What the 2012 election taught us

What the 2012 election taught us

There are 10317 comments on the The Washington Post story from Nov 6, 2012, titled What the 2012 election taught us. In it, The Washington Post reports that:

We've been scouring the data for clues as to what we should learn from what happened tonight as President Obama relatively easily claimed a second term.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Washington Post.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#10891 Jun 16, 2013
Vance1 wrote:
5. Most Americans are not for this ObamaCare
It hasn't started yet, Vince.

I know welfare clients like you get health care but there is a large sector that don't.

People who work for a living- no one you know deaqr.

Say hello to GayDavy, eh, Vince?

PS: Did you notice you lost the election, Vince?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#10892 Jun 16, 2013
Vance1 wrote:
This is why the Democrat or Liberal Party hasn't anything to offer Most Americans
You offered us Herman Cain, Vince.

Did you notice you lost the election, Vince?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#10893 Jun 16, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You and your aliases have established nothing othere than the fact that you are a liar, AnalOriface.
You count Navy Seals among the people who say are on welfare.
I am pointing to what you are saying and the "facts" that you use to establish these "welfare" states- that you include EVERYONE that gets ANY check from the government.
Including Navy Seals. And everyone else in the Navy, the Coast Guard, the Marines and the Air Force.
Happy to see you explain this to someone who has served their county- no one you'd know.
you ramble and make no sense what so ever beside you don't like the facts that are true which you like twist & spin because you know your lifestyle is threaten besides you provide nothing to society except take like I told you people sign up for welfare should be on their way to the Miltary providing a service to society instead of just taking and providing nothing to society which seen what your kind has done to Detroit, Michigan.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#10894 Jun 16, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>you ramble and make no sense what so ever beside.
wipe your chin AnalOriface, you overflowth

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#10895 Jun 16, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
I told you people sign up for welfare
You haven't lifted a finger for this country, AnalOriface, you f*king mooch, you understand why no one listens.

I want to be there when you tell a member of the US military he's on welfare because he takes a check from the government.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#10896 Jun 16, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You haven't lifted a finger for this country, AnalOriface, you f*king mooch, you understand why no one listens.
I want to be there when you tell a member of the US military he's on welfare because he takes a check from the government.
Anal Buccaneer, we all know you have not done anything productive for this country except add to the Federal Deficit that is an already given with you thinking in your post that is one lie after another.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#10897 Jun 16, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
wipe your chin AnalOriface, you overflowth
you better wipe your face Anal Buccaneer.

“Bullsh*% Detector Enabled”

Since: Dec 08

Brooklyn, New York

#10898 Jun 17, 2013
Vance1 wrote:
The Last election told us this and continues to say this
1. Most Americans do not give two shits about Gay marriage
2. Most Americans want low taxes, they believe that they pay enough already.
3. Most Americans realize that More Regulations means less and fewer JOBS.
4. Most Americans intend to have Big Government out of their lives.
5. Most Americans are not for this ObamaCare
6. Most Americans do not seek Bigger Government, They seek Less
7. Most Americans do not seek so called Fundamental Change they appreciate the country for what it is, Not what socialists seek to make it.
8. Most Americans do not seek more laws, They just want the laws we already have enforced.
9. Most Americans adore the 2nd Amendment and love having the right in our country of self protection, specifically in rural area's.
10. Most Americans do not require the need to Government to tell them what to do.
This is why the Democrat or Liberal Party hasn't anything to offer Most Americans
Sad.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#10899 Jun 17, 2013
Black Rhino wrote:
<quoted text>
Crybaby. Death and taxes. Inevitable.
Yup. Looks like Janet Napolitano is planning to take the "taxes" option away from a few million Americans.
By the way, just who is the enemy Janet Napolitano preparing to fight a large-scale war with?
How many millions of casualties do you think 2,400 tanks and 7,000 machine guns and 1.6 billioin rounds of ammunition will create?
Do you really think you're going to win that war you want to start? You do know when it's over the winners will certainly hang the losers, right? If it's your neck the rope is put around, don't whine and cry like a baby. Take it like a man. After all, you started it.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#10900 Jun 17, 2013
Black Rhino wrote:
<quoted text>
Save your cut and paste for your hitler youth rally.
Every year taxes will go up, it doesn't matter who is president or which party is in power.
Does a bag of rice or chicken cost the same now that it did in 1940? No. And all that shit will be more expensive in another year.
You want to beat that? You'll have to live off the grid and catch your own food and process your own way to live.
Are you willing to do that? No, you're not. You'll just keep crying and whining until you're blue in the face. Get out and enjoy life, junior...It's short.
It's really funny how you nazis accuse everyone else of being nazis.
More importantly, a bag of rice or chicken has more than doubled in price since Obama took office. You should be honest and put in that perspective.
I've got a solution, though. Nothing will be done about this until all the people feel it equally. When half the country is mooching off the government, they won't even realize its happening.
So, it seems the only way to make all Americans realize that inflation is going through the ceiling is to cut all welfare and food stamps. When everyone has to feel the cost of inflation, we'll stop putting these elitist communists like Obama in office.
Or, you can just dig into your own wallet and pay the price for being able to say that's your boy in the White House.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#10901 Jun 17, 2013
Flat tax.
No exemptions.
No exceptions.
No excuses.
That's the only solution. A homeless crackwhore gets 10 dollars, they give a buck fifty or so to the government. No exemptions. No exceptions. No excuses.
Now, that's a fair tax.
Stoneman

