Church Leaders Vow Political Backlash...

Church Leaders Vow Political Backlash if Gay Marriage Passes

There are 17562 comments on the NBC Chicago story from Jan 7, 2013, titled Church Leaders Vow Political Backlash if Gay Marriage Passes. In it, NBC Chicago reports that:

Leaders of several Chicago-area African American churches on Monday urged state lawmakers to vote against pending legislation that would allow same-sex marriage in Illinois.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at NBC Chicago.

Carol

Oak Park, MI

#884 Jan 12, 2013
sickofit wrote:
<quoted text>
the buybull is ahte speech and a pile of trash....thats aid no one wants to ban your cult or take away your buybull...JUST WANT YOU TO LET OTHERS AHVE SAME FREEDOM AND RIGHTS YOU HAVE....GOT IT HITLER BIOTCH??????????
Love you more...{{{{{{{ Big hug}}}}}}}
Carol

Oak Park, MI

#885 Jan 12, 2013
sickofit wrote:
<quoted text>
Dont call me "luv"......makes me sick hearing that from a nazi.
Awwww darlin

“Together for 24, legal for 5”

Since: Sep 07

Littleton, NH

#886 Jan 12, 2013
Carol wrote:
<quoted text>
She was talking about men and women ...
Not a group who can't survive without outside help....
Seems like you want everyone else to drop their faith, freedoms and bow to homosexuals as their new god.
So, your still commenting on something you didn't bother to read? Here, let me repost for you. I will annotate wit CAPITAL LETTERS so that you can find the relevant words tha Mrs. Loving spoke.
. I believe ALL Americans, no matter their race, no
matter their sex, no matter their SEXUAL ORIENTATION, should have that same freedom to
marry. Government has no business imposing some people’s religious beliefs over
others. Especially if it denies people’s civil rights.
I am still not a political person, but I am proud that Richard's and my name is on a court
case that can help reinforce the love, the commitment, the fairness, and the family that so
many people, black or white, young or old, GAY OR STRAIGHT seek in life. I support the
freedom to marry for ALL. That's what Loving, and loving, are all about.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#887 Jan 12, 2013
Carol wrote:
<quoted text>
That was the best family model ever...
until femi Nazis messed up the home trying to be men.....
It was the best family situation ever when daddy worked...
and mama was home cooking dinner when kids came home from school.
It was a 1950s myth, dear. It never really existed. Mostly it was created by the "Madmen". lol
sickofit

Owatonna, MN

#888 Jan 12, 2013
Carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Love you more...{{{{{{{ Big hug}}}}}}}
If you were a REAL kind person that would mean something...But since your a hate filled bigot I know your words are worthless...

“Together for 24, legal for 5”

Since: Sep 07

Littleton, NH

#889 Jan 12, 2013
Carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Right you will then go after the millions of Catholics and Christians who preach from the bible...
Your goal is to have the bible labeled hate speech.
Paranoid much?
JrEsq

El Segundo, CA

#890 Jan 12, 2013
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
It was a 1950s myth, dear. It never really existed. Mostly it was created by the "Madmen". lol
Wrong. That model did exist until World War Two, when women left the home to become "Rosie the Riveter".
Carol

Oak Park, MI

#891 Jan 12, 2013
sickofit wrote:
<quoted text>
If you were a REAL kind person that would mean something...But since your a hate filled bigot I know your words are worthless...
Gives sickofit a big smooch on the cheek and bear hug...

Then runs like heck so he can't catch me to beat me up..or have me arrested for an unlawful smooth attack, lol...

Running.......:)
sickofit

Owatonna, MN

#892 Jan 12, 2013
Carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Gives sickofit a big smooch on the cheek and bear hug...
Then runs like heck so he can't catch me to beat me up..or have me arrested for an unlawful smooth attack, lol...
Running.......:)
I am sure you cant out run me...But I wont run toward you but away...

