Obama: Gun-control advocates have to ...

Obama: Gun-control advocates have to listen more

There are 671 comments on the WOI story from Jan 27, 2013, titled Obama: Gun-control advocates have to listen more. In it, WOI reports that:

16, 2013, file photo, President Barack Obama, accompanied by Vice President Joe Biden, talks about proposals to reduce gun violence at the White House in Washington.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at WOI.

“Now do whats right!”

Since: Jan 09

Doolittle, Mo.

#275 Feb 4, 2013
Dr-Sniper wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you attempt the same talking point with every poster you encounter? Even after being debunked?
Yes, when those posters says something that is misinsrewed or verges on failure or lies or is taken out of context, or....

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#276 Feb 4, 2013
CB can see both sides wrote:
<quoted text>Not when it is on youtube. Hell, I can watch cartoons and get the same guality of info.

I care not how fast you can take your eye off target, eject magazine, align mag, insert, refocus and resight, and pull trigger there is still elapsed time for the target victim to react.
Tell you what. You use your pencil. I'll start with an empty magazine in my AR. If you can get to me from 15 feet away, before I complete your list, I'll let you stab me in the eye socket.

To commemorate the event, I reserve the right to put it on YouTube.

“Now do whats right!”

Since: Jan 09

Doolittle, Mo.

#277 Feb 4, 2013
Dr-Sniper wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you attempt the same talking point with every poster you encounter? Even after being debunked?
And who again is set on banning all guns in America?
If you have no answer just admit it or lets hear your paranoid conspiracy theory. I don't know how to make it any simpler for you and your answer.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#278 Feb 4, 2013
CB can see both sides wrote:
<quoted text>If you are still speaking of the youtube video I have not watched it so you can either show another reliable source I will view it and respond until then you are only talking to yourself!

If the victim has time to pull his weapon while you are reloading and puts a slug in a vital spot yes most definitely a shooter can be dropped before he can reload.

Black belt in what arts?
Now wait a minute! How is the victim going to pull his weapon and put a slug in a vital spot, if this takes place in a school? It's a gun free zone! The victim is unarmed by law!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#279 Feb 4, 2013
CB can see both sides wrote:
<quoted text>Yes, there are more legal and safe gun owners than the opposite, because civillized peoples understand how quickly misuse {duels, vigilantyism, safety issuers} can becomne the norm.
Yet you willingly suggest violating their rights ?

Since: Aug 12

United States

#280 Feb 4, 2013
Non gun people will always say BAN THE SCARY GUN... Crimony, if they knew anything they'd ban the 7mm deer rifle that can be very scary when you're standing 800 yards away and knock argues head off.....

Get a clue people.....223s shot from a big scary looking gun are TWENTY TWO CALIBER...... They fly out the end of a barrel and go any which way the wind is blowing.

7mm ammo has some weight to it. Can be deadly from much much further away. The wood grain stock of a deer rifle isn't nearly as scary though is it???? Just ban the scary ones right?

LOL

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#281 Feb 4, 2013
CB can see both sides wrote:
<quoted text>Here we go again, they take this military type weapon and next they will want my child water gun!

The ol NRA money grabbing propaganda headline! Buy more guns, buy more guns they {?} are coming after all guns!

And they are exactly who again? Our military, our police, our first reponders,etc.?

Who? Easy question, and if you are so sure of this "take over" {urban legend} then let us know.
Ok. Liberals! Liberal progressives!
Feinstein's proposal is the proof in the pudding.
Next?

“Now do whats right!”

Since: Jan 09

Doolittle, Mo.

#282 Feb 4, 2013
Dr-Sniper wrote:
<quoted text>
Now wait a minute! How is the victim going to pull his weapon and put a slug in a vital spot, if this takes place in a school? It's a gun free zone! The victim is unarmed by law!
We were not talking about gune free zones, come on, try and keep up!

“Now do whats right!”

Since: Jan 09

Doolittle, Mo.

#283 Feb 4, 2013
Dr-Sniper wrote:
<quoted text>
Yet you willingly suggest violating their rights ?
Yes, and if it is or isn't the law of the land I will obey. But it's my right to further my agenda until that time.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#284 Feb 4, 2013
CB can see both sides wrote:
<quoted text>Why would we want to ban freedom of expressionn it doesn't rip flesh from bone as military type weapons often do.
Tell you what. You have freedom of expression right?
Express on here that derogatory term for negro.
I'll be waiting to see it actually show up. It will not happen. But go ahead and try. Force topix to allow that freedom of expression.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#285 Feb 4, 2013
CB can see both sides wrote:
<quoted text>Yes, when those posters says something that is misinsrewed or verges on failure or lies or is taken out of context, or....
Have you been hittin the hooch? Your last few posts haven't been coherent.

“Now do whats right!”

Since: Jan 09

Doolittle, Mo.

