Atheists on the march in America

Aug 26, 2009 Full story: TurkishPress.com 70,983

When South Florida atheists held their first meeting, they were just five friends, having a beer at a bar.

Full Story

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#68538 Feb 21, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>There is no law.

But.

NONE of your fictional disciples-- repeat--NONE-- lived to see the written gospels.

NONE.

That means? That ALL FOUR of your gospels were written by OTHER PEOPLE--NOT EYEWITNESSES.

So, there you go!

Zero eyewitnesses to your Jewsus-boy.
"Zero eyewitnesses to your Jewsus-boy"

LOL!

Thousand of eye-witnesses!

"Jesus' 12 disciples had just returned from a missionary journey he had sent them on. After they told him all they had done and taught, he took them with him in a boat on the Sea of Galilee to a remote place, for rest and prayer.

Great crowds of people in the area heard that Jesus was near. They ran to see him, bringing their sick friends and relatives. When the boat landed, Jesus saw all the men, women and children and had compassion on them. He taught them about the Kingdom of God and healed those who were sick.

Looking at the crowd, which numbered about 5,000 men, not counting women and children, Jesus asked his disciple Philip, "Where shall we buy bread for these people to eat?" (John 6:5, NIV) Jesus knew what he was going to do, but he asked Philip to test him. Philip replied that even eight months' wages would not be enough to give each person even one bite of bread.

Andrew, Simon Peter's brother, had more faith in Jesus. He brought forward a young boy who had five small loaves of barley bread and two small fish. Even so, Andrew wondered how that could help.

Jesus ordered the crowd to sit down in groups of fifty. He took the five loaves, looked up to heaven, gave thanks to God his Father, and passed them to his disciples to be distributed. He did the same with the two fish.

Everyone—men, women and children—ate as much as they wanted! Jesus miraculously multiplied the loaves and fishes so there was more than enough. Then he told his disciples to gather the leftovers so nothing was wasted. They collected enough to fill 12 baskets.

The crowd was so overwhelmed by this miracle that they understood Jesus was the prophet who had been promised. Knowing they would want to force him to become their king, Jesus fled from them."

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#68539 Feb 21, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>I love how you have a magic mind-reading ray, such that you are able to READ MY MIND.

Wow.

You ought to patent that-- quick!
You broadcast your thoughts very well.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#68540 Feb 21, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>Nope-- the only point you prove, is that you are just another godbot-assh()le.

Again: atheists HAVE NO BELIEF IN GODS.

That's it.

Your dictionary is incomplete-- all it has is your strawman/godbot lie as a "definition".

Why do you lie like this?
.
.
.
Oh! you're an assh()le... I nearly forgot...
Oh come now. Still stuck on that are you? Well you're wrong still.

Oh how was church this weekend?

Wikipedia
"Positive atheism (also called strong atheism and hard atheism) is the form of atheism that asserts that no deities exist.[1]Negative atheism (also called weak atheism and soft atheism) is any other type of atheism, wherein a person does not believe in the existence of any deities, but does not explicitly assert there to be none.[1][2][3]

The terms negative atheism and positive atheism were used by Antony Flew in 1976,[1] and appeared again in Michael Martin's writings in 1990.[4] However, usage of the strong/weak terminology has grown since the mid-1990s on the Internet, particularly due to the newsgroup alt.atheism.[better source needed][5]"

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#68541 Feb 21, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>I've read the bible-- cover-to-cover, not skipping a single word-- 100's of times.

And guess what?

IT IS NOT EVEN A LITTLE BIT HISTORICAL.

Yes-- I had to yell, because you are a proven assh9le, and you are also quite dense.

The bible is NOT historical--it's 100% fictional hearsay.

Or more accurately, gossip.

Pity you.
You're wrong but the. What else is new?

How's that peep hole show going?

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#68543 Feb 21, 2013
Thinking wrote:
I have yet to see any evidence of John.
He fails the Turing Test every time.
<quoted text>
LOL. Ask him to post something other than the 4 or 5 posts he copy/pastes. See if he can come up with some actual evidence for god.:)

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#68544 Feb 21, 2013
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
First part right! Second part Wrong:(
Now quite Ho.
Provide some evidence heaven exists.
You can't.
You'll just make some lame "Ho" joke.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#68545 Feb 21, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>Interesting that you didn't provide the link to where you got your definition ... more interesting that you only posted on portion of the definition. But that's all besides the point, you are playing semantics, and thus you lose the argument from the start.
It's the whole definition and it was copied straight out of my Merriam-Webster app.

You lose but then you always lose so nothing new there.

athe·ist\ˈā-thē-ist\
noun
: one who believes that there is no deity
athe·is·tic \ˌā-thē-ˈis-tik\ or athe·is·ti·cal \ˌā-thē-ˈis-ti-kəl\ adjective
athe·is·ti·cal·ly \-ti-k(ə-)lē\ adverb
First use: 1551

LOL

It's so funny you all call yourselves atheist but you can't stand what that word means. LOL

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#68546 Feb 21, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>Provide some evidence heaven exists.
You can't.
You'll just make some lame "Ho" joke.
I could but only my wife is allowed to see that heaven on earth.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#68547 Feb 21, 2013
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
It's the whole definition and it was copied straight out of my Merriam-Webster app.
You lose but then you always lose so nothing new there.
athe·ist\ˈā-thē-ist\
noun
: one who believes that there is no deity
athe·is·tic \ˌā-thē-ˈis-tik\ or athe·is·ti·cal \ˌā-thē-ˈis-ti-kəl\ adjective
athe·is·ti·cal·ly \-ti-k(ə-)lē\ adverb
First use: 1551
LOL
It's so funny you all call yourselves atheist but you can't stand what that word means. LOL
Look, it's important to be clear about the meanings of words you us, but there is a point at which being nit-picky about the definition of words is just a distraction.
Do you have any kind of point?