“Together for 24, legal for 5”

Since: Sep 07

Littleton, NH

#893 Jan 12, 2013
Carol wrote:
<quoted text>
That's OK I knew you wouldn't have a rebuttal.
And of course you had to make yourself look even more foolish by commenting on a video that you didn't watch. Well, we already knew what your opinions are worth: one vote out of 100,000,000. Nothing more.
Stan

Pekin, IL

#895 Jan 12, 2013
sickofit wrote:
<quoted text>
If you were a REAL kind person that would mean something...But since your a hate filled bigot I know your words are worthless...
It's you homofascists who are the real bigots. People of faith have just as much right to have their voices heard as you and your horrible hate based radical homosexual movement do.
sickofit

Owatonna, MN

#896 Jan 12, 2013
Stan wrote:
<quoted text>It's you homofascists who are the real bigots. People of faith have just as much right to have their voices heard as you and your horrible hate based radical homosexual movement do.
yes have your rights....JUST DONT TAKE OTHERS OR KEEP OTHERS AWAY BECAUSE OF YOUR CULTS BELIEFS.....GOT IT HITLER BOY????????

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#897 Jan 12, 2013
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
It was a 1950s myth, dear. It never really existed. Mostly it was created by the "Madmen". lol
Well, I have female family members alive in their 90s who still have excellent minds and I like to hear about their pasts and they tell me the truth of it. Also, most people in their 60s and 70s now can remember such mothers in their childhoods.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#898 Jan 12, 2013
^^^Also- I know I am butting in on a post meant for another poster. That's what I often do- butt in. I post a lot on the AA forum about various- mostly non-AA related current events/political issues and there have been times when I butt in that they say-- Oh, you are also that poster because you answer for them-- REVELATION!!! No, I just butt in, lol.
sickofit

Owatonna, MN

#900 Jan 12, 2013
sONE wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, I have female family members alive in their 90s who still have excellent minds and I like to hear about their pasts and they tell me the truth of it. Also, most people in their 60s and 70s now can remember such mothers in their childhoods.
Well this is 2013 and we will never go back to the time when only white men ruled and all others were slaves or property..GOT IT HITLER BOY...

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#901 Jan 12, 2013
sickofit wrote:
<quoted text>
Well this is 2013 and we will never go back to the time when only white men ruled and all others were slaves or property..GOT IT HITLER BOY...
I'm not a boy, so maybe I am Eva Braun, lol.

People didn't have slaves here in the 1950s (though it is "normal" even today in many parts of the world :/) and all White men weren't "Rulers".
sickofit

Owatonna, MN

#904 Jan 12, 2013
sONE wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not a boy, so maybe I am Eva Braun, lol.
People didn't have slaves here in the 1950s (though it is "normal" even today in many parts of the world :/) and all White men weren't "Rulers".
Well you sure want to go back in time and have things like years ago..I HAVE AN IDEA MOVE TO IRAN....YOU WILL FIT RIGHT IN...
sickofit

Owatonna, MN

#906 Jan 12, 2013
Mom of Two wrote:
<quoted text>LOL
I am not black by the way......Nice try at your racist evil post..

“equality for ALL means ALL”

Since: Jan 07

Fort Lauderdale FL

#907 Jan 12, 2013
nhjeff wrote:
<quoted text>
Guess what? In 45 states and in the federal government as well as all US territories, there is no "civil union" alternative to marriage. It doesn't exist. And it's much easier to expand who's allowed to participate in marriage than it is to create a parallel purpose for no discernible reason other than to mark some participants as different and, by implication, inferior.
Well put. You have far more patience than I.

“equality for ALL means ALL”

Since: Jan 07

Fort Lauderdale FL

#908 Jan 12, 2013
Fitz wrote:
<quoted text>
Your changing the definition of marriage... thats cler to any fair observor..
I can quote multiple precedents as I do above, both pro & con fo changing the definition that admit frankly that they are....changing the definition..
Now SCOTUS is going to weight in on this in June... What did you think to 40 plus states are putting into their constitutions if not the definiion of marriage?
Its always funny to watch pedestrian advocates like yourself argue facts that real iformed advocates of same-sex "marriage" dont dispute.
You are arguing a moot point. I don't care if it is changing a definition or not. Personally I don't see it that way. But if it is - so be it. Whatever is necessary.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 2 min Aura Mytha 164,364
News Bentonville High student groups to rally for LG... 6 min Zack 7
News Meet the Candidate: Carly Fiorina 7 min Le Jimbo 620
News Hillary Clinton: A woman ready to lead a " beca... 8 min Wiktor 2
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 8 min Coffee Party 190,237
News GOP's fight for 2016 nomination likely to drag ... 11 min Le Jimbo 168
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 19 min HILLARY 2016 182,818
News Ireland same-sex marriage 23 min Good Reverend 311
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 34 min Nostrilis Waxman 1,234,351
News The President has failed us (Jun '12) 39 min Coffee Party 328,665
More from around the web