69 Nov 23, 2013
wild child wrote:
<quoted text> not worried dont want them.I dont think we are talking about a few.do you?
Whether you want them here is irrelevant. They're here and they're not going anywhere.

Btw, there are more gays & lesbians in America than illegals, yet the anti-gays keep insisting that's too small a number to matter.
spud

Reading, PA

#71 Nov 24, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
No more so than conservatives are victims of the biased media they watch.
Common sense tells me the majority of hipsanics aren't going to vote for the GOPasaurs as long as they continue to oppose immigration reform.
Conservatives are not totally immune from being influenced by the corrupt and biased media but they won't be bamboozled into thinking we have an honest President who is working for betterment of the American people. It's easier to brainwash someone whose mind isn't so cluttered up with facts or logical opinions.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#72 Nov 24, 2013
spud wrote:
<quoted text>Conservatives are not totally immune from being influenced by the corrupt and biased media but they won't be bamboozled into thinking we have an honest President who is working for betterment of the American people. It's easier to brainwash someone whose mind isn't so cluttered up with facts or logical opinions.
I agree it's nearly impossible for the anti-Obama conservatives to open their mind.
Dee Dee Dee

Emmaus, PA

#73 Nov 24, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree it's nearly impossible for the anti-Obama conservatives to open their mind.
True those opposed to Obama don't want to open their minds to his socialistic agenda for moral and philosophical reasons but,it is impossible for an Obama supporter to open their mind because they are not biologically equipped.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#74 Nov 24, 2013
Dee Dee Dee wrote:
<quoted text>
True those opposed to Obama don't want to open their minds to his socialistic agenda for moral and philosophical reasons but,it is impossible for an Obama supporter to open their mind because they are not biologically equipped.
More irrational stupidity from another anti-Obama.
Dee Dee Dee

Emmaus, PA

#75 Nov 24, 2013
Thanks for proving me right again.
spud

Reading, PA

#76 Nov 24, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree it's nearly impossible for the anti-Obama conservatives to open their mind.
Come on sheep, that's kid stuff. You can do better than that.....can't you?

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#77 Nov 25, 2013
spud wrote:
<quoted text>Come on sheep, that's kid stuff. You can do better than that.....can't you?
The anti-Obamas have proven over & over they will oppose anything proposed by the President, regardless of what it is. Their ONLY criteria is if Obama supports or endorses or proposes it, they'll automatically oppose it.

If Obama came out in support of shooting all illegals on site, the anti-Obamas would oppose it and immediately demand illegals be given citizenship.

If Obama came out in support of banning all abortions, the anti-Obamas would oppose it and immediately demand every pregnancy be aborted.

If Obama came out in support of banning all same-sex marriages, the anti-Obamas would oppose it and immediately demand all men have to marry another man.

That's what anti-Obamas do.
wild child

Brooklyn, NY

#78 Nov 25, 2013
If obama was not so stupid and anti american.the republicans would agree with him.they block him coz he comes up with crap.he needs to be stopped.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#79 Nov 25, 2013
wild child wrote:
If obama was not so stupid and anti american.the republicans would agree with him.they block him coz he comes up with crap.he needs to be stopped.
Obama supported the REPUBLICAN IDEA of the individual mandate, and as predicted the anti-Obamas immediately changed position to oppose it.

Yes, the individual mandate was originally a REPUBLICAN idea.
spud

Reading, PA

#80 Nov 25, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
The anti-Obamas have proven over & over they will oppose anything proposed by the President, regardless of what it is. Their ONLY criteria is if Obama supports or endorses or proposes it, they'll automatically oppose it.
If Obama came out in support of shooting all illegals on site, the anti-Obamas would oppose it and immediately demand illegals be given citizenship.
If Obama came out in support of banning all abortions, the anti-Obamas would oppose it and immediately demand every pregnancy be aborted.
If Obama came out in support of banning all same-sex marriages, the anti-Obamas would oppose it and immediately demand all men have to marry another man.
That's what anti-Obamas do.
You're just wrong, man. This isn't a personal thing against Obama. It has nothing to do with racism. This is a philosophical difference. Add the fact that Obama is a RADICAL progressive to that existing philosophical difference and it's not hard to understand where the disagreements come from.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#81 Nov 25, 2013
spud wrote:
<quoted text>You're just wrong, man. This isn't a personal thing against Obama. It has nothing to do with racism. This is a philosophical difference. Add the fact that Obama is a RADICAL progressive to that existing philosophical difference and it's not hard to understand where the disagreements come from.
And yet the evidence indicates otherwise, such as the conservatives suddenly opposing their own idea of an individual mandate once Obama embraced it.
spud