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

#68548 Feb 21, 2013
Secular proof of any of these? No.
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
"Zero eyewitnesses to your Jewsus-boy"
LOL!
Thousand of eye-witnesses!
"Jesus' 12 disciples had just returned from a missionary journey he had sent them on. After they told him all they had done and taught, he took them with him in a boat on the Sea of Galilee to a remote place, for rest and prayer.
Great crowds of people in the area heard that Jesus was near. They ran to see him, bringing their sick friends and relatives. When the boat landed, Jesus saw all the men, women and children and had compassion on them. He taught them about the Kingdom of God and healed those who were sick.
Looking at the crowd, which numbered about 5,000 men, not counting women and children, Jesus asked his disciple Philip, "Where shall we buy bread for these people to eat?" (John 6:5, NIV) Jesus knew what he was going to do, but he asked Philip to test him. Philip replied that even eight months' wages would not be enough to give each person even one bite of bread.
Andrew, Simon Peter's brother, had more faith in Jesus. He brought forward a young boy who had five small loaves of barley bread and two small fish. Even so, Andrew wondered how that could help.
Jesus ordered the crowd to sit down in groups of fifty. He took the five loaves, looked up to heaven, gave thanks to God his Father, and passed them to his disciples to be distributed. He did the same with the two fish.
Everyone—men, women and children—ate as much as they wanted! Jesus miraculously multiplied the loaves and fishes so there was more than enough. Then he told his disciples to gather the leftovers so nothing was wasted. They collected enough to fill 12 baskets.
The crowd was so overwhelmed by this miracle that they understood Jesus was the prophet who had been promised. Knowing they would want to force him to become their king, Jesus fled from them."

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

#68549 Feb 21, 2013
No link I see. So we will just caulk it up to you made it all up or changed the words around. As usual.
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh come now. Still stuck on that are you? Well you're wrong still.
Oh how was church this weekend?
Wikipedia
"Positive atheism (also called strong atheism and hard atheism) is the form of atheism that asserts that no deities exist.[1]Negative atheism (also called weak atheism and soft atheism) is any other type of atheism, wherein a person does not believe in the existence of any deities, but does not explicitly assert there to be none.[1][2][3]
The terms negative atheism and positive atheism were used by Antony Flew in 1976,[1] and appeared again in Michael Martin's writings in 1990.[4] However, usage of the strong/weak terminology has grown since the mid-1990s on the Internet, particularly due to the newsgroup alt.atheism.[better source needed][5]"

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

#68551 Feb 21, 2013
Gosh Rose! He just stole it from Derek and reposts it hundreds of times like a mindless sheep. Don't ask him to use reason!
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Look, it's important to be clear about the meanings of words you us, but there is a point at which being nit-picky about the definition of words is just a distraction.
Do you have any kind of point?

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#68552 Feb 21, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>Look, it's important to be clear about the meanings of words you us, but there is a point at which being nit-picky about the definition of words is just a distraction.
Do you have any kind of point?
Yes! I have a point.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#68553 Feb 21, 2013
Givemeliberty wrote:
<quoted text>Secular proof of any of these? No.
Yup!

Research it!

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#68554 Feb 21, 2013
Givemeliberty wrote:
<quoted text>No link I see. So we will just caulk it up to you made it all up or changed the words around. As usual.
If you like! I did go to get the link and the site was inaccessible at the time.
John

East Saint Louis, IL

#68555 Feb 21, 2013
Another day of ineptitude from the antitheists.*Note to lurkers* They have gone almost three years without giving one accountable position they are willing to debate. Three years without an example of evidence that meets their criteria for evidence. These are angry agenda driven folks that don't give a damn about the evidence.
If you want to subject yourself to this farce by all means see for yourself. Antitheists you could also just cut and paste one of the 65,800 posts to show otherwise.
Stump an antitheist! Ask them what they believe. True
science that is repeatable and observable.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#68556 Feb 21, 2013
John wrote:
65,000th nothing.
Okay, lets start with evidence according to YOU.

Begin-- prove your god is real, using evidence according to YOU.

Let's see how far you get, before you make a logical mistake...

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#68557 Feb 21, 2013
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
First part right! Second part Wrong:(
Now quite Ho.
Prove it.

What? You can't?

Interesting...

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#68558 Feb 21, 2013
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
"Zero eyewitnesses to your Jewsus-boy"
LOL!
Thousand of eye-witnesses!
Nope. Lie.

The OLDEST gospel dates to about 60 years post-death of the alleged jesus character.

Sixty years.

That's not "eyewitness", that's 2nd generation gossip.

NEXT!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#68559 Feb 21, 2013
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes! I have a point.
Only in your wildest hallucinations, do you have a ... "point" ...

... sad.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... 5 min Eagle 12 2,215
Who do you side with in Ferguson? 6 min R12 Freon 9,762
Southern Californiaa s Cuban Americans give mix... 8 min WelbyMD 1
US to start talks with Cuba to normalize full d... 10 min Foster 31
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 10 min Guru 181,710
Obama's plan: 'Deport felons, not families' 26 min R12 Freon 557
Obama: As a black man he's been mistaken for valet 29 min Dutch Dead Man 5
The President has failed us (Jun '12) 1 hr - Lady Liberty - 292,980
Stars and others react to 'Interview' cancellation 2 hr Hooogle It 4
Immigrants closer to driver's licenses in Arizona 3 hr Hooogle It 4
Republican Leader: Keystone Pipeline to Top Sen... 5 hr Dr Wu 19
More from around the web