Obama campaigners boost gun safety in...

Obama campaigners boost gun safety initiative

There are 106 comments on the Seattle Post-Intelligencer story from Nov 27, 2013, titled Obama campaigners boost gun safety initiative. In it, Seattle Post-Intelligencer reports that:

The campaign for Initiative 594, which would require criminal background checks for gun purchasers, has received a strong endorsement from Organizing for Action, the national organizing group formed out of President Obama's 2012 reelection campaign to boost the 44th president's agenda.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Seattle Post-Intelligencer.

First Prev
of 6
Next Last

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#1 Nov 27, 2013
Big deal.

The demonrats know that if they pull ANY 'gun control' schemes at all. Then they will be utterly CRUCIFIED in the 2014-16 elections. Just as they were in 1994-96 and 2000.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#2 Nov 27, 2013
Ummm... yeah, it's 2013, GumsShow.

The Republicunts have achieved the lowest rating of approval of any political party since they have been tracking.

They lost seven out of eight in the last election.

Wipe your chin, Shug.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#3 Nov 27, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
Ummm... yeah, it's 2013, GumsShow.
The Republicunts have achieved the lowest rating of approval of any political party since they have been tracking.
They lost seven out of eight in the last election.
Wipe your chin, Shug.
Then WHY aren't the demonrats passing 'gun control', sycophant troll? Why did your 'master' almost start crying when the congress FAILED during the last attempt? And how come it hasn't come up again in congress. Even though 'biden' stated; "Gun Control Will Pass Before End Of Year".

WHAT HAPPENED, traitor-troll?

And even someone as lame as you KNOWS that they won't dare try it during an election year - 2014.

Take a hike, you mindless traitor-troll.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#4 Nov 27, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
Then WHY aren't the demonrats passing 'gun control',
Republicunts: lowest approval rating ever.

You keep thinking I have to make you agree with facts posted.

Wipe your chin, spunkmonkey.
Cordwainer Trout

Elizabethtown, KY

#5 Nov 27, 2013
False issue. Criminal background checks are already performed on gun purchasers. Democrat leadership are control freaks and are going to lose big time in the 2014 elections. The lying homosexual Liberal press is already fearful of it. Every program and idea the Democrat leadership has offered in the last five years has turned out to be a lie. That's because queers lie. They're pathological liars.
CTM

New Milford, CT

#6 Nov 27, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
Ummm... yeah, it's 2013, GumsShow.
The Republicunts have achieved the lowest rating of approval of any political party since they have been tracking.
They lost seven out of eight in the last election.
Wipe your chin, Shug.
......Not 2013 for long, nad people are starting to wake up to just how much the jew controlled media is lying. The dems kept the shutdown going even after the Republicans gave in, just to kick 'em while it looked like all their doing. Then the dems packed the budget with pork for them and their buddies. The dismal experience of obamacare itself will help Republicans a lot.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#7 Nov 27, 2013
Cordwainer Trout wrote:
False issue. Criminal background checks are already performed on gun purchasers.
Big liar.

It would not be an issue at all if criminal background checks were being performed on all gun purchasers.

It would not be an issue if criminals- and others- were not allowed to purchase guns at gun shows -- many of them being held in buildings paid for by taxpayers.

Yet special rights gun gnutters insist: they should be able to sell firearms to anyone they damn well please.

Or it would not be an issue.
Gun Control Does Not Work

United States

#8 Nov 27, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Big liar.
It would not be an issue at all if criminal background checks were being performed on all gun purchasers.
It would not be an issue if criminals- and others- were not allowed to purchase guns at gun shows -- many of them being held in buildings paid for by taxpayers.
Yet special rights gun gnutters insist: they should be able to sell firearms to anyone they damn well please.
Or it would not be an issue.
How many background checks did Holder do for the criminals that got Fast and Furious guns? More like a reverse background, if you were clean no gun, but if you were dirty as many as you wanted.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#9 Nov 27, 2013
Cordwainer Trout wrote:
Democrat leadership are control freaks and are going to lose big time in the 2014 elections..
wahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh hhhhhhhhhhhhh!

If only the Democrats didn't win the last TWO times and if only just a couple weeks ago the GOP lost seven out of eight, and the one they did win was by a guy who was thinking about switching to the Democratic party.

And the GOP is down further than it has been before... ever.

But sure, with your pep talk, they will take over the world, no doubT!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#10 Nov 27, 2013
Cordwainer Trout wrote:
The lying homosexual Liberal press is already fearful of it.
The lying homosexual cunservative press is already coming up with excuses for why they lost in 2014.