Boise, ID

#10902 Jun 17, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
AThe House has passed the same bill 39 times knowing the Senate would not approve it.
What if instead of screwing around, the House did something about unemployment.
PS: the people who say what the official unemployment rate is is the Bureau of Labor and they been counting the same way for forty years. They don't count people like you who aren't working but aren't bothering to look.
OKAY! We're making progress!

Now-- what was it about the bills passed by the House that Lord Obama and the Socialist/Democrat Senate couldn't accept?

Was it, perhaps, that the S/D's wouldn't allow any legislation that didn't include more taxes on the Evil Rich, even though the connection between taxing the Evil Rich more and unemployment is dubious at best?

Was it, perhaps, that the S/D's wanted to simply slather on more pork and public works projects, which Lord Obama joked about a year or two ago "weren't as shovel-ready as we thought (tee-hee)"?

You Socialists are a one-trick pony. Every economic problem can be solved by 1) taxing the hell out of people and 2) spending more money on gubbermint projects. Even after blowing his way thru a trillion+ dollars, Lord Obama still thinks we could get on Easy Street if we just spend a few trillion more...

“Bullsh*% Detector Enabled”

Since: Dec 08

Brooklyn, New York

#10903 Jun 17, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>Yup. Looks like Janet Napolitano is planning to take the "taxes" option away from a few million Americans.
By the way, just who is the enemy Janet Napolitano preparing to fight a large-scale war with?
How many millions of casualties do you think 2,400 tanks and 7,000 machine guns and 1.6 billioin rounds of ammunition will create?
Do you really think you're going to win that war you want to start? You do know when it's over the winners will certainly hang the losers, right? If it's your neck the rope is put around, don't whine and cry like a baby. Take it like a man. After all, you started it.
Faux news babble is all this is about.
You're crying because she's in charge of homeland security. Man up.

“Bullsh*% Detector Enabled”

Since: Dec 08

Brooklyn, New York

#10904 Jun 17, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>It's really funny how you nazis accuse everyone else of being nazis.
More importantly, a bag of rice or chicken has more than doubled in price since Obama took office. You should be honest and put in that perspective.
I've got a solution, though. Nothing will be done about this until all the people feel it equally. When half the country is mooching off the government, they won't even realize its happening.
So, it seems the only way to make all Americans realize that inflation is going through the ceiling is to cut all welfare and food stamps. When everyone has to feel the cost of inflation, we'll stop putting these elitist communists like Obama in office.
Or, you can just dig into your own wallet and pay the price for being able to say that's your boy in the White House.
I pay my taxes and don't botch about it.
How about you?

Wearing a stupid hat and crying about you're taxed enough already??? That's your solution?

Don't make me laugh.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#10905 Jun 17, 2013
Black Rhino wrote:
<quoted text>
Faux news babble is all this is about.
You're crying because she's in charge of homeland security. Man up.
You're avoiding the question again.

Janet Napolitano is obviously preparing for a large-scale war.

So, who is the enemy she is planning to wage war against?

