The President has failed us

[Republican Honey]

NTRPRNR1 wrote:

<quoted text>He's got an opinion. Unfortunately, polls show that the public doesn't share his opinion:
Sequestration poll: Republicans to be blamed most
By KEVIN ROBILLARD | 2/21/13
Nearly half of Americans would blame Republicans if $1.2 trillion in spending cuts go into effect on March 1, according to a poll released Wednesday.
Only 31 percent would blame President Barack Obama, according to the Pew Research Center/USA Today poll, while 49 percent would blame the congressional GOP. Eleven percent would blame both.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/sequest...
Then, this:
The Morning Plum: Americans will blame GOP for sequester
Posted by Greg Sargent on February 20, 2013
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line...
Indeed, majorities of the American people take a dim view of the Congressional GOP’s policy priorities. A recent Post poll found that 55 percent of Americans — including 55 percent of independents and 64 percent of moderates — have an unfavorable view of the policies Congressional Republicans will pursue over the next four years. This is not a political atmosphere in which Republicans can count on escaping blame if and when Washington shenanigans damage the economy. Obama just decisively won an election that turned heavily on public perceptions of which party is really on the side of working Americans, and which is really on the side of the wealthy. Polls have shown majorities see Republicans as the uncompromising party in Washington. So the public is likely to be inclined to blame them — at least in part — for the continued standoff, without paying close attention to the details. Put simply, Republicans have more to lose politically than the reelected Obama does.(cont.)
Link to the Poll:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/page/2010-2019/...

Senator Baucus' statement is not an opinion. Obama helped create it in 2011 and then threatened to veto any actions to get rid of it.
----------

“I will veto any effort to get rid of those automatic spending cuts,” said Obama from the White House’s briefing room, adding “the only way to get rid of those cuts is to get Congress to come together and work on a deal.”

http://www.forbes.com/sites/afontevecchia/201...
----------

I do not doubt the public polls. My personal opinion is the public polls are largely due to the liberal media.

[Bud Abbott]

Quirky The Eye wrote:

<quoted text>
Rico pizzes lots of people off. But that is what he is all about. He likes it that way. Like frito, Sharpshooter, X-Man. His Mouthy BS will catch up to him one day.

That was you being the fall guy, pretending to be Rico.

[dweebydilbert]

dweebydilbert wrote:

Seems some posts ARE disappearing!
Post #105842 in particular.
WHY?

Mine! I just wonder how MANY have been?
Do you morons NOT realize this IS censorship?!?

My voice not being heard.
First Amendment violation!

And some of you morons are worried about someone being "off topic" ???

IF only!

[Jaxxon]

The Dissident wrote:

<quoted text>I wasn't trying to stifle your speech as you were him, I was trying to get you to correct your misconduct but I can see that you mother didn't get very far either so I’ll just let it go…

"...I’ll just let it go"

Probably a good idea.

[X -Man-]

dweebydilbert wrote:

Seems some posts ARE disappearing!
Post #105842 in particular.
WHY?

Seems like some of the posters are "disappearing" too!

What happened to American Lady?!!

**bites nails** lol

[Jaxxon]

Republican Honey wrote:

<quoted text>
Senator Baucus' statement is not an opinion. Obama helped create it in 2011 and then threatened to veto any actions to get rid of it.
----------
“I will veto any effort to get rid of those automatic spending cuts,” said Obama from the White House’s briefing room, adding “the only way to get rid of those cuts is to get Congress to come together and work on a deal.”
http://www.forbes.com/sites/afontevecchia/201...
----------
I do not doubt the public polls. My personal opinion is the public polls are largely due to the liberal media.

You don't have a very high opinion of the American people do you?

[marlowe44]

---Wild Irish Rose--- wrote:

<quoted text>
No, I read, write and understand English quite well.
It was implied in your comment. If only the employed were allowed to vote a great many other people wouldn't be allowed to vote.
Your comment was silly.

My "comment" was a rhetorical question. Likely others with more gray matter realized that.

[marlowe44]

Food for thought:

"We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions"
Barack Obama

Oh wait, that is not right. It was-

Adolf Hitler
(Speech of May 1, 1927. Quoted by Toland, 1976, p. 306)

Now I don't know whether to call him a nazi or a socialist.

[Republican Honey]

NTRPRNR1 wrote:

<quoted text>Try to follow:
AMERICANS polled on the issue will blame Republicans MOST if sequestration takes place.
It has nothing to do with who Obama blames. It's Americans doing the blaming.
You're welcome.

It has EVERYTHING to do with who Obama blames. He is the one in the liberal media. He is the one everyone sees on the news. Americans make their decisions on what they "know". His is the only side most people hear.

[Jaxxon]

dweebydilbert wrote:

<quoted text>
Mine! I just wonder how MANY have been?
Do you morons NOT realize this IS censorship?!?
My voice not being heard.
First Amendment violation!
And some of you morons are worried about someone being "off topic" ???
IF only!