Wipe your chin, dear: look like you have a mouthful of Fox broadcasting.
Cordwainer Trout

Elizabethtown, KY

#11 Nov 27, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Big liar.
It would not be an issue at all if criminal background checks were being performed on all gun purchasers.
It would not be an issue if criminals- and others- were not allowed to purchase guns at gun shows -- many of them being held in buildings paid for by taxpayers.
Yet special rights gun gnutters insist: they should be able to sell firearms to anyone they damn well please.
Or it would not be an issue.
People already having legitimate concealed carry status and identification are pre-checked. Criminals don't buy at gun shows because they use untraceable guns from other criminals, plus they aren't pre-checked. Purchases of guns at gun shows are legitimate and completely traceable.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#12 Nov 27, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Republicunts: lowest approval rating ever.
You keep thinking I have to make you agree with facts posted.
Wipe your chin, spunkmonkey.
Drinking already, troll? I will NEVER agree with ANYTHING that emanates from you. And you have NEVER posted ANYTHING factual on these threads.

All you know how to do is be vile. And you are the most despised poster on Topix because of it.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#13 Nov 27, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
The lying homosexual cunservative press is already coming up with excuses for why they lost in 2014.
Wipe your chin, dear: look like you have a mouthful of Fox broadcasting.
History Favors a 2014 GOP Comeback
http://www.nationaljournal.com/columns/cook-r...

You treasonous freaks have a very short attention span.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#14 Nov 27, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Big liar.
It would not be an issue at all if criminal background checks were being performed on all gun purchasers.
It would not be an issue if criminals- and others- were not allowed to purchase guns at gun shows -- many of them being held in buildings paid for by taxpayers.
Yet special rights gun gnutters insist: they should be able to sell firearms to anyone they damn well please.
Or it would not be an issue.
Not quite, you drooling LIEberal:

How Criminals Get Guns
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows...

Which means an 'extended background check' would be ABSOLUTELY MEANINGLESS ACCORDING TO THE B.A.T.F.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#15 Nov 27, 2013
Gun Control Does Not Work wrote:
<quoted text>
How many background checks did Holder do for the criminals that got Fast and Furious guns?
The same number that Bush did for Operation Wide Receiver: that was the starting point for F&F.

Wipe your chin, shug.

Here's the kicker, cmmmstain: the weapons for both Bush & Obama's gun tracking investigations were bought at guns shows from people like you who were ALL TOO HAPPY to sell guns to complete strangers.
Cordwainer Trout

Elizabethtown, KY

#16 Nov 27, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
The same number that Bush did for Operation Wide Receiver: that was the starting point for F&F.
Wipe your chin, shug.
Here's the kicker, cmmmstain: the weapons for both Bush & Obama's gun tracking investigations were bought at guns shows from people like you who were ALL TOO HAPPY to sell guns to complete strangers.
How were (are) the guns traceable, if your implication is true? You make no sense.

“Act Interdimensional ly”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#17 Nov 27, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>The lying homosexual cunservative press ...
I'm not sure which I find more amusing. Your attempt to defend your principles with insults instead of reason ... Or the fact you consider the term homosexual to be an insult.

I'll just await your latest homophobic retort.
Gun Control Does Not Work

United States

#18 Nov 27, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
The same number that Bush did for Operation Wide Receiver: that was the starting point for F&F.
Wipe your chin, shug.
Here's the kicker, cmmmstain: the weapons for both Bush & Obama's gun tracking investigations were bought at guns shows from people like you who were ALL TOO HAPPY to sell guns to complete strangers.
Operation Wide receiver bought guns from criminals and tracked guns already in the hands of criminals. Fast and Furious put guns in the hands of criminals and resulted in many homicides including a border agent. Big difference. Now go clean up your leaking DNA once again.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#19 Nov 27, 2013
Gun Control Does Not Work wrote:
<quoted text>
Operation Wide receiver bought guns from criminals
I'm not interested in listening to a cmmstain that doesn't know what he was talking about.

F&F was no more than Wide Receiver II.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#20 Nov 27, 2013
Rick Moss wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not sure which I find more amusing.
You told use a plastic gun wouldn't work and I crammed one that hold nine rounds up your azz.

I am sure you find 2 Broke Girls funny. I don't care, it doesn't take much for you to be amused.

Plastic guns can make it through metal detectors and have absolute no useful purpose to mankind other than a prop in a movie.

NOt rocket science.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 6
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min Grey Ghost 1,579,390
News Reactions to Trump's statement on violence in V... 2 min Poor Trumpflakes 285
News 'God has given Trump authority to take out Kim ... 6 min waco1909 201
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 10 min Truth is might 316,253
News Obama's response to Charlottesville becomes mos... 19 min spud 31
News U.S. judge deals blow to Texas 'sanctuary' city... 19 min Gordo 12
News Mitch McConnell's secret fury over Charlottesvi... 26 min RustyS 2
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 27 min Abe 285,809
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 45 min Alt right lies ne... 24,639
News Dear Trump Voters: The 1950's Aren't Coming Back 2 hr Just Saying 1,161
More from around the web