#286 Feb 4, 2013
UdintBuildThat wrote:
Non gun people will always say BAN THE SCARY GUN... Crimony, if they knew anything they'd ban the 7mm deer rifle that can be very scary when you're standing 800 yards away and knock argues head off.....
Get a clue people.....223s shot from a big scary looking gun are TWENTY TWO CALIBER...... They fly out the end of a barrel and go any which way the wind is blowing.
7mm ammo has some weight to it. Can be deadly from much much further away. The wood grain stock of a deer rifle isn't nearly as scary though is it???? Just ban the scary ones right?
LOL
Nope, only ones who gun nuts choose to use in mass shootings.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#287 Feb 4, 2013
CB can see both sides wrote:
<quoted text>And who again is set on banning all guns in America?
If you have no answer just admit it or lets hear your paranoid conspiracy theory. I don't know how to make it any simpler for you and your answer.
Nobody is saying anyone is presently trying to ban all guns. What we are saying is that banning a type of gun is a violation of the second amendment . To limit or undermine is to infringe, by definition.

Since: Aug 12

United States

#288 Feb 4, 2013
Dumbass, they're just gonna use whatever else they can get their hands on.

“Now do whats right!”

Since: Jan 09

Doolittle, Mo.

#289 Feb 4, 2013
Dr-Sniper wrote:
<quoted text>
Have you been hittin the hooch? Your last few posts haven't been coherent.
And have you been dozing off, you seem to haved missed answering my question.

Who again is going to come and take your guns away, our military, police first responders,etc.?

Simple question, should be a simple answer, unless....

“Now do whats right!”

Since: Jan 09

Doolittle, Mo.

#290 Feb 4, 2013
UdintBuildThat wrote:
Dumbass, they're just gonna use whatever else they can get their hands on.
Haven't in a majority of cases, have they?

Always amuses me when some are caught "flat footed" and their only answer is to revert back to childish name calling. Like that would support their agenda. Hint, it doensn't it only shows the inability to have revelent solutions.

“Now do whats right!”

Since: Jan 09

Doolittle, Mo.

#291 Feb 4, 2013
Dr-Sniper wrote:
<quoted text>
Nobody is saying anyone is presently trying to ban all guns. What we are saying is that banning a type of gun is a violation of the second amendment . To limit or undermine is to infringe, by definition.
OK, better. If we as citizens are faced with situations that are detrimental to a safe enviroment, then is it not our responsibility to attempt to improve those conditons or actions? If those improvements are only a degree of controls?

Seat belts, speed limits, unsafe working conditions, tainted foods, explosives, military type weapons that are chosen in a majority of mass killings.

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#292 Feb 4, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
What will save lives are trained armed security in these schools. At the very least, let the janitor or teachers come to school armed if they so desire.
Armed with what XX? Obamas' proposal allows funding for that for the Schools that want it.
It just doesn't make much sense. They had armed guards at Columbine, remember?

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#293 Feb 4, 2013
CB can see both sides wrote:
<quoted text>I have no opposition to trained armed personnel in schools, because out nation has become a nation of gun hate and murder.
I assure you though some {teacher and janitors} cannot and will not carry guns in a school situation.
It is impossible for a teacher or janitor to keep an assault weapon,(and it would need to be to match an intruders weapon) on their person continually. At some point the weapon would need to be secured and students could and would get to it.
That is just a stupid, unrealistic dream.
Makes more sense to do some gun regulation add bullet proof glass and doors like they have in Convenience Stores. Our kids are worth that I believe. They have a right to an education free of that kind of danger.
More cameras extending further out on school grounds. These are things we can do now.
I urge you, if you're a parent, grandparent, uncle, aunt or if you just care about kids, call your Congressmen/Women and your district Representative and tell them to do these simple things that can be done without passing any bills.

Since: Aug 12

United States

#294 Feb 4, 2013
CB can see both sides wrote:
<quoted text>Haven't in a majority of cases, have they?
Always amuses me when some are caught "flat footed" and their only answer is to revert back to childish name calling. Like that would support their agenda. Hint, it doensn't it only shows the inability to have revelent solutions.
Seems to me that YES they will use what they can get their hands on. Are you actually trying to tell me that a nut that wants to shoot as many people as he can is going to say "awww screw it if I can't use an AR15?"

THAT'S MORONIC you do realize.....

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 2 min narrowmindedbigot... 51,947
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min Grey Ghost 1,681,994
News Major shift as Trump opens way for Medicaid wor... 8 min Quirky 116
News Trump's popularity is slipping in rural America... 9 min Cat 2,104
News News 14 Mins Ago Democrat's upset in Wisconsin ... 13 min Impeach the Creep 1
Trump: Liar in Chief 15 min Cat 18
News Leaders say Trump presidency is at odds with ML... 27 min NOOPHRA 116
News Oprah speech has Democrats buzzing about possib... 3 hr CodeTalker 524
News White House will override Obama's climate plan 8 hr RiccardoFire 2,583
News What would Jesus say about same-sex marriage? (Jul '15) 9 hr cpeter1313 17,299
More from around the web