You actually have to name someone or something to answer this question. Her only authority is domestic. She is obviously preparing for a large-scale war.
Who will she fight in this war she's planning for?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#10906 Jun 17, 2013
Black Rhino wrote:
<quoted text>
I pay my taxes and don't botch about it.
How about you?
Wearing a stupid hat and crying about you're taxed enough already??? That's your solution?
Don't make me laugh.
Like I said, dufus...
"you can just dig into your own wallet and pay the price for being able to say that's your boy in the White House."

Now, who is Janet Napolitano preparing to go to war with? What's the plan?

“Bullsh*% Detector Enabled”

Since: Dec 08

Brooklyn, New York

#10907 Jun 17, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>You're avoiding the question again.

Janet Napolitano is obviously preparing for a large-scale war.

So, who is the enemy she is planning to wage war against?

You actually have to name someone or something to answer this question. Her only authority is domestic. She is obviously preparing for a large-scale war.
Who will she fight in this war she's planning for?
What large scale war?

Are you high, son?

You should really do something about that paranoia...It's not healthy.

You have nothing to validate that ridiculous assumption, yet you want me to give you an answer to that foolishness.

Fkn Hilarious.

“Bullsh*% Detector Enabled”

Since: Dec 08

Brooklyn, New York

#10908 Jun 17, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>Like I said, dufus...
"you can just dig into your own wallet and pay the price for being able to say that's your boy in the White House."

Now, who is Janet Napolitano preparing to go to war with? What's the plan?
Wow.

When did you become a raging nut bar?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#10909 Jun 17, 2013
Black Rhino wrote:
<quoted text>
What large scale war?
Are you high, son?
You should really do something about that paranoia...It's not healthy.
You have nothing to validate that ridiculous assumption, yet you want me to give you an answer to that foolishness.
Fkn Hilarious.
The large-scale war Janet Napolitano needs 2,700 armored combat vehicles, 7,000 machine guns, and almost 2 billion rounds of ammunition for, dumbass.
You should really do something about your ignorance. Or, perhaps you want to see this war coming, and you're just another lying Democrat pretending to not know about the huge arms build-up in the administration.

Let's see what Congress knows that your ignorant ass doesn't:

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

New Jersey Rep. Leonard Lance told constituents that Janet Napolitano must explain to Congress why DHS has purchased 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition and 2700 armored vehicles for domestic use.

That was in March, dumbass. Since Congress is the institution where all money is appropriated, don't you think a goddam Congressman knows more than your dumb ass? And if you read publications like "Market Watch" and "The Wall Street Journal" and "Commerce Business Daily" you'll see the goddam RFPs and contract awards published, dumbass.

You can play dumb all you want. The bottom line is, those clowns you're following are leading you into a war with the American people. If you know anything about world history, which you're probably completely ignorant of considering your only information comes from "liberal" indoctrination, which has no relationship to actual history, wars involving the American people become the most destructive in history. The American revolution was the most destructive war in history at that time. The American civil war was the most destructive war in history at that time. If you start a war with the American people, you can expect, based on history, for it to be the most destructive war in history.
Do you really want that?
Of course, you do. You're too ignorant to not want it.

Now that you have the facts shoved in your face, answer the question, boy:

Who is the enemy the government is obviously planning to fight a large-scale war with?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#10910 Jun 17, 2013
Stoneman wrote:
<quoted text>
OKAY! We're making progress!
Now-- what was it about the bills passed by the House
Have someone explain how the US goverment works, spooge breath.

I say if you try to pass something three times and it fails, it would be a good indication that it isn't going to pass.

The House as an approval rating of 12 percent.

This is why.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 1 min -Dont Panic- 409,183
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min Brad 1,479,986
News Julian Assange 'to face extradition' after Chel... 4 min anonymous 13
News News 16 Mins Ago Inaugural speech is Trump's ti... 8 min shot first whites 41
News Specter of Lyndon Johnson haunts Trump 10 min shot first whites 47
News As anger over election of Donald Trump erupts, ... 10 min President Donald ... 4,395
News Can Democrats learn to fight fire with fire? 11 min tomin cali 59
News Trump Isn't Bluffing, He'll Deport 11 Million P... (May '16) 1 hr President Donald ... 17,838
News King's legacy celebrated as Trump, Lewis duel l... 1 hr Aquarius-wy 213
More from around the web