Yer funny.

[La Santa Muerte]

NTRPRNR1 wrote:

<quoted text>Try to follow:
AMERICANS polled on the issue will blame Republicans MOST if sequestration takes place.
It has nothing to do with who Obama blames. It's Americans doing the blaming.

Yet another chapter in the book of successful democrat demagoguery.

[dweebydilbert]

X -Man- wrote:

<quoted text>
Seems like some of the posters are "disappearing" too!
What happened to American Lady?!!
**bites nails** lol

Wouldn't you like to know, along with a lot of people on this board. I'd say she's been enjoying oysters on Bourbon St. From what I read.

[Quirky The Eye]

Pok Guy wrote:

<quoted text>
Fair and equal for everyone is fine, except what we're playing with is a stacked deck.
Whites have successively oppressed minorities for the past 200 years. Our society today reflects this idea of white superiority. For more immediate examples of this, just take a look at some on the comments on this forum.
Now, minorities, with the help of the government, are trying to level the playing field. Whites are trying to save their rigged game by insisting on merit, but what good is merit when the game has been rigged for 200 years?
Merit should be the standard, but only after the field is in fact made level for everyone.

Since the 50`s this Country has gone beyong their means to make things equal. And things were pretty copasetic. Untill Obama! Obama has inflamed every scare tactic in hies power to make it completely outreagous.

One of the problems with Blacks is they have been equalized. But they kept on complaining and still do. 10 Years ago there was equal opertunity for Blacks.

The problem with Illegal Hispanic`s is that they have tryed to pick up on the Black inequality theam. In that they claim Racisim. When in fact they come here illegally, then claim they are discriminated against. When if fact they are here Illegally. No one discriminated against them. Americans just do not want to absorb the burden of paying for them and their Anchor Babies.

Oh, but we are heartless Right??

America had a good Social security plan. Now we are supposed to pay for Illegals with it. Thanks to our wonderful Law makers stealing that from us! To pay for wars and other Bad decisions made by our wonderful Law makers. 911 Was a good example of statements made by Comunists whaen they said (We will get to you from within)!!

[American Cherry Pie]

X -Man- wrote:

<quoted text>
Seems like some of the posters are "disappearing" too!
What happened to American Lady?!!
**bites nails** lol

'Pop' goes the Weasel!

[La Santa Muerte]

"First of all, the sequester is not something that I've proposed. It is something that Congress has proposed"

A bald faced lie by Obama, swallowed hook, line and sinker by his zombie-like supporters.

[positronium]

Quirky The Eye wrote:

<quoted text>
Jack has his head up his arz, sitting on his Farm speaking out with his Demonic views. A real azzet to America he is.

He likes my codpiece.

[dweebydilbert]

Jaxxon wrote:

<quoted text>
Yer funny.

Really NOW?!? You are a LIAR! On top of a WUSS!

Jaxxon

Since: Jan 13

1,102


Location hidden
Please wait... Reply »
|Report Abuse |Judge it!|#105841 1 hr ago

EAGLE EYE1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Full blooded Americans?? LMFAO.. No they are not.. They might be American by birth but if their parents are not American they sure as hell are not full blooded..
Eagle
"American" isn't a race. It's a nationality and if you're born here you're American. Full blooded red, white and blue.

This one's so simple even you should be able to figure it out.


~~~ 1 post removed ~~~


---Wild Irish Rose---
“Location, Location, Location”


Since: Jun 10

33,049


San Jose, CA
Please wait... Reply »
|Report Abuse |Judge it!|#105843 1 hr ago
Judged:

EAGLE EYE1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Full blooded Americans?? LMFAO.. No they are not.. They might be American by birth but if their parents are not American they sure as hell are not full blooded..
Eagle
By your narrow definition, NO ONE is a full-blooded American except for Native Americans then.

You're not a "full-blooded American" either if you have any European ancestors. Since when is American a race?

"Full-blooded American" is an inaccurate term to begin with. It's straight out of a John Wayne western. Go figure.

http://www.topix.com/forum/us/politics/TR4NO3...

[---Wild Irish Rose---]

marlowe44 wrote:

<quoted text>
My "comment" was a rhetorical question. Likely others with more gray matter realized that.

Okay, so you ask questions that you don't expect an answer to. Got it.

Was this also a "rhetorical question?" Regardless, your question is silly.

marlowe44 wrote:
How about this: what if those on section 8, welfare and food stamps couldn't vote?

[Quirky The Eye]

Jaxxon wrote:

<quoted text>
Yer funny.

U R dumber than a box of rocks. Stupid MF!

[dweebydilbert]

Jaxxon wrote:

<quoted text>
Yer funny.

And the ones who
Funnied 2
AgreeD 2
Brilliant-ed 1

are LIARS too.