Reading, PA

#82 Nov 25, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
And yet the evidence indicates otherwise, such as the conservatives suddenly opposing their own idea of an individual mandate once Obama embraced it.
Yea, yea, yea. Politicians are almost all weasels, don't you agree? I mean it's not like Obama didn't counsel Republicans about the the dangers of using the nuclear option when he was a senator or that if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor, PERIOD. Both sides are only concerned with what is best for them, not the country. If the polling said that 90% of amnestied individuals would vote straight Republican, do you think Democrats would still be pushing amnesty? This deal isn't about right and wrong or compassion or anything else like that. It's about votes and power. It's like I said. The mainstream of both parties are all weasels.
see the light

El Paso, TX

#83 Nov 25, 2013
IRS should take extra taxes from Dems, since they want to support ILLEGALS.
spud

Reading, PA

#84 Nov 25, 2013
see the light wrote:
IRS should take extra taxes from Dems, since they want to support ILLEGALS.
Take extra taxes from the neocons too. They are in this thing too. Thank God for the Tea Party. They are the only people in there that are working for the majority of Americans.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#85 Nov 26, 2013
spud wrote:
<quoted text>Yea, yea, yea. Politicians are almost all weasels, don't you agree? I mean it's not like Obama didn't counsel Republicans about the the dangers of using the nuclear option when he was a senator or that if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor, PERIOD. Both sides are only concerned with what is best for them, not the country. If the polling said that 90% of amnestied individuals would vote straight Republican, do you think Democrats would still be pushing amnesty? This deal isn't about right and wrong or compassion or anything else like that. It's about votes and power. It's like I said. The mainstream of both parties are all weasels.
Correct, the GOPasaurs would be pushing amnesty instead.

Just as the GOPasaurs support voting ID laws ONLY because statistics show those without a valid state issued voter ID are overwhelmingly more likely to vote for the Dems.

The difference is the GOPasaurs keep yammering about their supposed "principles", yet continue to demonstrate they have none. At least the Dems admit they have no principles.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#86 Nov 26, 2013
see the light wrote:
IRS should take extra taxes from Dems, since they want to support ILLEGALS.
IRS should take extra taxes from GOPasaurs, since they want to support ILLEGALS by hiring them for cheap labor- like Romney did.
spud

Reading, PA

#87 Nov 26, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Correct, the GOPasaurs would be pushing amnesty instead.
Just as the GOPasaurs support voting ID laws ONLY because statistics show those without a valid state issued voter ID are overwhelmingly more likely to vote for the Dems.
The difference is the GOPasaurs keep yammering about their supposed "principles", yet continue to demonstrate they have none. At least the Dems admit they have no principles.
So your support for Democrats is based on their honesty?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 2 min Blitzking 187,145
News Voters have trust issues with Hillary Clinton? ... (Jul '15) 5 min ima Ilis Myka Ash... 3,115
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 5 min Fair Game 57,301
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 9 min - Lady Liberty - 370,631
News Axelrod: Obama faces 'titanic struggle' (Sep '11) 10 min Swedenforever 655
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 11 min IND 213,933
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 16 min OzRitz 1,347,356
News FBI 'ready to indict' Hillary Clinton, Tom Dela... 40 min Patriot 858
News The Latest: Sheriff says armed men want to spar... 2 hr LIVE call from Re... 1,979
News Axelrod: Clinton should look inward over struggles 2 hr Lawrence Wolf 46
More from around the web